Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"Data mining has rapidly emerged as an enabling, robust, and scalable technique to analyze data for novel patterns, trends, anomalies, structures, and features that can be employed for a variety of biomedical and clinical domains. Approaching the techniques and challenges of image mining from a multidisciplinary perspective, this book presents data mining techniques, methodologies, algorithms, and strategies to analyze biomedical signals and images. Written by experts, the text addresses data mining paradigms for the development of biomedical systems. It also includes special coverage of knowledge discovery in mammograms and emphasizes both the diagnostic and therapeutic fields of eye imaging\"--Provided by publisher.

To evaluate the impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Prevention and Management for Delirium (AI-AntiDelirium) on improving adherence to delirium guidelines among nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU). Between November 2022 and June 2023, A cluster randomized controlled trial was undertaken. A total of 38 nurses were enrolled in the interventional arm, whereas 42 nurses were recruited for the control arm in six ICUs across two hospitals in Beijing, comparing nurses’ adherence and cognitive load in units that use AI-AntiDelirium or the control group. The AI-AntiDelirium tailored delirium preventive or treated interventions to address patients’ specific risk factors. The adherence rate of delirium interventions was the primary endpoint. The other endpoints were adherence to risk factors assessment, ICU delirium assessment, and nurses’ cognitive load. The repeated measures analysis of variance was utilized to explore the influence of time, group, and time × group interaction on the repeated measurement variable (e.g., adherence, cognitive load). A cumulative total of 1040 nurse days were analyzed for this study. The adherence to delirium intervention of nurses in AI-AntiDelirium groups was higher than control units (75 % vs. 58 %, P < 0.01). When compared to control groups, AI-AntiDelirium was found to be significantly effective in both decreasing extraneous cognitive load (P < 0.01) and improving germane cognitive load (P < 0.01). This study supports the effectiveness of AI-AntiDelirium in enhancing nurses’ adherence to evidence-based, individualized delirium intervention and also reducing extraneous cognitive load. A nurse-led systemshould be applied by nursing administrators to improve compliance with nursing interventions among ICU nurses.

Providing comprehensive and individualized diabetes care remains a significant challenge in the face of the increasing complexity of diabetes management and a lack of specialized endocrinologists to support diabetes care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are progressively being used to improve diabetes care, while many health care providers lack awareness and knowledge about CDSSs in diabetes care. A comprehensive analysis of the applications of CDSSs in diabetes care is still lacking. This review aimed to summarize the research landscape, clinical applications, and impact on both patients and physicians of CDSSs in diabetes care. We conducted a scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search was conducted in 7 electronic databases to identify the clinical applications of CDSSs in diabetes care up to June 30, 2022. Additional searches were conducted for conference abstracts from the period of 2021-2022. Two researchers independently performed the screening and data charting processes. Of 11,569 retrieved studies, 85 (0.7%) were included for analysis. Research interest is growing in this field, with 45 (53%) of the 85 studies published in the past 5 years. Among the 58 (68%) out of 85 studies disclosing the underlying decision-making mechanism, most CDSSs (44/58, 76%) were knowledge based, while the number of non-knowledge-based systems has been increasing in recent years. Among the 81 (95%) out of 85 studies disclosing application scenarios, the majority of CDSSs were used for treatment recommendation (63/81, 78%). Among the 39 (46%) out of 85 studies disclosing physician user types, primary care physicians (20/39, 51%) were the most common, followed by endocrinologists (15/39, 39%) and nonendocrinology specialists (8/39, 21%). CDSSs significantly improved patients' blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid profiles in 71% (45/63), 67% (12/18), and 38% (8/21) of the studies, respectively, with no increase in the risk of hypoglycemia. CDSSs are both effective and safe in improving diabetes care, implying that they could be a potentially reliable assistant in diabetes care, especially for physicians with limited experience and patients with limited access to medical resources. RR2-10.37766/inplasy2022.9.0061.

