Explore the vast range of titles available.

Three complement components, C1r, C4 and C1 inhibitor, of the classical activation pathway have been fully sequenced and their expression investigated in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Trout C1r cDNA encodes a 707-amino-acid (aa) protein with a theoretical M(r) of 77,200. The trout translation shows highest homology with carp C1r/s, and lower, equal homologies to mammalian C1r and C1s, and MASPs from other vertebrate species. However, phylogenetic analysis and structural features suggest that the trout sequence, together with the two carp sequences, are the orthologues of mammalian C1r. The trout C4 cDNA encodes a 1,724-aa protein with a theoretical M(r) of 192,600. The trout translation shows higher homologies to the carp C4B and medaka C4, but lower homologies to C4 from other species and the carp C4A. It has a predicted signal peptide of 22 aa, a alpha-chain of 773 aa, a beta-chain of 635 aa and a lambda-chain of 288 aa. Trout C1 inhibitor cDNA encodes a 611-aa protein with a theoretical M(r) of 68,700. The trout translation has a C-terminal serpin domain with high homologies with mammalian counterparts (~37% identities), and a longer N-terminus, with no significant homology to other serpins, which contains two Ig-like domains. A molecule containing two Ig-like domains followed by a serpin domain, has also been found in an EST clone from another bony fish, the Japanese flounder. This suggests a unique structural feature of C1 inhibitor in fish. The functional significance of the Ig domains is discussed. The liver is the major site of expression of the three trout complement components, C1r, C4 and C1 inhibitor, although their expression is also detectable in other tissues. The extra-hepatic expression of complement genes may be important for local protection and inflammatory responses. Low-level constitutive expression of the three components was also detectable in a trout monocyte/macrophage cell line RTS-11, but only the expression of C4 could be upregulated by LPS.

In this placebo-controlled trial, CSL830, a subcutaneous C1 inhibitor, significantly reduced the rate of hereditary angioedema attacks; local site reactions were the dominant side effect. Of the patients who received 60 IU per kilogram twice weekly, 40% had no attacks for 16 weeks. Hereditary angioedema is a disabling and potentially fatal condition characterized by recurrent episodes of swelling without urticaria or pruritus. The condition is caused by deficiency (type I) or dysfunction (type II) of the C1 inhibitor protein. 1 Patients have insufficient C1 inhibitor function to prevent bradykinin production by the contact system, leading to episodes of increased capillary hyperpermeability and swelling. These episodes manifest clinically as angioedema attacks. 2 , 3 Low levels of C1 inhibitor protein antigen or low functional levels of C1 inhibitor activity, as well as low levels of complement C4, are diagnostic for hereditary angioedema, and baseline C1 inhibitor function . . .

Hereditary angioedema is a rare genetic disease that may include recurrent attacks of cutaneous angioedema, severe abdominal pain, and airway compromise. Prophylaxis and treatment include C1 inhibitor replacement and inhibition of the kallikrein and bradykinin pathways.

