Explore the vast range of titles available.

First published in 1920, Paul Miliukov's book concerns the international nature of Bolshevism, both in terms of its ideologically internationalist doctrine of World Revolution and in terms of the attempts to spread Bolshevism in the period immediately preceding and following the First World War and the Russian revolution of October 1917. This reissue is a must for anyone interested in the rise of Bolshevism as an international force.

In The Dialectic of Position and Maneuver, Daniel Egan examines the role that the military metaphors of war of position and war of maneuver play in Antonio Gramsci's social theory. The foundation for this analysis is the different ways in which Marxists have understood war and military strategy since the mid-nineteenth century. In doing so, Egan argues that the distinction between war of position and war of maneuver which is so central to Gramsci's work as well as contemporary interpretations of his work must be understood in a more dialectical manner. This conclusion is important not only in terms of Gramsci's social theory, but also for understanding the limits and possibilities of contemporary political strategies for the left worldwide.

\"In The Dialectic of Position and Maneuver, Daniel Egan examines the role that the military metaphors of war of position and war of maneuver play in Antonio Gramsci's social theory. The foundation for this analysis is the different ways in which Marxists have understood war and military strategy since the mid-nineteenth century. In doing so, Egan argues that the distinction between war of position and war of maneuver which is so central to Gramsci's work as well as contemporary interpretations of his work must be understood in a more dialectical manner. This conclusion is important not only in terms of Gramsci's social theory, but also for understanding the limits and possibilities of contemporary political strategies for the left worldwide.\"--Provided by publisher.

\"7 Second, instrumental lawfare is the use of legal tools, like sanctions or bans, to achieve effects similar to conventional military actions.8 Third, proxy lawfare is legal action against an adversary's proxy, such as a PRC or Russian corporation.9 Fourth, \"information lawfare is the use of law to control the narrative\" of competition or conflict or the use of misleading legal positions to justify coercion or aggression.10 Fifth, institutional lawfare is the creation of domestic law to achieve strategic efforts, such as asserting sovereignty or jurisdiction.11 The PRC, however, has clearly defined lawfare.12 The PRC has implemented three reinforcing warfares: legal warfare, public opinion warfare, and psychological warfare.13 The PRC views lawfare as an offensive weapon to seize the initiative-a form of combat.14 The PRC lawfare involves \"arguing that one's own side is obeying the law, criticizing the other side for violating the law, and making arguments for one's own side in cases where there are also violations of the law. \"15 Conversely, public opinion warfare is the struggle over media dominance, and psychological warfare involves erosion of political will.16 As demonstrated in the commonplace example below, lawfare is part of the PRC's daily operations, which necessitates U.S. counter-lawfare-activities that preserve legitimacy, build legal consensus, and oppose unlawful action and misinformation that threatens the rules-based international order.17 The PRC regularly shadows and confronts vessels in the South China Sea18 because the PRC asserts sovereignty over it.19 Nearly one-third of global maritime trade-or $5.3 trillion of trade-passes through these waters each year, and the PRC portrays U.S. navigation in these waters as a violation of international law.20 Throughout these engagements, the PRC asserts that it is obeying-even enforcing- the law and the United States is aggressively violating the law, specifically PRC sovereignty, even when the PRC is operating its own vessels in an unsafe manner. In this example, though the PRC ship set a collision course and blamed the United States for the same, the PRC ship does not actually seek a collision. 2 Division and foreign intervention plagued the ROC's rule of mainland China.33 At the outset, Mongolia declared independence in Outer Mongolia during the Revolution of 1911.34 The Mongolian People's Republic became a Soviet satellite state,35 and the ROC signed a treaty with Russia over Mongolia in 1915, regained control of it by force from Russia in 1919, and then lost control again in 1921.36 Russia also colonized Tannu Tuva (Tyva), a region between Russia and Mongolia.37 Further, civil war erupted in the late 1920s between the ruling Kuomintang (KMT or Nationalist) Party and the Soviet-backed Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which calls itself the Zhöngguó Gongch nd ng, or Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (СССР).38 The ROC initially suppressed the CCP's rebellion and forced the retreat known as the Long March, but the 1931 Japanese invasion eventually unraveled the ROC's control of mainland China.39 Japan launched a full-scale invasion in 1937, resulting in Japanese control of Manchuria and most of the larger cities of eastern China, including Hong Kong.40 An intermission in the civil war between the ROC and the CCP enabled the ROC to prioritize focus and revenue on fighting Japanese forces, but ROC forces failed to prevent destruction and stop Japanese atrocities.41 Meanwhile, the CCP focused on the \"battle for the hearts and minds of the peasants,\" distributing landlord lands to laborers.42 After World War II, the CCP enjoyed popularity, with many Chinese people having a stake in the CCP's success, while the ROC autocracy felt hostile towards the Chinese people.43 Ultimately, after an agreement to govern a united China failed, fighting broke out between the ROC and CCP in 1948.44 In 1949, the ROC and 1.2 million Chinese nationalists fled to Taiwan, which Japan returned to the ROC at the end of World War II.45 Since 1949, the CCP has exercised control over mainland China under an autocratic socialist system.46 Mao Zedong, CCP chairman,47 initially planned on using the name Zhönghuá Mínguó (Republic of China) for his new government but assessed the people wanted a new, more appropriate title.48 On 1 October 1949, Mao declared the creation of the People's Republic of China (PRC)-or Zhönghuá Rénmín Gbngheguó.49 The United Nations, however, continued to recognize the ROC as \"China\" until 1971.50 Then, in 1979, the United States recognized the CCP's PRC51 has a \"One China\" principle-without agreeing with the PRC position-and committed domestically to unofficial relations with and defensive assistance of Taiwan via the U.S.-PRC Shanghai Communiqué and the Taiwan Relations Act.52 The CCP and the CCP's PRC have never exercised control over Taiwan or its outlying islands, including Kinmen Island, the Matsu Islands, or the Penghu Islands.53 \"Youll Remember You Belong to Me\"54 The PRC has been waging and winning lawfare from its founding.55 Today, the CCP's PRC argues that, in 1949, the Chinese people proclaimed the PRC's replacement of the ROC as the only government

