Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundRobotic-assisted surgery (RAS) potentially reduces workload and shortens the surgical learning curve compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL). The present study aimed to compare robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the initial learning phase for novices.MethodsIn a randomized crossover study, medical students (n = 40) in their clinical years performed both LC and RAC on a cadaveric porcine model. After standardized instructions and basic skill training, group 1 started with RAC and then performed LC, while group 2 started with LC and then performed RAC. The primary endpoint was surgical performance measured with Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, secondary endpoints included operating time, complications (liver damage, gallbladder perforations, vessel damage), force applied to tissue, and subjective workload assessment.ResultsSurgical performance was better for RAC than for LC for total OSATS (RAC = 77.4 ± 7.9 vs. LC = 73.8 ± 9.4; p = 0.025, global OSATS (RAC = 27.2 ± 1.0 vs. LC = 26.5 ± 1.6; p = 0.012, and task specific OSATS score (RAC = 50.5 ± 7.5 vs. LC = 47.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.037). There were less complications with RAC than with LC (10 (25.6%) vs. 26 (65.0%), p = 0.006) but no difference in operating times (RAC = 77.0 ± 15.3 vs. LC = 75.5 ± 15.3 min; p = 0.517). Force applied to tissue was similar. Students found RAC less physical demanding and less frustrating than LC.ConclusionsNovices performed their first cholecystectomies with better performance and less complications with RAS than with CL, while operating time showed no differences. Students perceived less subjective workload for RAS than for CL. Unlike our expectations, the lack of haptic feedback on the robotic system did not lead to higher force application during RAC than LC and did not increase tissue damage. These results show potential advantages for RAS over CL for surgical novices while performing their first RAC and LC using an ex vivo cadaveric porcine model.Registration numberresearchregistry6029Graphic abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard treatment for cholelithiasis. In situations where laparoscopic cholecystectomy is dangerous, a surgeon may be forced to change from laparoscopy to an open procedure. Data from the literature shows that 2 to 15% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies are converted to open surgery during surgery for various reasons. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for the conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. A retrospective analysis of medical records and operation protocols was performed. The study group consisted of 263 patients who were converted into open surgery during laparoscopic surgery, and 264 randomly selected patients in the control group. Conversion risk factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis that modeled the probability of a certain event as a function of independent factors. Statistically significant factors in the regression model with all explanatory variables were age, emergency treatment, acute cholecystitis, peritoneal adhesions, chronic cholecystitis, and inflammatory infiltration. The use of predictive risk assessments or nomograms can be the most helpful tool for risk stratification in a clinical scenario. With such predictive tools, clinicians can optimize care based on the known risk factors for the conversion, and patients can be better informed about the risks of their surgery.

Background Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy evolved from the traditional multiport laparoscopic technique. Prior trials have demonstrated improved cosmesis with the single-incision technique. Robotic single-site surgery minimizes the technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic single-incision approach. This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in terms of cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Methods Patients with symptomatic benign gallbladder disease were randomized to RSSC or MPLC. Data included perioperative variables such as operative time, conversion and complications and cosmesis satisfaction, body image perception, quality of life using validated questionnaires, at postoperative visits of 2, 6 weeks and 3 months. Results One hundred thirty-six patients were randomized to RSSC ( N  = 83) and MPLC ( N  = 53) at 8 institutions. Both cohorts were dominated by higher enrollment of females (RSSC = 78%, MPLC = 92%). The RSSC and MPLC cohorts were otherwise statistically matched. Operative time was longer for RSSC (61 min vs. 44 min, P  < 0.0001). There were no differences in complication rates. RSSC demonstrated a significant superiority in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception ( P value < 0.05 at every follow-up). There was no statistically significant difference in patient-reported quality of life. Multivariate analysis of female patients demonstrated significantly higher preference for RSSC over MPLC in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception with no difference seen in overall quality of life. Conclusions Results from this trial show that RSSC is associated with improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception without a difference in observed complication rate. The uncompromised safety and the improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception provided by RSSC for female patients support consideration of the robotic single-site approach. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01932216.

