Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
6,839
result(s) for
"Central Nervous System Depressants"
Sort by:
Melatonin for Sleep in Children with Autism: A Controlled Trial Examining Dose, Tolerability, and Outcomes
by
Goldman, Suzanne E.
,
Adkins, Karen W.
,
Wang, Lily
in
Actigraphy
,
Autism
,
Autism Spectrum Disorders
2012
Supplemental melatonin has shown promise in treating sleep onset insomnia in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Twenty-four children, free of psychotropic medications, completed an open-label dose-escalation study to assess dose–response, tolerability, safety, feasibility of collecting actigraphy data, and ability of outcome measures to detect change during a 14-week intervention. Supplemental melatonin improved sleep latency, as measured by actigraphy, in most children at 1 or 3 mg dosages. It was effective in week 1 of treatment, maintained effects over several months, was well tolerated and safe, and showed improvement in sleep, behavior, and parenting stress. Our findings contribute to the growing literature on supplemental melatonin for insomnia in ASD and inform planning for a large randomized trial in this population.
Journal Article
Extrapineal melatonin: sources, regulation, and potential functions
by
Escames, Germaine
,
Lima-Cabello, Elena
,
López, Luis C
in
Amniotic fluid
,
Animals
,
anti-inflammatory activity
2014
Endogenous melatonin is synthesized from tryptophan via 5-hydroxytryptamine. It is considered an indoleamine from a biochemical point of view because the melatonin molecule contains a substituted indolic ring with an amino group. The circadian production of melatonin by the pineal gland explains its chronobiotic influence on organismal activity, including the endocrine and non-endocrine rhythms. Other functions of melatonin, including its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, its genomic effects, and its capacity to modulate mitochondrial homeostasis, are linked to the redox status of cells and tissues. With the aid of specific melatonin antibodies, the presence of melatonin has been detected in multiple extrapineal tissues including the brain, retina, lens, cochlea, Harderian gland, airway epithelium, skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidney, thyroid, pancreas, thymus, spleen, immune system cells, carotid body, reproductive tract, and endothelial cells. In most of these tissues, the melatonin-synthesizing enzymes have been identified. Melatonin is present in essentially all biological fluids including cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, bile, synovial fluid, amniotic fluid, and breast milk. In several of these fluids, melatonin concentrations exceed those in the blood. The importance of the continual availability of melatonin at the cellular level is important for its physiological regulation of cell homeostasis, and may be relevant to its therapeutic applications. Because of this, it is essential to compile information related to its peripheral production and regulation of this ubiquitously acting indoleamine. Thus, this review emphasizes the presence of melatonin in extrapineal organs, tissues, and fluids of mammals including humans.
Journal Article
Adjuvant use of melatonin for relieving symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy: results of a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
by
Mohammadi Younes
,
Mehrpooya Maryam
,
Sajedi Firozeh
in
Clinical trials
,
Diabetes
,
Diabetes mellitus
2021
PurposeThe trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of exogenous melatonin as an adjuvant to pregabalin for relief of pain in patients suffering from painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).Patients and methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out between October 2019 and December 2020 in an outpatient specialty clinic in Iran. One-hundred-three type 2 diabetic patients suffering from PDN were randomized into either the melatonin group (n = 52) or the placebo group (n = 51). Besides pregabalin at a dose of 150 mg per day, patients started with melatonin or an identical placebo, at a dose of 3 mg/day at bedtime for 1 week, which was augmented to 6 mg/day for further 7 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in mean NRS (numerical rating scale) pain score from baseline to endpoint and responder rate (patients with a reduction of 50% and higher in average pain score compared with baseline). Secondary endpoints were changes in mean NRS pain-related sleep-interference score, overall improvement evaluated by Patient and Clinical Global Impressions of Change (PGIC, CGIC), and impact of the intervention on patient’s Health-related quality of life (QOL). All analyses were conducted on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis data set.ResultsAt the study endpoint, treatment with melatonin resulted in a considerably higher reduction in the mean NRS pain score in comparison with placebo (4.2 ± 1.83 vs. 2.9 ± 1.56; P-value < 0.001). In terms of treatment responders, a greater proportion of melatonin-treated patients satisfied the responder criterion than placebo-treated patients (63.5% vs. 43.1%). Melatonin also reduced pain-related sleep interference scores more than did placebo (3.38 ± 1.49 vs. 2.25 ± 1.26; P-value < 0.001). Further, at the endpoint, more improvement was also seen in terms of PGIC, CGIC, and Health-related QOL in patients treated with melatonin than placebo. Melatonin was also well tolerated.ConclusionThe present results showed that melatonin as an adjunct therapy to pregabalin might be helpful for use in patients with PDN. However, confirmation of these results requires further studies.
