Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
41
result(s) for
"Cognitive-analytic therapy."
Sort by:
Cognitive–behavioural versus cognitive–analytic guided self-help for mild-to-moderate anxiety: a pragmatic, randomised patient preference trial
Guided self-help (GSH) for anxiety is widely implemented in primary care services because of service efficiency gains, but there is also evidence of poor acceptability, low effectiveness and relapse.
The aim was to compare preferences for, acceptability and efficacy of cognitive-behavioural guided self-help (CBT-GSH) versus cognitive-analytic guided self-help (CAT-GSH).
This was a pragmatic, randomised, patient preference trial (Clinical trials identifier: NCT03730532). The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was the primary outcome at 8- and 24-week follow-up. Interventions were delivered competently on the telephone via structured workbooks over 6-8 (30-35 min) sessions by trained practitioners.
A total of 271 eligible participants were included, of whom 19 (7%) accepted being randomised and 252 (93%) chose their treatment. In the preference cohort, 181 (72%) chose CAT-GSH and 71 (28%) preferred CBT-GSH. BAI outcomes in the preference and randomised cohorts did not differ at 8 weeks (-0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.52 to 2.92) or 24 weeks (0.85, 95% CI -2.87 to 4.57). After controlling for allocation method and baseline covariates, there were no differences between CAT-GSH and CBT-GSH at 8 weeks (F(1, 263) = 0.22,
= 0.639) or at 24 weeks (
(1, 263) = 0.22,
= 0.639). Mean BAI change from baseline was a reduction of 9.28 for CAT-GSH and 9.78 for CBT-GSH at 8 weeks and 12.90 for CAT-GSH and 12.43 for CBT-GSH at 24 weeks.
Patients accessing routine primary care talking treatments prefer to choose the intervention they receive. CAT-GSH expands the treatment offer in primary care for patients with anxiety seeking a brief but analytically informed GSH solution.
Journal Article
Early intervention for adolescents with borderline personality disorder using cognitive analytic therapy: randomised controlled trial
No accepted intervention exists for borderline personality disorder presenting in adolescence.
To compare the effectiveness of up to 24 sessions of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) or manualised good clinical care (GCC) in addition to a comprehensive service model of care.
In a randomised controlled trial, CAT and GCC were compared in out-patients aged 15-18 years who fulfilled two to nine of the DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder. We predicted that, compared with the GCC group, the CAT group would show greater reductions in psychopathology and parasuicidal behaviour and greater improvement in global functioning over 24 months.
Eighty-six patients were randomised and 78 (CAT n=41; GCC n=37) provided follow-up data. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of the treatment groups at 24 months on the pre-chosen measures but there was some evidence that patients allocated to CAT improved more rapidly. No adverse effect was shown with either treatment.
Both CAT and GCC are effective in reducing externalising psychopathology in teenagers with sub-syndromal or full-syndrome borderline [corrected] personality disorder. Larger studies are required to determine the specific value of CAT in this population.
Journal Article
The Relational Approach to Treating Self-Harm (RELATE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study of cognitive analytic therapy for adults who self-harm versus treatment at usual
Background
Self-harm is a prevalent behaviour that has a major detrimental impact on a person’s life. Psychological therapies have the potential to help, but evidence of effective interventions remains limited. Access and acceptability of interventions can also be a significant challenge, with individuals either being unable to access help or having to endure long waiting lists. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a time-limited and relationally-focused psychotherapy that may provide a valuable treatment option for people who self-harm. This protocol outlines the methodology for the first feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CAT for adults that self-harm. The trial will aim to determine the feasibility, acceptability and safety of undertaking larger-scale evaluations of CAT for self-harm within an RCT context.
Method
An RCT design with 1:1 allocation to CAT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Participants will be adult outpatients with three or more instances of self-harm in the past year (target sample of
n
= 60). CAT will be 8 one-to-one weekly 60-min sessions plus a follow-up session up to 8 weeks after the last session. Assessments will occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after randomisation. Qualitative interviews with participants will gain insights into the feasibility and acceptability of CAT. Feasibility outcomes will be judged against progression criteria.
Discussion
CAT may be an effective and accessible treatment option for people who self-harm, providing a more relationally orientated alternative to more behavioural therapies. The proposed feasibility RCT is an important first step in evaluating CAT as a treatment for self-harm.
Trial registration
The trial was pre-registered (21/10/22) on ISR CTN (ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422).
Journal Article
Cognitive Analytic Therapy for Functional/Dissociative Seizures in an Adolescent: Case Report and Mixed-Methods Single-Case Evaluation
Background and clinical significance: Functional/dissociative seizures (FDSs) in adolescents are paroxysmal events which superficially resemble epileptic seizures or syncope. This study evaluated the effectiveness of brief cognitive analytic therapy (CAT). Case presentation: The patient was a 17-year-old white cisgender male with a diagnosis of non-epileptic attack disorder. The functional/dissociative seizures were treated with 8-session CAT, with follow-up at 5 weeks. Two target problems (TPs) and associated target problem procedures (TPPs) were rated for recognition and revision at each session and at follow-up. An A-B-C-FU single-case experimental evaluation of the TP/TPPs was conducted. Nomothetic outcome measures (DES-2 and RCADS) were administered at session 1, session 8, and at follow-up, and the YP-CORE and the Session Rating Scale were completed at each session. The patient was independently interviewed using the Change Interview 13 weeks after completing therapy. The results show that CAT effectively increased the recognition and revision of TPs/TPPs, four specific changes occurred (including cessation of functional seizures). There were pre–post reliable and clinically significant improvements to psychological wellbeing, but these were not maintained at follow-up. Conclusions: This study indicates that CAT was a partially effective intervention. The use of CAT as a treatment for FND in adolescents holds promise, but more research is needed.
