Explore the vast range of titles available.

Advanced genomic tests in pregnancy, such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), provide higher detection rates yet often produce probabilistic and uncertain information. This study aimed to understand how the most knowledgeable patients, i.e., pregnant genetic counselors, act in their own pregnancies, thereby gaining insight into the impact of patients’ knowledge on the diagnostic process. Seventeen interviews were conducted with Israeli genetic counselors, either pregnant or up to 2 years post-pregnancy. A third of the participants chose not to have CMA while two thirds underwent it despite no detected abnormalities. Although knowledge was the main motivation, counselors varied in the desired degree of information. Two thirds of those opting for CMA wished to have all findings identified whereas roughly one third asked for a targeted platform seeking to avoid uncertain results. Counselors were not quick to adopt new tests such as whole-exome sequencing. Being knowledgeable was described as promoting a sense of control yet also being a source of stress and moral dilemmas. While the basic premise of informed consent is crucial, it does not always make things easier for educated patients. Consequently, raising levels of patient knowledge is only a limited step forward in the search for best practice.

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the detection efficiency and clinical application value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for foetal copy number variants (CNVs) in clinical samples from 39,002 prospective cases. Methods A total of 39,002 pregnant women who received NIPT by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a sequencing depth of 6 M reads in our centre from January 2018 to April 2020 were enrolled. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was further used to diagnose suspected chromosomal aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication for consistency assessment. Results A total of 473 pregnancies (1.213%) were positive for clinically significant foetal chromosome abnormalities by NIPT. This group comprised 99 trisomy 21 (T21, 0.254%), 30 trisomy 18 (T18, 0.077%), 25 trisomy 13 (T13, 0.064%), 155 sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA, 0.398%), 69 rare trisomy (0.177%), and 95 microdeletion/microduplication syndrome (MMS, 0.244%) cases. Based on follow-up tests, the positive predictive values (PPVs) for the T21, T18, T13, SCA, rare trisomy, and MMS cases were calculated to be 88.89%, 53.33%, 20.00%, 40.22%, 4.88%, and 49.02%, respectively. In addition, the PPVs of CNVs of < 5 Mb, 5–10 Mb, and > 10 Mb were 54.55%, 38.46%, and 40.00%, respectively. Among the 95 cases with suspected CNVs, 25 were diagnosed as true positive and 26 cases as false positive; follow-up prenatal diagnosis by CMA was not performed for 44 cases. Moreover, among the 25 true positive cases, 10 were pathogenic, 3 were likely pathogenic, and 12 were of uncertain significance. Conclusion NIPT is not only suitable for screening T21, T18, T13, and SCA but also has potential significance for CNV detection. As combined with ultrasound, extended NIPT is effective for screening MMS. However, NIPT should not be recommended for whole-chromosome aneuploidy screening.

Background Emerging studies suggest that low‐coverage massively parallel copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) more sensitive than chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detecting low-level mosaicism. However, a retrospective back-to-back comparison evaluating accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of CNV-seq compared with CMA is warranted. Methods A total of 72 mosaicism cases identified by karyotyping or CMA were recruited to the study. There were 67 mosaic samples co-analysed by CMA and CNV-seq, comprising 40 with sex chromosome aneuploidy, 22 with autosomal aneuploidy and 5 with large cryptic genomic rearrangements. Results Of the 67 positive mosaic cases, the levels of mosaicism defined by CNV-seq ranged from 6 to 92% compared to the ratio from 3 to 90% by karyotyping and 20% to 72% by CMA. CNV-seq not only identified all 43 chromosomal aneuploidies or large cryptic genomic rearrangements detected by CMA, but also provided a 34.88% (15/43) increased yield compared with CMA. The improved yield of mosaicism detection by CNV-seq was largely due to the ability to detect low level mosaicism below 20%. Conclusion In the context of prenatal diagnosis, CNV-seq identified additional and clinically significant mosaicism with enhanced resolution and increased sensitivity. This study provides strong evidence for applying CNV-seq as an alternative to CMA for detection of aneuploidy and mosaic variants.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of birth defects in humans. Genetic factors have been identified as an important contributor to the etiology of CHD. However, the underlying genetic causes in most individuals remain unclear. Here, 101 individuals with CHD and their unaffected parents were included in this study. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) as a first-tier clinical diagnostic tool was applied for all affected individuals, followed by trio-based whole exome sequencing (WES) of 76 probands and proband-only WES of 3 probands. We detected aneuploidies in 2 individuals (trisomy 21 and monosomy X), 21 pathogenic and likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) in 19 individuals, and pathogenic and likely pathogenic SNVs/InDels in 8 individuals. The combined genetic diagnostic yield was 28.7%, including 20.8% with chromosomal abnormalities and 7.9% with sequence-level variants. Eighteen CNVs in 17 individuals were associated with 13 recurrent chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication syndromes, the most common being 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic sequence-level variants were identified in 8 genes, including GATA6 , FLNA , KANSL1 , TRAF7, KAT6A , PKD1L1 , RIT1 , and SMAD6 . Trio sequencing facilitated the identification of pathogenic variation (55.6% were de novo missense variants). In individuals with extracardiac features, the overall detection rate was significantly higher (61.5%) than in individuals with isolated CHD (17.3%) ( P  = 4.6 × 10 − 3 ). Our study further emphasized the importance of combining CMA and trio-WES for clinical genetic testing of individuals with CHD. Trio-based WES should be part of the diagnostic algorithm.

