Explore the vast range of titles available.

Bile acid sequestrants (BASs), including cholestyramine, colestipol, and colesevelam, are widely used in endocrine and gastrointestinal disorders. However, their long-term safety remains under-characterized. This study leveraged real-world pharmacovigilance data to evaluate underreported and subclass-specific adverse events (AEs) associated with BASs. We analyzed 5,286 AE reports related to BASs from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2004-2024) using four disproportionality methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). AE signals were assessed at both the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) levels. Time-to-onset (TTO) analysis was also performed. All three BASs showed prominent gastrointestinal AEs. Cholestyramine was notably associated with oropharyngeal irritation (e.g., throat irritation, ROR = 21.89; oropharyngeal discomfort, ROR = 36.53), while colestipol presented mechanical risks such as dysphagia (ROR = 21.51) and choking (ROR = 67.44). Colesevelam exhibited musculoskeletal toxicity, including myalgia (ROR = 4.74) and muscle spasms (ROR = 3.43). Consensus signals across all methods further revealed novel AEs such as dysgeusia, dental abnormalities, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and fecaloma. TTO analysis showed that most AEs occurred within the first month of therapy, with 15-16% persisting beyond 6 months. This large-scale FAERS study updates the safety profiles of BASs, highlighting distinct risk patterns and delayed complications. The findings support personalized monitoring strategies that consider both drug-specific characteristics and temporal AE patterns.

To evaluate the effects of bile acid sequestrants (BASs) versus placebo, no intervention or active comparators on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Data were retrieved and a systematic review with meta-analyses was performed. We evaluated bias control and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate heterogeneity and bias. We included 17 trials with a total of 2950 patients randomized to BASs (colesevelam or colestimide) versus placebo, no intervention, statins or sitagliptin. Random-effects meta-analysis showed that patients randomized to BASs had a lower hemoglobin A1c at the end of treatment compared with the control group (mean difference−0.55%; 95% confidence interval−0.64 to −0.46). Analysis of trials with low risk of bias in all domains confirmed the findings. Data on adverse events were limited. There were no differences between trials stratified by the control group and no evidence of publication bias or small study effects. Our analyses found that BAS treatment improves glycemic control. The size of the effect was clinically relevant and despite limited safety data, our findings support the inclusion of BASs in current diabetes management algorithms for type 2 diabetes.

Patients with a Fontan circulation suffer from progressive multiorgan dysfunction, yet central biochemical drivers remain poorly defined. Our recent work exploring metabolomic analyses have identified - elevated circulating bile acids (BAs) in adult Fontan patients compared with healthy controls. Elevated BAs, especially secondary and hydrophobic ones produced by the gut microbiome were found to correlate with worse exercise capacity, greater frailty, and impaired hemodynamics. Bile acid accumulation may contribute to Fontan pathophysiology. Colesevelam, a nonabsorbed bile acid sequestrant, offers a potential targeted therapy to reduce BA levels and interrupt this disease pathway. The MYSTIC trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study in 25 adult Fontan patients (with 25 age- and sex-matched healthy controls for baseline comparisons) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of colesevelam in lowering plasma BA levels. Primary outcomes include safety/tolerability and change in total plasma BA levels. Secondary outcomes include changes in noninvasive hemodynamics, gut microbiome composition, fecal bile acid excretion, and biochemical profiles. Single center. 25 patients and 25 healthy subjects. September 2025 to August 2027. NCT06197763 This manuscript describes the rationale and design of the MYSTIC study, which to our knowledge is the first interventional trial targeting a Fontan-specific metabolic derangement. The results will inform the feasibility of BA sequestration therapy in Fontan patients and guide future larger studies aimed at improving outcomes in this growing high-risk population.

