Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
2,919
result(s) for
"Choice (Psychology) in children."
Sort by:
Come clean, Carlos : tell the truth
by
Eason, Sarah
in
Choice (Psychology) in children Juvenile literature.
,
Honesty Juvenile literature.
,
Choice (Psychology)
2013
\"This title explores the story of one child who faces dilemmas about different social situations, the choices he or she makes and the consequences of those choices\"--Provided by publisher.
Engagement tools for charged-up learning. 6, Forced choice
by
Silver, Harvey F
in
Choice (Psychology) in children
,
Critical thinking in children
,
Debates and debating
2017
This video highlights an inclusive fourth grade classroom where co-teachers use controversy and movement to foster critical thinking, collaboration, and respectful debate.
Streaming Video
Young Children Selectively Avoid Helping People With Harmful Intentions
2010
Two studies investigated whether young children are selectively prosocial toward others, based on the others' moral behaviors. In Study 1 (N = 54), 3-year-olds watched 1 adult (the actor) harming or helping another adult. Children subsequently helped the harmful actor less often than a third (previously neutral) adult, but helped the helpful and neutral adults equally often. In Study 2 (N = 36), 3-year-olds helped an actor who intended but failed to harm another adult less often than a neutral adult, but helped an accidentally harmful and a neutral adult equally often. Children's prosocial behavior was thus mediated by the intentions behind the actor's moral behavior, irrespective of outcome. Children thus selectively avoid helping those who cause— or even intend to cause— others harm.
Journal Article
Making smart choices
by
Raatma, Lucia
in
Health Juvenile literature.
,
Health behavior in children Juvenile literature.
,
Choice (Psychology) in children Juvenile literature.
2013
\"Discusses making good life choices, including eating healthy foods, staying active, and learning to deal with stress\"--Amazon.com.
Eating for Pleasure or Profit: The Effect of Incentives on Children's Enjoyment of Vegetables
by
Wardle, Jane
,
Cooke, Lucy J.
,
Chambers, Lucy C.
in
Appetite
,
Behavioural psychology
,
Biological and medical sciences
2011
Parents commonly use rewards to encourage children to eat healthfully, but this practice remains controversial because rewards are suspected of undermining children's intrinsic motivation. A cluster-randomized trial examined children's acceptance of a disliked vegetable over 12 daily taste exposures. These exposures were paired with a tangible reward, a social reward, or no reward, and the findings were compared with the results from a no-treatment control condition. Liking and intake of the vegetable were assessed in a free-choice consumption task at preintervention, postintervention, I month after intervention, and 3 months after intervention. Liking increased more in the three intervention conditions than in the control condition, and there were no significant differences between the intervention conditions. These effects were maintained at follow-up. Children in both reward conditions increased consumption, and these effects were maintained for 3 months; however, the effects of exposure with no reward became nonsignificant by 3 months. These results indicate that external rewards do not necessarily produce negative effects and may be useful in promoting healthful eating.
Journal Article
This or that? : the wacky book of choices to reveal the hidden you
by
Boyer, Crispin, author
in
Personality in children Juvenile literature.
,
Decision making in children Juvenile literature.
,
Choice (Psychology) in children Juvenile literature.
2014
Presents simple quizzes combined with informative facts and psychological insights for assisting middle school children to discover their personality traits and possible career paths.
Consequences of \Minimal\ Group Affiliations in Children
2011
Three experiments (total N = 140) tested the hypothesis that 5-year-old children's membership in randomly assigned \"minimal\" groups would be sufficient to induce intergroup bias. Children were randomly assigned to groups and engaged in tasks involving judgments of unfamiliar in-group or out-group children. Despite an absence of information regarding the relative status of groups or any competitive context, in-group preferences were observed on explicit and implicit measures of attitude and resource allocation (Experiment 1), behavioral attribution, and expectations of reciprocity, with preferences persisting when groups were not described via a noun label (Experiment 2). In addition, children systematically distorted incoming information by preferentially encoding positive information about in-group members (Experiment 3). Implications for the developmental origins of intergroup bias are discussed.
Journal Article
Flip flop!
by
Rau, Dana Meachen, 1971-
,
Christy, Jana, ill
in
Summer Juvenile fiction.
,
Decision making Juvenile fiction.
,
Choice (Psychology) in children Juvenile fiction.
2011
Rhyming text explores the many options that summer presents to two best friends, from swimming in a pool versus swimming in the sea, to wearing flip flops versus going barefoot.
Evaluating and Approaching a Strange Animal: Children's Trust in Informant Testimony
2014
This study examined 3- to 7-year-old children's reliance on informant testimony to learn about a novel animal. Sixty participants were given positive or negative information about an Australian marsupial from an informant described as a maternal figure or a zookeeper. Children were asked which informant was correct and were invited to touch the animal, which was a stuffed toy hidden in a crate. Overall, younger children endorsed the zookeeper's testimony about the animal, but touched the animal more readily when the maternal figure provided positive information. Older children endorsed the informant who provided positive information, but showed some sensitivity to zookeeper expertise. Age differences were obtained in the association between participant characteristics and informant selection and animal approach behavior.
Journal Article