To compare the frequency of copy-number variants (CNVs) of variable penetrance in low-risk and high-risk prenatal samples and postnatal samples. Two cohorts were categorized according to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) indication: group I, low-risk prenatal—women with uneventful pregnancy (control group); group II, high-risk prenatal—women whose fetuses had congenital malformations; and group III, postnatal—individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, or multiple congenital anomalies. CNVs were categorized based on clinical penetrance: (i) high (>40%), (ii) moderate (10–40%), and (iii) low (<10%). From 2013 to 2016, 21,594 CMAs were performed. The frequency of high-penetrance CNVs was 0.1% (21/15,215) in group I, 0.9% (26/2,791) in group II, and 2.6% (92/3,588) in group III. Moderate-penetrance CNV frequency was 0.3% (47/15,215), 0.6% (19/2,791), and 1.2% (46/3,588), respectively. These differences were statistically significant. The frequency of low-penetrance CNVs was not significantly different among groups: 0.6% (85/15,215), 0.9% (25/2,791), and 1.0% (35/3,588), respectively. High-penetrance CNVs might be a major factor in the overall heritability of developmental, intellectual, and structural anomalies. Low-penetrance CNV alone does not seem to contribute to these anomalies. These data may assist pre- and posttest CMA counseling.

Background With the development of whole-genome sequencing technology, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been applied gradually to screen chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications that cannot be detected by traditional karyotyping. However, in NIPT, some false positives and false negatives occur. This study aimed to investigate the applicability of extended NIPT (NIPT-PLUS) in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion/microduplication syndrome (MMS). Methods A total of 452 pregnancies that underwent prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), were screened by NIPT-PLUS from the peripheral blood sample of the pregnant women. The results of the two tested items were compared and analysed. Results Of the 452 cases, 335 (74.12%) had positive CMA results, and 117 (25.88%) had no abnormal results. A total of 86 cases of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were detected by CMA and NIPT-PLUS, with a detection rate of 96.51% (83/86). Among them, the detection rates of T18, T13; 47, XXY; 47, XXX and 47 XYY were 100%, and the detection rates of T21 and 45 XO were 96.55% and 90%, respectively. The detection sensitivity of rare chromosomal trisomy (RAT) was 80% (4/5). The positive predictive values of NIPT-PLUS for chromosome aneuploidy T21, T18 and T13 and for SCA and RAT were 90.32%, 87.50%, 25.00%, 88.89% and 50%, respectively. A total of 249 cases (74.32%) of chromosomal MMS were detected by CMA. The detection rate of NIPT-PLUS was 63.86% (159/249), and 90 cases (36.14%) were missed. The larger the MMS fragment, the higher the NIPT-PLUS detection sensitivity. In addition, most small fragments were of maternal origin. Conclusion The comparison between the CMA and NIPT-PLUS techniques shows that NIPT-PLUS has high sensitivity for detecting chromosomal aneuploidy and chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) with fragments > 5 M. However, the sensitivity of CNV for fragments < 5 M is low, and the missed detection rate is high. Additionally, confined placental mosaicism and foetal mosaicism are the key factors causing false negatives in NIPT-PLUS, while maternal chromosomal abnormalities and confined placental mosaicism are key contributors to false positives, so appropriate genetic counselling is especially important for pregnant women before and after NIPT-PLUS testing.

