Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
4
result(s) for
"Chamaebatia"
Sort by:
Ericaphis voegtlini, a new, unusual aphid species from the USA (Hemiptera, Aphididae)
by
Barjadze, Shalva
,
Kanturski, Mariusz
,
Jensen, Andrew S.
in
Aphididae
,
California
,
Chamaebatia foliolosa
2018
Ericaphisvoegtlini sp. n. living on Chamaebatiafoliolosa (Rosaceae) in California is described based on apterous and alate viviparous females. The new species differs from all other species of the genus Ericaphis Börner, 1939 in several important morphological characters including very long and rigid dorsal setae and distinctly swollen siphunculi with clearly visible polygonal reticulation.
Journal Article
Molecular systematics of Rosoideae (Rosaceae)
2020
The four-subfamily subdivision of Rosaceae has been recently replaced by a three-subfamily scheme. The re-circumscribed Rosoideae lacks a solid and well-resolved phylogeny on which a classification can be based. In this study, we sampled 56 genera presumably belonging to Rosoideae and 10 genera belonging to other subfamilies or families and used 12 chloroplast regions (
mat
K,
rbc
L,
trn
L,
trn
L–F,
ndh
F,
ycf
1,
trn
C–
ycf
6,
trn
S–G,
trn
S,
psb
A–
trn
H,
rpo
C1 and
trn
S–
ycf
9) to reconstruct their phylogeny. Our results confirmed (1) the exclusion of
Rhodotypos
and
Kerria
from Rosoideae and their inclusion in the subfamily Amygdaloideae and (2) the exclusion of
Chamaebatia
,
Cercocarpus
,
Dryas
and
Purshia
(including
Cowania
) from Rosoideae and their inclusion in Dryadoideae, the sister subfamily of Rosoideae. Within Rosoideae, there are six strongly supported lineages that correspond to six tribes: Ulmarieae, Colurieae, Rubeae, Roseae, Agrimonieae and Potentilleae. We dated the divergence of Rosoideae back to approximately 69.77 million years ago (Mya; 95% HPD = 61.28–78.33 Mya) and that of the tribes within Rosoideae to from 10.42 to 40.02 million years ago (Mya; 95% HPD = 4.73–59.08 Mya). The subfamily is probably of North American and Asian origin and thrives in the northern hemisphere, especially in Asia. After re-circumscriptions of several genera, there are 36 genera recognized in Rosoideae.
Journal Article
Bumble Bee Use of Post-Fire Chaparral in the Central Sierra Nevada
by
LOFFLAND, HELEN L.
,
SIEGEL, RODNEY B.
,
ELSEY, ERIN A.
in
Abundance
,
Bayesian analysis
,
Bayesian theory
2017
Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) are declining across many regions in the Northern Hemisphere, leading to a need for management actions that will protect and enhance their habitats. In the Sierra Nevada of California, USA, montane chaparral is prevalent across the landscape, particularly after forest fires, and may provide important floral resources for pollinators. However post-fire montane chaparral is often targeted for removal during reforestation efforts, to reduce competition with young trees. In 2015 and 2016, we conducted non-lethal bumble bee surveys within 2 areas in the Sierra Nevada that burned in forest fires in 2004. Our goals were to describe bumble bee abundance and species richness in a post-fire landscape, to compare results from chaparral-dominated upland vegetation with results from interspersed patches of riparian vegetation, and to identify characteristics of individual chaparral stands that might make some stands more valuable to bumble bees than others. We captured 2,494 bumble bees of 12 species, and used Bayesian hierarchical modeling to determine that bumble bee abundance was substantially greater in riparian plots (modeled capture rate x̄=1.10±0.31 [SD] bees/survey in 2015, and 2.96±0.83 bees/survey in 2016) than in upland plots (x̄=0.47±0.07 bees/survey in 2015, and 1.27±0.18 bees/survey in 2016), which comprised a mix of chaparral shrubs and associated herbaceous plants. Modeled species richness was also greater in riparian plots, with an average mean richness of 4.1±1.8 bumble bee species in riparian plots versus 2.3±1.3 species in upland plots across the 2 years of the study. Within upland and riparian areas, plots dominated by herbaceous vegetation had greater abundance and species richness. One chaparral shrub species, bearclover (Chamaebatia foliolosa), was foraged on preferentially over all other shrub species and over all but 1 forb taxon, and was associated with increased occupancy probability in the Vosnesensky bumble bee (Bombus vosnesenskii), the most abundant bumble bee species on our study plots. A complex of closely related herbaceous species in the genus Phacelia, commonly associated with upland chaparral in our study area, was the plant taxon most frequently used by bumble bees, and appeared to be particularly important during mid-summer after bearclover flowers became scarce. Our findings suggest that post-fire chaparral communities are generally less intensively used by bumble bees than nearby riparian vegetation but may nevertheless provide important habitat. When chaparral removal is part of post-fire forest regeneration strategies, bumble bees will likely benefit from retention of a mosaic of upland habitat patches dominated by herbaceous vegetation and, in our study area, bearclover, which may provide foraging resources throughout the life cycle of local bumble bee colonies. Because habitat characteristics affected the occupancy of individual bumble bee species differently, managers should consider foraging preferences of target bumble bee species when making land management decisions.
Journal Article
The Essential Oils of Chamaebatiaria millefolium, Chamabatia australis, and Chamaebatia foliolosa (Rosaceae) and Comments on “Chamaebatiaria multiflorium” and “Chamaebatiaria nelleae” as Medicinal Plants
by
Henrickson, James
,
Davis, Jaclyn
,
Maciarello, Michael J.
in
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
,
Alcohols
,
Biological and medical sciences
2003
The essential oil of Chamaebatiaria millefolium from California is dominated by 24.90 ± 4.46% camphor, 17.36 ± 4.23% borneol, 11.17 ± 4.26% camphene, and 10.95 ± 4.59% α-pinene. The essential oil of Chamaebatia australis from California is dominated by no constituent greater than 10% but contains 7.07 ± 0.97% δ-cadinene, 6.84 ± 1.47% terpinen-4-ol, and 5.46 ± 1.50% linalool. The essential oil of Chamaebatia foliolosa from California is dominated by 12.90 ± 3.67% unidentified sesquiterpene alcohol and 15.96 ± 6.61% viridiflorol. No scientific literature exists to substantiate the medicinal claims for “Chamae Rose.” Neither Chamaebatiaria multiflorium nor Chamabatiaria nelleae exist in the scientific literature.
Journal Article