Explore the vast range of titles available.

Climate extremes, such as heat waves, droughts, extreme rainfall can lead to harvest failures, flooding and consequently threaten the food security worldwide. Improving our understanding about climate extremes can mitigate the worst impacts of climate change and extremes. The objective here is to investigate the changes in climate and climate extremes by considering two time slices (i.e., 1962–1990 and 1991–2019) in all climate zones of Pakistan by utilizing observed data from 54 meteorological stations. Different statistical methods and techniques were applied on observed station data to assess changes in temperature, precipitation and spatio-temporal trends of climatic extremes over Pakistan from 1962 to 2019. The Mann-Kendal test demonstrated increasing precipitation (DJF) and decreasing maximum and minimum temperatures (JJA) at the meteorological stations located in the Karakoram region during 1962–1990. The decadal analysis, on the other hand, showed a decrease in precipitation during 1991–2019 and an increase in temperature (maximum and minimum) during 2010–2019, which is consistent with the recently observed slight mass loss of glaciers related to the Karakoram Anomaly. These changes are highly significant at 5% level of significance at most of the stations. In case of temperature extremes, summer days (SU25) increased except in zone 4, TX10p (cold days) decreased across the country during 1962–1990, except for zones 1 and 2. TX90p (warm days) increased between 1991–2019, with the exception of zone 5, and decreased during 1962–1990, with the exception of zones 2 and 5. The spatio-temporal trend of consecutive dry days (CDD) indicated a rising tendency from 1991 to 2019, with the exception of zone 4, which showed a decreasing trend. PRCPTOT (annual total wet-day precipitation), R10 (number of heavy precipitation days), R20 (number of very heavy precipitation days), and R25mm (very heavy precipitation days) increased (decreased) considerably in the North Pakistan during 1962–1990 (1991–2019). The findings of this study can help to address some of the sustainable development goals related climate action, hunger and environment. In addition, the findings can help in developing sustainable adaptation and mitigation strategies against climate change and extremes. As the climate and extremes conditions are not the uniform in all climate zone, therefore, it is suggested to the formers and agriculture department to harvest crops resilient to the climatic condition of each zone. Temperature has increasing trend in the northern Pakistan, therefore, the concerned stakeholders need to make rational plans for higher river flow/flood situation due to snow and glacier melt.

Accurate and detailed spatial soil information is essential for environmental modelling, risk assessment and decision making. The use of Remote Sensing data as secondary sources of information in digital soil mapping has been found to be cost effective and less time consuming compared to traditional soil mapping approaches. But the potentials of Remote Sensing data in improving knowledge of local scale soil information in West Africa have not been fully explored. This study investigated the use of high spatial resolution satellite data (RapidEye and Landsat), terrain/climatic data and laboratory analysed soil samples to map the spatial distribution of six soil properties-sand, silt, clay, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen-in a 580 km2 agricultural watershed in south-western Burkina Faso. Four statistical prediction models-multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector machine (SVM), stochastic gradient boosting (SGB)-were tested and compared. Internal validation was conducted by cross validation while the predictions were validated against an independent set of soil samples considering the modelling area and an extrapolation area. Model performance statistics revealed that the machine learning techniques performed marginally better than the MLR, with the RFR providing in most cases the highest accuracy. The inability of MLR to handle non-linear relationships between dependent and independent variables was found to be a limitation in accurately predicting soil properties at unsampled locations. Satellite data acquired during ploughing or early crop development stages (e.g. May, June) were found to be the most important spectral predictors while elevation, temperature and precipitation came up as prominent terrain/climatic variables in predicting soil properties. The results further showed that shortwave infrared and near infrared channels of Landsat8 as well as soil specific indices of redness, coloration and saturation were prominent predictors in digital soil mapping. Considering the increased availability of freely available Remote Sensing data (e.g. Landsat, SRTM, Sentinels), soil information at local and regional scales in data poor regions such as West Africa can be improved with relatively little financial and human resources.

