Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
175 result(s) for "Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation"
Sort by:
Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphism and ovarian responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET
This study was performed to investigate the association between FSH receptor (FSHR) gene polymorphism at position 680 and the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in Korean women. Two hundred and sixty-three patients under 40 years of age who underwent IVF-ET procedures were included in this study. Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, or a previous history of ovarian surgery were excluded. Following extraction of genomic DNA, the FSHR polymorphism at position 680 was determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The FSHR genotype distribution was 41.8% for Asn/Asn, 45.6% for Asn/Ser, and 12.5% for Ser/Ser FSHR genotype groups. Although there was no difference among the three genotype groups in terms of the age and infertility diagnosis of study subjects, the basal levels of FSH (day 3) were significantly different [5.7 ± 0.3 IU/l (mean±SEM), 6.0 ± 0.3 IU/l, and 8.2 ± 0.9 IU/l for Asn/Asn, Asn/Ser, and Ser/Ser groups, respectively. The Ser/Ser group tended to require a higher dose of gonadotropins for COH, and tended to show lower serum estradiol levels at the time of hCG administration than the other two groups, though these differences did not reach statistical significance. The numbers of oocytes retrieved tended to be different for the three groups (9.6 ± 0.6, 10.2 ± 0.6, and 7.9 ± 0.8 for Asn/Asn, Asn/Ser, and Ser/Ser groups, respectively). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in Asn/Asn, compared to the others (45.7 vs. 30.5%, P =0.013). The homozygous Ser/Ser genotype of FSHR polymorphism at position 680 may be associated with a reduced ovarian response to COH for IVF-ET, while Asn/Asn genotypes showed a higher pregnancy rate.
The impact of luteal phase support on endometrial estrogen and progesterone receptor expression: a randomized control trial
Background To assess the impact of luteal phase support on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and progesterone receptors B (PR-B) on the endometrium of oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Methods A prospective, randomized study was conducted in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for oocyte donation. Participants were randomized to receive no luteal support, vaginal progesterone alone, or vaginal progesterone plus orally administered 17 Beta estradiol. Endometrial biopsies were obtained at 4 time points in the luteal phase and evaluated by tissue microarray for expression of ER alpha and PR-B. Results One-hundred and eight endometrial tissue samples were obtained from 12 patients. No differences were found in expression of ER alpha and PR-B among all the specimens with the exception of one sample value. Conclusions The administration of progesterone during the luteal phase of COH for oocyte donor cycles, either with or without estrogen, does not significantly affect the endometrial expression of ER alpha and PR.
Risk of thrombosis in women with cancer undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation
PurposeThe study aims to evaluate the risk factors and incidence of thromboembolic events among adult women with cancer who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility preservation.MethodsRetrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of patient demographics, medical history, cancer type/treatment, laboratory values, thrombosis within 6 months of COH.Results4 of 127 study participants experienced a venous thromboembolic event within 6 months of COH. The median time between oocyte aspiration and the event was 0.25 years (range = 0.10–0.50). The average age at time of event was 25.3 years (SD = 5.3). Three of four thrombotic patients had ovarian cancer, one had breast cancer. All had received surgery and chemotherapy for treatment. All underwent an antagonist cycle ovarian stimulation protocol — none developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The average anti-mullerian hormone level at the time of hyperstimulation in the thrombosis group was 1.6 (SD = 1.3), compared to 3.6 in the non-thrombosis group. The average max estradiol level reached during ovarian stimulation was 1281.3 (SD = 665.3) in the thrombosis group and 1839.1 (SD = 1513.9) in the non-thrombosis group. Thromboembolic events were not directly associated with mortality.ConclusionsWithin this small descriptive study, the incidence of thromboembolic events in women with cancer undergoing COH for fertility preservation is high. Cancer may play a greater role than COH in thrombosis risk. Ovarian cancer patients who undergo ovarian stimulation may have an increased risk compared to other cancer types. These findings may inform future, prospective studies to determine the role of thromboprophylaxis.