In the classical complement pathway, the C1 initiation complex binds to danger patterns on the surface of microbes or damaged host cells and triggers an immune response. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies form hexamers on cell surfaces that have high avidity for the C1 complex. Ugurlar et al. used cryo–electron microscopy to show how a hexamer of C1 complexes interacts with the IgG hexamer. Structure-guided mutagenesis revealed how C1 is activated to trigger an immune response. Science , this issue p. 794 Cryo–electron microscopy structures suggest mechanisms for how danger patterns on cell membranes trigger an immune response. Danger patterns on microbes or damaged host cells bind and activate C1, inducing innate immune responses and clearance through the complement cascade. How these patterns trigger complement initiation remains elusive. Here, we present cryo–electron microscopy analyses of C1 bound to monoclonal antibodies in which we observed heterogeneous structures of single and clustered C1–immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) hexamer complexes. Distinct C1q binding sites are observed on the two Fc-CH2 domains of each IgG molecule. These are consistent with known interactions and also reveal additional interactions, which are supported by functional IgG1-mutant analysis. Upon antibody binding, the C1q arms condense, inducing rearrangements of the C1r 2 s 2 proteases and tilting C1q’s cone-shaped stalk. The data suggest that C1r may activate C1s within single, strained C1 complexes or between neighboring C1 complexes on surfaces.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) has been recognized for almost 150 years. The newest form of HAE, where C1 inhibitor levels are normal (HAE-nC1INH), was first described in 2000. Over the last two decades, new types of apparent non-mast cell–mediated angioedema with normal quantity and activity of C1INH have been described, in some cases with proven genetic pathogenic variants that co-segregate with angioedema expression within families. Like HAE due to C1INH deficiency, HAE-nC1INH patients are at risk of serious morbidity and mortality. Therefore, proactive management and treatment of HAE-nC1INH patients after an expert physician diagnosis is critically important. The underlying pathophysiology responsible for the angioedema has also been clarified in some of the HAE-nC1INH types. While several clinical guidelines and practice parameters including HAE-nC1INH have been published, we have made substantial progress in our understanding encompassing diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and treatment outcomes. HAE International (HAEi) and the US HAE Association (HAEA) convened a symposium of global HAE-nC1INH experts to synthesize our current knowledge in the area. Given the paucity of high-level evidence in HAE-nC1INH, all recommendations are based on expert opinion. This review and expert opinion on the best practice approach to diagnosing and treating HAE-nC1INH will support physicians to better manage patients with HAE-nC1INH.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and malignant primary brain tumor in adults. While immune evasion is a well-recognized driver of GBM progression and a major obstacle for efficient immunotherapy, the role of the complement system remains underexplored. C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), a regulator of complement activation, was recently found overexpressed in GBM. We therefore hypothesized that GBM overexpresses additional complement regulators beyond C1-INH and the present work aimed to identify these. Gene expression of complement inhibitors, the complement regulator pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and complement proteins was analyzed across nine publicly available transcriptomic datasets. Within each dataset, statistical comparisons were performed between sample groups for each gene. Differentially expressed complement inhibitors were validated at the protein level by immunostaining in the rat GBM cell line NS1 and patient derived GBM tissue. CFI, encoding factor I, was significantly overexpressed in GBM compared to non-tumoral brain, while THBD and CFH, encoding thrombomodulin and factor H, displayed moderate overexpression. SERPING1, encoding C1-INH, was also upregulated, confirming previous findings. Immunostaining confirmed the expression of these inhibitors in vitro as well as in human glioblastoma tissue. Additionally, PTX3 and early complement proteins were significantly overexpressed in GBM, while levels of C5 and downstream components were comparable to normal brain. Our findings indicate that the GBM tumor overexpresses a specific set of complement regulators and components of the complement cascade, possibly inhibiting an efficient anti-tumoral immune response. Further investigations of these regulators as potential therapeutical targets in GBM are therefore highly warranted.

IgG3 is unique among the IgG subclasses due to its extended hinge, allotypic diversity and enhanced effector functions, including highly efficient pathogen neutralisation and complement activation. It is also underrepresented as an immunotherapeutic candidate, partly due to a lack of structural information. Here, we use cryoEM to solve structures of antigen-bound IgG3 alone and in complex with complement components. These structures reveal a propensity for IgG3-Fab clustering, which is possible due to the IgG3-specific flexible upper hinge region and may maximise pathogen neutralisation by forming high-density antibody arrays. IgG3 forms elevated hexameric Fc platforms that extend above the protein corona to maximise binding to receptors and the complement C1 complex, which here adopts a unique protease conformation that may precede C1 activation. Mass spectrometry reveals that C1 deposits C4b directly onto specific IgG3 residues proximal to the Fab domains. Structural analysis shows this to be caused by the height of the C1-IgG3 complex. Together, these data provide structural insights into the role of the unique IgG3 extended hinge, which will aid the development and design of upcoming immunotherapeutics based on IgG3. IgG3 antibodies have potent effector functions, but are not used as therapeutics and structural data are missing. Here, the authors combine cryoEM and MS to study IgG3-mediated complement activation to provide the first structural insights into IgG3.

