Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chancroid is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by the Gram negative bacterium Haemophilus ducreyi and is characterised by necrotising genital ulceration which may be accompanied by inguinal lymphadenitis or bubo formation. H ducreyi is a fastidious organism which is difficult to culture from genital ulcer material. DNA amplification techniques have shown improved diagnostic sensitivity but are only performed in a few laboratories. The management of chancroid in the tropics tends to be undertaken in the context of syndromic management of genital ulcer disease and treatment is usually with erythromycin. A number of single dose regimens are also available to treat H ducreyi infection. Genital ulceration as a syndrome has been associated with increased transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in several cross sectional and longitudinal studies. Effective and early treatment of genital ulceration is therefore an important part of any strategy to control the spread of HIV infection in tropical countries.

Chancroid, caused by Haemophilus ducreyi, has declined in importance as a sexually transmitted pathogen in most countries where it was previously endemic. The global prevalence of chancroid is unknown as most countries lack the required laboratory diagnostic capacity and surveillance systems to determine this. H. ducreyi has recently emerged as a cause of chronic skin ulceration in some South Pacific islands. Although no antimicrobial susceptibility data for H. ducreyi have been published for two decades, it is still assumed that the infection will respond successfully to treatment with recommended cephalosporin, macrolide or fluoroquinolone-based regimens. HIV-1-infected patients require careful follow-up due to reports of treatment failure with single dose regimens. Buboes may need additional treatment with either aspiration or excision and drainage.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in Nairobi, Kenya, to compare single-dose ciprofloxacin with a 7-day course of erythromycin for the treatment of chancroid. In all, 208 men and 37 women presenting with genital ulcers clinically compatible with chancroid were enrolled. Ulcer etiology was determined using culture techniques for chancroid, serology for syphilis, and a multiplex polymerase chain reaction for chancroid, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus (HSV). Ulcer etiology was 31% unmixed chancroid, 23% unmixed syphilis, 16% unmixed HSV, 15% mixed etiology, and 15% unknown. for 111 participants with chancroid, cure rates were 92% with ciprofloxacin and 91% with erythromycin. For all study participants, the treatment failure rate was 15%, mostly related to ulcer etiologies of HSV infection or syphilis, and treatment failure was 3 times more frequent in human immunodeficiency virus—infected subjects than in others, mostly owing to HSV infection. Ciprofloxacin is an effective single-dose treatment for chancroid, but current recommendations for empiric therapy of genital ulcers may result in high treatment failure due to HSV infection.

Haemophilus ducreyi resists the cytotoxic effects of human antimicrobial peptides (APs), including α-defensins, β-defensins, and the cathelicidin LL-37. Resistance to LL-37, mediated by the sensitive to antimicrobial peptide (Sap) transporter, is required for H. ducreyi virulence in humans. Cationic APs are attracted to the negatively charged bacterial cell surface. In other gram-negative bacteria, modification of lipopolysaccharide or lipooligosaccharide (LOS) by the addition of positively charged moieties, such as phosphoethanolamine (PEA), confers AP resistance by means of electrostatic repulsion. H. ducreyi LOS has PEA modifications at two sites, and we identified three genes (lptA, ptdA, and ptdB) in H. ducreyi with homology to a family of bacterial PEA transferases. We generated non-polar, unmarked mutants with deletions in one, two, or all three putative PEA transferase genes. The triple mutant was significantly more susceptible to both α- and β-defensins; complementation of all three genes restored parental levels of AP resistance. Deletion of all three PEA transferase genes also resulted in a significant increase in the negativity of the mutant cell surface. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed that LptA was required for PEA modification of lipid A; PtdA and PtdB did not affect PEA modification of LOS. In human inoculation experiments, the triple mutant was as virulent as its parent strain. While this is the first identified mechanism of resistance to α-defensins in H. ducreyi, our in vivo data suggest that resistance to cathelicidin LL-37 may be more important than defensin resistance to H. ducreyi pathogenesis.

We conducted a randomized, unblinded, prospective study designed to determine the efficacy of single-dose azithromycin for the treatment of chancroid. Men and women 16 years of age and older who had darkfield-negative genital ulcers that were clinically suspected to be caused by Haemophilus ducreyi and who attended urban sexually transmitted disease clinics or presented to hospital emergency departments were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized to receive 250 mg of ceftriaxone im or 1 g of azithromycin orally, both given as a single dose. They were followed for up to 23 days after treatment. For 65 patients, cultures were positive for H. ducreyi; there were 68 patients whose cultures were negative for both H. ducreyi and herpes simplex virus and who had no evidence of syphilis. All 133 patients returned for at least one follow-up visit. At the time of the last follow-up visit, all 32 patients whose cultures were positive for H. ducreyi and who were treated with azithromycin were clinically cured. In all 33 culture-positive cases in which ceftriaxone was used, there was either clinical improvement or cure at the time of the patient's last follow-up visit. In addition, azithromycin and ceftriaxone were equally effective in healing ulcers for which cultures were negative. We conclude that a single 1-g oral dose of azithromycin is as effective as a 250-mg im dose of ceftriaxone for the treatment of chancroid.