Background Continuous waveform monitoring is standard-of-care for patients at risk for or with critically illness. Derived from waveforms, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure variability contain useful diagnostic and prognostic information; and when combined with machine learning, can provide predictive indices relating to severity of illness and/or reduced physiologic reserve. Integration of predictive models into clinical decision support software (CDSS) tools represents a potential evolution of monitoring. Methods We perform a review and analysis of the multidisciplinary steps required to develop and rigorously evaluate predictive clinical decision support tools based on monitoring. Results Development and evaluation of waveform-based variability-derived predictive models involves a multistep, multidisciplinary approach. The stepwise processes involves data science (data collection, waveform processing, variability analysis, statistical analysis, machine learning, predictive modelling), CDSS development (iterative research prototype evolution to commercial tool), and clinical research (observational and interventional implementation studies, followed by feasibility then definitive randomized controlled trials), and poses unique challenges (including technical, analytical, psychological, regulatory and commercial). Conclusions The proposed roadmap provides guidance for the development and evaluation of novel predictive CDSS tools with potential to help transform monitoring and improve care.

Background Although alert fatigue is blamed for high override rates in contemporary clinical decision support systems, the concept of alert fatigue is poorly defined. We tested hypotheses arising from two possible alert fatigue mechanisms: (A) cognitive overload associated with amount of work, complexity of work, and effort distinguishing informative from uninformative alerts, and (B) desensitization from repeated exposure to the same alert over time. Methods Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data (both drug alerts and clinical practice reminders) from January 2010 through June 2013 from 112 ambulatory primary care clinicians. The cognitive overload hypotheses were that alert acceptance would be lower with higher workload (number of encounters, number of patients), higher work complexity (patient comorbidity, alerts per encounter), and more alerts low in informational value (repeated alerts for the same patient in the same year). The desensitization hypothesis was that, for newly deployed alerts, acceptance rates would decline after an initial peak. Results On average, one-quarter of drug alerts received by a primary care clinician, and one-third of clinical reminders, were repeats for the same patient within the same year. Alert acceptance was associated with work complexity and repeated alerts, but not with the amount of work. Likelihood of reminder acceptance dropped by 30% for each additional reminder received per encounter, and by 10% for each five percentage point increase in proportion of repeated reminders. The newly deployed reminders did not show a pattern of declining response rates over time, which would have been consistent with desensitization. Interestingly, nurse practitioners were 4 times as likely to accept drug alerts as physicians. Conclusions Clinicians became less likely to accept alerts as they received more of them, particularly more repeated alerts. There was no evidence of an effect of workload per se, or of desensitization over time for a newly deployed alert. Reducing within-patient repeats may be a promising target for reducing alert overrides and alert fatigue.

Background The emergency department is a critical juncture in the trajectory of care of patients with serious, life-limiting illness. Implementation of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool automates identification of older adults who may benefit from palliative care instead of relying upon providers to identify such patients, thus improving quality of care by assisting providers with adhering to guidelines. The Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER) study aims to optimize the use of the electronic health record by creating a CDS tool to identify high risk patients most likely to benefit from primary palliative care and provide point-of-care clinical recommendations. Methods A clinical decision support tool entitled Emergency Department Supportive Care Clinical Decision Support (Support-ED) was developed as part of an institutionally-sponsored value based medicine initiative at the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine at NYU Langone Health. A multidisciplinary approach was used to develop Support-ED including: a scoping review of ED palliative care screening tools; launch of a workgroup to identify patient screening criteria and appropriate referral services; initial design and usability testing via the standard System Usability Scale questionnaire, education of the ED workforce on the Support-ED background, purpose and use, and; creation of a dashboard for monitoring and feedback. Results The scoping review identified the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) survey as a validated instrument in which to adapt and apply for the creation of the CDS tool. The multidisciplinary workshops identified two primary objectives of the CDS: to identify patients with indicators of serious life limiting illness, and to assist with referrals to services such as palliative care or social work. Additionally, the iterative design process yielded three specific patient scenarios that trigger a clinical alert to fire, including: 1) when an advance care planning document was present, 2) when a patient had a previous disposition to hospice, and 3) when historical and/or current clinical data points identify a serious life-limiting illness without an advance care planning document present. Monitoring and feedback indicated a need for several modifications to improve CDS functionality. Conclusions CDS can be an effective tool in the implementation of primary palliative care quality improvement best practices. Health systems should thoughtfully consider tailoring their CDSs in order to adapt to their unique workflows and environments. The findings of this research can assist health systems in effectively integrating a primary palliative care CDS system seamlessly into their processes of care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03424109 . Registered 6 February 2018, Grant Number: AT009844–01.