Journal Article
Adjuvant use of melatonin for pain management in dysmenorrhea — a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
2022
PurposeDysmenorrhea is a common, recurring, painful condition with a global prevalence of 71%. The treatment regime for dysmenorrhea includes hormonal therapies and NSAID, both of which are associated with side effects.A dose of 10 mg melatonin daily has previously been shown to reduce the level of pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. We chose to investigate how this regime, administered during the week of menstruation, would affect women with dysmenorrhea but without any signs of endometriosis, as adjuvant analgesic treatment.MethodsForty participants with severe dysmenorrhea were randomized to either melatonin or placebo, 20 in each group. Our primary outcome was pain measured with numeric rating scale (NRS); a difference of at least 1.3 units between the groups was considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes were use of analgesics, as well as absenteeism and amount of bleeding. Mixed model was used for statistical analysis.ResultsEighteen participants completed the study in the placebo group and 19 in the melatonin group. Mean NRS in the placebo group was 2.45 and 3.18 in the melatonin group, which proved to be statistically, although not clinically significant.ConclusionThis randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial could not show that 10 mg of melatonin given orally at bedtime during the menstrual week had better analgesic effect on dysmenorrhea as compared with placebo. However, no adverse effects were observed.Clinical trialsNCT03782740 registered on 17 December 2018.
Journal Article
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pediatric Prolonged-Release Melatonin for Insomnia in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
by
Shahmoon, Shiri
,
Gringras, Paul
,
Maras, Athanasios
in
Adolescents
,
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - complications
,
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology
2018
A recent double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study demonstrated 3-month efficacy and safety of a novel pediatric-appropriate prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) for insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurogenetic disorders (NGD) with/without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity. Long-term efficacy and safety of PedPRM treatment was studied.
A prospective, open-label efficacy and safety follow-up of nightly 2, 5, or 10 mg PedPRM in subjects who completed the 13-week double-blind trial (51 PedPRM; 44 placebo). Measures included caregiver-reported Sleep and Nap Diary, Composite Sleep Disturbance Index (CSDI), caregiver's Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and quality of life (WHO-5 Well-Being Index).
Ninety-five subjects (74.7% males; mean [standard deviation] age, 9 [4.24]; range, 2-17.5 years) received PedPRM (2/5 mg) according to the double-blind phase dose, for 39 weeks with optional dose adjustment (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) after the first 13 weeks. After 52 weeks of continuous treatment (PedPRM-randomized group) subjects slept (mean [SE]) 62.08 (21.5) minutes longer (
= 0.007); fell asleep 48.6 (10.2) minutes faster (
< 0.001); had 89.1 (25.5) minutes longer uninterrupted sleep episodes (
= 0.001); 0.41 (0.12) less nightly awakenings (>50% decrease;
= 0.001); and better sleep quality (
< 0.001) compared with baseline. The placebo-randomized group also improved with PedPRM. Altogether, by the end of 39-week follow-up, regardless of randomization assignment, 55/72 (76%) of completers achieved overall improvement of ≥1 hour in total sleep time (TST), sleep latency or both, over baseline, with no evidence of decreased efficacy. In parallel, CSDI child sleep disturbance and caregivers' satisfaction of their child's sleep patterns (
< 0.001 for both), PSQI global (
< 0.001), and WHO-5 (
= 0.001) improved in statistically significant and clinically relevant manner (
= 72) compared with baseline. PedPRM was generally safe; most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (5.3%) and mood swings (3.2% of patients).
PedPRM, an easily swallowed formulation shown to be efficacious versus placebo, is an efficacious and safe option for long-term treatment (up to 52 weeks reported here) of children with ASD and NGD who suffer from insomnia and subsequently improves caregivers' quality of life.
