Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundThe adequacy of leptomeningeal collateral flow has a pivotal role in determining clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke. The American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) collateral score is among the most commonly used scales for measuring this flow. It is based on the extent and rate of retrograde collateral flow to the impaired territory on angiography.ObjectiveTo evaluate inter- and intraobserver agreementin angiographic leptomeningeal collateral flow assessment.Materials and methodsThirty pretreatment angiogram video loops (frontal and lateral view), chosen from the randomized controlled trial THRombectomie des Artères CErebrales (THRACE), were sent for grading in an electronic file. 19 readers participated, including eight who had access to a training set before the first grading. 13 readers made a double evaluation, 3 months apart.ResultsOverall agreement among the 19 observers was poor (κ = 0,16 ± 6,5.10 -3), and not improved with prior training (κ = 0,14 ± 0,016). Grade 4 showed the poorest interobserver agreement (κ=0.18±0.002) while grades 0 and 1 were associated with the best results (κ=0.52±0.001 and κ=0.43±0.004, respectively). Interobserver agreement increased (κ = 0,27± 0,014) when a dichotomized score, ‘poor collaterals’ (score of 0, 1 or 2) versus ‘good collaterals’ (score of 3 or 4) was used. The intraobserver agreements varied between slight (κ=0.18±0.13) and substantial (κ=0.74±0.1), and were slightly improved with the dichotomized score (from κ=0.19±0.2 to κ=0.79±0.11).ConclusionInter- and intraobserver agreement of collateral circulation grading using the ASITN/SIR score was poor, raising concerns about comparisons among publications. A simplified dichotomized judgment may be a more reproducible assessment when images are rated by the same observer(s) in randomized trials.

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate the radiation dose to the eye lens (lens dose) during cerebral angiography and to evaluate the effectiveness of the lens dose reduction protocol for 3-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) in reducing overall lens dose exposure.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial at a tertiary hospital with patients undergoing cerebral angiography. The lens dose reduction protocol in 3D-RA involved raising the table to position the patient’s eye lens away from the rotation axis. The lens dose was estimated by measuring the entrance surface air kerma using a photoluminescent glass dosimeter. The lens doses of 3D-RA, overall examination, and image quality were analyzed and compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 20 participants (mean age, 58±9.4 years; including 12 men [60%]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional group or the dose reduction group. The median lens dose in 3D-RA was significantly lower in the dose reduction group compared with the conventional group (1.1 mGy vs 4.5 mGy, p<0.001). The total dose was significantly lower in the dose reduction group (median of 7.5 mGy vs 10.2 mGy, p=0.003). In the conventional group, 3D-RA accounted for 46% of the total lens dose, while in the dose reduction group, its proportion decreased to 16%. No significant differences were observed in the image quality between the groups.ConclusionThe lens dose reduction protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the lens dose of the 3D-RA as well as entire cerebral angiography, while maintaining the image quality.

BackgroundWhile robotic assisted technology has advanced in cardiovascular interventions, neurovascular applications still lack a robotic system. To assess the safety and efficacy of novel robotic systems designed for cerebral angiography, we conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.Methods130 patients were recruited who received cerebral angiography in four centers. After identifying the target vessels, patients were randomly allocated to an experimental group for robotic procedures and a control group for manual procedures in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical success rate, technical success rate, overall surgery time, pre-puncture set-up time, puncture-to-unsheathed time, mean catheterization time per target vessel, X-ray fluoroscopy time, and primary operator’s radiation dose were compared. The safety endpoints were incidence of perioperative vascular injuries, any adverse events, and device malfunctions.Results64 patients were assigned to the experimental group and 66 to the control group. Both groups achieved 100% clinical success and a 100% technical success. Significantly, the primary operator’s radiation dose in the robotic group was lower than that in the manual group (1.67±3.49 μSv vs 43.63±38.95 μSv, P<0.001). The puncture-to-unsheathed time (P=0.882), mean catheterization time per target vessel (P=0.247), and fluoroscopy time (P=0.701) were comparable. The pre-puncture set-up time in the robotic group was longer (P<0.001), attributed to prolonged robotic instrument set-up. No robot related adverse events were observed.ConclusionThe trial showed that the robotic system was safe and effective for assisting cerebral angiography, notably reducing primary operators’ radiation exposure.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT05778214.

