Explore the vast range of titles available.

The number one cause of disability in the world is low-back pain, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. To reduce mechanical loading, exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace. Substantial reductions in back muscle activity were found when using the exoskeleton during static bending and manual materials handling. However, most exoskeletons only have one joint at hip level, resulting in loss of range of motion and shifting of the exoskeleton relative to the body. To address these issues, a new exoskeleton design has been developed and tested. The present study investigated the effect of the SPEXOR passive exoskeleton on compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during static bending at six hand heights and during lifting of a box of 10 kg from around ankle height using three techniques: Free, Squat and Stoop. For static bending, the exoskeleton reduced the compression force by 13–21% depending on bending angle. Another effect of the exoskeleton was that participants substantially reduced lumbar flexion. While lifting, the exoskeleton reduced the peak compression force, on average, by 14%. Lifting technique did not modify the effect of the exoskeleton such that the reduction in compression force was similar. In conclusion, substantial reductions in compression forces were found as a result of the support generated by the exoskeleton and changes in behavior when wearing the exoskeleton. For static bending, lumbar flexion was reduced with the exoskeleton, indicating reduced passive tissue strain. In addition, the reduced peak compression force could reduce the risk of compression induced tissue failure during lifting.

Low-back pain is the number one cause of disability in the world, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. Exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace to reduce low back loading. During static forward bending, exoskeletons have been shown to reduce back muscle activity by 10% to 40%. However, effects during dynamic lifting are not well documented. Relative support of the exoskeleton might be smaller in lifting compared to static bending due to higher peak loads. In addition, exoskeletons might also result in changes in lifting behavior, which in turn could affect low back loading. The present study investigated the effect of a passive exoskeleton on peak compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during symmetric lifting. Two types (LOW and HIGH) of the device, which generate peak support moments at large and moderate flexion angles, respectively, were tested during lifts from knee and ankle height from a near and far horizontal position, with a load of 10 kg. Both types of the trunk exoskeleton tested here reduced the peak L5S1 compression force by around 5–10% for lifts from the FAR position from both KNEE and ANKLE height. Subjects did adjust their lifting style when wearing the device with a 17% reduced peak trunk angular velocity and 5 degrees increased lumbar flexion, especially during ANKLE height lifts. In conclusion, the exoskeleton had a minor and varying effect on the peak L5S1 compression force with only significant differences in the FAR lifts.

Low back joint compression forces have been linked to the development of chronic back pain. Back-support exoskeletons controllers based on low back compression force estimates could potentially reduce the incidence of chronic pain. However, progress has been hampered by the lack of robust and accurate methods for compression force estimation. Electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal models have been proposed to estimate lumbar compression forces. Nonetheless, they commonly underrepresented trunk musculoskeletal geometries or activation–contraction dynamics, preventing validation across large sets of conditions. Here, we develop and validate a subject-specific large-scale (238 muscle–tendon units) EMG-driven musculoskeletal model for the estimation of lumbosacral moments and compression forces, under eight box-lifting conditions. Ten participants performed symmetric and asymmetric box liftings under 5 and 15 kg weight conditions. EMG-driven model-based estimates of L5/S1 flexion–extension moments displayed high correlation, R2 (mean range: 0.88–0.94), and root mean squared errors between 0.21 and 0.38 Nm/kg, with respect to reference inverse dynamics moments. Model-derived muscle forces were utilized to compute lumbosacral compression forces, which reached eight times participants body weight in 15 kg liftings. For conditions involving stooped postures, model-based analyses revealed a predominant decrease in peak lumbar EMG amplitude during the lowering phase of liftings, which did not translate into a decrease in muscle–tendon forces. During eccentric contraction (box-lowering), our model employed the muscle force–velocity relationship to preserve muscle force despite significant EMG reduction. Our modeling methodology can inherently account for EMG-to-force non-linearities across subjects and lifting conditions, a crucial requirement for robust real-time control of back-support exoskeletons.