INTRODUCTION:Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an option for microscopic colitis (MC) refractory or intolerant to budesonide. There are inconsistent data on the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and utility of bile acid testing in MC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate these outcomes.METHODS:A systematic search of randomized control trials and observational studies of adults with MC treated with BAS was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception to January 22, 2024. Data were extracted on (i) prevalence of BAM, (ii) clinical response and adverse events, and (iii) recurrence after BAS discontinuation. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS:We included 23 studies (1 randomized control trial, 22 observational), with 1,011 patients with MC assessed for BAM and 771 treated with BAS. The pooled prevalence of BAM was 34% (95% CI 0.26-0.42, I2 = 81%). The pooled response rate with BAS induction for all patients with MC, irrespective of BAM, was 62% (95% CI 0.55-0.70, I2 = 71%). There was a higher pooled response rate in patients with BAM compared with those without BAM (P < 0.0001). The pooled rate of BAS-related adverse effects was 9% (95% CI 0.05-0.14, I2 = 58%).DISCUSSION:One-third of patients with MC had BAM, and almost two-thirds of all patients responded to BAS with limited side effects. Patients with MC and BAM were more likely to respond to therapy, supporting the value of bile acid testing.

[...] colesevelam has not been extensively studied in combination with thiazolidinediones. Because hypoglycemia is considered a major, if not the main, cause of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with longstanding type 2 diabetes and comorbidities, colesevelam, with its low risk of hypoglycemia, is an ideal choice for antidiabetes therapy.

This study evaluated the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c-lowering effect of colesevelam hydrochloride, a bile acid sequestrant, in subjects with type 2 diabetes that was inadequately controlled by existing antihyperglycemic therapy. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, subjects with type 2 diabetes and an HbA 1c value of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized to receive colesevelam 3.75 g/d or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Subjects' previous oral anti hyperglycemic medication (sulfonylurea and/or metformin) was continued throughout the study. Fasting blood samples were obtained at weeks −5, −1, 0, 1, 4, 8, and 12. The primary efficacy end point was the change in HbA 1c from baseline to week 12. Secondary end points included changes in fructosamine levels, fasting plasma glucose levels, postprandial glucose level, and meal glucose response (ie, difference between preprandial and postprandial levels), and percent changes in lipid parameters from baseline to week 12. The 65 randomized subjects (31 colesevelam, 34 placebo) had a mean age of 56.2 years and a mean body mass index of 32.4 kg/m 2; 55.4% were male and 53.8% were white. The difference in least squares (LS) mean (SE) change in HbA 1c between the colesevelam group and the placebo group was −0.5% (0.18) ( P = 0.007). In subjects with a baseline HbAIc ≥ 8.0%, the difference in LS mean change in HbA 1c was −1.0% (0.27) ( P = 0.002). Relative to placebo, colesevelam treatment was associated with reductions in levels of fructosamine (−29.0 [10.9] pmol/L; P = 0.011) and postprandial glucose (−31.5 [13.6] mg/dL; P = 0.026). The mean percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was -9.6% in the colesevelam group, compared with 2.1% in the placebo group (treatment difference, −11.7% [4.2]; P = 0.007); the respective mean percent changes in total cholesterol were −4.0% and 3.4% (treatment difference, −7.3% [3.0]; P = 0.019). Colesevelam also was associated with significant decreases in the percent change in apolipoprotein B (P = 0.003) and low-density lipoprotein particle concentration ( P = 0.037). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar in both groups, although treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the colesevelam group than in the placebo group (29.0% vs 8.8%, respectively). The most frequent TEAEs in the colesevelam group were gastrointestinal disorders (22.6%), primarily constipation (19.4%), compared with an 8.8% incidence of gastrointestinal disorders (0% constipation) in the placebo group. There were no significant changes in body weight or the occurrence of hypoglycemia between treatment groups. In these subjects with type 2 diabetes, 12 weeks of colesevelam treatment were associated with significant reductions in HbA 1c and in fructosamine and postprandial glucose levels compared with placebo. The 2 groups had a similar adverse-event profile, with the exception of an increased incidence of constipation in the colesevelam group. These results suggest that colesevelam may improve both lipid control and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving oral antihyperglycemic medications.