BackgroundDespite the increasing use of non-invasive imaging, DSA remains the gold standard for cerebrovascular imaging. However, trends in DSA utilization are poorly understood. The goal of this study was to describe DSA utilization in a large claims database in the US over a 13 year period.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study assessed a nationwide database of privately insured individuals from 2005 to 2018 for patients undergoing cranial CT angiography (CTA), MR angiography (MRA), and DSA. We assessed trends in the overall use of and indications for each modality. For DSA, we examined the types of performing proceduralists.ResultsAmong patients undergoing DSA in 2018, median age was 52 years, and 60% were women. MRA and DSA use decreased, from 289 to 275 claims, and from 38 to 29 claims per 100 000 enrollees, respectively, while CTA use increased from 31 to 286 claims per 100 000 enrollees. These trends differed by geographic region and indication. Nearly half of DSA procedures but <25% of non-invasive imaging were inpatient studies. DSA performed by neurosurgeons increased from 0.5 to 4.1 while those performed by radiologists decreased from 7.2 to 4.0 studies per 100 000 enrollees.ConclusionsDSA use decreased slightly while CTA use increased by ninefold. The reasons for this change are likely complex and may reflect more aggressive imaging for stroke, increased detection of incidental findings, and increased quality of non-invasive imaging. Over time, the proportion of DSA procedures performed by neurosurgeons overtook that performed by radiologists.

BackgroundInterventional cardiology produced level 1 evidence recommending radial artery-first for coronary angiography given lower vascular complications. Neuroendovascular surgeons have not widely adopted the transradial approach. This prospective, single center, non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study aims to compare the transradial and transfemoral approaches for diagnostic cerebral angiography with respect to efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction.MethodsConsecutive patients presenting for diagnostic cerebral angiography were selected to undergo right radial or femoral access based on date of presentation. Primary outcome was ability to answer the predefined diagnostic goal of the cerebral angiogram using the initial access site and was assessed with a non-inferiority design. Secondary outcomes included technical success per vessel, complications, procedure times and patient satisfaction.ResultsA total of 312 patients were enrolled, 158 and 154 for right radial and femoral access, respectively. The diagnostic goal of the angiogram was achieved in 152 of 154 (99%) patients who underwent attempted femoral access compared with 153 of 158 (97%) patients who underwent radial access, confirming non-inferiority of the transradial approach. Secondary outcomes showed equivalent technical success by vessel, no major complications, and similar frequency of minor complications between the two approaches. In-room time was similar between approaches, though post-procedure recovery room time was significantly shorter for transradial patients. Patient satisfaction results significantly favored the radial approach.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography, transfemoral and transradial access achieve procedural goals with similar effectiveness and safety, though patients strongly prefer the radial approach. Findings support consideration of adopting a radial-first strategy for diagnostic cerebral angiography.

