Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective: To analyse the risk of clinical chromosomal abnormalities in foetuses with umbilical cord cysts. Methods: Data from all genetic assays that were performed as part of invasive prenatal diagnoses of umbilical cord cysts between October 2014 and June 2021 were retrospectively collected from Guangdong Women and Children Hospital. We compared the differences in genetic assay findings in isolated and nonisolated umbilical cord cyst cohorts. Results: A total of 49 singleton pregnancies and 2 foetuses that were one of the cotwins in monochorionic twin pregnancies were enrolled in the cohort; 20 isolated and 31 nonisolated umbilical cord cysts were identified in the cohort. One foetus (5%, 1/20) in the isolated umbilical cord cyst group showed chromosomal abnormalities and 17p12 microduplication. Twelve cases (38.7%, 12/31) of chromosomal abnormalities, including seven cases of trisomy 18, two cases of trisomy 13 and three cases of microdeletion, were identified in the nonisolated umbilical cord cyst group. The incidences of chromosomal abnormalities between the two groups were significantly different (1/20, 5% vs 13/31, 38.7%, p=0.003). There was no relative pathological medical exome sequencing finding in the three foetuses suffering from nonisolated umbilical cord cysts whose parents chose to undergo chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and medical exome sequencing. Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the value of CMA in foetuses with umbilical cord cysts and suggested that copy number variants (CNVs) may be the basic genetic aetiological factors that should be considered for diagnostic evaluation. We recommended CMA as a basic genetic evaluation in cases of umbilical cord cysts, especially in nonisolated cases. Keywords: chromosomal microarray analyses, CMA, umbilical cord cyst, G banding karyotype

Advanced genomic tests in pregnancy, such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), provide higher detection rates yet often produce probabilistic and uncertain information. This study aimed to understand how the most knowledgeable patients, i.e., pregnant genetic counselors, act in their own pregnancies, thereby gaining insight into the impact of patients’ knowledge on the diagnostic process. Seventeen interviews were conducted with Israeli genetic counselors, either pregnant or up to 2 years post-pregnancy. A third of the participants chose not to have CMA while two thirds underwent it despite no detected abnormalities. Although knowledge was the main motivation, counselors varied in the desired degree of information. Two thirds of those opting for CMA wished to have all findings identified whereas roughly one third asked for a targeted platform seeking to avoid uncertain results. Counselors were not quick to adopt new tests such as whole-exome sequencing. Being knowledgeable was described as promoting a sense of control yet also being a source of stress and moral dilemmas. While the basic premise of informed consent is crucial, it does not always make things easier for educated patients. Consequently, raising levels of patient knowledge is only a limited step forward in the search for best practice.

Especially, mosaicism for tetrasomy 18p is even rare. Because of a very limited number of cases, the phenotypic spectrum of mosaic tetrasomy 18p, the complications, and prognosis are unknown. [...]she could sit independently at 15 months old. At last, the two cell lines, including 47, XX,+i(18)(p10)/46, XX, are formed. [...]the patient had features not fully consistent with the tetrasomy 18p phenotype. Except for small ears, bilateral internal strabismus, and microcephaly, she had less craniofacial characteristic features for tetrasomy 18p. [...]we suspect that the patients with mosaic tetrasomy 18p might present variable phenotypic features ranging from an apparently normal phenotype to multiple abnormalities. Among them, five genes including TGIF1, LAMA1, PIEZO2, AFG3L2, and MC2R are listed in the Developmental Disorders Genotype-Phenotype Database (DDG2P) (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/ddd#ddgenes). [...]the developmental delay in the patient might be associated with these five genes. [...]IMPA2 gene (605922), a strong candidate gene for bipolar disorder, might be responsible for aggressive behavior reported in tetrasomy 18p patients although the case is too young to present behavioral regulation problems. SNP microarray has been a valuable diagnostic tool for genetic testing of genome-wide copy number changes. [4] In this study, the size and copy number of the duplication region were determined by SNP microarray. [...]accurate diagnosis of the tetrasomy 18p syndrome, especially for the mosaic tetrasomy 18p, requires the use of combined techniques, such as karyotyping, SNP, and FISH.

Background Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is extensively used in the detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13, which is promptly becoming a common clinical practice. Concerned about the clinical application of non‐invasive detection of the fetal autosomal duplications or deletion. Case Presentation A 34‐year‐old, healthy pregnant woman was referred to the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University. The ultrasound examination indicates that low‐lying placenta, the fetus has a left ventricular bright spot and small amount of pericardial effusion. NIPT was chosen to further screen for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. NIPT results indicated an approximately 18 Mb deletion, which was verified by prenatal diagnosis. The chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) result showed about 19.2 Mb deletions in 21q11.2‐q22.11. The karyotype analysis result showed 46,XN,del(21)(q11.2q22.1). Prenatal diagnosis was consistent with NIPT results, and the paternal karyotype revealed no obvious abnormalities. Conclusion In this study, we successfully detected and diagnosed deletions of large fragments in chromosome 21 in a fetus using NIPT. This indicates that NIPT can provide effective genetic information for detecting fetal subchromosomal deletions/duplications.

