Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Trabectedin is reported to be particularly effective against translocation-related sarcoma. Recently, a randomized phase 2 study in patients with translocation-related sarcomas unresponsive or intolerable to standard chemotherapy was conducted, which showed clinical benefit of trabectedin compared with best supportive care (BSC). Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMCS) and Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) are very rare malignant soft tissue sarcomas, and are associated with translocations resulting in fusion genes. In addition, the previous in vivo data showed that trabectedin affect tumor necrosis and reduction in vascularization in a xenograft model of a human high-grade chondrosarcoma. The aim of the present analysis was to clarify the efficacy of trabectedin for EMCS and MCS subjects in the randomized phase 2 study. Methods Five subjects with EMCS and MCS received trabectedin treatment in the randomized phase 2 study. Three MCS subjects were allocated to the BSC group. Objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by central radiology imaging review. Results The median follow-up time of the randomized phase 2 study was 22.7 months, and one subject with MCS was still receiving trabectedin treatment at the final data cutoff. The median PFS was 12.5 months (95 % CI: 7.4–not reached) in the trabectedin group, while 1.0 months (95 % CI: 0.3–1.0 months) in MCS subjects of the BSC group. The six-month progression-free rate was 100 % in the trabectedin group. One subject with MCS showed partial response, and the others in the trabectedin group showed stable disease. Overall survival of EMCS and MCS subjects was 26.4 months (range, 10.4–26.4 months) in the trabectedin group. At the final data cutoff, two of five subjects were still alive. Conclusions This sub-analysis shows that trabectedin is effective for patients with EMCS and MCS compared with BSC. The efficacy results were better than previously reported data of TRS. These facts suggest that trabectedin become an important choice of treatment for patients with advanced EMCS or MCS who failed or were intolerable to standard chemotherapy. Trial registration The randomized phase 2 study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-121850 (May 31, 2012).

Introduction. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival of patients with limb chondrosarcomas. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database was used to identify patients diagnosed with chondrosarcomas, from which data was extracted from 18 registries in the United States between 1973 and 2016. A total of 813 patients were selected from the database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models on the training group to identify independent prognostic factors and construct a nomogram to predict the 3- and 5-year survival probability of patients with limb chondrosarcomas. The predictive values were compared using concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration plots. Results. All 813 patients were randomly divided into a training group (n=572) and a validation group (n=241). After univariate and multivariate Cox regression, a nomogram was constructed based on a new model containing the predictive variables of age, site, grade, tumor size, histology, stage, and use of surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. The prediction model provided excellent C-indexes (0.86 and 0.77 in the training and validation groups, respectively). The good discrimination and calibration of the nomograms were demonstrated for both the training and validation groups. Conclusions. The nomograms precisely and individually predict the overall survival of patients with limb chondrosarcomas and could assist personalized prognostic evaluation and individualized clinical decision-making.

The research retrospectively analyzed cases of spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma involving patients who received treatment at the two hospitals between 2001 and 2023. Among the 48 patients studied (39 chordoma and 9 chondrosarcoma cases), the average age was 53.9 ± 15.8 years, with a range of 17 to 86 years. Out of these patients, 43 underwent excision surgery and were categorized based on tumor margin into negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) margin ( n  = 14) and macroscopically positive (R2) margin ( n  = 29) groups. The mean overall survival (OS) for R0/R1 and R2 groups was 156.5 ± 19.3 and 79.2 ± 11.9 months, respectively ( p value = 0.012). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for R0/R1 and R2 was 112.9 ± 24.4 and 25.5 ± 5.5 months ( p value < 0.001). The study showed that regardless of whether patients in the R0/R1 or R2 groups received radiation therapy (RT) or not, there was no significant improvement in OS or PFS. Specifically, the OS and PFS for the RT only group were 75.9 ± 16.6 and 73.3 ± 18.0 months. In conclusion, the recommended treatment approach for spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma remains en bloc resection surgery with an appropriate margin. Patients who are unsuitable for or decline surgery may find a beneficial disease control rate with traditional external beam photon/proton therapy.