Towards the end of June 2021, temperature records were broken by several degrees Celsius in several cities in the Pacific Northwest areas of the US and Canada, leading to spikes in sudden deaths and sharp increases in emergency calls and hospital visits for heat-related illnesses. Here we present a multi-model, multi-method attribution analysis to investigate the extent to which human-induced climate change has influenced the probability and intensity of extreme heat waves in this region. Based on observations, modelling and a classical statistical approach, the occurrence of a heat wave defined as the maximum daily temperature (TXx) observed in the area 45–52∘ N, 119–123∘ W, was found to be virtually impossible without human-caused climate change. The observed temperatures were so extreme that they lay far outside the range of historical temperature observations. This makes it hard to state with confidence how rare the event was. Using a statistical analysis that assumes that the heat wave is part of the same distribution as previous heat waves in this region led to a first-order estimation of the event frequency of the order of once in 1000 years under current climate conditions. Using this assumption and combining the results from the analysis of climate models and weather observations, we found that such a heat wave event would be at least 150 times less common without human-induced climate change. Also, this heat wave was about 2 ∘C hotter than a 1-in-1000-year heat wave would have been in 1850–1900, when global mean temperatures were 1.2 ∘C cooler than today. Looking into the future, in a world with 2 ∘C of global warming (0.8 ∘C warmer than today), a 1000-year event would be another degree hotter. Our results provide a strong warning: our rapidly warming climate is bringing us into uncharted territory with significant consequences for health, well-being and livelihoods. Adaptation and mitigation are urgently needed to prepare societies for a very different future.

The risk of extreme climatic conditions leading to unusually low global agricultural production is exacerbated if more than one global ‘breadbasket’ is exposed at the same time. Such shocks can pose a risk to the global food system, amplifying threats to food security, and could potentially trigger other systemic risks1,2. While the possibility of climatic extremes hitting more than one breadbasket has been postulated3,4, little is known about the actual risk. Here we combine region-specific data on agricultural production with spatial statistics of climatic extremes to quantify the changing risk of low production for the major food-producing regions (breadbaskets) over time. We show an increasing risk of simultaneous failure of wheat, maize and soybean crops across the breadbaskets analysed. For rice, risks of simultaneous adverse climate conditions have decreased in the recent past, mostly owing to solar radiation changes favouring rice growth. Depending on the correlation structure between the breadbaskets, spatial dependence between climatic extremes globally can mitigate or aggravate the risks for the global food production. Our analysis can provide the basis for more efficient allocation of resources to contingency plans and/or strategic crop reserves that would enhance the resilience of the global food system.

When studying the impacts of climate change, there is a tendency to select climate data from a small set of arbitrary time periods or climate windows (e.g., spring temperature). However, these arbitrary windows may not encompass the strongest periods of climatic sensitivity and may lead to erroneous biological interpretations. Therefore, there is a need to consider a wider range of climate windows to better predict the impacts of future climate change. We introduce the R package climwin that provides a number of methods to test the effect of different climate windows on a chosen response variable and compare these windows to identify potential climate signals. climwin extracts the relevant data for each possible climate window and uses this data to fit a statistical model, the structure of which is chosen by the user. Models are then compared using an information criteria approach. This allows users to determine how well each window explains variation in the response variable and compare model support between windows. climwin also contains methods to detect type I and II errors, which are often a problem with this type of exploratory analysis. This article presents the statistical framework and technical details behind the climwin package and demonstrates the applicability of the method with a number of worked examples.

Assessing the spatial and temporal variability of climate data is one of the basic requirements to solve the hydrological and water management problems. In this manuscript, a comprehensive assessment of data quality, precipitation concentration index (PCI), Mann-Kendall (MK) trend test, and extreme climate change indices analyses were performed. The standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT), the Pettitt test, the Buishand range test, and the Von Neumann ratio test were used for homogeneity analysis, and most of the climate stations exhibited homogenous precipitation series. The annual mean and dry season PCI values demonstrated higher spatial and temporal variability or irregular distribution of precipitation, whereas PCI in the wetter seasons indicated low precipitation concentration in the Upper Awash basin. The MK trend test exhibited a significantly increasing trend of maximum temperature; however, the trend of mean annual and extreme precipitation events was insignificant for the majority of stations. Moreover, the magnitude and trend of ten main extreme precipitation indices were constructed. Unlike the mean annual precipitation, larger values of the extreme 1-day (Rx1day) and 5-day (Rx5day) annual precipitation were obtained in the downstream areas of the basin which could signify the prevalence higher flood risk in this portion of the basin. The highest predicted 100-year annual maximum daily (AMD) precipitation was obtained at Zikuala station as 128.5 mm. Statistical analysis of the magnitude and trend of extreme precipitation indices and spatial variability of climate data is imperative for the integrated water resource planning and management decisions.