Journal Article
Tolerance and cross-tolerance to neurocognitive effects of THC and alcohol in heavy cannabis users
by
de Brouwer, Marjolein
,
Theunissen, Eef L.
,
Toennes, Stefan W.
in
Administration, Inhalation
,
Administration, Oral
,
Adult
2011
Introduction
Previous research has shown that heavy cannabis users develop tolerance to the impairing effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on neurocognitive functions. Animal studies suggest that chronic cannabis consumption may also produce cross-tolerance for the impairing effects of alcohol, but supportive data in humans is scarce.
Purpose
The present study was designed to assess tolerance and cross-tolerance to the neurocognitive effects of THC and alcohol in heavy cannabis users.
Methods
Twenty-one heavy cannabis users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way study. Subjects underwent three alcohol-dosing conditions that were designed to achieve a steady blood alcohol concentration of about 0, 0.5, and 0.7 mg/ml during a 5-h time window. In addition, subjects smoked a THC cigarette (400 μg/kg) at 3 h post-onset of alcohol dosing during every alcohol condition. Performance tests were conducted repeatedly between 0 and 7 h after onset of drinking and included measures of perceptual motor control (critical tracking task), dual task processing (divided-attention task), motor inhibition (stop-signal task), and cognition (Tower of London).
Results
Alcohol significantly impaired critical tracking, divided attention, and stop-signal performance. THC generally did not affect task performance. However, combined effects of THC and alcohol on divided attention were bigger than those by alcohol alone.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study generally confirms that heavy cannabis users develop tolerance to the impairing effects of THC on neurocognitive task performance. Yet, heavy cannabis users did not develop cross-tolerance to the impairing effects of alcohol, and the presence of the latter even selectively potentiated THC effects on measures of divided attention.
Journal Article
Pediatric Prolonged-Release Melatonin for Sleep in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Impact on Child Behavior and Caregiver’s Quality of Life
2019
A randomized, 13-weeks, placebo-controlled double-blind study in 125 subjects aged 2–17.5 years with Autism Spectrum Disorder or Smith-Magenis syndrome and insomnia demonstrated efficacy and safety of easily-swallowed prolonged-release melatonin mini-tablets (PedPRM; 2–5 mg) in improving sleep duration and onset. Treatment effects on child behavior and caregiver’s quality of life were evaluated. PedPRM treatment resulted in significant improvement in externalizing but not internalizing behavior (Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire; SDQ) compared to placebo (p = 0.021) with clinically-relevant improvements in 53.7% of PedPRM-treated versus 27.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.008). Caregivers’ quality of life also improved with PedPRM versus placebo (p = 0.010) and correlated with the change in total SDQ (p = 0.0005). PedPRM alleviates insomnia-related difficulties, particularly externalizing behavior in the children, subsequently improving caregivers’ quality of life.
Journal Article
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Melatonin in moderately ill patients with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
by
Ziaei, Ava
,
Hassanipour, Soheil
,
Dadvand, Habib
in
Adult
,
Betacoronavirus - drug effects
,
Betacoronavirus - genetics
2020
Objectives
We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Melatonin, compared to the standard therapeutic regimen on clinical symptoms and serum inflammatory parameters in patients with confirmed COVID-19, who are moderately ill.
Trial design
This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a parallel-group design conducted at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Participants
All patients admitted to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Departments of Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abbas, Iran will be screened for the following criteria.
Inclusion criteria
:
1. Age ≥20 years
2. Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (positive polymerase chain reaction).
3. Moderate COVID-19 pneumonia (via computed tomography and or X-ray imaging), requiring hospitalization.
4. Hospitalized ≤48 hours.
5. Signing informed consent and willingness of the participant to accept randomization to any assigned treatment arm.
Exclusion criteria
:
1. Underlying diseases, including chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, seizure, depression, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and cholestatic liver diseases.
2. Severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia.
3. Use of warfarin, corticosteroids, hormonal drugs, alcohol, other antiviral and investigational medicines, and illegal drugs (during the last 30 days).
4. History of known allergy to Melatonin.
5. Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Intervention and comparator
Intervention group
: The standard treatment regimen for COVID-19, according to the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education's protocol, along with Melatonin capsules at a dose of 50 mg daily for a period of seven days.