Background In the United States, primary care providers (PCPs) routinely balance acute, chronic, and preventive patient care delivery, including cancer prevention and screening, in time-limited visits. Clinical decision support (CDS) may help PCPs prioritize cancer prevention and screening with other patient needs. In a three-arm, pragmatic, clinic-randomized control trial, we are studying cancer prevention CDS in a large, upper Midwestern healthcare system. The web-based, electronic health record (EHR)-linked CDS integrates evidence-based primary and secondary cancer prevention and screening recommendations into an existing cardiovascular risk management CDS system. Our objective with this study was to identify adoption barriers and facilitators before implementation in primary care. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) with 28 key informants employed by the healthcare organization in either leadership roles or the direct provision of clinical care. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results EHR, CDS workflow, CDS users (providers and patients), training, and organizational barriers and facilitators were identified related to Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, and Characteristics of Individuals CFIR domains. Conclusion Identifying and addressing key informant-identified barriers and facilitators before implementing cancer prevention CDS in primary care may support a successful implementation and sustained use. The CFIR is a useful framework for understanding pre-implementation barriers and facilitators. Based on our findings, the research team developed and instituted specialized training, pilot testing, implementation plans, and post-implementation efforts to maximize identified facilitators and address barriers. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02986230 , December 6, 2016.

While numerous antimicrobial stewardship programs aim to decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, evidence of their positive impact is needed to optimize future interventions. This study aimed to evaluate 2 multifaceted antibiotic stewardship interventions for inappropriate systemic antibiotic prescription in primary care. An open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial of 2501 general practitioners (GPs) working in western France was conducted from July 2019 to January 2021. Two interventions were studied: the standard intervention, consisting of a visit by a health insurance representative who gave prescription feedback and provided a leaflet for treating cystitis and tonsillitis; and a clinical decision support system (CDSS)-based intervention, consisting of a visit with prescription feedback and a CDSS demonstration on antibiotic prescribing. The control group received no intervention. Data on systemic antibiotic dispensing was obtained from the National Health Insurance System (Système National d'Information Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie) database. The overall antibiotic volume dispensed per GP at 12 months was compared between arms using a 2-level hierarchical analysis of covariance adjusted for annual antibiotic prescription volume at baseline. Overall, 2501 GPs were randomized (n=1099, 43.9% women). At 12 months, the mean volume of systemic antibiotics per GP decreased by 219.2 (SD 61.4; 95% CI -339.5 to -98.8; P<.001) defined daily doses in the CDSS-based visit group compared with the control group. The decrease in the mean volume of systemic antibiotics dispensed per GP was not significantly different between the standard visit group and the control group (-109.7, SD 62.4; 95% CI -232.0 to 12.5 defined daily doses; P=.08). A visit by a health insurance representative combining feedback and a CDSS demonstration resulted in a 4.4% (-219.2/4930) reduction in the total volume of systemic antibiotic prescriptions in 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04028830; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028830.

Background The role of appropriate semantic qualifiers (SQs) in the effective use of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) is not yet fully understood. Previous studies have not investigated the input. This study aimed to investigate whether the appropriateness of SQs modified the impact of CDSS on diagnostic accuracy among medical students. Methods For this randomized controlled trial, a total of forty-two fifth-year medical students in a clinical clerkship at Chiba University Hospital were enrolled from May to December 2020. They were divided into the CDSS (CDSS use; 22 participants) and control groups (no CDSS use; 20 participants). Students were presented with ten expert-developed case vignettes asking for SQs and a diagnosis. Three appropriate SQs were established for each case vignette. The participants were awarded one point for each SQ that was consistent with the set SQs. Those with two or more points were considered to have provided appropriate SQs. The CDSS used was the Current Decision Support Ⓡ . We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and the appropriateness of SQ differences between the CDSS and control groups. Results Data from all 42 participants were analyzed. The CDSS and control groups provided 133 (60.5%; 220 answers) and 115 (57.5%; 200 answers) appropriate SQs, respectively. Among CDSS users, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with appropriate SQs compared to inappropriate SQs (χ 2 (1) = 4.97, p  = 0.026). With appropriate SQs, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CDSS group compared to the control group (χ 2 (1) = 1.16 × 10, p  < 0.001). With inappropriate SQs, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (χ 2 (1) = 8.62 × 10 –2 , p  = 0.769). Conclusions Medical students may make more accurate diagnoses using the CDSS if appropriate SQs are set. Improving students’ ability to set appropriate SQs may improve the effectiveness of CDSS use. Trial registration This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 24/12/2020 (Unique trial number: UMIN000042831).