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Methods This retrospective cohort analysis included all pregnancies with normal ultrasound undergoing CMA testing between the years 2010 and 2016. We calculated the rate of detection of clinically significant CMA findings in the whole cohort and according to various indications. Results Of 5541 CMA analyses, clinically significant findings were yielded in 78 cases (1.4%). Of these, 31 (39.7%) variants could have theoretically been detected by karyotyping (e.g., sized above 10 Mb), and 28 (35.9%) by noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at five common aneuploidies. Of the 47 submicroscopic findings detectable by CMA only, the majority (37 cases, 78.7%) represented known recurrent syndromes. Detection of clinically significant CMA findings in women with no indication for invasive testing was 0.76% (21/2752), which was significantly lower compared with 1.8% in advanced maternal age group (41/2336), 2.8% in abnormal biochemical serum screening (6/211), and 4.1% (10/242) in fetuses with sonographic soft markers. Conclusion Clinically significant CMA aberrations are detected in 1 of 71 pregnancies with normal ultrasound, and in 1 of 131 women with no indication for invasive testing. Thus, CMA might be recommended a first-tier test in pregnancies with normal ultrasound.

Genetic disorders are one of the leading causes of infant mortality and are frequent in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Rapid genome-wide sequencing (GWS; whole genome or exome sequencing (ES)), due to its diagnostic capabilities and immediate impacts on medical management, is becoming an appealing testing option in the NICU setting. RAPIDOMICS was a trio-based rapid ES pilot study of 25 babies with suspected genetic disorders in the BC Women’s Hospital NICU. ES and bioinformatic analysis were performed after careful patient ascertainment. Trio analysis was performed using an in-house pipeline reporting variants in known disease-causing genes. Variants interpreted by the research team as definitely or possibly causal of the infant’s phenotype were Sanger validated in a clinical laboratory. The average time to preliminary diagnosis was 7.2 days. Sanger validation was pursued in 15 patients for 13 autosomal dominant and 2 autosomal recessive disorders, with an overall diagnostic rate (partial or complete) of 60%.Conclusion: In total, 72% of patients enrolled had a genomic diagnosis achieved through ES, multi-gene panel testing or chromosomal microarray analysis. Among these, there was an 83% rate of significant and immediate impact on medical decision-making directly related to new knowledge of the diagnosis. Health service implementation challenges and successes are discussed.What is Known:• Rapid genome-wide sequencing in the neonatal intensive care setting has a greater diagnostic hit rate and impact on medical management than conventional genetic testing. However, the impact of consultation with genetics and patient ascertainment requires further investigation.What is New:• This study demonstrates the importance of genetic consultation and careful patient selection prior to pursuing exome sequencing (ES).• In total, 15/25 (60%) patients achieved a diagnosis through ES and 18/25 (72%) through ES, multi-gene panel testing or chromosomal microarray analysis with 83% of those having immediate effects on medical management.

Background and objectives Congenital heart defect (CHD) is one of the most common birth defects. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with different types of CHD, aiming to assist genetic counseling and clinical decision-making. Methods In this study, 642 fetuses with CHD were enrolled from a single center over a six-year period (2017–2022). Both conventional karyotyping and CMA were performed simultaneously on these fetuses. Results The diagnostic yield of CMA in fetuses with CHD in our study was 15.3% (98/642). Our findings revealed a significant increase in the diagnostic yield of CMA compared to karyotyping in fetuses with CHD. Among CHD subgroups, the diagnostic yields were high in complex CHD (34.9%), conotruncal defects (28.6%), right ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (RVOTO) (25.9%), atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) (25.0%) and left ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (LVOTO) (24.1%), while those in other CHD (10.6%) and septal defects (10.9%) were relatively low. The overall detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the non-isolated CHD group compared to the isolated CHD group (33.1% vs. 9.9%, P  < 0.0001). Interestingly, numerical chromosomal abnormalities were more likely to occur in the non-isolated CHD group than in the isolated CHD group (20.3% vs. 2.0%, P  < 0.0001). The rate of termination of pregnancy (TOP)/Still birth in the non-isolated CHD group was significantly higher than that in the isolated CHD group (40.5% vs. 20.6%, P  < 0.0001). Compared to the isolated CHD group, the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the group of CHD with soft markers (35.6% vs. 9.9%, P  < 0.0001) and in the group of CHD with additional structural anomalies (36.1% vs. 9.9%, P  < 0.0001). Conclusions CMA is a reliable and high-resolution technique that should be recommended as the front-line test for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with CHD. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities varies greatly among different subgroups of CHD, and special attention should be given to prenatal non-isolated cases of CHD, especially those accompanied by additional structural anomalies or soft markers.