National healthcare organizers require feedback from patients to improve medical treatment methods. Three-dimensional laparoscopy cholecystectomy (3D-LC) is a modern technique in surgery. However, there are no studies with patient feedback from validated questionnaires assessing the postoperative treatment results in 3D-LC. Initially 200 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized into 3D-LC or mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) groups. RAND-36-Item Health Survey was performed preoperatively and 4 weeks following surgery relating the survey scores between the 3D-LC and MC groups. Similar postoperative RAND-36 scores were reported for both groups preoperatively and at 4 weeks following surgery, and no significant differences in RAND-36 domains were shown. When the patients in both study groups were combined, Mental Health (p<0.001), Bodily Pain (p=0.01) and General Health (p=0.016) domain scores were significantly higher, indicating a significantly positive change in quality of life 4 weeks postoperatively, while those for the Role-Physical domain were significantly lower, indicating reduced physical activity during the 4 weeks following surgery. In comparison to the Finnish reference RAND-36 scores, scores at 4 weeks were significantly higher for the Mental Health domain (MC group, p<0.001 and 3D-LC group, p=0.001) whilst scores were significantly lower in four other domains: Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, Bodily Pain and Role-Physical. This study shows, for the first time using the RAND-36-Item Health Survey, relatively similar short-term outcomes in patients 4 weeks following cholecystectomy by 3D-LC and MC. Although scores for three RAND-36 domains were significantly higher postoperatively, indicating a significantly positive change in quality of life, a longer follow-up after cholecystectomy is needed for final conclusions to be drawn.

Three-dimensional laparoscopy (3D-Lap) is a recent innovation in surgery. The 3D-Lap is rarely used in cholecystectomy (3D-LC) and there are no prospective studies assessing advantages and disadvantages of 3D-LC versus minilaparotomy (MC) in cholecystectomy. This was a prospective clinical study conducted in the Kuopio University Hospital, including 200 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who were randomized into 3D-LC (n=112) or MC (n=88) groups. The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score and number of analgesic doses (NAD) following surgery were documented. Similar low postoperative pain scores were reported in the 3D-LC and MC groups during the first hours following surgery, although the 3D-LC patients reported lower NRS pain score (p<0.05) one hour postoperatively. Interestingly, the 3D-LC patients showed significantly less pain 24 hours following surgery, the mean of NRS of 0-10 score at rest being 1.2 in the 3D-LC group versus 2.2 in the MC group (p<0.001), and the pain at the quick movement/coughing, the mean NRS being 2.9 in the 3D-LC group versus 3.6 in the MC group (p=0.05). The 3D-LC patients reported significantly lower pain scores 24 hours postoperatively than MC patients. However, the patient experience of pain depends on many factors and our results suggest that both 3D-LC and MC are safe and efficient techniques for cholecystectomy.

In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25–30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic intervention, or gallstone colic) or mortality within 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint from 8% in the interval group to 1% in the same-admission group. Safety endpoints included bile duct leakage and other complications necessitating re-intervention. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN72764151, and is complete. Between Dec 22, 2010, and Aug 19, 2013, 266 inpatients from 23 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to interval cholecystectomy (n=137) or same-admission cholecystectomy (n=129). One patient from each group was excluded from the final analyses, because of an incorrect diagnosis of pancreatitis in one patient (in the interval group) and discontinued follow-up in the other (in the same-admission group). The primary endpoint occurred in 23 (17%) of 136 patients in the interval group and in six (5%) of 128 patients in the same-admission group (risk ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·12–0·66; p=0·002). Safety endpoints occurred in four patients: one case of bile duct leakage and one case of postoperative bleeding in each group. All of these were serious adverse events and were judged to be treatment related, but none led to death. Compared with interval cholecystectomy, same-admission cholecystectomy reduced the rate of recurrent gallstone-related complications in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, with a very low risk of cholecystectomy-related complications. Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation.

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC) with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (pre-ERCP+LC) for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.MethodsAn electronic search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 1 July 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LCBDE+LC versus pre-ERCP+LC were included. The common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate, postoperative bile leakage, postoperative pancreatitis, morbidity, mortality, and overall hospital stay were analyzed.ResultsTwelve RCTs involving 1545 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 12 RCTs, seven confirmed and five did not confirm CBD stones preoperatively. The meta-analysis showed a significantly higher CBD stone clearance rate for pre-ERCP+LC than LCBDE+LC. A similar result was found in the subgroup analysis of patients with confirmed CBD stones. A significantly lower postoperative bile leakage rate was found for pre-ERCP+LC than LCBDE+LC in all 12 RCTs and in the subgroup of patients with confirmed CBD stones. However, a significantly higher rate of pancreatitis was found in pre-ERCP+LC and in the subgroup of patients with confirmed CBD stones. LCBDE+LC was superior to pre-ERCP+LC in terms of the overall hospital stay. No significant differences were found in morbidity or mortality.ConclusionsPre-ERCP+LC is associated with a higher CBD stone clearance rate, lower postoperative bile leakage rate, and higher rate of pancreatitis. LCBDE+LC might help to shorten the hospital stay. Further studies on this topic are recommended.

