Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and Objective Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone used for empirical and targeted therapy of a wide range of infections. Despite the increase in obesity prevalence, only very limited guidance is available on whether the ciprofloxacin dose needs to be adjusted when administered orally or intravenously in (morbidly) obese individuals. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of (morbid) obesity on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics after both oral and intravenous administration, to ultimately guide dosing in this population. Methods (Morbidly) obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery received ciprofloxacin either orally (500 mg; n  = 10) or intravenously (400 mg; n  = 10), while non-obese participants received semi-simultaneous oral dosing of 500 mg followed by intravenous dosing of 400 mg 3 h later ( n  = 8). All participants underwent rich sampling (11–17 samples) for 12 h after administration. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling and simulations were performed to evaluate ciprofloxacin exposure in plasma. Prior data from the literature were subsequently included in the model to explore exposure in soft tissue in obese and non-obese patients. Results Overall, 28 participants with body weights ranging from 57 to 212 kg were recruited. No significant influence of body weight on bioavailability, clearance or volume of distribution was identified (all p  > 0.01). Soft tissue concentrations were predicted to be lower in obese individuals despite similar plasma concentrations compared with non-obese individuals. Conclusion Based on plasma pharmacokinetics, we found no evidence of the influence of obesity on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters; therefore, ciprofloxacin dosages do not need to be increased routinely in obese individuals. In the treatment of infections in tissue where impaired ciprofloxacin penetration is anticipated, higher dosages may be required. Trial Registration Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR6058).

Inhaled antibacterial agents are used to manage chronic pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. However, established nebulized preparations impose a substantial time burden on patients. A dry powder formulation of ciprofloxacin for inhalation (ciprofloxacin DPI) has been developed using PulmoSphere™ (Novartis, Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) technology (administered using a T-326 inhaler) to maximize antibacterial activity and convenience. This study investigated the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of multiple-dose once-daily and twice-daily ciprofloxacin DPI in adults with CF. A Phase I, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study in patients with CF (median age 29.0 years [19–40]), stable pulmonary status, and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization. Sequential cohorts received ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg qd (1 capsule for inhalation; n = 6), 65 mg qd (2 capsules for inhalation; n = 6), or 32.5 mg (n = 6) bid for 7 days. Each group was placebo controlled. Twenty-five patients were enrolled (12 men; median age, 29.0 years [range, 19–40 years]; 6, 6, 6, and 7 patients in the ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg qd, 65 mg qd, and 32.5 mg bid and placebo groups, respectively). No serious treatment-emergent adverse events or clinically relevant changes in tolerability parameters, including lung function measurements, were reported. Twenty-one patients (ciprofloxacin, n = 17; placebo, n = 4) experienced 29 mild drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, including bitter taste (ciprofloxacin, 17 patients; placebo, 2) and bronchospasm (ciprofloxacin, 3; placebo, 2). Ciprofloxacin DPI was absorbed rapidly after inhalation. Systemic exposure to ciprofloxacin was low and comparable between single and multiple dosing in all 3 dose groups, suggesting an absence of substantial drug accumulation. The geometric mean AUCs after the last dose were 0.383, 1.472, and 0.781 mg · h/L with ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg qd, 65 mg qd, and 32.5 mg bid, respectively. The range of geometric mean t½ in plasma was 3.4 to 9.5 hours. Sputum concentrations of ciprofloxacin were high, with substantial variability. Geometric mean ciprofloxacin concentrations (%CV) in induced sputum were 57.7 (118.2), 177.5 (53.4), and 149.7 (249.7) mg/L 0.75 hours after the last dose of ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg qd, 65 mg qd, and 32.5 mg bid, respectively. Ciprofloxacin DPI was well tolerated, especially with respect to lung function, with minimal systemic exposure compared with data from previous studies of oral and intravenous administration, and with no apparent accumulation at steady state. Sputum ciprofloxacin concentrations above 100-times the minimum inhibitory concentration for P aeruginosa were detected. Ciprofloxacin DPI may be effectively delivered to the lungs at microbiologically active concentrations while minimizing the risk for systemic intolerabilities. Eudra clinical trial identifier: 2006-003690-26.

