Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a randomized trial of patients with primary biliary cholangitis, bezafibrate and ursodeoxycholic acid resulted in a higher rate of complete biochemical response than ursodeoxycholic acid alone. Bezafibrate was associated with increases in creatinine and myalgias.

To evaluate the utility and safety of a short-type double-balloon endoscope (DBE) in the treatment of biliary disease in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal (GI) anatomy. This study was conducted as a multicenter, single-arm, prospective trial at five tertiary academic care centers and three community-based hospitals in Japan. Consecutive patients with biliary disease with altered GI anatomy were prospectively included in this study. A total of 311 patients underwent double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). The success rate of reaching the target site, the primary end point, was 97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 95.4-99.1). The success rate of biliary cannulation and contrast injection of the targeted duct, the secondary end point, was 96.4% (95% CI: 93.6-98.2), and the therapeutic success rate was 97.9% (95% CI: 95.4-99.2). Adverse events occurred in 33 patients (10.6%, 95% CI: 7.1-14.0) and were managed conservatively in all patients with the exception of 1 in whom a perforation developed, requiring emergency surgery. ERC using a short-type DBE resulted in an excellent therapeutic success rate and a low rate of adverse events. This treatment can be a first-line treatment for biliary disease in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy.

Background IgG4-related cholangitis (IRC) is a rare systemic fibroinflammatory disorder that can affect multiple secretory organs, posing diagnostic challenges. It mimics both benign biliary strictures (BBS) and malignant biliary strictures (MBS). A hallmark feature of IRC is its dramatic response to systemic corticosteroids. Misdiagnosis may lead to incorrect treatment or unwarranted surgical procedures. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics, laboratory test results, imaging findings, and treatment responses between IRC and other BBS groups. Methods We reviewed all patients with a definitive diagnosis of BBS between January 2013 and January 2023. Data on serum bilirubin, serum IgG4 level, stent type, and response to treatment were collected. The baseline characteristics, biliary stricture treatment, and stent indwelling time were compared between the IRC and other BBS groups. Results A total of 158 patients with BBS were included (IRC, n  = 19; other BBS, n  = 139). The mean age was 59 years, and 62% were male. No significant difference in comorbidities or initial laboratory results was observed between the two groups. The IRC group had significantly higher rates of jaundice (73.7% vs. 29.7%, p  < 0.001) and coexisting autoimmune pancreatitis (52.6% vs. 0%, p  < 0.001). Patients with IRC had significantly higher serum IgG4 levels (5.384 g/L vs. 0.838 g/L, p  < 0.001) and longer stricture lengths (23 mm vs. 7 mm, p  < 0.001). Patients with IRC achieved complete responses to medication without requiring prolonged endoscopic stenting or surgery. Key diagnostic factors for IRC included being male (odds ratio [OR] 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–13.32, p  = 0.045), uniform circumferential bile duct thickening (OR 5.00, 95% CI 1.82–13.69, p  = 0.002), long stricture length (> 15 mm) (OR 5.72, 95% CI 2.02–16.19, p  = 0.001), The multivariate analysis demonstrated tissue lymphoplasmacytic infiltration (OR 88.38, 95% CI 7.98-978.53, P  < 0.001) and Cholangiography type I (OR 22.47, 95% CI 2.63-192.26, p  = 0.004). Conclusions IRC can be distinguished from other BBS through specific clinical and imaging features. Elevated serum IgG4 levels and tissue staining for IgG4-positive cells aid in accurate diagnosis. Recognising IRC, even in low-prevalence areas, guides appropriate treatment and avoids unnecessary surgery.

IgG4-associated cholangitis is a steroid-responsive hepatobiliary inflammatory condition associated with autoimmune pancreatitis that clinically and radiologically mimics primary sclerosing cholangitis. In this study, we conducted a morphological and immunohistochemical analysis of liver material obtained from individuals with IgG4-associated cholangitis, and compared these with well-characterized cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis. The study group consisted of 10 patients (9 biopsy and 1 hepatectomy case) with IgG4-associated cholangitis and 17 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (16 needle biopsy and 1 hepatectomy case). All patients with IgG4-associated cholangitis had pancreatic involvement as well, and six pancreatectomy samples revealed characteristic histopathological features of autoimmune pancreatitis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis cases were defined by the presence of a characteristic ERCP appearance. Clinical, pathological, radiological, and follow-up data were recorded for all cases. Portal and periportal inflammation was graded according to Ishak's guidelines. Immunohistochemical stains for IgG and IgG4 were performed. The cohort of patients with IgG4-associated cholangitis (mean age: 63 years) was older than individuals with primary sclerosing cholangitis (mean age: 44 years). Seven of these cases showed intrahepatic biliary strictures. IgG4-associated cholangitis liver samples showed higher portal ( P =0.06) and lobular ( P =0.009) inflammatory scores. Microscopic portal-based fibro-inflammatory nodules that were composed of fibroblasts, plasma cells, lymphocytes, and eosinophils were exclusively observed in five of the IgG4-associated cholangitis cases (50%). More than 10 IgG4-positive plasma cells per HPF (high power field) were observed in 6 of the IgG4-associated cholangitis cases (mean: 60, range: 0–140 per HPF), whereas all primary sclerosing cholangitis cases showed significantly lesser numbers (mean: 0.08, range: 0–1 per HPF). On a liver biopsy, the histological features of IgG4-associated cholangitis may be distinctive, and in conjunction with IgG4 immunohistochemical stain, may help distinguish this disease from primary sclerosing cholangitis.