First published in 1920, Paul Miliukov's book concerns the international nature of Bolshevism, both in terms of its ideologically internationalist doctrine of World Revolution and in terms of the attempts to spread Bolshevism in the period immediately preceding and following the First World War and the Russian revolution of October 1917. This reissue is a must for anyone interested in the rise of Bolshevism as an international force.

In 1931, eight leaders of the Communist Party of Canada (cpc) were convicted under Section 98 – a federal law that criminalized the advocacy of radical politics – and the party was declared illegal in Canada. The Canadian Labour Defense League (cldl), the party's ancillary organization responsible for legal matters, conducted an intense campaign directed at securing both the release of the party's leaders and the repeal of Section 98. This campaign included the distribution of pamphlets, the organization of demonstrations, and even the production of a dramatic play, entitled Eight Men Speak. Canadian state officials, led by Prime Minister R. B. Bennett, responded to the party's efforts oppressively. Prison guards fired shots into cpc general secretary Tim Buck's cell in Kingston Penitentiary, and Bennett himself had Eight Men Speak banned from performance in Toronto. Such kneejerk reactions, however, afforded cldl leaders opportunities to conduct meaningful work. This article argues that the cldl skillfully accentuated its own repression, keeping Section 98 relevant to Canada's voting populace and placing capitalism and the Canadian state on trial in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This title examines the role of the Europeans in the Cold War during the 'Khrushchev Era'. It was a period marked by the struggle for a regulated co-existence in a world of blocs, an initial arrangement to find a temporary arrangement failed due to German desires to quickly overcome the status quo. It was only when the danger of an unintended nuclear war was demonstrated through the crises over Berlin and Cuba that a tacit arrangement became possible, which was based on a system dominated by a nuclear arms race.The book provides useful information on the role of Konrad Adenauer and the beginnings of the German 'new Eastern policy', as well as examining the Western European power policy in the era of Harold Macmillan and Charles de Gaulle.

This title examines the role of the Europeans in the Cold War during the 'Khrushchev Era'. It was a period marked by the struggle for a regulated co-existence in a world of blocs, an initial arrangement to find a temporary arrangement failed due to German desires to quickly overcome the status quo. It was only when the danger of an unintended nuclear war was demonstrated through the crises over Berlin and Cuba that a tacit arrangement became possible, which was based on a system dominated by a nuclear arms race. The book provides useful information on the role of Konrad Adenauer and the beginnings of the German 'new Eastern policy', as well as examining the Western European power policy in the era of Harold Macmillan and Charles de Gaulle. Part 1: 1953-1958 Part 2: 1958-1962 Part 3: 1962-1965 Part 4: Direct Negotiations between Eastern and Western Europe