Myo-inositol supplementation reduces the amount of gonadotropins and length of ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
PurposeTo evaluate whether oral myo-inositol supplementation (MI) is able to reduce the amount of gonadotropins (GA) and the length of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (SL) in both Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).MethodsWe performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017069439) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched articles published in English between January 1985 to August 2017, using the combination of the Medical Subject Headings “Inositol” with “Ovulation Induction”, “follicle-stimulating hormone, human, with HCG C-terminal peptide”, “Reproductive Techniques, Assisted”, and “Fertilization in Vitro”. We collected data about GA and SL comparing MI to no treatment or d-Chiro-Inositol (DCI) supplementation (controls). A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate selected outcomes in PCOS and non-PCOS women.ResultsWe included 8 studies embedding 812 participants. We found a reduction in GA (p < 0.00001) and SL (p = 0.0007) in patients receiving MI with respect to controls. MI was effective in both PCOS (p < 0.00001) and non-PCOS women (p = 0.02) in reducing GA; conversely, MI supplementation decreased the SL only in PCOS women (p < 0.00001).ConclusionDuring IVF, MI is effective in both PCOS and non-PCOS women in saving gonadotropins, but reduces efficiently SL only in PCOS women.
Triggering final follicular maturation for IVF cycles
As part of a conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, final follicular maturation is usually triggered by a single bolus dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). COH, which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment with GnRH agonist(GnRHa) trigger, is often used in attempts to eliminate severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and to improve oocyte/embryo yield and quality. Recently, the combination of GnRHa, with hCG trigger has also been implemented into clinical practice. Here, we analyze and discuss published studies on various ways of triggering final follicular maturation, seeking to elucidate the appropriateness of each approach for specific patient subgroups.
Electroacupuncture facilitates implantation by enhancing endometrial angiogenesis in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) impairs the synchronized development of endometrium and embryo, resulting in the failure of embryo implantation. Here, we investigated what effects electroacupuncture had on embryo implantation in COH rats. Female rats were randomly assigned to four groups: normal (N), model (M), electroacupuncture (EA), and electroacupuncture pretreatment (PEA). Rats in groups M, EA, PEA were injected with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and human chorionic gonadotropin to establish the COH model. Rats in group EA received electroacupuncture treatment from the PMSG injection day to the 3rd day of pregnancy (D3), while those in group PEA received electroacupuncture treatment for 3 days before the PMSG day and continuing to D3. Furthermore, another 30 female rats who received the same treatment as the rats in group PEA were injected with siVEGFR2 into uterine lumen. The endometrial microvascular density (MVD) and the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, angiopoietin-1, and fibroblast growth factor-2 were significantly lower in groups M than in groups N and PEA. The percentage of dolichos biflorus agglutinin positive uterine natural killer cells in groups N, EA and PEA was higher than that in group M. After the siVEGFR2 injection, the protein expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), PI3K, p-AKT and p-ERK, the embryo number and the MVD were significantly reduced. In conclusion, electroacupuncture can facilitate embryo implantation in COH rats by activating the VEGFR2/PI3K/AKT and VEGFR2/ERK signaling pathways which have a positive relationship with endometrial angiogenesis. Summary Sentence Electroacupuncture can facilitate embryo implantation in COH rats by activating the VEGFR2/PI3K/AKT and VEGFR2/ERK signaling pathways which have a positive relationship with endometrial angiogenesis.