Background Karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are commonly used for prenatal diagnosis, however they have many disadvantages. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of CMA in the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies in southwest of China. Methods A total of 3336 samples of amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood from pregnant women with high-risk indicators at our center in southwest of China from June 2018 to January 2023 were included in the retrospective analysis. 3222 cases tested by CMA and karyotyping, 114 cases only tested by CMA. Results 3336 samples divided into 2911 cases with single and 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators. The aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) of 2911 cases with single high-risk indicator were 4.43% (129/2911) and 2.44% (71/2911) respectively; the aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs of 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators were 6.82% (29/425) and 2.12% (9/425) respectively. The rate of aneuploidy increased significantly with pregnancy age or NT value. The detection rate of aneuploidy on cases with AMA combined NT ≥ 2.5 mm was significantly higher than that in cases only with AMA ( p  < 0.001); the detection rate of aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs in cases with AMA combined NIPT high-risk were higher than that in cases only with AMA ( p  < 0.001, p  < 0.05). Conclusions The combined application of CMA and karyotyping were recommended in prenatal diagnosis for providing a scientific and accurate genetic diagnosis and improving the quality of prenatal genetic counseling.

Background: Copy number variants of uncertain significance (CNVus) from chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) presents unresolved challenges for clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, and patients. We performed a systematic reevaluation of reported CNVus and reanalysis of selected CNVus by whole genome sequencing (WGS) to assess the diagnostic value and clinical impact on CNVus reclassification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 5277 consecutive pediatric cases by CMA from the Yale Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory over a 13-year period. Reevaluation was performed on all reported CNVus following current ACMG/ClinGen guidelines. Reanalysis by WGS was applied to selected cases for reclassification of CNVus. Results: A total of 567 CNVus from 480 cases were reported, which accounted for 9.1% of pediatric cases. A total of 4 CNVus in 4 cases (0.8%, 4/480) were reclassified to pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (pCNVs/lpCNVs); while 23 CNVus in 23 cases (4.8%, 23/480) were reclassified to benign/likely benign CNVs (bCNVs/lbCNVs). The overall rate of reclassification was 5.6%. WGS performed on selected cases further defined breakpoints and ruled out additional causative genetic variants. Conclusions: The results from this study demonstrated the diagnostic value of periodic reevaluation of CNVus and reanalysis by WGS in an interval of 3–5 years and provided evidence to support standardized laboratory reevaluation and reanalysis.

The population of Israel is ethnically diverse, and individuals from different ethnic groups share specific genetic variations. These variations, which have been passed on from common ancestors, are usually reported in public databases as rare variants. Here, we aimed to identify ethnicity-based benign copy number variants (CNVs) and generate the first Israeli CNV database. We applied a data-mining approach to the results of 10,193 chromosomal microarray tests, of which 2150 tests were from individuals of 13 common ethnic backgrounds (n ≥ 10). We found 165 CNV regions (> 50 kbp) that are unique to specific ethnic groups (uCNVRs). The frequency of more than 19% of these uCNVRs is between 1 and 20% of the common ethnic origin, while their frequency in the overall cohort is between 0.5 and 1.6%. Of these 165 uCNVRs, 98 are reported as variants of unknown significance or as not available in dbVar; we postulate that these uCNVRs should be annotated as either \"likely benign\" or \"benign\". The ethnic-specific CNVs extracted in this study will allow geneticists to distinguish between relevant pathogenic genomic aberrations and benign ethnicity-related variations, thus preventing variant misinterpretation that may lead to unnecessary pregnancy terminations.

Background Copy number variants (CNVs) are an important source of normal and pathogenic genome variations. Unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCA) are either gains or losses or large genomic regions, but the affected person is not or only minimally clinically affected. CNVs and UBCA identified in prenatal cases need careful considerations and correct interpretation if those are harmless or harmful variants from the norm. Case presentation A 24-year-old, gravida 1, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results revealed a 12.4 Mb duplication from 10p11.2 to 10q11.2. GTG-banding karyotype analysis was performed on cultured amniocytes. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) on uncultured amniocytes was performed. Results Chromosomal GTG-banding of the cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(10)(p11.2q11.2). CMA detected a 12.5-Mb chromosomal duplication in the region of 10p11.23q11.21 (arr[GRCh37] 10p11.23q11.21(30,345,109_42,826,062) × 3). Conclusion The present report enlarges the known UBCA region 10p11.22-10q11.22 to 10p11.23-10q11.22. Also it highlights that an integration of prenatal ultrasound, NIPT, karyotype analysis, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal deletions/duplications.