Explore the vast range of titles available.

Fine‐scale seasonal snow depth observations can improve estimates of snow water equivalent at critical times of year. Airborne lidar is the current gold standard for snow depth measurement, but it involves high costs and relatively limited coverage. Using very‐high‐resolution satellite stereo images from WorldView‐2, WorldView‐3, and Pléiades‐HR 1A/1B, we produced a six‐year time series (2017–2022) of spatially continuous digital elevation models for an 874 km2 study area over Grand Mesa, Colorado. We generated high‐resolution stereo snow depth maps that capture intra‐ and interannual variability and span multiple anomalous years (58%–158% of median peak SNOTEL snow depth). Comparisons with near‐contemporaneous airborne lidar snow depth measurements showed good agreement, with median offset of −0.13 m, precision of 0.19 m and accuracy of 0.31 m. Our results suggest that satellite stereo can provide snow depth observations with the spatiotemporal coverage needed to improve operational forecast models and inform adaptive management strategies. Plain Language Summary Detailed observations of snow depth can help us better understand how much water is stored as snow during important times of the year. We used high‐resolution images from commercial satellites to create detailed maps of snow‐covered surfaces for a study site in Colorado. Using a technique called stereo photogrammetry, we created precise three‐dimensional models of surface elevation from these images. By subtracting a snow‐free summer ground surface model from the winter snow surface models, we estimated snow depth over large areas and multiple years. Our satellite snow depth estimates agreed with snow depth measurements from airborne lidar and field campaigns. This satellite stereo approach helps us understand how mountain snow depth varies from year to year, providing valuable information to improve models and decisions for water resources management. Key Points Satellite stereo photogrammetry offers repeat, spatially continuous, high‐resolution snow depth measurements over large areas Stereo snow depth measurements are within ∼0.13–0.33 m of near‐contemporaneous airborne lidar and in situ measurements Stereo snow depth captures detailed intra‐ and interannual snow depth variability in low and high snow years

In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the position, orientation, and gain of a magnetic field sensor using a set of (large) electromagnetic coils. We apply the method for calibrating an array of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first measure the magnetic fields of the coils at multiple known positions using a well-calibrated triaxial magnetometer, and model these discreetly sampled fields using vector spherical harmonics (VSH) functions. We then localize and calibrate an OPM by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the model signals and the OPM responses to the coil fields. We show that by using homogeneous and first-order gradient fields, the OPM sensor parameters (gain, position, and orientation) can be obtained from a set of linear equations with pseudo-inverses of two matrices. The currents that should be applied to the coils for approximating these low-order field components can be determined based on the VSH models. Computationally simple initial estimates of the OPM sensor parameters follow. As a first test of the method, we placed a fluxgate magnetometer at multiple positions and estimated the RMS position, orientation, and gain errors of the method to be 1.0 mm, 0.2°, and 0.8%, respectively. Lastly, we calibrated a 48-channel OPM array. The accuracy of the OPM calibration was tested by using the OPM array to localize magnetic dipoles in a phantom, which resulted in an average dipole position error of 3.3 mm. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using electromagnetic coils to calibrate and localize OPMs for MEG.

An extension of the optimal transport problem is proposed, which includes a family of transformations incurring no transportation costs. This extension improves the co-registration among imagery datasets where transformations such as rotations, displacements and changes of perspective are a natural component of data acquisition. More generally, it provides a strategy for co-registration that blends the robustness of optimal transport with the interpretability of models. The extended optimal transport problem pairs two distributions with minimal additional distortion, while identifying a cost-free, explainable component of the map. A data-driven formulation is developed, as well as a methodology for its numerical solution. The latter complements gradient descent with a game-theory inspired approach, favoring collaborative moves between the cost-free and the unrestricted transformations. Sample validations are provided. The methodology is illustrated through its successful application to matching pairs of both synthetic and real images, which are conceptualized as weighted samples from underlying distributions, and through the determination of treatment effects by co-registering treated and untreated populations in a synthetic example.

Geospatial co-registration is a mandatory prerequisite when dealing with remote sensing data. Inter- or intra-sensoral misregistration will negatively affect any subsequent image analysis, specifically when processing multi-sensoral or multi-temporal data. In recent decades, many algorithms have been developed to enable manual, semi- or fully automatic displacement correction. Especially in the context of big data processing and the development of automated processing chains that aim to be applicable to different remote sensing systems, there is a strong need for efficient, accurate and generally usable co-registration. Here, we present AROSICS (Automated and Robust Open-Source Image Co-Registration Software), a Python-based open-source software including an easy-to-use user interface for automatic detection and correction of sub-pixel misalignments between various remote sensing datasets. It is independent of spatial or spectral characteristics and robust against high degrees of cloud coverage and spectral and temporal land cover dynamics. The co-registration is based on phase correlation for sub-pixel shift estimation in the frequency domain utilizing the Fourier shift theorem in a moving-window manner. A dense grid of spatial shift vectors can be created and automatically filtered by combining various validation and quality estimation metrics. Additionally, the software supports the masking of, e.g., clouds and cloud shadows to exclude such areas from spatial shift detection. The software has been tested on more than 9000 satellite images acquired by different sensors. The results are evaluated exemplarily for two inter-sensoral and two intra-sensoral use cases and show registration results in the sub-pixel range with root mean square error fits around 0.3 pixels and better.