With mechanical loading as the main risk factor for LBP, exoskeletons (EXO) are designed to reduce the load on the back by taking over part of the moment normally generated by back muscles. The present study investigated the effect of an active exoskeleton, controlled using three different control modes (INCLINATION, EMG & HYBRID), on spinal compression forces during lifting with various techniques. Ten healthy male subjects lifted a 15 kg box, with three lifting techniques (free, squat & stoop), each of which was performed four times, once without EXO and once each with the three different control modes. Using inverse dynamics, we calculated L5/S1 joint moments. Subsequently, we estimated spine forces using an EMG-assisted trunk model. Peak compression forces substantially decreased by 17.8% when wearing the EXO compared to NO EXO. However, this reduction was partly, by about one third, attributable to a reduction of 25% in peak lifting speed when wearing the EXO. While subtle differences in back load patterns were seen between the three control modes, no differences in peak compression forces were found. In part, this may be related to limitations in the torque generating capacity of the EXO. Therefore, with the current limitations of the motors it was impossible to determine which of the control modes was best. Despite these limitations, the EXO still reduced both peak and cumulative compression forces by about 18%.

Lumbar joint compression forces have been linked to the development of chronic low back pain, which is specially present in occupational environments. Offline methodologies for lumbosacral joint compression force estimation are not commonly integrated in occupational or medical applications due to the highly time-consuming and complex post-processing procedures. Hence, applications such as real-time adjustment of assistive devices (i.e., back-support exoskeletons) for optimal modulation of compression forces remains unfeasible. Here, we present a real-time electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal model, capable of estimating accurate lumbosacral joint moments and plausible compression forces. Ten participants performed box-lifting tasks (5 and 15 kg) with and without the Laevo Flex back-support exoskeleton using squat and stoop lifting techniques. Lumbosacral kinematics and EMGs from abdominal and thoracolumbar muscles were used to drive, in real-time, subject-specific EMG-driven models, and estimate lumbosacral joint moments and compression forces. Real-time EMG-model derived moments showed high correlations (R2 = 0.76 - 0.83) and estimation errors below 30% with respect to reference inverse dynamic moments. Compared to unassisted lifting conditions, exoskeleton liftings showed mean lumbosacral joint moments and compression forces reductions of 11.9 - 18.7 Nm (6 - 12% of peak moment) and 300 - 450 N (5 - 10%), respectively. Our modelling framework was capable of estimating in real-time, valid lumbosacral joint moments and compression forces in line with in vivo experimental data, as well as detecting the biomechanical effects of a passive back-support exoskeleton. Our presented technology may lead to a new class of bio-protective robots in which personalized assistance profiles are provided based on subject-specific musculoskeletal variables.

Industrial back support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising approach to addressing low back pain (LBP) which still affect a significant proportion of the workforce. They aim to reduce lumbar loading, the main biomechanical risk factor for LBP, by providing external support to the lumbar spine. The aim of this study was to determine the supporting effect of one active (A1) and two passive (P1 and P2) BSEs during different manual material handling tasks. Kinematic data and back muscle activity were collected from 12 subjects during dynamic lifting and static holding of 10 kg. Mean and peak L5/S1 extension moments, L5/S1 compression forces and muscle activation were included in the analysis. During dynamic lifting all BSEs reduced peak (12–26 %) and mean (4–17 %) extension moments and peak (10–22 %) and mean (4–15 %) compression forces in the lumbar spine. The peak (13–28 %) and mean (4–32 %) activity of the back extensor muscles was reduced accordingly. In the static holding task, analogous mean reductions for P1 and P2 of L5/S1 extension moments (12–20 %), compression forces (13–23 %) and muscular activity (16–23 %) were found. A1 showed a greater reduction during static holding for extension moments (46 %), compression forces (41 %) and muscular activity (54 %). This pronounced difference in the performance of the BSEs between tasks was attributed to the actuators used by the different BSEs.

Fish taphonomy from archaeological sites provides considerable useful information about human behaviours and environmental contexts as potential food remains or as natural occurrences. This article focuses on mechanical deformations of fish vertebrae and the potential information about predation, diachrony in the deposition of the remains, and time-averaging and reworking processes these provide. Experimental work using uniaxial compression on dry and water-soaked vertebrae from modern skeletons [Meagre (Argyrosomus regius, Asso 1801), European hake (Merluccius merluccius, L. 1758) and Pouting (Trisopterus luscus, L. 1758)] compared to modern digested fish vertebrae from a predator of extreme taphonomic modification (European otter, Lutra lutra) allowed us to assess key features to identify different processes and site formation agents. Our results are also compared with experimental assemblages modified by water and dry abiotic abrasion. These provide a baseline to understand the nature of the agents causing modifications to archaeological vertebrae from the Middle Holocene Argentinian sites of El Americano II and Barrio Las Dunas and the Magdalenian site of Santa Catalina (Basque Country, Spain). The experimental frame of reference allowed us to identify dry compression on Barrio Las Dunas and Santa Catalina assemblages and wet compression on El Americano II and Santa Catalina sites, improving our interpretation of the formation of those archaeological deposits and their fish assemblages. These data allow one to explore with a higher degree of confidence than has been hitherto possible how humans obtained, processed, and discarded fish in former times.