Changes in thyroid function during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and its impact on assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundTo investigate the thyroid function changes during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and ascertain its impact on reproductive outcomes.MethodsWe conducted meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies reported changes in thyroid parameters during COH. We analyzed thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, free thyroxin (fT4) levels, changes in estrogens (E2), thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), relative risks (RRs) of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and mean difference (MD) of TSH increment between the miscarriage group and ongoing pregnancy group.ResultsThis meta-analysis included fifteen individual studies (n = 1665 subjects). At the end of COH, the mean TSH (2.53 mIU/L; 95% CI, 2.19 to 2.88; I2 = 92.9%) exceeded the upper limit (2.5 mIU/L) and remained above the threshold until one month following embryo transfer (ET). Thyroxin decreased from baseline to the end of COH (−0.18 ng/l; 95% CI, −0.35 to 0.00; I2 = 92.2%). The CPR and LBR of patients with TSH exceeding the cutoff after COH were significantly lower than those of patients with TSH below the threshold (CPR: RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.82; I2 = 0.0% and LBR: RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92; I2 = 0.0%). The MD of the increment in TSH levels between the miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy groups was 0.40 mIU/L (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.65; I2 = 0.0%).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that TSH increases and fT4 decreases during COH. COH-induced thyroid disorder impairs reproductive outcomes.
Triggering final follicular maturation- hCG, GnRH-agonist or both, when and to whom?
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment and GnRH-agonist (GnRHa) trigger has become a common tool aiming to eliminate severe early OHSS and to support the concept of an OHSS-free clinic. However, due to the reported significantly reduced clinical, efforts have been made to improve reproductive outcome. One of the suggested optional strategies aiming to improve outcome was the addition of low-dose (1500 IU) HCG bolus, administered, concomitant, 35 h or 5 days after the triggering bolus of GnRHa. All these regimens were demonstrated to rescue the luteal phase, resulting in improved reproductive outcome in patients at risk to develop severe OHSS, compared to GnRHa trigger alone, however, with the questionable ability to eliminate severe OHSS. Moreover, following the observations demonstrating comparable or even better oocyte\\embryos quality following GnRHa, compared to hCG trigger, and the different effects of LH and hCG on the downstream signaling of the LH receptor, GnRHa is now offered concomitant to the standard hCG trigger dose to improve oocyte/embryo yield and quality. GnRHa and hCG may be offered either concomitantly, 35–37 h prior to oocyte retrieval (dual trigger), or 40 h and 34 h prior to oocyte retrieval, respectively (double trigger).
Serum levels of stem cell factor for predicting embryo quality
We evaluated whether serum stem cell factor (s-SCF) levels just prior to ovulation induction could indicate the ability to develop a top-quality (TQ) blastocyst by day 5. We investigated patients with normal ovarian reserve (NOR), polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), or mild endometriosis. Our pilot research suggests a correlation between s-SCF levels and the ability to form TQ blastocysts in patients with mild endometriosis. This significant statistical difference ( p  < 0.05) was noted between mild endometriosis patients for whom a TQ blastocyst was obtained and those for whom it was not possible, as measured on the 8th day of stimulation and the day of oocyte retrieval. The mean SCF levels in the serum of these women on the 8th day were at 28.07 (± 2.67) pg/ml for the TQ subgroup and 53.32 (± 16.02) pg/ml for the non-TQ subgroup ( p  < 0.05). On oocyte retrieval day it was 33.47 (± 3.93) pg/ml and 52.23 (± 9.72) pg/ml ( p  < 0.05), respectively.
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation yields comparable outcomes to the GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
To prevent the occurrence of a luteinizing hormone surge during assisted reproductive technology cycles, clinicians commonly utilize gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues or progestin. However, there is a paucity of data directly comparing the reliability and efficacy of these strategies. This retrospective study compares ovarian stimulation outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using either a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol or a GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, conducted between January 2022 and November 2023. A total of 385 patients were analyzed, with 150 receiving the PPOS protocol and 235 receiving the GnRH antagonist protocol. There were no significant differences in oocyte yield, embryo quality, fertilization rates, or pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the type of stimulation protocol was not associated with live birth rates (LBR). However, longer infertility duration ( p  = 0.011) and diminished ovarian reserve ( p  < 0.001) were linked to lower LBR. Conversely, a higher number of good-quality embryos ( p  = 0.003), increased blastocyst formation rates ( p  = 0.003), and two-embryo transfers ( p  = 0.003) were associated with improved LBR. These findings suggest that the PPOS protocol is an effective approach for ovarian stimulation in ICSI cycles, demonstrating comparable outcomes to GnRH antagonists across multiple outcome measures.