Introduction Spinal chondrosarcoma exhibits higher invasiveness and a worse prognosis compared to chondrosarcoma in the extremities. The prognosis and therapeutic plan vary greatly among different pathological subtypes of chondrosarcoma. This study aimed to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics, molecular features, therapeutic effects, and prognostic factors among the subtypes of chondrosarcoma in the spine. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 205 patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. The clinical features and immunohistochemical (IHC) markers were compared among the pathological subtypes of chondrosarcoma grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS), dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DCS), and clear cell chondrosarcoma (CCCS). Chondrosarcoma grade 1/2/3 are collectively referred to as conventional chondrosarcoma (CCS) for multivariate survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS were identified in CCS and MCS. Results MCS patients were younger than the other subtypes. Patients with chondrosarcoma grade 1/2 had better OS than those with chondrosarcoma grade 3, MCS and DCS, while only chondrosarcoma grade 1 patients showed better RFS than chondrosarcoma grade 2/3, MCS and DCS patients. Ki-67 index was higher in chondrosarcoma grade 3, MCS and DCS than chondrosarcoma grade 1/2. The comparison of IHC markers further highlighted the overexpression of P53/MDM2 in MCS and DCS. Gross total resection, including en-bloc and piecemeal resection, significantly improved OS and RFS for CCS patients, while only en-bloc resection significantly improved the prognosis of MCS patients. Chemotherapy appeared to be important for the OS of MCS patients. Conclusion P53/MDM2 pathway was upregulated in MCS and DCS compared to chondrosarcoma grade 1/2. Radical tumor resection is crucial for the treatment of spinal chondrosarcoma, while MCS patients require further comprehensive treatments perioperatively.

Chondrosarcomas are rare cartilaginous neoplasms with limited treatment options. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (m IDH1/2 ) mutations occur in 65% of chondrosarcomas. Here we report safety and efficacy of olutasidenib, an mIDH1 inhibitor, evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic m IDH1 chondrosarcoma (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03684811). The primary endpoint was objective response rate by tumor evaluation; secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free and overall survival. Patients received olutasidenib 150 mg twice daily. Twenty-three patients were enrolled; 16 were diagnosed with conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS). Median age was 57 (range, 30-71) years. In 21 response-evaluable patients, 11 (52%) had stable disease, 8 (38%) had progressive disease, and 2 (10%) were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.0 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.7, 4.7); median overall survival was 16.0 months (95%CI: 7.7, not reached). Among patients with cCS, 10 (63%) had stable disease; 6 (38%) had progressive disease; mPFS was 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7, 5.1). Median overall survival in cCS patients was 19.0 months (95% CI: 7.7, not reached). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported during the study. Olutasidenib was well tolerated and conferred disease control in cCS. Study limitations include open-label design and low patient sample due to rarity of cCS. Chondrosarcomas are rare cartilaginous neoplasms with limited treatment options. Here this trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of olutasidenib (mIDH1 inhibitor) on 23 patients with locally advanced or metastatic mIDH1 chondrosarcoma.

Background Though relatively rare, bone tumors significantly impact patient health and treatment outcomes. Objective This systematic review analyzes the incidence, types, survival rates, and risk factors associated with bone tumors, including both benign and malignant forms. Methods This systematic review was conducted using the keywords “bone tumors,” “epidemiology,” “benign bone tumors,” “malignant bone tumors,” “osteosarcoma,” “Ewing sarcoma,” “chondrosarcoma,” “risk factors,” and “survival” in electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2024. The search strategy was based on the PRISMA statement. Finally, 9 articles were selected for inclusion in the study. Results The systematic review highlights that primary bone tumors can be classified into benign and malignant types, with osteosarcoma being the most prevalent malignant form, particularly among adolescents and young adults. The epidemiology of bone tumors is influenced by factors such as age, gender, geographic location, and genetic predispositions. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have improved the detection of these tumors, contributing to an increasing recognition of their prevalence. Data shows that the limited-duration prevalence of malignant bone tumors has increased significantly. This increase is from 0.00069% in 2000 to 0.00749% in 2018, indicating an increasing recognition and diagnosis of these rare tumors over time. Survival rates vary significantly by tumor type, with approximately 50–60% for osteosarcoma and around 70% for Ewing’s sarcoma, though these rates decrease with metastasis. Key risk factors identified include genetic predispositions such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome and TP53 mutations, environmental exposures like radiation, and growth patterns related to height. Conclusion The review highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment intervention, as survival rates are significantly better for patients with localized disease compared to those with metastatic conditions. The observed variations in survival rates across different tumor types underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies. Key risk factors include genetic predispositions and environmental exposures, highlighting the need for targeted screening and ongoing research to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies.

Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series. Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores. 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10-85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7-182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%). Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma.