With severely inflamed gallbladders, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be difficult and may require procedures like subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Few studies exist comparing SC and total cholecystectomy (TC) in the setting of severe biliary inflammation. This meta-analysis aims to compare SC and TC for difficult gallbladders. Medline-OVID, Embase-OVID, and Cinahl were searched including only studies comparing SC to TC for difficult gallbladders. Primary outcome was CBD injury. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, duodenal injury, retained stone, bleeding, intraabdominal collection, wound infection, reoperation, and mortality. Ten studies were included. Compared to TC, SC significantly lowered the risk for CBD injury (0 ​% vs. 1.6 ​%, RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.10–0.87) but increased risk of bile leaks (RR 3.5, 95%CI 1.79–6.84), postoperative ERCP (RR 2.86, 95%CI 1.53–5.35), intraabdominal collections (RR 2.55, 95%CI 1.32–4.93), and reoperation (RR 2.92, 95%CI 1.14–7.47). SC is a reasonable alternative to difficult gallbladders that may decrease the risk of CBD injuries. Knowing both approaches is crucial to manage the difficult gallbladder while minimizing harm. Further studies are needed to understand the value of SC for difficult cholecystectomy. [Display omitted] •First SRMA to compare subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) and total cholecystectomy (TC) specifically in difficult gallbladders.•SC may be associated with higher morbidity however associated with a decreased risk of common bile duct injuries.•SC is an alternative approach to difficult gallbladders that may reduce the risk of common bile duct injuries.

IntroductionInformed consent is essential in ensuring patients’ understanding of their medical condition, treatment, and potential risks. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of utilizing a video consent compared to standard consent for patient knowledge and satisfaction in selected general surgical procedures.Methods and proceduresWe included 118 patients undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and fundoplication at two hospitals in Omaha, NE. Patients were randomized to either a standard consent or a video consent. Outcomes included a pretest and posttest objective knowledge assessment of their procedure, as well as a satisfaction survey which was completed immediately after consent and following discharge. Given the pre-post design, a linear mixed-effect model was estimated for both outcomes. A two-way interaction effect was of primary interest to assess whether pre-to-post change in the outcome differed between patients randomized to standard or video consent.ResultsBaseline characteristics were mostly similar between groups except for patient sex, p = 0.041. Both groups showed a statistically significant increase in knowledge from pretest to posttest (standard group: 0.25, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.51, p = 0.048; video group: 0.68, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.00, p < 0.001), with the video group showing significantly greater change (interaction p = 0.043) indicating that incorporating a video into the consent process resulted in a better improvement in patient’s knowledge of the proposed procedure. Further, both groups showed a decrease in satisfaction post-discharge, but no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of decrease between the groups (interaction p = 0.309).ConclusionVideo consent lead to a significant improvement in a patient’s knowledge of the proposed treatment. Although the patient satisfaction survey didn’t show a significant difference, it did show a trend. We propose incorporating videos into the consent process for routine general surgical procedures.

Oxidative stress biomarker superoxide dismutase (SOD1) plasma levels in operated gallstone patients versus cancer patients are unknown. In addition, the number of analgesic doses during the first 24 h postoperatively (NAD ) in gallstone patients operated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or minicholecystectomy (MC) is unreported. The aim of the study was to determine a correlation between the plasma SOD1 levels in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients. Initially, 114 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into LC (n=54) or MC (n=60) groups. The plasma levels of the SOD1 marker were measured just before, immediately after (POP1) and 6 h after the operation (POP2). The median plasma SOD1 levels preoperatively and following surgery in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients were statistically insignificant (p=0.90, p=0.88, p=0.21, respectively). The median plasma levels of SOD1 increased immediately after operation (POP1) and the postoperative elevation between the preoperative (PRE) and the POP1 values in the SOD1 marker were statistically significant (p=0.027). Then the median plasma levels of SOD1 marker decreased 6 h postoperatively (POP2) and the decrease between the POP1 and POP2 values in the SOD1 marker were statistically highly significant (p<0.001). There is a highly significant inverse correlation between the individual values of the NAD and plasma SOD1 values postoperatively in LC and MC patients (r=-0.335, p=0.011). The plasma SOD1 levels preoperatively and following surgery in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients were quite similar. Cholecystectomy patients with enhanced levels of SOD1 appeared to have significantly lower number of analgesic oxycodone doses during the first 24 h postoperatively (NAD ).