Explore the vast range of titles available.

AimTo assess the added value of Near InfraRed Fluorescence (NIRF) imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsThis international multicentre randomized controlled trial included participants with an indication for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Participants were randomised into a NIRF imaging assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NIRF-LC) group and a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) group. Primary end point was time to ‘Critical View of Safety’ (CVS). The follow-up period of this study was 90 postoperative days. An expert panel analysed the video recordings after surgery to confirm designated surgical time points.ResultsA total of 294 patients were included, of which 143 were randomized in the NIRF-LC and 151 in the CLC group. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed. Time to CVS was on average 19 min and 14 s for the NIRF-LC group and 23 min and 9 s for the CLC group (p 0.032). Time to identification of the CD was 6 min and 47 s and 13 min for NIRF-LC and CLC respectively (p < 0.001). Transition of the CD in the gallbladder was identified after an average of 9 min and 39 s with NIRF-LC, compared to 18 min and 7 s with CLC (p < 0.001). No difference in postoperative length of hospital stay nor occurrence of postoperative complications was found. ICG related complications were limited to one patient who developed a rash after injection of ICG.ConclusionUse of NIRF imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides earlier identification of relevant extrahepatic biliary anatomy: earlier achievement of CVS, cystic duct visualisation and visualisation of both cystic duct and cystic artery transition into the gallbladder.

Background Different techniques have been proposed to reduce the incidence of the intraoperative bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Among these, Near-Infrared Fluorescence Cholangiography (NIFC) with Indocyanine Green (ICG) represents a relatively recent addition. At present, there is considerable variation in the protocols for the administration of ICG. Methods The aim of this randomized multicenter clinical trial (RCT) is to ascertain whether there are differences between the dosage and administration intervals of ICG, with a view to optimizing a good-quality NIFC during LC. Furthermore, an analysis was conducted to determine the potential impact of different factors on the outcomes of this technique. The trial was approved by the local institutional Ethics Committee. Results From June 2022 to June 2023, 200 patients were randomized in four arms (G1: 2.5 mg ICG > 3 h prior to surgery, G2: 2.5 mg ICG 15–30 min prior to surgery, G3: 0.05 mg/kg ICG > 3 h prior to surgery and G4: 0.05 mg/kg ICG 15–30 min prior to surgery). We found differences in the DISTURBED score between the groups ( p  < 0.001), suggesting that ICG administration 15–30 min before surgery was worse than administration > 3 h after LC ( p  = 0.02). Additionally, it was observed that body mass index (BMI), gender, ASA Classification System, previous liver and biliary disease and the type of surgery had influence on NIFC. Finally, the NIFC had an impact in intraoperative and postoperative complications, operative time and hospital length of stay. Conclusions The administration of ICG > 3 h improve liver background fluorescence in the NIFC during LC. There are different factors may affect NIFC results (BMI, ASA grade, previous liver disease, presence of gallbladder inflammation and type of surgery). Finally, high-quality NIFC was associated with fewer surgical complications, shorter surgical time and shorter length of hospital stay.

Purpose To establish the optimal dose of indocyanine green (ICG) to administer intravenously 30 min before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients undergoing LC for cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and/or cholecystic polyps were randomized into four groups given four different ICG doses (0.025, 0.1, 0.25, 2.5 mg). Using OptoMedic endoscopy combined with a near-infrared fluorescent imaging system, we evaluated the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct and liver at three timepoints: before surgical dissection of the cystohepatic triangle, before clipping of the cystic duct, and before closure. The bile duct-to-liver ratio (BLR) of the FI was analyzed to assess the cholangiography effect. Results Sixty-four patients were allocated to one of four groups, with 40 patients included in the final analysis. Generally, with increasing ICG doses, the levels of FI in the bile duct and liver increased gradually at each of the three timepoints. Before surgical dissection of the cystohepatic triangle, 0.1-mg ICG showed the highest BLR ( F  = 3.47, p  = 0.0259). Before clipping the cystic duct and before closure, the 0.025- and 0.1-mg groups showed a higher BLR than the 0.25- and 2.5-mg groups ( p  < 0.05). When setting the ideal cholangiography at a BLR ≥ 1, ≥ 3, or ≥ 5, the 0.1-mg group showed the highest qualified case number at the three timepoints. Conclusions The intravenous administration of 0.1-mg ICG, 30 min before LC, is significantly better for fluorescent cholangiography of the extrahepatic biliary structures before dissection and clipping of the cystohepatic triangle. Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (ChiCTR2200057933).