Background Although optimization of the fluoroquinolone dosage increases the efficacy of this class of drugs against bacterial infections, its impact on the emergence of resistance in commensal bacteria is unknown. Methods Six different 14-day dosages of oral ciprofloxacin were randomly assigned to 48 healthy volunteers. Individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters combining antibiotic exposure in plasma, saliva, and stool specimens and ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and mutant prevention concentrations against viridans group streptococci in the pharyngeal flora and Escherichia coli in the fecal flora were estimated. Their links with the emergence of resistance to nalidixic acid or ciprofloxacin in the fecal flora and to levofloxacin in the pharyngeal flora 7, 14, or 42 days after ciprofloxacin initiation were investigated. Results Resistance emerged in the fecal and pharyngeal flora of 25% and 33% of the subjects, respectively, mainly when local concentrations of ciprofloxacin were less than the MIC. No variable that integrated pharmacokinetic data and pharmacodynamic parameters was found to differ significantly between the subjects in whom resistance emerged and those in whom it did not. Probabilities of the emergence of resistance were not significantly different across the different antibiotic dosages. Conclusions Selection of resistant commensals during ciprofloxacin therapy is a frequent ecological side effect that is not preventable by dosage optimization. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT00190151.

Background Oral and intravenous formulations of ciprofloxacin have established efficacy and safety profiles in respiratory infections. A dry powder for inhalation (DPI) that uses Novartis’ PulmoSphere™ technology has been developed to deliver high concentrations of ciprofloxacin to the lung with low systemic exposure using a portable and convenient passive dry powder inhaler (Novartis’ T-326 inhaler). Objectives The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of ciprofloxacin DPI in healthy male subjects, with a secondary objective to investigate the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after ciprofloxacin DPI administration. Methods This was a phase I, single-dose, single-site, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted in the hospital setting. Subjects were followed up for safety for approximately 2 weeks. Six healthy male subjects, aged 27–42 years with no history of pulmonary disease, repeated bronchitis or respiratory allergies were enrolled. In randomized order and separated by a 1-week washout period, subjects inhaled a single dose of ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg or placebo from the T-326 inhaler. Primary safety parameters included vital signs, electrocardiogram, laboratory tests, adverse events and lung function (total specific resistance, thoracic gas volume and forced expiratory volume in 1 s). Plasma concentration–time data were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. Results Ciprofloxacin DPI was well tolerated with no clinically relevant adverse effects on lung function. Estimates of lung deposition derived from physiology-based pharmacokinetic modelling suggest that approximately 40 % of the total dose of ciprofloxacin DPI reached the trachea/bronchi and alveolar space. Systemic ciprofloxacin was detected soon after inhalation [peak concentration in plasma ( C max ) 56.42 μg/L, median time to C max 0.625 h], but total systemic exposure was minimal (area under the plasma concentration–time curve 354.4 μg·h/L). Terminal elimination half-life (9.5 h), apparent total clearance from plasma after non-intravenous administration (91.7 L/h) and apparent volume of distribution (1,262 L) data suggest that elimination from the respiratory tract was prolonged. Conclusions In healthy subjects, ciprofloxacin DPI was well tolerated, delivered ciprofloxacin to the lungs and resulted in minimal systemic exposure, allowing further investigation of its clinical use for the management of specific, chronic infections in pulmonary diseases.

Abstract Background: Reliable, reproducible deposition to the lung is a major prerequisite for the clinical use of inhaled drugs. Ciprofloxacin dry powder for inhalation (ciprofloxacin DPI; Bayer HealthCare AG, Leverkusen, Germany) is an antibacterial therapy in development using Novartis' PulmoSphere™ technology (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) for the targeted delivery of ciprofloxacin to the lung via a T-326 inhaler. Methods: This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single-dose ciprofloxacin DPI (32.5 mg [n=6] or 65 mg [n=6]) and matching placebo (n=4) in adult patients with cystic fibrosis and stable pulmonary status (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec ≥30%) who were colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Results: Peak sputum concentrations of 34.9 mg/L (range 2.03–229) and 376 mg/L (8.95–1283) for ciprofloxacin 32.5 mg and 65 mg, respectively, indicated targeting of ciprofloxacin DPI to the lung. This contrasted with low systemic exposure (peak plasma concentrations: 0.0790 mg/L [32.5 mg] and 0.182 mg/L [65 mg]). Single-dose ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg or 65 mg was well tolerated with similar incidences of adverse events across all groups. No deaths, discontinuations, treatment-related serious adverse events, or clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or lung function tests were reported. Conclusions: Lung targeting with high pulmonary concentrations of ciprofloxacin combined with low systemic exposure was confirmed. These results support further study of ciprofloxacin DPI as a potentially more convenient alternative to nebulized antibiotic solutions for managing chronic lung infections.