A hybrid statistical dynamical downscaling method intended to emulate regional climate models is described and applied to Western Europe. The method is based on a constructed analogues algorithm, already used for statistical downscaling. For emulation, the statistical downscaling relationship is not derived from observations but from climate projections at low and high resolution. The hybrid approach therefore does not rely on the stationarity assumption inherent to conventional statistical downscaling. Within a perfect model framework, and using a large number of regional projections, the hybrid method is shown to reproduce climate change signals very well and to outperform a conventional statistical downscaling method also based on constructed analogues. The hybrid approach remains skillful even when applied to very low resolution climate data. In practice, two emulation modes exist. In the GCM/RCM mode, the downscaling relationship is built between a RCM and its forcing GCM. In the RCM/RCM mode, the relationship is built between a RCM and the same RCM after aggregation of its results to a low resolution grid. The large-scale climate change signal of the downscaled GCM is generally retained with the RCM/RCM mode, but not with the GCM /RCM mode. Additionally, the choice of the GCM/RCM pair used for learning leads to large differences in downscaling results at large scale (i.e. at low resolution) with the GCM /RCM mode, but not with the RCM/RCM mode. These results are explained by the differences that generally exist at large scale between projected changes by current RCMs and their forcing GCMs. Whether these differences are a testimony of a real added value of RCMs at large scale in the climate change context, or whether they have other causes, is therefore a crucial question.

Precipitation is the most important driver of the hydrological cycle, but it is challenging to estimate it over large scales from satellites and models. Here, we assessed the performance of six global and quasi-global high-resolution precipitation datasets (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), Climate Hazards group Infrared Precipitation with Stations version 2.0 (CHIRPS), Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation version 2.80 (MSWEP), TerraClimate (TERRA), Climate Prediction Centre Unified version 1.0 (CPCU), and Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Cloud Classification System-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CCS-CDR, hereafter PERCCDR) for hydrological modelling globally and quasi-globally. We forced the WBMsed global hydrological model with the precipitation datasets to simulate river discharge from 1983 to 2019 and evaluated the predicted discharge against 1825 hydrological stations worldwide, using a range of statistical methods. The results show large differences in the accuracy of discharge predictions when using different precipitation input datasets. Based on evaluation at annual, monthly, and daily timescales, MSWEP followed by ERA5 demonstrated a higher correlation (CC) and Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) than other datasets for more than 50 % of the stations, whilst ERA5 was the second-highest-performing dataset, and it showed the highest error and bias for about 20 % of the stations. PERCCDR is the least-well-performing dataset, with a bias of up to 99 % and a normalised root mean square error of up to 247 %. PERCCDR only show a higher KGE and CC than the other products for less than 10 % of the stations. Even though MSWEP provided the highest performance overall, our analysis reveals high spatial variability, meaning that it is important to consider other datasets in areas where MSWEP showed a lower performance. The results of this study provide guidance on the selection of precipitation datasets for modelling river discharge for a basin, region, or climatic zone as there is no single best precipitation dataset globally. Finally, the large discrepancy in the performance of the datasets in different parts of the world highlights the need to improve global precipitation data products.

Based on four reanalyses or gridded data sets (ERA5, 20CR, APHRODITE and REGEN), we provide an overview of 23 Historical and 7 HighResMIP experiments’ performance from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) (for short, 6-Hist, HighRes) in simulating seven extreme precipitation indices over Asia defined by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI). We compare them with 28 Historical experiments in CMIP5 (5-Hist). CMIP5 and CMIP6 models are generally able to reproduce extreme precipitation’s spatial distribution and their trend patterns in comparison to the benchmark data set (APHRODITE). The overall performance of individual model is summarized by a “portrait” diagram based on four statistics for each index. We divide all 58 models into three groups (A, the top 20%; B, the median 60% and C group, the last 20%) according to MR rankings (the comprehensive ranking measure). Based on the “portrait” diagram and MR rankings, models that perform relatively well for all seven extreme precipitation indices include HadCM3, HadGEM2-AO, HadGEM2-CC and HadGEM2-ES from 5-Hist, EC-Earth3, EC-Earth3-Veg from 6-Hist and ECMWF-IFS-HR, ECMWF-IFS-LR, ECMWF-IFS-MR from HighRes. The simulated performance of CMIP6 is polarized, for the top four and the last five ranking models are both from CMIP6. Compared with the counterpart models in CMIP6 and CMIP5, the improvement of PCC (pattern correlation coefficient) is more obvious. Furthermore, the dry biases of CMIP6 (both 6-Hist and HighRes) in Southern China and India and the wet biases of CMIP6 in Tibet are reduced compared to CMIP5. This may benefit from the improvement that CMIP6 models can capture the characteristics of meridional moisture flux convergence, and improve the overestimation or underestimation of meridional and zonal specific humidity eddies compared to CMIP5.