Background: Commercially available bile-acid sequestrants are not well tolerated by >80% of patients. Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of colesevelam hydrochloride in patients who developed bile-acid malabsorption after cancer therapy. Methods: The present study comprised 2 parts: a retrospective chart review of the electronic patient records and a patient questionnaire assessing outcome measures. All patients included in this study had a diagnosis of cancer and were being followed up in a cancer clinic at The Royal Marsden Hospital. In addition, all had symptoms of bile-acid malabsorption for >3 months and had been prescribed colesevelam in the gastroenterology clinic at the hospital. The electronic records of patients who were prescribed colesevelam between 2004 and 2007 were obtained from the hospital pharmacy. Those patients who were prescribed colesevelam and did not take any of the prescribed medication or did not return for a follow-up clinical review were excluded. To help further assess outcomes, a questionnaire was mailed to patients who were still residing in the United Kingdom, were not terminally ill, and were not lost to follow-up. The questionnaire comprised questions that assessed medication history (ie, whether patients were still taking colesevelam or not [and the reason for not taking colesevelam]), dosage, effectiveness for symptom relief, and adverse events. Results: In total, 45 patients (37 women and 8 men; median age, 58 years [range, 32–89 years]) who received treatment with colesevelam between 2004 and 2007 were included. Of these, 36 were sent a questionnaire and 30 responded. Identifiable causes of bile acid malabsorption in this sample population were pelvic radiotherapy (n = 29), small-bowel resection (12), upper gastrointestinal surgery (2), high-dose chemotherapy (1), and new-onset Crohn's disease (1). Of these patients, 67% (30/45) had not previously responded to cholestyramine treatment, but following treatment with colesevelam, this group had a recorded improvement in: diarrhea, 83% (25/30); urgency of defecation, 74% (20/27); frequency of defecation, 72% (21/29); steatorrhea, 71% (12/17); abdominal pain, 68% (15/22); and fecal incontinence, 62% (13/21). Based on the medical chart review and the patient questionnaire, after colesevelam treatment, the following proportions of all 45 patients studied experienced improvement in symptoms: loose stool (diarrhea), 88% (medical chart) and 80% (questionnaire); frequency of defecation, 77% and 83%, respectively; steatorrhea, 76% and 80%; urgency of defecation, 76% and 80%; abdominal pain, 74% and 58%; and fecal incontinence, 69% and 74%. During the study period, 15 patients discontinued colesevelam: ineffectiveness, 5; adverse events, 5 (because ≥1 of the following: bloating, constipation, heartburn, abdominal pain, flatulence, or perianal soreness); and other reasons, 7 (too many tablets or tablets difficult to swallow [3]; symptoms resolved [2]; colesevelam replaced with another medication [1]; and lost to follow-up [1]). Sixty-seven percent (30/45) of patients continued using colesevelam for up to 4 years. Conclusion: In view of the data found in this retrospective chart review and patient questionnaire, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of colesevelam for bile acid malabsorption are warranted.