Purpose Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT), an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shows satisfactory post-operative results. However, the biomechanical quantities and consequences after VBT surgery remain largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the spinal biomechanics during different motions using a multibody simulation approach. Methods The tether and intervertebral compression forces were simulated in a validated spine model during different physiological movements at different pre-tensions and screw positions, while considering the anatomical muscle and ligament properties. Results The simulations showed that an augmentation of the pre-tension and an alteration of the screw position have both significant impact on the intervertebral compression and tether forces. The forces also vary depending on the movement performed, with the highest tether forces measured during lateral bending. In the upright position, with a pre-tension of 200 N, the maximum compression force increases by up to 157% compared to the untethered maximum compression force. The screw position can lead to large differences in the distribution of forces in the spine. Conclusion The biomechanical data provide a first impression of the forces that occur along the spine during various physiological movements and are consistent with published clinical data. Forces are not evenly distributed along the spine, with higher lumbar forces. The tether forces reach values during lateral bending that can potentially destroy the tether´s integrity and thus may explain the common post-operative complication, namely tether breakage. The results of the model can therefore have an impact on future directions for improved surgical VBT treatment.

Background This study investigated the impact of higher interfragmentary compression force (IFCF) on the stability of locking plate fixation in lateral tibial plateau fractures. Methods Biomechanical experiments and finite element analysis (FEA) were employed to compare the performance of the AO cancellous lag screw (AOCLS) and a newly developed combined cancellous lag screw (CCLS). Results The results demonstrated that the CCLS provided a higher IFCF without the risk of over-screwing, significantly improving fixation stability. High IFCF markedly increased the initial axial stiffness, allowing for earlier weight-bearing in patients. Additionally, the FEA showed that increased IFCF reduced the peak von Mises stress on implants and the peak equivalent elastic strain on the lateral fragment, thereby enhancing overall structural stability. Conclusions These findings suggested that the CCLS, with its superior IFCF and reduced risk of over-screwing, was a promising option for improving fixation stability in lateral tibial plateau fractures. This improvement could facilitate early rehabilitation, minimise complications, and provide better clinical outcomes. These results provide strong scientific evidence for the clinical use of CCLS.

The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) like neck and back pain is high among open-surgery surgeons. Prolonged working in the same posture and unfavourable postures are biomechanical risk factors for developing MSS. Ergonomic devices such as exoskeletons are possible solutions that can reduce muscle and joint load. To design effective exoskeletons for surgeons, one needs to quantify which neck and trunk postures are seen and how much support during actual surgery is required. Hence, this study aimed to establish the biomechanical profile of neck and trunk postures and neck and lumbar joint loads during open surgery (training). Eight surgical trainees volunteered to participate in this research. Neck and trunk segment orientations were recorded using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system during open surgery (training). Neck and lumbar joint kinematics, joint moments and compression forces were computed using OpenSim modelling software and a musculoskeletal model. Histograms were used to illustrate the joint angle and load distribution of the neck and lumbar joints over time. During open surgery, the neck flexion angle was 71.6% of the total duration in the range of 10~40 degrees, and lumbar flexion was 68.9% of the duration in the range of 10~30 degrees. The normalized neck and lumbar flexion moments were 53.8% and 35.5% of the time in the range of 0.04~0.06 Nm/kg and 0.4~0.6 Nm/kg, respectively. Furthermore, the neck and lumbar compression forces were 32.9% and 38.2% of the time in the range of 2.0~2.5 N/kg and 15~20 N/kg, respectively. In contrast to exoskeletons used for heavy lifting tasks, exoskeletons designed for surgeons exhibit lower support torque requirements while additional degrees of freedom (DOF) are needed to accommodate combinations of neck and trunk postures.