To investigate the incidence and clinical significance of chromosomal mosaicism (CM) in prenatal diagnosis by G‐banding karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). This is a single‐centre retrospective study of invasive prenatal diagnosis for CM. From 5758 karyotyping results and 6066 CMA results, 104 foetal cases with CM were selected and analysed further. In total, 50% (52/104) of foetal cases with CM were affected by ultrasound‐detectable phenotypes. Regardless of whether they were singleton or twin pregnancies, isolated structural defects in one system (51.35%, 19/37 in singletons; 86.67%, 13/15 in twins) and a single soft marker (18.92%, 7/37 in singletons; 13.33%, 2/15 in twins) were the most common ultrasound anomalies. Mosaic autosomal trisomy (19.23%, 20/104) was the most frequent type, and its rate was higher in phenotypic foetuses (28.85%, 15/52) than in non‐phenotypic foetuses (9.62%, 5/52). There was no difference in mosaic fractions between phenotypic and non‐phenotypic foetuses based on specimen sources or overall classification. Discordant mosaic results were observed in 16 cases (15.38%, 16/104) from different specimens or different testing methods. Genetic counselling and clinical management regarding CM in prenatal diagnosis remain challenging due to the variable phenotypes and unclear significance. Greater caution should be used in prenatal counselling, and more comprehensive assays involving serial ultrasound examinations, different specimens or testing methods verifications and follow‐up should be applied.

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the detection efficiency and clinical application value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for foetal copy number variants (CNVs) in clinical samples from 39,002 prospective cases. Methods A total of 39,002 pregnant women who received NIPT by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a sequencing depth of 6 M reads in our centre from January 2018 to April 2020 were enrolled. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was further used to diagnose suspected chromosomal aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication for consistency assessment. Results A total of 473 pregnancies (1.213%) were positive for clinically significant foetal chromosome abnormalities by NIPT. This group comprised 99 trisomy 21 (T21, 0.254%), 30 trisomy 18 (T18, 0.077%), 25 trisomy 13 (T13, 0.064%), 155 sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA, 0.398%), 69 rare trisomy (0.177%), and 95 microdeletion/microduplication syndrome (MMS, 0.244%) cases. Based on follow-up tests, the positive predictive values (PPVs) for the T21, T18, T13, SCA, rare trisomy, and MMS cases were calculated to be 88.89%, 53.33%, 20.00%, 40.22%, 4.88%, and 49.02%, respectively. In addition, the PPVs of CNVs of < 5 Mb, 5–10 Mb, and > 10 Mb were 54.55%, 38.46%, and 40.00%, respectively. Among the 95 cases with suspected CNVs, 25 were diagnosed as true positive and 26 cases as false positive; follow-up prenatal diagnosis by CMA was not performed for 44 cases. Moreover, among the 25 true positive cases, 10 were pathogenic, 3 were likely pathogenic, and 12 were of uncertain significance. Conclusion NIPT is not only suitable for screening T21, T18, T13, and SCA but also has potential significance for CNV detection. As combined with ultrasound, extended NIPT is effective for screening MMS. However, NIPT should not be recommended for whole-chromosome aneuploidy screening.

Background Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging cytogenetic method for concurrently detecting structural variants (SVs) and copy number variants (CNVs). However, its clinical application in prenatal diagnosis remains underexplored. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical validity of OGM in prenatal diagnosis by comparing with two routine genetic testing methods: karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Both positive and negative cases detected by routine genetic methods were enrolled to evaluate the technical concordance of OGM and its capability to improve diagnostic rate in negative cases. The exclusion criteria were balanced centromeric translocations, mosaic cases with cellular fractions < 20%, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) < 25 Mb. All samples subjected to OGM testing were anonymized and analyzed blindly. The results from OGM were compared with those from routine genetic testing, and statistical analyses were performed to assess technical concordance and diagnostic rate. Results Of 217 samples (166 positive samples and 51 negative samples for routine genetic testing), all were successfully tested with OGM, including 2 umbilical cord blood samples, 4 chorionic villi samples, and 211 cultured amniotic fluid samples. Of the 207 reportable chromosomal aberrations from 166 positive samples, the blinded concordance between OGM and CMA, karyotyping, and combination of karyotyping plus CMA was 97.81%, 96.36%, and 97.10%, respectively. OGM missed six aberrations initially, including one LOH, two marker chromosomes, and three microdeletions. However, after reanalysis, its concordance improved to 100% with CMA and 99.03% with karyotyping plus CMA. OGM also diagnosed one additional case of a 3-kb deletion in 51 negative samples, improving the diagnostic rate by 1.96%. Moreover, OGM reclassified the pathogenicity of two microdeletions from pathogenic to uncertain significance in 2 positive cases. Furthermore, OGM clarified the diagnosis suspected by routine genetic testing and improved diagnostic accuracy in some cases. Conclusion As far as we know, this is the largest retrospective study on OGM in prenatal diagnosis, and it includes a broad range of sample types. The results showed that OGM exhibits high concordance among the tested methods and increases the diagnostic rate. Thus, OGM has the potential to become a first-line technique for prenatal diagnosis in the future.