Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background While conventional chemotherapy is effective at eliminating the bulk of leukemic cells, chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a prevalent problem that hinders conventional therapies and contributes to disease relapse, and ultimately patient death. We have recently shown that allogeneic double negative T cells (DNTs) are able to target the majority of primary AML blasts in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models. However, some primary AML blast samples are resistant to DNT cell therapy. Given the differences in the modes of action of DNTs and chemotherapy, we hypothesize that DNT therapy can be used in combination with conventional chemotherapy to further improve their anti-leukemic effects and to target chemotherapy-resistant disease. Methods Drug titration assays and flow-based cytotoxicity assays using ex vivo expanded allogeneic DNTs were performed on multiple AML cell lines to identify therapy-resistance. Primary AML samples were also tested to validate our in vitro findings. Further, a xenograft model was employed to demonstrate the feasibility of combining conventional chemotherapy and adoptive DNT therapy to target therapy-resistant AML. Lastly, blocking assays with neutralizing antibodies were employed to determine the mechanism by which chemotherapy increases the susceptibility of AML to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity. Results Here, we demonstrate that KG1a, a stem-like AML cell line that is resistant to DNTs and chemotherapy, and chemotherapy-resistant primary AML samples both became more susceptible to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro following pre-treatment with daunorubicin. Moreover, chemotherapy treatment followed by adoptive DNT cell therapy significantly decreased bone marrow engraftment of KG1a in a xenograft model. Mechanistically, daunorubicin increased the expression of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands on KG1a; blocking of these pathways attenuated DNT-mediated cytotoxicity. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the feasibility and benefit of using DNTs as an immunotherapy after the administration of conventional chemotherapy.

Cellular therapies have become an important part of clinical care. The treatment of patients with cell therapies often involves the collection of autologous cells at the medical center treating the patient, the shipment of these cells to a centralized manufacturing site, and the return of the cryopreserved clinical cell therapy to the medical center treating the patient for storage until infusion. As this activity grows, cell processing laboratories at many academic medical centers are involved with many different autologous products manufactured by several different centralized laboratories. The handling of these products by medical center-based cell therapy laboratories is complicated and resource-intensive since each centralized manufacturing laboratory has unique methods for labeling, storing, shipping, receiving, thawing, and infusing the cells. The field would benefit from the development of more uniform practices. The development of a coordinating center similar to those established to facilitate the collection, shipping, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from unrelated donors would also be beneficial. In summary, the wide range of practices involved with labeling, shipping, freezing, thawing, and infusing centrally manufactured autologous cellular therapies lack efficiency and consistency and puts patients at risk. More uniform practices are needed.

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with limited therapeutic options, particularly in the metastatic setting. Adoptive cellular therapies (ACTs), including tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene-modified T-cell therapy, offer promising novel approaches for these refractory tumors. TIL-based therapy has demonstrated early efficacy in melanoma and myeloma, with ongoing trials exploring its role in sarcoma. CAR T-cell strategies targeting HER2, GD2, and B7-H3 antigens are in development, though challenges such as tumor microenvironment-mediated resistance and antigen escape remain significant. Engineered TCRs, particularly those targeting MAGE-A4 and NY-ESO-1, have shown promising clinical results in synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS), leading to the recent FDA approval of afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) and letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel). Despite encouraging preliminary data, ACT implementation faces barriers including limited antigen specificity, off-tumor toxicity, immune evasion, and manufacturing scalability. Future research will focus on optimizing lymphodepleting regimens, mitigating toxicity, enhancing in vivo persistence, and combining ACT with other therapeutic agents. As clinical trials expand, ACT holds the potential to revolutionize sarcoma treatment by offering durable, targeted therapies for previously refractory disease.

Enhanced cellular therapy has emerged as a novel concept following the basis of cellular therapy. This treatment modality applied drugs or biotechnology to directly enhance or genetically modify cells to enhance the efficacy of adoptive cellular therapy (ACT). Drugs or biotechnology that enhance the killing ability of immune cells include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) / antibody drugs, small molecule inhibitors, immunomodulatory factors, proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC), oncolytic virus (OV), etc. Firstly, overcoming the inhibitory tumor microenvironment (TME) can enhance the efficacy of ACT, which can be achieved by blocking the immune checkpoint. Secondly, cytokines or cytokine receptors can be expressed by genetic engineering or added directly to adoptive cells to enhance the migration and infiltration of adoptive cells to tumor cells. Moreover, multi-antigen chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) can be designed to enhance the specific recognition of tumor cell-related antigens, and OVs can also stimulate antigen release. In addition to inserting suicide genes into adoptive cells, PROTAC technology can be used as a safety switch or degradation agent of immunosuppressive factors to enhance the safety and efficacy of adoptive cells. This article comprehensively summarizes the mechanism, current situation, and clinical application of enhanced cellular therapy, describing potential improvements to adoptive cellular therapy.