Control group
: The standard therapeutic regimen for COVID-19 along with Melatonin-like placebo capsules at a dose of one capsule daily for a period of seven days.
Both Melatonin and placebo capsules were prepared at the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Main outcomes
The primary outcomes are the recovery rate of clinical symptoms and oxygen saturation as well as improvement of serum inflammatory parameters, including C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 within seven days of randomization.
The secondary outcomes are the time to improve clinical and paraclinical features along with the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions within seven days of randomization.
Randomization
Included patients will be allocated to one of the study arms using block randomization in a 1:1 ratio (each block consists of 10 patients). This randomization method ensures a balanced allocation between the arms during the study. A web-based system will generate random numbers for the allocation sequence and concealment of participants. Each number relates to one of the study arms.
Blinding (masking)
All study participants, clinicians, nurses, research coordinators, and those analyzing the data are blinded to the group assignment.
Numbers to be randomized (sample size)
A total of 60 patients randomized into two groups (30 in each group).
Trial Status
The trial protocol is Version 1.0, August 14, 2020. Recruitment began August 22, 2020, and is anticipated to be completed by November 30, 2020.
Trial registration
The trial protocol has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). The registration number is “
IRCT20200506047323N5
”. The registration date was 14 August 2020.
Full protocol
The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file
1
). In the interest in expediting the dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
Journal Article
The effect of melatonin on sleep and quality of life in patients with advanced breast cancer
by
Kiss, Alex
,
Innominato, Pasquale F.
,
Bjarnason, Georg A.
in
Actigraphy
,
Actigraphy - methods
,
Adult
2016
Background
Fatigue and sleep problems are prevalent in cancer patients and can be associated with disruption of circadian rhythmicity. In this prospective phase II trial, we sought to assess the effect of melatonin on circadian biomarkers, sleep, and quality of life in breast cancer patients.
Methods
Thirty-two patients with metastatic breast cancer, receiving hormonal or trastuzumab therapy, took 5 mg of melatonin at bedtime for 2 months. Before starting and after 2 months on melatonin therapy, sleep and circadian rhythmicity were assessed by actigraphy, diurnal patterns of serum cortisol, and the expression of the core clock genes
PER2
and
BMAL1
in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire was completed for subjective parameters.
Results
Bedtime melatonin was associated with a significant improvement in a marker of objective sleep quality, sleep fragmentation and quantity, subjective sleep, fatigue severity, global quality of life, and social and cognitive functioning scales. Morning clock gene expression was increased following bedtime melatonin intake. Melatonin did not affect actigraphy measure of circadian rhythmicity, or the diurnal cortisol pattern.
Conclusion
These results invite further investigation of melatonin as a potentially useful therapeutic agent for improving sleep and quality of life in cancer patients.
Journal Article
Effect of melatonin on depressive symptoms and anxiety in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
2014
Depression, anxiety and sleep disturbances are known problems in patients with breast cancer. The effect of melatonin as an antidepressant in humans with cancer has not been investigated. We investigated whether melatonin could lower the risk of depressive symptoms in women with breast cancer in a three-month period after surgery and assessed the effect of melatonin on subjective parameters: anxiety, sleep, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken from July 2011 to December 2012 at a department of breast surgery in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women, 30–75 years, undergoing surgery for breast cancer and without signs of depression on Major Depression Inventory (MDI) were included 1 week before surgery and received 6 mg oral melatonin or placebo for 3 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of depressive symptoms measured by MDI. The secondary outcomes were area under the curve (AUC) for the subjective parameters. 54 patients were randomized to melatonin (
n
= 28) or placebo (
n
= 26) and 11 withdrew from the study (10 placebo group and 1 melatonin group,
P
= 0.002). The risk of developing depressive symptoms was significantly lower with melatonin than with placebo (3 [11 %] of 27 vs. 9 [45 %] of 20; relative risk 0.25 [95 % CI 0.077–0.80]), giving a NNT of 3.0 [95 % CI 1.7–11.0]. No significant differences were found between AUC for the subjective parameters. No differences in side effects were found (
P
= 0.78). Melatonin significantly reduced the risk of depressive symptoms in women with breast cancer during a three-month period after surgery.
Journal Article