Abstract Background: Ciprofloxacin dry powder for inhalation (Ciprofloxacin DPI) is in development as long-term intermittent therapy to reduce the frequency of acute exacerbations in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) patients with respiratory bacterial pathogens. There is no approved therapy in this indication. Reliable, reproducible lung deposition is a prerequisite for inhaled drugs. Methods: In this phase I study, six patients with NCFB, six with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 12 healthy volunteers (HVs), received one dose of 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin DPI 32.5 mg to assess pulmonary drug deposition by quantitative scintigraphy. 81mKrypton ventilation scans were performed to map lung contours. Systemic exposure as mediated by absorption in the lung was measured using the charcoal block method. HVs ingested activated charcoal orally (20 g before and 2 × 10 g after inhalation) to block gastrointestinal absorption of drug swallowed during inhalation. Indirect determination of pulmonary drug deposition was based on plasma and urine pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Results: Scintigraphic data revealed high, reproducible lung deposition in all participants (intrapulmonary deposition relative to nominal dose, mean [standard deviation; range]: NCFB, 53% [11%; 38%–64%]; COPD, 51% [10%; 34%–61%]; HVs, 51% [7%; 40%–64%] to 53% [8%; 44%–70%]). Similar ratios of central-to-peripheral airway deposition were seen across groups. Systemic exposure to ciprofloxacin was low. Relative bioavailability of Ciprofloxacin DPI was reduced by ∼60% after charcoal block, suggesting that systemic exposure was mainly caused by uptake via the lung. Lung deposition of 30% was estimated from PK data, but this may be an underestimation due to drug clearance from the lung and transintestinal secretion. Adverse events were no more frequent or severe in patients with lung diseases versus HVs, and no clinically relevant influence on vital signs or lung function was observed. Conclusion: This study supports the continued development of Ciprofloxacin DPI in NCFB patients with respiratory bacterial pathogens.

This paper builds on a previous paper in which new ciprofloxacin extended-release tablets were developed based on a ciprofloxacin-based swellable drug polyelectrolyte matrix (SDPM-CIP). The matrix contains a molecular dispersion of ciprofloxacin ionically bonded to the acidic groups of carbomer, forming the polyelectrolyte-drug complex CB-CIP. This formulation showed that the release profile of the ciprofloxacin bilayer tablets currently commercialised can be achieved with a simpler strategy. Thus, since ciprofloxacin urine concentrations are associated with the clinical cure of urinary tract infections, the goal of this work was to compare the urinary excretion of SDPM-CIP tablets with those of the CIPRO XR® bilayer tablets. A batch of SDPM-CIP tablets was manufactured by the wet granulation method and the CB-CIP ionic complex was obtained in situ. Fasted healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of 500 mg ciprofloxacin of either formulation in a randomised crossover study. Urinary concentrations were assessed by HPLC at intervals up to 36 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters (rate of urinary excretion, maximum urine excretion rate, tmax, area under the curve, amount and percentage of the ciprofloxacin dose excreted in urine) showed no statistical differences between both formulations at any of the time intervals of collection. The processing conditions to obtain SDPM-CIP tablets are easy to scale up since they involve technology currently employed in the pharmaceutical industry and the process is less challenging to implement. In addition, SDPM-CIP tablets met pharmacopoeial quality specifications.

To determine the steady-state plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Multiple-dose, open-label, randomized pharmacokinetic study. Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects were randomized either to oral levofloxacin, 500 or 750 mg once daily for five doses, or ciprofloxacin, 500 mg q12h for nine doses. Interventions: Venipuncture, bronchoscopy, and BAL were performed in each subject at 4 h, 12 h, or 24 h after the last administered dose of antibiotic. Mean plasma concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were similar to those previously reported. For once-daily dosing of levofloxacin, 500 mg, the mean (± SD) steady-state concentrations at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h in ELF were 9.9 ± 2.7μμ g/mL, 6.5 ± 2.5 μμg/mL, and 0.7 ± 0.4 μμg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 97.9 ± 80.0 μμg/mL, 36.7 ± 23.4 μμg/mL, and 13.8 ± 16.0 μμg/mL, respectively. For levofloxacin, 750 mg, the mean steady-state concentrations in ELF were 22.1 ± 14.9 μμg/mL, 9.2 ± 5.3 μμg/mL, and 1.5 ± 0.8 μμg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 105.1 ± 65.5 μμg/mL, 36.2 ± 26.1 μμg/mL, and 15.1 ± 2.0 μμg/mL, respectively. The concentrations of ciprofloxacin at 4 h and 12 h in ELF were 1.9 ± 0.9 μμg/mL and 0.4 ± 0.1 μμg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 34.9 ± 23.2 μμg/mL and 6.8 ± 5.9 μμg/mL, respectively. The differences in the ELF concentrations of the two levofloxacin groups vs those of the ciprofloxacin group were significant (p < 0.05) at each sampling time. Levofloxacin was more extensively distributed into intrapulmonary compartments than ciprofloxacin and achieved significantly higher steady-state concentrations in plasma and ELF during the 24 h after drug administration.