Background To potentially lessen injuries and associated complications, fluorescence cholangiography has been suggested as a technique for enhancing the visualization and identification of extrahepatic biliary anatomy. The most popular way to administer indocyanine green (ICG) is intravenously, as there is currently little data on ICG injections directly into the gallbladder. In order to visualize extrahepatic biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), we compared the two different ICG administration techniques. We also examined variations in visualization time, as well as the effectiveness, benefits, and drawbacks of each modality. Methods In this prospective randomized clinical study, 60 consecutive adult patients with chronic and acute gallbladder disease were included. Our study conducted from 2022 to 2024 in Surgical Department of Theodor Bilharz Research Institute. Thirty patients underwent LC with intravenous ICG administration (IV-ICG), thirty patients received a direct injection of gallbladder through transhepatic ICG (IC-ICG) and Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient data were examined. Results In terms of their perioperative and demographic features, the groups were similar. Without a statistically significant difference, the IV-ICG group’s total operating time was less than that of the IC-ICG group (p 0.140). Compared to the transhepatic IC-ICG method, IV-ICG was more accurate in identifying the duodenum and the common hepatic duct ( p  = 0.029 and p  = 0.016, respectively). In the transhepatic IC-ICG and IV-ICG groups, the cystic duct could be identified prior to dissection in 66.6% and 73.3% of cases, respectively, and this increased to 86.6% and 93.3% following dissection. In the transhepatic IC-ICG group, the common bile duct was visible in 93.3% of cases; in the IV-ICG group, it was visible in 90% of cases. Two cases in the IC-ICG group and every case following IV-ICG administration had liver fluorescence (6.6% versus 100%; p  < 0.001). Conclusion The current study shows that for both administration methods, ICG-fluorescence cholangiography can be useful in identifying the extrahepatic biliary anatomy during Calot’s triangle dissection. By avoiding hepatic fluorescence, the transhepatic IC-ICG route can increase the bile duct-to-liver contrast with less expense and no risk of hypersensitivity reactions than the intravenous ICG injection method. We recommend to use both techniques in case of acute cholecystitis with cystic duct obstruction. In cases of liver cirrhosis, we recommend transhepatic IC-ICG as IV-ICG is limited.

To explore the Advantages of Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Imaging over Conventional Fiber-Optic Imaging in Laparoscopic Cholangiography and Immediate Suture for Stone Removal. The study is a randomized controlled descriptive research. Consecutive patient data were collected from October 2022 to January 2024 at the Second People’s Hospital of Chengdu for those who underwent laparoscopic bile duct exploration and stone removal, totaling 72 cases. According to the order of admission, they were randomly assigned to either the study group or the control group, with 36 cases in each group. Ten minutes preoperatively, indocyanine green (ICG) was administered intravenously through a peripheral vein to the subjects in the study group, to enable real-time fluorescent tracing of the extrahepatic bile ducts during surgery. This study compares the efficiency of bile duct structure and boundary recognition, the timeliness of bile duct incision positioning, operative time, blood loss, and the incidence of bile duct injury between patients who were injected with ICG and those who were not. In addition, it assesses liver function and white blood-cell counts rechecked 24 h postoperatively, the duration of postoperative hospital stay, and the occurrence of bile leakage. The study included 72 patients, with 36 in the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence group and 36 in the conventional fiber-optic group, comprising 26 males and 46 females. There were 18 patients with a history of previous biliary exploration surgery and 23 who had undergone previous cholecystectomy. During surgery, ICG fluorescence was successfully visualized in all 36 cases of the ICG group, allowing for a clear view of the anatomical structure and boundaries of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Compared to the control group, the ICG fluorescence group demonstrated a reduction in the time required for identification of the biliary system and positioning of the bile duct incision, as well as a decrease in operative time and postoperative hospital stay; intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of bile leakage were also relatively reduced, with statistically significant differences ( P  < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in postoperative serum alanine aminotransferase levels, white blood-cell counts, direct bilirubin, and indirect bilirubin between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). One case of bile duct injury occurred in the control group. The application of ICG fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy can effectively enhance the visibility of the bile ducts, rapidly identify the location for bile duct incision, and is conducive to reducing both the duration of surgery and postoperative hospital stay. It also minimizes intraoperative blood loss, prevents bile leakage and bile duct injuries. This program has demonstrating significant clinical value.