The complement is a powerful cascade of the innate immunity and also acts as a bridge between innate and acquired immune defence. Complement activation can occur via three distinct pathways, the classical, alternative and lectin pathways, each resulting in the common terminal pathway. Complement activation results in the release of a range of biologically active molecules that significantly contribute to immune surveillance and tissue homeostasis. Several soluble and membrane-bound regulatory proteins restrict complement activation in order to prevent complement-mediated autologous damage, consumption and exacerbated inflammation. The crucial role of complement in the host homeostasis is illustrated by association of both complement deficiency and overactivation with severe and life-threatening diseases. Autoantibodies targeting complement components have been described to alter expression and/or function of target protein resulting in a dysregulation of the delicate equilibrium between activation and inhibition of complement. The spectrum of diseases associated with complement autoantibodies depends on which complement protein and activation pathway are targeted, ranging from autoimmune disorders to kidney and vascular diseases. Nevertheless, these autoantibodies have been identified as differential biomarkers for diagnosis or follow-up of disease only in a small number of clinical conditions. For some autoantibodies, a clear relationship with clinical manifestations has been identified, such as anti-C1q, anti-Factor H, anti-C1 Inhibitor antibodies and C3 nephritic factor. For other autoantibodies, the origin and the functional consequences still remain to be elucidated, questioning about the pathophysiological significance of these autoantibodies, such as anti-mannose binding lectin, anti-Factor I, anti-Factor B and anti-C3b antibodies. The detection of autoantibodies targeting complement components is performed in specialized laboratories; however, there is no consensus on detection methods and standardization of the assays is a real challenge. This review summarizes the current panorama of autoantibodies targeting complement recognition proteins of the classical and lectin pathways, associated proteases, convertases, regulators and terminal components, with an emphasis on autoantibodies clearly involved in clinical conditions.

Complement is an important effector mechanism for antibody-mediated clearance of infections and tumor cells. Upon binding to target cells, the antibody’s constant (Fc) domain recruits complement component C1 to initiate a proteolytic cascade that generates lytic pores and stimulates phagocytosis. The C1 complex (C1qr₂s₂) consists of the large recognition protein C1q and a heterotetramer of proteases C1r and C1s (C1r₂s₂). While interactions between C1 and IgG-Fc are believed to be mediated by the globular heads of C1q, we here find that C1r₂s₂ proteases affect the capacity of C1q to form an avid complex with surface-bound IgG molecules (on various 2,4-dinitrophenol [DNP]-coated surfaces and pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus). The extent to which C1r₂s₂ contributes to C1q–IgG stability strongly differs between human IgG subclasses. Using antibody engineering of monoclonal IgG, we reveal that hexamer-enhancing mutations improve C1q–IgG stability, both in the absence and presence of C1r₂s₂. In addition, hexamer-enhanced IgGs targeting S. aureus mediate improved complement-dependent phagocytosis by human neutrophils. Altogether, these molecular insights into complement binding to surface-bound IgGs could be important for optimal design of antibody therapies.

The multiprotein complex C1 initiates the classical pathway of complement activation on binding to antibody–antigen complexes, pathogen surfaces, apoptotic cells, and polyanionic structures. It is formed from the recognition subcomponent C1q and a tetramer of proteases C1r₂C1s₂ as a Ca2+-dependent complex. Here we have determined the structure of a complex between the CUB1-EGF-CUB2 fragments of C1r and C1s to reveal the C1r–C1s interaction that forms the core of C1. Both fragments are L-shaped and interlock to form a compact antiparallel heterodimer with a Ca2+ from each subcomponent at the interface. Contacts, involving all three domains of each protease, are more extensive than those of C1r or C1s homodimers, explaining why heterocomplexes form preferentially. The available structural and biophysical data support a model of C1r₂C1s₂ in which two C1r-C1s dimers are linked via the catalytic domains of C1r. They are incompatible with a recent model in which the N-terminal domains of C1r and C1s form a fixed tetramer. On binding to C1q, the proteases become more compact, with the C1r-C1s dimers at the center and the six collagenous stems of C1q arranged around the perimeter. Activation is likely driven by separation of the C1r-C1s dimer pairs when C1q binds to a surface. Considerable flexibility in C1s likely facilitates C1 complex formation, activation of C1s by C1r, and binding and activation of downstream substrates C4 and C4b-bound C2 to initiate the reaction cascade.