MMX(®) mesalamine is a once daily oral 5-aminosalicylic acid formulation, effective in induction and maintenance of ulcerative colitis remission. Patients on long-term mesalamine maintenance may occasionally require concomitant antibiotic treatment for unrelated infections. To evaluate the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between MMX mesalamine and amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin extended release (XR), metronidazole, or sulfamethoxazole in four open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover studies. In all four studies, healthy adults received placebo once daily or MMX mesalamine 4.8 g once daily on days 1-4 in one of two treatment sequences. In studies 1 and 2, subjects also received a single dose of amoxicillin 500 mg (N=62) or ciprofloxacin XR 500 mg (N=30) on day 4. In studies 3 and 4, subjects received metronidazole 750 mg twice daily on days 1-3 and once on day 4 (N=30); or sulfamethoxazole 800 mg/trimethoprim 160 mg twice daily on days 1-3 and once on day 4 (N=44). MMX mesalamine had no significant effects on systemic exposure to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, or metronidazole; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) around the geometric mean ratios (antibiotic + MMX mesalamine: antibiotic + placebo) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) fell within the predefined equivalence range (0.80-1.25). Sulfamethoxazole exposure increased by a statistically significant amount when coadministered with MMX mesalamine; however, increased exposure (by 12% in Cmax at steady state; by 15% in AUC at steady state) was not considered clinically significant, as the 90% CIs for each point estimate fell entirely within the predefined equivalence range. Adverse events in all studies were generally mild. MMX mesalamine may be coadministered with amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, or sulfamethoxazole, without affecting pharmacokinetics or safety of these antibiotics. NCT01442688, NCT01402947, NCT01418365, and NCT01469637.

Introduction Ex vivo experiments in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits have identified octanol-water partition coefficient (logP, a marker of lipophilicity) and protein binding (PB) as key drug factors affecting pharmacokinetics (PK) during ECMO. Using ovine models, in this study we investigated whether these drug properties can be used to predict PK alterations of antimicrobial drugs during ECMO. Methods Single-dose PK sampling was performed in healthy sheep (HS, n  = 7), healthy sheep on ECMO (E24H, n  = 7) and sheep with smoke inhalation acute lung injury on ECMO (SE24H, n  = 6). The sheep received eight study antimicrobials (ceftriaxone, gentamicin, meropenem, vancomycin, doripenem, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, caspofungin) that exhibit varying degrees of logP and PB. Plasma drug concentrations were determined using validated chromatographic techniques. PK data obtained from a non-compartmental analysis were used in a linear regression model to predict PK parameters based on logP and PB. Results We found statistically significant differences in pH, haemodynamics, fluid balance and plasma proteins between the E24H and SE24H groups ( p  < 0.001). logP had a strong positive linear relationship with steady-state volume of distribution (V ss ) in both the E24H and SE24H groups ( p  < 0.001) but not in the HS group ( p  = 0.9) and no relationship with clearance (CL) in all study groups. Although we observed an increase in CL for highly PB drugs in ECMO sheep, PB exhibited a weaker negative linear relationship with both CL (HS, p  = 0.01; E24H, p  < 0.001; SE24H, p  < 0.001) and V ss (HS, p  = 0.01; E24H, p  = 0.004; SE24H, p =0.05) in the final model. Conclusions Lipophilic antimicrobials are likely to have an increased V ss and decreased CL during ECMO. Protein-bound antimicrobial agents are likely to have reductions both in CL and V ss during ECMO. The strong relationship between lipophilicity and V ss seen in both the E24H and SE24H groups indicates circuit sequestration of lipophilic drugs. These findings highlight the importance of drug factors in predicting antimicrobial drug PK during ECMO and should be a consideration when performing and interpreting population PK studies.