Background and Objectives: Chancroid is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa and enhances the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1). Azithromycin is an orally absorbed macrolide antibiotic that is active against Haemophilus ducreyi, the causative agent of chancroid, and has pharmacokinetic properties that are suitable for single dosing. Study Design: In a randomized single-blinded study of 127 men presenting to a referral STD clinic with culture proven chancroid, we compared the efficacy of azithromycin, administered as a single 1 g dose, with erythromycin 500 mg given 4 times daily for 7 days. Results: Cure rates were 89% (73 of 82) in the azithromycin group and 91% (41 of 45) in the erythromycin group. A failure to respond to treatment was associated with HIV-1 seropositivity and a lack of circumcision. Both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusions: Azithromycin, given as a single 1 g oral dose, is an effective treatment for chancroid in men, and offers major prescribing advantages over erythromycin.

A comparative open study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of single doses of ciprofloxacin (500 mg) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ; 640 mg/3,200 mg) for the treatment of culture-proven chancroid. Clinical cure or improvement was observed 7 days after treatment in 32 (76.2%) of the 42 patients who received ciprofloxacin and 21 (52.5%) of the 40 patients who received TMP-SMZ (P = .04). Cultures for one (4.5%) of 22 patients not cured with ciprofloxacin and 16 (59.3%) of 27 patients not cured with TMP-SMZ were still positive for Haemophilus ducreyi 7 days after treatment (P < .001). Although 77 (71.3%) of the 108 patients tested were seropositive for HIV-1 antibody, HIV infection and the degree of CD4+ lymphocyte depletion had no effect on clinical and bacteriologic outcome. All isolates of H. ducreyi were highly susceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC, 0.004–0.06 mg/L). In contrast, resistance to TMP-SMZ (MIC, ⩾4/76 µg/mL) was observed in 48.9% of isolates (22 of 45) and was significantly associated with treatment failure. Therefore, the administration of TMP-SMZ, in single or multiple doses, is no longer indicated for the treatment of chancroid in Rwanda.

Background and Objectives: Cotrimoxazole has traditionally been used as first drug for treatment of chancroid in India. With reports of increasing resistance to the drug, this study was conducted to compare treatment response of clinical chancroid between ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily for 3 days, erythromycin, 500 mg four times daily for 7 days, and doublestrength cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim 160 mg + sulfamethoxazole 800 mg), twice daily for 7 days. Study Design: Forty-six patients with a clinical diagnosis of chancroid were randomly divided into 3 groups. Sixteen patients received ciprofloxacin, whereas 15 each received erythromycin and cotrimoxazole. Patients were seen on day 7,14, and if needed day 21. Clinical response was noted in terms of cure, improvement, or failure. Results: Excellent response was observed to both ciprofloxacin and erythromycin therapy with cure rates of 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. Improvement was observed in 6.7% cases in both groups. There were no failures with either ciprofloxacin or erythromycin. Poor response to cotrimoxazole therapy was observed with 53.3% cure rates and a high failure rate of 46.7%. Conclusion: Ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are equally effective in chancroid. Ciprofloxacin is better in terms of dosage schedule, duration of treatment, and low cost. Cotrimoxazole should be discontinued as drug of choice because of high failure rates.

We report the sensitivity and specificity of physical examination findings for diagnosing primary syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes. The physical features of genital ulcers in 446 men were measured in accordance with a quantitative scale. Two hundred-twenty of these men had an established, single microbiological diagnosis. Forty-five (20%) had primary syphilis, 118 (54%) had chancroid, and 57 (26%) had genital herpes. There was considerable overlap in the clinical presentation of these three diseases. The classic clinical sign complex attributed to primary syphilis (painless, indurated, clean-based ulcers) was only 31% sensitive but 98% specific. The classic presentation of a chancroid ulcer (a deep, undermined, purulent ulcer) was only 34% sensitive but 94% specific. The classic description of genital herpes ulcers (multiple, shallow, tender ulcers) was only 35% sensitive but 94% specific. Inguinal lymph node findings did not contribute significantly to clinical diagnostic accuracy. These data indicate that the clinical diagnosis of genital ulcer disease can be made with reasonable certainty only for a minority of patients. Rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tests for syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes are needed.

The epidemiology of global antibiotic resistance among Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus ducreyi is examined. The need for surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoaea and H. ducreyi has never been more important.