INTRODUCTION:Successful biliary drainage and antibiotics are the mainstays of therapy in management of patients with acute cholangitis. However, the duration of antibiotic therapy after successful biliary drainage has not been prospectively evaluated. We conducted a single-center, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare short duration of antibiotic therapy with conventional duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with moderate or severe cholangitis.METHODS:Consecutive patients were screened for the inclusion criteria and randomized into either conventional duration (CD) group (8 days) or short duration (SD) group (4 days) of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was clinical cure (absence of recurrence of cholangitis at day 30 and >50% reduction of bilirubin at day 15). Secondary outcomes were total days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization within 30 days, antibiotic-related adverse events, and all-cause mortality at day 30.RESULTS:The study included 120 patients (the mean age was 55.85 ± 13.52 years, and 50% were male patients). Of them, 51.7% patients had malignant etiology and 76.7% patients had moderate cholangitis. Clinical cure was seen in 79.66% (95% confidence interval, 67.58%-88.12%) patients in the CD group and 77.97% (95% confidence interval, 65.74%-86.78%) patients in the SD group (P = 0.822). On multivariate analysis, malignant etiology and hypotension at presentation were associated with lower clinical cure. Total duration of antibiotics required postintervention was lower in the SD group (8.58 ± 1.92 and 4.75 ± 2.32 days; P < 0.001). Duration of hospitalization and mortality were similar in both the groups.DISCUSSION:Short duration of antibiotics is noninferior to conventional duration in patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis in terms of clinical cure, recurrence of cholangitis, and overall mortality.

Background Acute cholangitis is an infection of the biliary tract that is managed with adequate biliary drainage combined with antibiotic treatment. The international Tokyo Guidelines 2018 recommend 4 to 7 days of antibiotic treatment after adequate biliary drainage, but observational data suggest shorter treatment may be sufficient. We assessed whether 1 day of antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to 4–7 days of antibiotic treatment for acute cholangitis after adequate biliary drainage. Methods The COBRA-trial is a multicentre, open-label, parallel group randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 416 patients with acute cholangitis will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (1 day of antibiotic treatment after adequate biliary drainage) or to the control group (4–7 days of antibiotic treatment after adequate biliary drainage). Patients with acute cholangitis due to common bile duct stones, benign or malignant distal biliary obstruction, or distal biliary stent dysfunction are eligible. Randomization will take place once adequate biliary drainage is achieved by ERCP. Main exclusion criteria are concomitant pancreatitis, liver abscess, cholecystitis, and another infectious diagnosis at the time of randomization, use of systemic maintenance antibiotics, and specific immunosuppressants. Patients will be stratified for blood culture results at the time of randomization and aetiology of cholangitis. The primary endpoint is clinical cure, defined as the patient being symptom-free by day 14, with no relapse or death occurring by day 30. Secondary endpoints include 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality, relapse of cholangitis by day 90, time from ERCP to first relapse, any other subsequent infection requiring antibiotic treatment within 90 days, duration of initial hospital stay, number of days treated with antibiotics by day 30, subsequent infections with multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion This trial assesses whether a short course of antibiotic treatment for acute cholangitis is as safe and effective compared to a longer course of antibiotic treatment. If confirmed, the results could substantially reduce antibiotic exposure and healthcare resource utilization, thereby contributing to global efforts to minimize unnecessary antibiotic treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05750966, registered on March 2nd, 2023.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are rare, and chronic cholestatic diseases that can progress to liver failure. The goals of treatment are to halt the progression of liver disease to cirrhosis and/or liver failure, and alleviate symptoms associated with these diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid has historically been the first-line treatment of PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates used as second-line or adjunctive therapies. However, the treatment landscape is rapidly expanding. Recently, 2 new second-line agents gained US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of PBC, and several other therapies remain under investigation with promising results. Although significant progress has been made in the development of therapies for PBC, there are no current approved treatments of PSC other than liver transplantation although several emerging therapies have shown encouraging results. This review outlines the current and upcoming treatments of PBC and PSC.

IntroductionPrimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The strong association between gut and liver inflammation has driven several pathogenic hypotheses to which the intestinal microbiome is proposed to contribute. Pilot studies of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in PSC and IBD are demonstrated to be safe and associated with increased gut bacterial diversity. However, the longevity of such changes and the impact on markers of disease activity and disease progression have not been studied. The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the effects of repeated FMT as a treatment for PSC-IBD.Methods and analysisFAecal micRobiota transplantation in primary sclerosinG chOlangitis (FARGO) is a phase IIa randomised placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of repeated colonic administration of FMT in patients with non-cirrhotic PSC-IBD. Fifty-eight patients will be recruited from six sites across England and randomised in a 1:1 ratio between active FMT or FMT placebo arms. FMT will be manufactured by the University of Birmingham Microbiome Treatment Centre, using stool collected from rigorously screened healthy donors. A total of 8 weekly treatments will be delivered; the first through colonoscopic administration (week 1) and the remaining seven via once-weekly enema (up to week 8). Participants will then be followed on a 12-weekly basis until week 48 from the first treatment visit. The primary efficacy outcome will be to determine the effect of FMT on serum alkaline phosphatase values over time (end of study at 48 weeks). Key secondary outcomes will be to evaluate the impact of FMT on other liver biochemical parameters, PSC risk scores, circulating and imaging markers of liver fibrosis, health-related quality of life measures, IBD activity and the incidence of PSC-related clinical events. Key translational objectives will be to identify mucosal metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, metabolomic and immunological pathways associated with the administration of FMT.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the South Central—Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (REC 23/SC/0147). Participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 23 February 2024 (NCT06286709). Weblink: Study Details | FAecal Microbiota Transplantation in primaRy sclerosinG chOlangitis | ClinicalTrials.gov.

Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease in which a cycle of immune mediated biliary epithelial cell injury, cholestasis and progressive fibrosis can culminate over time in an end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Both genetic and environmental influences are presumed relevant to disease initiation. PBC is most prevalent in women and those over the age of 50, but a spectrum of disease is recognised in adult patients globally; male sex, younger age at onset (<45) and advanced disease at presentation are baseline predictors of poorer outcome. As the disease is increasingly diagnosed through the combination of cholestatic serum liver tests and the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies, most presenting patients are not cirrhotic and the term cholangitis is more accurate. Disease course is frequently accompanied by symptoms that can be burdensome for patients, and management of patients with PBC must address, in a life-long manner, both disease progression and symptom burden. Licensed therapies include ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA), alongside experimental new and re-purposed agents. Disease management focuses on initiation of UDCA for all patients and risk stratification based on baseline and on-treatment factors, including in particular the response to treatment. Those intolerant of treatment with UDCA or those with high-risk disease as evidenced by UDCA treatment failure (frequently reflected in trial and clinical practice as an alkaline phosphatase >1.67 × upper limit of normal and/or elevated bilirubin) should be considered for second-line therapy, of which OCA is the only currently licensed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended agent. Follow-up of patients is life-long and must address treatment of the disease and management of associated symptoms.

Background Progress of cholangitis to cholangiosepsis is a frequent observation in patients with secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC–CIP). Adequate biliary drainage may reduce episodes of cholangiosepsis and therefore stabilize liver function and improve survival. The primary objective of the BISCIT study is to demonstrate that scheduled biliary interventions will reduce incidence of cholangiosepsis, liver transplantation, or death in patients with SSC–CIP. Methods A total of 104 patients will be randomized at ten study sites. Patients with SSC–CIP, confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), will be randomized 1:1 either in the intervention group which will be treated with scheduled biliary interventions (i.e., therapeutic ERC) every 8 weeks for 6 months or in the control group which will receive standard of care. The randomization will be stratified by center. The composite primary efficacy endpoint is defined as (1) occurrence of death, (2) necessity of liver transplantation, or (3) occurrence of cholangiosepsis within 6 months following randomization. Discussion Prospective evaluation of endoscopic treatment procedures is urgently needed to establish an evidence-based therapeutic treatment algorithm in SSC–CIP. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for patients with SSC–CIP. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05396755, date of registration: May 31, 2022, last update: May 31, 2022).