PurposeNeratinib is an irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the extended adjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Its use is associated with the development of severe diarrhea in up to 40% of patients in the absence of proactive management. We previously developed a rat model of neratinib-induced diarrhea and found inflammation and anatomical disruption in the ileum and colon. Here we tested whether anti-diarrheal interventions, budesonide and colesevelam, can reduce neratinib-induced diarrhea and intestinal pathology.MethodsRats were treated with 50 mg/kg neratinib via oral gavage for 14 or 28 days (total n = 64). Body weight and diarrhea severity were recorded daily. Apoptosis was measured using immunohistochemistry for caspase-3. Inflammation was measured via a multiplex cytokine/chemokine assay. ErbB levels were measured using PCR and Western Blot.ResultsBudesonide co-treatment caused rats to gain significantly less weight than neratinib alone from day 4 of treatment (P = 0.0418). Budesonide (P = 0.027) and colesevelam (P = 0.033) each reduced the amount of days with moderate diarrhea compared to neratinib alone. In the proximal colon, rats treated with neratinib had higher levels of apoptosis compared to controls (P = 0.0035). Budesonide reduced histopathological injury in the proximal (P = 0.0401) and distal colon (P = 0.027) and increased anti-inflammatory IL-4 tissue concentration (ileum; P = 0.0026, colon; P = 0.031) compared to rats treated with neratinib alone. In the distal ileum, while budesonide decreased ErbB1 mRNA expression compared to controls (P = 0.018) (PCR), an increase in total ErbB1 protein was detected (P = 0.0021) (Western Blot).ConclusionBoth budesonide and colesevelam show potential as effective interventions against neratinib-induced diarrhea.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common autosomal co-dominant genetic disorder that results in severely increased levels of LDL-C. Patients with FH are at an increased risk for premature coronary artery disease. Expert panels therefore recommend initiation of lipid-lowering therapy in childhood to reduce the very high lifetime risk of coronary artery disease. The bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is indicated to reduce elevated LDL-C levels in adults with primary hyperlipidemia and in boys and postmenarchal girls (aged 10–17 years) with heterozygous FH. The purpose of this article was to review currently available data on the use of colesevelam in the treatment of heterozygous FH. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify clinical trials evaluating colesevelam in patients with heterozygous FH. The search returned 2 results (both multicenter, multinational studies): 1 study conducted in adults and the other in pediatric patients. In the study in adults with refractory FH, the addition of colesevelam to a maximally tolerated regimen of a statin plus ezetimibe provided a significantly greater reduction from baseline in LDL-C levels compared with placebo. Significantly greater reductions from baseline in LDL-C were also seen in pediatric patients with heterozygous FH receiving colesevelam (alone or in combination with statins) compared with placebo. Colesevelam was generally well tolerated in studies in patients with FH; consistent with other colesevelam studies, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common drug-related adverse events, but these events rarely led to study withdrawal. Currently available data demonstrate that colesevelam, alone or in combination therapy, is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of heterozygous FH in adults and pediatric patients, supporting its use as a treatment option in both of these patient populations.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk when untreated or when normal LDL-C concentrations are not reached. Some patients with FH do not reach LDL-C goals despite intensive combination therapy. Objective: This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of colesevelam added to maximally tolerated, stable-dose combination treatment with a statin + ezetimibe. Methods: This Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years with FH and an LDL-C concentration >2.5 mmol/L who were receiving a maximally tolerated and stable regimen of a statin + ezetimibe. Patients were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam 3.75 g/d or placebo added to the statin + ezetimibe for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in LDL-C between the colesevelam and placebo groups after 6 weeks. Secondary efficacy outcomes were between-group differences in LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, triglyceride (Tg), apolipoprotein (apo) B, and apoA-I concentrations, as well as apoB/apoA-I ratio after 12 weeks. Tolerability was assessed based on the prevalences of adverse events by organ system class in each treatment group. Results: Eighty-six patients were randomized (45 colesevelam, 41 placebo), of whom 84 (44 colesevelam, 40 placebo) were included in the primary analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 52.8 (10.8) years, and 51 (59%) were men. The difference (95% CI) in LDL-C between colesevelam and placebo after 6 weeks was −18.5% (−25.3 to −11.8). Between-group differences in LDL-C, TC, HDL-C, Tg, and apoB/apoA-I ratio after 12 weeks were −12.0% (−17.8 to −6.3), −7.3% (−12.0 to −2.6), +3.3% (−2.4 to +9.0), +2.8% (−10.4 to +15.9), and −12.2% (−20.2 to −4.2), respectively. Colesevelam was generally well tolerated, with gastrointestinal adverse events in 12 of 45 patients (27%) versus 7 of 40 (18%) in the placebo group ( P = NS). Conclusion: In these patients with FH, colesevelam added to a combination of a statin + ezetimibe was associated with significantly improved LDL-C concentrations compared with placebo during the 12-week study period and was generally well tolerated.