Hyperspectral aerial imagery is becoming increasingly available due to both technology evolution and a somewhat affordable price tag. However, selecting a proper UAV + hyperspectral sensor combo to use in specific contexts is still challenging and lacks proper documental support. While selecting an UAV is more straightforward as it mostly relates with sensor compatibility, autonomy, reliability and cost, a hyperspectral sensor has much more to be considered. This note provides an assessment of two hyperspectral sensors (push-broom and snapshot) regarding practicality and suitability, within a precision viticulture context. The aim is to provide researchers, agronomists, winegrowers and UAV pilots with dependable data collection protocols and methods, enabling them to achieve faster processing techniques and helping to integrate multiple data sources. Furthermore, both the benefits and drawbacks of using each technology within a precision viticulture context are also highlighted. Hyperspectral sensors, UAVs, flight operations, and the processing methodology for each imaging type’ datasets are presented through a qualitative and quantitative analysis. For this purpose, four vineyards in two countries were selected as case studies. This supports the extrapolation of both advantages and issues related with the two types of hyperspectral sensors used, in different contexts. Sensors’ performance was compared through the evaluation of field operations complexity, processing time and qualitative accuracy of the results, namely the quality of the generated hyperspectral mosaics. The results shown an overall excellent geometrical quality, with no distortions or overlapping faults for both technologies, using the proposed mosaicking process and reconstruction. By resorting to the multi-site assessment, the qualitative and quantitative exchange of information throughout the UAV hyperspectral community is facilitated. In addition, all the major benefits and drawbacks of each hyperspectral sensor regarding its operation and data features are identified. Lastly, the operational complexity in the context of precision agriculture is also presented.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can non-invasively measure the electromagnetic activity of the brain. A new type of MEG, on-scalp MEG, has attracted the attention of researchers recently. Compared to the conventional SQUID-MEG, on-scalp MEG constructed with optically pumped magnetometers is wearable and has a high signal-to-noise ratio. While the co-registration between MEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly influences the source localization accuracy, co-registration error requires assessment, and quantification. Recent studies have evaluated the co-registration error of on-scalp MEG mainly based on the surface fit error or the repeatability error of different measurements, which do not reflect the true co-registration error. In this study, a three-dimensional-printed reference phantom was constructed to provide the ground truth of MEG sensor locations and orientations relative to MRI. The co-registration performances of commonly used three devices—electromagnetic digitization system, structured-light scanner, and laser scanner—were compared and quantified by the indices of final co-registration errors in the reference phantom and human experiments. Furthermore, the influence of the co-registration error on the performance of source localization was analyzed via simulations. The laser scanner had the best co-registration accuracy (rotation error of 0.23° and translation error of 0.76 mm based on the phantom experiment), whereas the structured-light scanner had the best cost performance. The results of this study provide recommendations and precautions for researchers regarding selecting and using an appropriate device for the co-registration of on-scalp MEG and MRI.

Long-term and high-intensity coal mining has led to the increasingly serious surface subsidence and environmental problems. Surface subsidence monitoring plays an important role in protecting the ecological environment of the mining area and the sustainable development of modern coal mines. The development of surveying technology has promoted the acquisition of high-resolution terrain data. The combination of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) point cloud and the structure from motion (SfM) method has shown the potential of collecting multi-temporal high-resolution terrain data in complex or inaccessible environments. The difference of the DEM (DoD) is the main method to obtain the surface subsidence in mining areas. However, the obtained digital elevation model (DEM) needs to interpolate the point cloud into the grid, and this process may introduce errors in complex natural topographic environments. Therefore, a complete three-dimensional change analysis is required to quantify the surface change in complex natural terrain. In this study, we propose a quantitative analysis method of ground subsidence based on three-dimensional point cloud. Firstly, the Monte Carlo simulation statistical analysis was adopted to indirectly evaluate the performance of direct georeferencing photogrammetric products. After that, the operation of co-registration was carried out to register the multi-temporal UAV dense matching point cloud. Finally, the model-to-model cloud comparison (M3C2) algorithm was used to quantify the surface change and reveal the spatio-temporal characteristics of surface subsidence. In order to evaluate the proposed method, four periods of multi-temporal UAV photogrammetric data and a period of airborne LiDAR point cloud data were collected in the Yangquan mining area, China, from 2020 to 2022. The 3D precision map of a sparse point cloud generated by Monte Carlo simulation shows that the average precision in X, Y and Z directions is 44.80 mm, 45.22 and 63.60 mm, respectively. The standard deviation range of the M3C2 distance calculated by multi-temporal data in the stable area is 0.13–0.19, indicating the consistency of multi-temporal photogrammetric data of UAV. Compared with DoD, the dynamic moving basin obtained by the M3C2 algorithm based on the 3D point cloud obtained more real surface deformation distribution. This method has high potential in monitoring terrain change in remote areas, and can provide a reference for monitoring similar objects such as landslides.