Journal Article
Treating Sexual Orientation Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Cognitive Analytic Therapy: Case Report and Quasi-Experimental Outcome Evaluation
Background and Clinical Significance: Evaluations of interventions for sexual orientation obsessive–compulsive disorder (SO-OCD) are rare. This study therefore evaluated the effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT). Case Presentation: A 28-year-old heterosexual male presented with SO-OCD in the form of obsessions concerning his sexual identity and associated avoidance and reassurance-seeking compulsions. The evaluation was a quasi-experiential A/B single-case experimental design (SCED) with follow-up of the eight-session CAT intervention. The SCED had three phases: baseline ‘A’ (two sessions; 21 days), active treatment ‘B’ (six sessions; 56 days) and follow-up (one session; 44 days). There were seven daily rated idiographic outcome measures (intrusion count as the control, a compulsion count and then intensity measures of checking, worrying, generating evidence, shame and anxiety). Four nomothetic outcome measures (including a primary outcome measure of SO-OCD) were collected at assessment, end of treatment and follow-up. Generalised logistical models were fitted to the idiographic outcomes. Six of the seven idiographic measures responded to treatment, indicating an effective intervention. Idiographic change was non-linear and synchronised with specific psychotherapeutic actions and there was no evidence of relapse. There was a clinically significant and reliable pre–post reduction in SO-OCD with progress sustained over the follow-up period. Conclusions: Overall, the study indicates that CAT was an effective intervention for the SO-OCD. The study methodology is critiqued and guidance on SO-OCD treatment is provided.
Journal Article
Cognitive analytic therapy for personality disorder: randomised controlled trial
Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a theoretically coherent approach developed to address common processes underlying personality disorders, but is supported by limited empirical evidence.
To investigate the effectiveness of time-limited CAT for participants with personality disorder.
A service-based randomised controlled trial (trial registration: ISRCTN79596618) comparing 24 sessions of CAT (n = 38) and treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 40) over 10 months for individuals with personality disorder. Primary outcomes were measures of psychological symptoms and interpersonal difficulties.
Participants receiving CAT showed reduced symptoms and experienced substantial benefits compared with TAU controls, who showed signs of deterioration during the treatment period.
Cognitive analytic therapy is more effective than TAU in improving outcomes associated with personality disorder. More elaborate and controlled evaluations of CAT are needed in the future.
Journal Article
Development and Evaluation of Cognitive Analytic Guided Self-Help (CAT-SH) for Use in IAPT Services
Background: There is a lack of treatment plurality at step 2 of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services. This project therefore sought to develop and pilot a cognitive analytic informed guided self-help treatment for mild-to-moderate anxiety for delivery by Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners (PWPs). Method: Medical Research Council treatment development guidelines were used. Phase I included development of the six-session treatment manual using practice guidelines, small-scale modelling (n = 3) and indicated manual iterations. Phase II consisted of a mixed methods case series design (n = 11) to index feasibility, uptake and clinical outcomes. Results: Cognitive analytic guided self-help (CAT-SH) met established quality parameters for guided self-help. A high treatment completion rate was observed, with 10/11 patients who attended the first treatment session subsequently completing full treatment. Six out of ten patients completing full treatment met reliable recovery criteria at follow-up. Effect sizes and recovery rates equate with extant PWP outcome benchmarks. Practitioner feedback indicated that delivery of CAT-SH was feasible. Conclusion: CAT-SH shows promise as a low-intensity treatment for anxiety, and so further, larger and more controlled evaluations are indicated.
Journal Article
Blending Cognitive Analytic Therapy With a Digital Support Tool: Mixed Methods Study Involving a User-Centered Design of a Prototype App
Patients can struggle to make good use of psychotherapy owing to deficits in awareness, and digital technologies that support awareness are at a premium. Currently, when patients participate in cognitive analytic therapy (CAT), the technology supporting relational awareness work involves completion of paper-based worksheets as between-session tasks.
We aimed to design, with therapists and patients, a prototype digital mobile app. This was to help patients better engage in the \"recognition\" phase of the CAT treatment model by providing an unobtrusive means for practicing relational awareness with dynamic feedback on progress.
A national online survey was conducted with CAT therapists (n=50) to determine readiness for adoption of a mobile app in clinical practice and to identify core content, functionality, and potential barriers to adoption. A prototype mobile app based on data and existing paper-based worksheets was built. Initial face-to-face user testing of the prototype system was completed with three therapists and three CAT expatients.
Among the therapists surveyed, 72% (36/50) reported not currently using any digital tools during CAT. However, the potential value of a mobile app to support patient awareness was widely endorsed. Areas of therapist concern were data security, data governance, and equality of access. These concerns were mirrored during subsequent user testing by CAT therapists. Expatients generated additional user specifications on the design, functionality, and usability of the app. Results from both streams were integrated to produce five key changes for the reiteration of the app.
The user-centered design process has enabled a prototype CAT-App to be developed to enhance the relational awareness work of CAT. This means that patients can now practice relational awareness in a much more unobtrusive manner and with ongoing dynamic feedback of progress. Testing the acceptability and feasibility of this technological innovation in clinical practice is the next stage in the research process, which has since been conducted and has been submitted. The important challenges of data protection and governance must be navigated in order to ensure implementation and adoption if the CAT-App is found to be acceptable and clinically effective.
Journal Article