Introduction Bile duct injury is a major complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography (ICG-NIFC) is a well-recognized technique who provides an intraoperative mapping of the biliary system. Methods All patients underwent urgent LC and randomly divided into two groups: in one group, only white light imaging was used and, in the ICG group, ICG was used. Due to the heterogeneity of our groups, a PSM was performed with a 1:1 PSM cohort. Results The use of ICG clearly decreases the operation time ( p value 0.002). The overall rate of intra- and post- operative complications was 4.17% and 15.8% respectively. Post-operative biliary duct injury trend decreases in ICG group and after the homogenization of the 2 cohorts, the intra- and post- operative complications (including vascular and biliary duct injury) results changed with a highest rate of complication in the cohort with no-ICG administration. The use of NIFC demonstrated a protective effect against intra- and post- operative complications and biliary duct injury (HR 0.037, p value 0.337 and HR 0.039, p value 0.647; HR 0.288; p value 0.05 and HR 0.635; p value 0.687, respectively). Conclusions The intra-operative use of NIFC showed a trend in the reduction of the rate of intra- and post-operative complications, the duration of surgery, and the length of hospital stay. ICG is a highly safe approach to urgent and emergency LC, as for elective LC, and could lead the surgeon to conduct the procedure more efficiently.

Background With the introduction of a new platform, robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) has been reported as feasible and safe for selected cases. In parallel, the development of real-time near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green (ICG) has been seen as a help during the dissection, even if the data are still preliminary. The study purpose is to report our experience with ICG RSSC and compare the outcomes to standard RSSC. Methods From February 2011 to December 2011, 44 selected patients underwent RSSC for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Among them, 23 (52.3 %) were included in an experimental protocol using the ICG, and the remainder (47.7 %) underwent standard RSSC. There was no randomization. The endpoints were the perioperative outcomes. This is a prospective study, approved by our local Ethics Committee. Results There were no differences in terms of patients’ characteristics, except that there were more male patients in the ICG group (47.8 vs. 9.5 %; p  = 0.008). Regarding the surgical data, the overall operative time was shorter for the ICG group, especially for patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≤25 (−24 min) but without reaching statistical significance ( p  = 0.06). For BMI >25, no differences were observed. Otherwise, there were no differences in terms of conversion, complications, or length of stay between both groups. Conclusions A RSSC with a real-time near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography can be performed safely. In addition, for selected patients with a low BMI, ICG could shorten the operative time during RSSC. Larger studies are still required before drawing definitive conclusions.