Selecting most appropriate approach between the transfemoral access (TFA) and transradial access (TRA) for diagnostic cerebral angiography is a subject of debate. To compare the safety and efficacy of TFA and TRA for diagnostic cerebral angiography. We performed a systematic search through four databases to find relevant clinical studies. Binary outcomes were analyzed and reported through the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI), while continuous outcomes were analyzed and reported through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95 % CI. We included 12,693 patients from 24 studies that evaluated the TRA vs TFA in diagnostic cerebral angiography. There was no significant difference between TRA and TFA in total (SMD = −0.78, P = 0.51) and sheath (SMD = −3.31, P = 0.6) costs, the hyperintense foci on diffusion-weighted MRI (OR = 7.15, P = 0.22), fluoroscopy time (SMD = 0.022, P = 0.83), procedure time (SMD = −0.42, P = 0.14), radiation exposure (SMD = −0.06, P = 0.81), and total contrast utilization (SMD = −0.26, P = 0.24). The success rate (OR = 0.54, P = 0.0065) and total complication (OR = 0.5, P = 0.02) were significantly lower in TRA. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between senior and fellow neurointerventionalists in total complications (P=0.09), success rate (P=0.62), and fluoroscopy time (P=0.35). TRA was associated with lower complications than TFA for diagnostic cerebral angiography, but the higher incidence of MRI-detected diffusion-weighted microemboli necessitates careful patient selection and procedural planning. •Success rate and total complications were significantly 46 % and 50 % lower in TRA vs TFA, respectively.•Hyperintense foci on diffusion-weighted MRI was 7.15 times higher in TRA, although difference was non-significant.•Total complication for elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) was significantly lower in TRA with no significant difference in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure between two approaches.•No significant difference was between fellows and expert surgeons in total complications, success rate, and procedure time.•Findings showed no significant difference between TRA versus TFA in costs, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, radiation exposure, and total contrast utilization.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography angiography (CTA) is commonly used to diagnose ruptured cerebral aneurysms with sensitivities reported as high as 97% to 100%. Studies validating CTA accuracy in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are scarce and limited by small sample sizes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CTA in detecting intracranial aneurysms in the setting of SAH. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort of 643 patients was reviewed. A total of 401 patients were identified whose diagnostic workup included both CTA and confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Aneurysms missed by CTA but diagnosed by DSA were further stratified by size and location. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty aneurysms were detected by CTA while DSA detected a total of 431 aneurysms. False positive CTA results were seen for 24 aneurysms. DSA identified 125 aneurysms that were missed by CTA and 83.2% of those were <5 mm in diameter. The sensitivity of CTA was 57.6% for aneurysms smaller than 5 mm in size, and 45% for aneurysms originating from the internal carotid artery. The overall sensitivity of CTA in the setting of SAH was 70.7%. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of CTA in the diagnosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysm may be lower than previously reported. CTA has a low sensitivity for aneurysms less than 5 mm in size, in locations adjacent to bony structures, and for those arising from small caliber parent vessels. It is our recommendation that CTA should be used with caution when used alone in the diagnosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

BackgroundAt present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery.MethodsFrom December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59±25.60 min versus 47.94±27.49 min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01±554.77 mGy versus 821.65±705.45 mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups.ConclusionThe robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography.

Cortical activity can be monitored for 6 months or longer from within the brain vasculature using an endovascular stent-electrode array. High-fidelity intracranial electrode arrays for recording and stimulating brain activity have facilitated major advances in the treatment of neurological conditions over the past decade. Traditional arrays require direct implantation into the brain via open craniotomy, which can lead to inflammatory tissue responses, necessitating development of minimally invasive approaches that avoid brain trauma. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of chronically recording brain activity from within a vein using a passive stent-electrode recording array (stentrode). We achieved implantation into a superficial cortical vein overlying the motor cortex via catheter angiography and demonstrate neural recordings in freely moving sheep for up to 190 d. Spectral content and bandwidth of vascular electrocorticography were comparable to those of recordings from epidural surface arrays. Venous internal lumen patency was maintained for the duration of implantation. Stentrodes may have wide ranging applications as a neural interface for treatment of a range of neurological conditions.

Radiomics has potential for reflecting the differences in glioma perfusion heterogeneity between arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) imaging. The aim of this study was to compare radiomic features of ASL and DSC imaging-derived parameters (cerebral blood flow, CBF) and assess radiomics-based classification models for low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs) using their parameters. The ASL-CBF and DSC-relative CBF of 46 glioma patients were normalized (ASL-nCBF and DSC-nrCBF) for data analysis. For each map, 91 radiomic features were extracted from the tumor volume. Seventy-five radiomic features were significantly different ( P  < 0.00055) between ASL-nCBF and DSC-nrCBF. Positive correlations were observed in 75 radiomic features between ASL-nCBF and DSC-nrCBF. Even though ASL imaging underestimated CBF compared with DSC imaging, there were significant correlations ( P  < 0.00055) in the first-order-based mean, median, 90 th percentile, and maximum. Texture analysis showed that ASL-nCBF and DSC-nrCBF characterized similar perfusion patterns, while ASL-nCBF could evaluate perfusion heterogeneity better. The areas under the curve of the ASL-nCBF and DSC-nrCBF radiomics-based classification models for gliomas were 0.888 and 0.962, respectively. Radiomics in ASL and DSC imaging is useful for characterizing glioma perfusion patterns quantitatively and for classifying LGGs and HGGs.