Purpose Periosteal chondrosarcoma (PCS) is the rarest subtype of chondrosarcoma and is recognized as a low-grade malignant tumour, reported to have an 88% ten year overall survival rate. The relationship between surgical margins and clinical outcome is inconsistent; some authors claim that PCS can be successfully treated with marginal resection and others report more local recurrence and distant metastasis with marginal compared to wide resection. This study was intended to report the treatment and prognosis of localized PCS patients from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database and to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationship between surgical margins and rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and mortality. Methods Twenty-three patients with pathologically-diagnosed PCS between 2006 and 2022 from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 105 studies found through a systematic search using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, nine studies were ultimately included. Results The local recurrence rate after R0 resection was 2.5% (3/118 patients) and after R1 resection was 33.3% (11/33 patients) ( p  < 0.001). The distant metastasis rate in the R0 resection group was 5.9% (7/118 patients) and in the R1 resection group was 27.3% (9/33 patients) ( p  = 0.010). Mortality following R0 resection was 4.2% (5/118 patients) but after R1 resection was 18.2% (6/33 patients) ( p  = 0.040). Conclusion Wide resection may be necessary for localized PCS to prevent local recurrence and distant metastasis and improve survival.

IntroductionThe management of spinal sarcomas is complex, given their widespread involvement and high recurrence rates. Despite consensus on the need for a multidisciplinary approach with surgery at its core, there is a lack of definitive guidelines for clinical decision-making. This study examines a case series of primary spinal sarcomas, focusing on the surgical strategies, clinical results, and survival data to inform and guide therapeutic practices.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical resection for primary spinal sarcomas between 2005 and 2022. The study focused on gathering data on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative complications, overall hospital stay, and mortality within 90 days post-surgery.ResultsThe study included 14 patients with a primary diagnosis of spinal sarcoma, with an average age of 48.6 ± 12.6 years. Chondrosarcoma emerged as the most common tumor type, representing 57.1% of cases, followed by Ewing sarcoma at 35.7%, and synovial sarcoma at 7.1%. Patients with chondrosarcoma were treated with en-bloc resection, while the patient with synovial sarcoma underwent intra-lesional excision and those with Ewing sarcoma received decompression and tumor debulking. Postoperative assessments revealed significant improvements in neurological conditions. Notably, functional status as measured by the Karnofski Performance Index (KPI), improved substantially post-surgery (from 61.4 to 80.0%) The mean follow-up was 34.9 ± 9.2 months. During this time period one patient experienced fatal bleeding after en-bloc resection complications involving the vena cava. None of the patient needed further surgery.ConclusionsOur 16-year study offers vital insights into managing primary spinal sarcomas, showcasing the effectiveness of surgical intervention, particularly en-bloc resection. Despite their rarity and complexity, our multidisciplinary treatment approach yields improved outcomes and highlights the potential for refined surgical strategies to become standardized care in this challenging domain.

Background Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is an extremely rare subtype of sarcoma characterized by NR4A3 gene rearrangement. Despite being considered slowly progressive sarcomas, EMCs tend to have local recurrences and distant metastases in the late stages. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of EMCs, especially the effect of (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy on localized EMCs and chemotherapy on advanced-stage EMCs. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 171 patients pathologically diagnosed with EMCs between 2002 and 2022 using the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry Database. Results Disease-specific survival was significantly shorter in the group with distant metastasis at presentation ( n  = 29) than in the group without ( n  = 142) (5-year disease-specific survival, 75.8% [95% CI: 54.7–89.1] vs. 91.3% [95% CI: 83.0-95.8]; p  = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that an R1 or R2 surgical margin was a risk factor for unfavorable local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 4.76 [95% CI: 1.72–13.15]; p  = 0.003). No association was found between (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy and local recurrence rates. With respect to disease-specific survival, the tumor site of the trunk (HR 6.28 [95% CI: 1.30-30.49]; p  = 0.023) and larger size (HR 1.18 [95% CI: 1.06–1.33]; p  = 0.004) were risk factors for unfavorable disease-specific survival. No association was found between (neo)adjuvant, or advanced-stage chemotherapy and disease-specific survival rates. Conclusions Patients with distant metastases at presentation had significantly shorter survival rates than those without. Wide resection is mandatory to reduce the risk of local recurrence of localized EMCs, and the local control effect of (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy is limited. Chemotherapy has a limited effect on improving survival.