Skin healing is a complex and dynamic physiological process that follows mechanical alteration of the skin barrier. Under normal conditions, this complex process can be divided into at least three continuous and overlapping phases: an inflammatory reaction, a proliferative phase that leads to tissue reconstruction and a phase of tissue remodeling. Macrophages critically contribute to the physiological cascade for tissue repair. In fact, as the inflammatory phase progresses, macrophage gene expression gradually shifts from pro-inflammatory M1-like to pro-resolutive M2-like characteristics, which is critical for entry into the repair phase. A dysregulation in this macrophage’ shift phenotype leads to the persistence of the inflammatory phase. Mesenchymal stromal cells and specifically the MSC-derived from adipose tissue (ADSCs) are more and more use to treat inflammatory diseases and several studies have demonstrated that ADSCs promote the wound healing thanks to their neoangiogenic, immunomodulant and regenerative properties. In several studies, ADSCs and macrophages have been injected directly into the wound bed, but the delivery of exogenous cells directly to the wound raise the problem of cell engraftment and preservation of pro-resolutive phenotype and viability of the cells. Complementary approaches have therefore been explored, such as the use of biomaterials enriched with therapeutic cell to improve cell survival and function. This review will present a background of the current scaffold models, using adipose derived stromal-cells and macrophage as therapeutic cells for wound healing, through a discussion on the potential impact for future applications in skin regeneration. According to the PRISMA statement, we resumed data from investigations reporting the use ADSCs and bioscaffolds and data from macrophages behavior with functional biomaterials in wound healing models. In the era of tissue engineering, functional biomaterials, that can maintain cell delivery and cellular viability, have had a profound impact on the development of dressings for the treatment of chronic wounds. Promising results have been showed in pre-clinical reports using ADSCs- and macrophages-based scaffolds to accelerate and to improve the quality of the cutaneous healing.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a promising treatment for immune-related diseases due to their diverse immunomodulatory paracrine functions. However, progress of culture-expanded MSCs is hindered by inconsistent cell function, poor localization, and insufficient retention when administered as suspended cell injections, thus placing spatiotemporal dosing constraints on therapeutic functions. To address these limitations, we introduce the combination of in vitro interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) priming, a key stimulator of MSC immunosuppressive potency, and thermoresponsive cultureware to harvest cultured MSCs as directly transplantable scaffold-free immunosuppressive cell sheets. Here, we demonstrate that MSC sheets produced with IFN-γ priming upregulate expression of immunosuppressive factors indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO-1), interleukin-10 (IL-10), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in both dose- and duration-dependent manners. In addition, IFN-γ primed MSC sheets showed increased ability to inhibit T-cell proliferation via indirect and direct contact, specifically related to increased IDO-1 and PGE2 concentrations. Furthermore, this study’s use of human clinical-grade single-cell-derived clonal bone marrow-derived MSCs, contributes to the future translatability and clinical relevancy of the produced sheets. Ultimately, these results present the combination of IFN-γ priming and MSC sheets as a new strategy to improve MSC-mediated treatment of localized inflammatory diseases.

Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate lymphoid cells (ILC) with cytotoxic and regulatory properties. Their functions are tightly regulated by an array of inhibitory and activating receptors, and their mechanisms of activation strongly differ from antigen recognition in the context of human leukocyte antigen presentation as needed for T-cell activation. NK cells thus offer unique opportunities for new and improved therapeutic manipulation, either or , in a variety of human diseases, including cancers. NK cell activity can possibly be modulated through direct or indirect actions exerted by small molecules or monoclonal antibodies. NK cells can also be adoptively transferred following more or less substantial modifications through cell and gene manufacturing, in order to empower them with new or improved functions and ensure their controlled persistence and activity in the recipient. In the present review, we will focus on the technological and regulatory challenges of NK cell manufacturing and discuss conditions in which these innovative cellular therapies can be brought to the clinic.

Novel cellular therapies outside of traditional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) therapy are currently under evaluation in clinical trials across the United States and around the world. Several cellular products, e.g., CD19-directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells, are poised for FDA approval and thus increased use at a wider range of academic centers within the next year, with the likelihood of dissemination to standard oncology practice once safety is confirmed. However, these therapies entail some unique challenges in terms of logistics of delivery and toxicity management. Building on experiences and Standards established for HPC programs, the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) has established new Standards specific to the use of Immune Effector Cells (IEC), including gene-modified T cells and natural (NK) cells. These Standards specify the clinical and quality infrastructure to facilitate safe administration of immune effector cells and formalize subsequent monitoring and reporting of patient outcomes to enable continual process improvement. Below we detail why these standards came into being, what they entail, and how a clinical team might access educational materials and implement these Standards. We propose that these Standards will be increasingly useful and relied up on as institutions and clinical service lines seek access to these treatment for their patients. FACT will begin accrediting programs that meet these new Standards for clinical administration of Immune Effector Cells in 2017.

Hepatocyte transplantation (HTx) is a promising alternative to liver transplantation; however, poor engraftment remains a major challenge. Although co-transplantation with adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) or islets improves engraftment, exposure of these cells to the portal vein enhances innate immune responses, resulting in a significant loss of hepatocytes. Therefore, we investigated HTx at the liver surface as a novel approach that does not involve the portal vein. Hepatocytes were transplanted onto the liver surface of syngeneic analbuminemic rats with or without ADSCs and/or islets. Serum albumin levels and immunohistochemical staining of the transplanted hepatocytes were evaluated. Hepatocyte engraftment was compared between the liver surface and intraportal groups. To examine the detailed mechanisms behind co-transplantation, co-cultured supernatants were analyzed using multiplex assays, and inhibition tests using neutralizing antibodies were performed. Results showed that islet and ADSC co-transplantation markedly enhanced hepatocyte engraftment at the liver surface (P < 0.01), and its efficiency was comparable to that of intraportal transplantation (P = 0.35). In the co-transplantation group, cells were not necessarily in proximity, suggesting that humoral factors are important. In an in vitro study, hepatocyte function was significantly improved by co-culturing with islets and ADSCs (P < 0.01). Multiplex assays and inhibition tests revealed several important humoral factors, most notably insulin, which promoted hepatocyte engraftment. These findings suggest that HTx at the liver surface, together with crucial factors, may be a novel alternative strategy for intraportal transplantation. Graphical Abstract

Developing Costimulatory Molecules for Immunotherapy of Diseases highlights the novel concept of reverse costimulation and how it can be effectively exploited to develop immunotherapy using either humanized antibodies against CD80, CD86, and other costimulatory molecules or CD28 fusinogenic proteins in the treatment of diseases, including.