Background Laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is an accepted treatment modality for single stage management of CBD stones in fit patients. A transcholedochal approach is preferred in patients with a dilated CBD and large impacted stones in whom ductal clearance remains problematic. There are very few studies comparing intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) with choledochoscopy to determine ductal clearance in patients undergoing transcholedochal LCBDE. This series represents the first of those comparing the two from Asia. Methods Between April 2009 and October 2012, 150 consecutive patients with CBD stones were enrolled in a prospective randomized study to undergo transcholedochal LCBDE on an intent-to-treat basis. Patients with CBD diameter of less than 9 mm on preoperative imaging were excluded from the study. Out of the 132 eligible patients, 65 patients underwent IOC (Group A), and 67 patients underwent intraoperative choledochoscopy (Group B) to determine CBD clearance. Results There were no differences between the two groups in the demographic profile and the preoperative biochemical findings. There was no conversion to open procedures, and complete stone clearance was achieved in all the 132 cases. The mean CBD diameter and the mean number of CBD stones removed were comparable between the two groups. Mean operating time was 170 min in Group A and 140 min in Group B ( p  < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. Nine patients in Group A (13.8 %) showed non-passage of contrast into the duodenum on IOC which resolved after administration of i.v. glucagon, suggesting a transient spasm of sphincter of Oddi. Two patients (3 %) showed a false-positive result on IOC which had to be resolved with choledochoscopy. Conclusions The present study showed that intraoperative choledochoscopy is better than IOC for determining ductal clearance after transcholedochal LCBDE and is less cumbersome and less time-consuming.

Background There is resistance to routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy because it prolongs surgery and may be experienced as cumbersome. An alternative instrument may help to reduce these drawbacks and lower the threshold for IOC. This trial compared the Kumar cannulation technique to the more commonly used Olsen clamp for IOC (KOALA trial; Dutch Trial Register NTR2582). Methods Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between IOC using the Kumar clamp and the Olsen clamp. Primary end points were the time that the IOC procedure took and its perceived ease as measured on a visual analog scale from 0 (impossible) to 10 (effortless). To detect a difference of 33 % in IOC time, a total sample size of 40 patients was required. Results Fifty-nine patients were randomized. Nine were excluded because of conversion to open cholecystectomy before the IOC procedure. Twenty-eight patients underwent IOC with the Kumar clamp and 22 with the Olsen clamp. The success rate was 23 (82.1 %) of 28 for the Kumar clamp and 19 (86.4 %) of 22 for the Olsen clamp ( p  > 0.999). The mean IOC time was 10 min 27 s ± 6 min 17 s using the Kumar clamp and 11 min 34 s ± 7 min 27 s using the Olsen clamp ( p  = 0.537). Surgeons graded the ease of the Kumar clamp as 6.8 ± 2.7 and the Olsen clamp as 6.8 ± 2.1 ( p  = 0.977). Conclusions IOC using the Kumar clamp was neither faster nor easier than using the Olsen clamp. Both clamps facilitated IOC in just over 10 min. Individual surgeon preference should dictate which clamp is used.

BackgroundIntraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can be used for visualisation of the biliary tract during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to compare use of LUS with IOC.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched (last update: April 2024). PICO: P = patients undergoing intraoperative imaging of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease; I = intervention: LUS; C = comparison: IOC; O = outcomes: mortality, bile duct injury, retained gallstone, conversion to open cholecystectomy, procedural failure, operation time including imaging time. Included articles were critically appraised using checklists. Conclusions were based on studies without major risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE.ResultsSixteen non-randomised studies met the PICO. Two before/after studies (594 versus 807 patients) contributed to conclusions regarding mortality (no events; very low certainty evidence), bile duct injury (1 versus 0 events; very low certainty evidence), retained gallstone (2 versus 2 events; very low certainty evidence), and conversion to open cholecystectomy (6 versus 21 events; risk ratio: 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.15–0.95); I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). Seven additional studies, using intra-individual comparisons, contributed to conclusions regarding procedural failure; risk ratio: 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.70–1.78; I2 = 83%; very low certainty evidence). No studies reported operation time. Mean imaging time for LUS and IOC, reported in 12 studies, was 4.8‒10.2 versus 10.9‒17.9 min (mean difference: − 7.8 min (95% confidence interval: − 9.3 to − 6.3); I2 = 95%; moderate certainty evidence).ConclusionIt is uncertain whether there is any difference in mortality/bile duct injury/retained gallstone using LUS compared with IOC, but LUS may be associated with fewer conversions to open cholecystectomy and is probably associated with shorter imaging time.