Subject-specific four-layer boundary element method (BEM) electrical forward head models for four participants, generated from magnetic resonance (MR) head images using NFT ( www.sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/NFT ), were used to simulate electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp potentials at 256 recorded electrode positions produced by single current dipoles of a 3-D grid in brain space. Locations of these dipoles were then estimated using gradient descent within five template head models fit to the electrode positions. These were: a spherical model, three-layer and four-layer BEM head models based on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template head image, and these BEM models warped to the recorded electrode positions. Smallest localization errors (4.1–6.2 mm, medians) were obtained using the electrode-position warped four-layer BEM models, with largest localization errors (~20 mm) for most basal brain locations. When we increased the brain-to-skull conductivity ratio assumed in the template model scalp projections from the simulated value (25:1) to a higher value (80:1) used in earlier studies, the estimated dipole locations moved outwards (12.4 mm, median). We also investigated the effects of errors in co-registering the electrode positions, of reducing electrode counts, and of adding a fifth, isotropic white matter layer to one individual head model. Results show that when individual subject MR head images are not available to construct subject-specific head models, accurate EEG source localization should employ a four- or five-layer BEM template head model incorporating an accurate skull conductivity estimate and warped to 64 or more accurately 3-D measured and co-registered electrode positions.

In recent times, the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as tools for environmental remote sensing has become more commonplace. Compared to traditional airborne remote sensing, UAVs can provide finer spatial resolution data (up to 1 cm/pixel) and higher temporal resolution data. For the purposes of vegetation monitoring, the use of multiple sensors such as near infrared and thermal infrared cameras are of benefit. Collecting data with multiple sensors, however, requires an accurate spatial co-registration of the various UAV image datasets. In this study, we used an Oktokopter UAV to investigate the physiological state of Antarctic moss ecosystems using three sensors: (i) a visible camera (1 cm/pixel), (ii) a 6 band multispectral camera (3 cm/pixel), and (iii) a thermal infrared camera (10 cm/pixel). Imagery from each sensor was geo-referenced and mosaicked with a combination of commercially available software and our own algorithms based on the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). The validation of the mosaic’s spatial co-registration revealed a mean root mean squared error (RMSE) of 1.78 pixels. A thematic map of moss health, derived from the multispectral mosaic using a Modified Triangular Vegetation Index (MTVI2), and an indicative map of moss surface temperature were then combined to demonstrate sufficient accuracy of our co-registration methodology for UAV-based monitoring of Antarctic moss beds.

Micro-ultrasound has recently been introduced as a low-cost alternative to multi-parametric MRI for imaging prostate cancer. Early clinical studies have demonstrated promising results; however, robust validation via comparison with whole-mount pathology has yet to be achieved. Due to micro-ultrasound probe design and tissue deformation during scanning, it is difficult to accurately correlate micro-ultrasound imaging planes with ground truth whole-mount pathology slides. In this study, we developed a multi-step methodology to co-register micro-ultrasound and MRI to whole-mount pathology. The three-step process had a registration error of 3.90 ± 0.11 mm and consists of: (1) micro-ultrasound image reconstruction, (2) 3D landmark registration of micro-ultrasound to MRI, and (3) 2D capsule registration of MRI to whole-mount pathology. This process was then used in a preliminary reader study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound and MRI in 15 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Micro-ultrasound was found to have equivalent performance to retrospective MRI review for index lesion detection (91.7% vs. 80%), while demonstrating an increased detection of tumor extent (52.5% vs. 36.7%) with similar false positive regions-of-interest (38.3% vs. 40.8%). Prospective MRI review had reduced detection of index lesions (73.3%) and tumor extent (18.9%) but improved false positive regions-of-interest (22.7%) relative to micro-ultrasound and retrospective MRI. Further evaluation is needed with a larger sample size.