Explore the vast range of titles available.

The use of two units of cord blood to reconstitute hematopoiesis in transplantation for relapsed hematologic cancers in patients 1 to 21 years of age proved to be no better and was in some ways worse than the standard one-unit transplant. Since 1993, unrelated-donor umbilical-cord blood has been used as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation in an estimated 30,000 patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. 1 As compared with stem-cell grafts from adult donors, cord blood has the advantages of more rapid availability, relative absence of donor attrition, and, after transplantation, a reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) despite donor–recipient HLA disparity. 2 , 3 In addition, less restriction on HLA matching permits greater use of cord blood for members of racial minorities, who are less likely to have a suitably HLA-matched volunteer adult donor. 4 However, the use of cord blood . . .

Delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) is a prevalent complication following umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT), accompanied by increased transplant-related mortality. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of romiplostim and recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in enhancing platelet engraftment after UCBT. A total of 19 patients scheduled to receive UCBT were randomly assigned to the romiplostim group (250 µg once weekly from day 5 to platelet engraftment after UCBT, n  = 7) or rhTPO group (300 U/kg once daily from days 5 to 18 after UCBT, n  = 12). The median time of PLT engraftment was no statistical difference between rhTPO and romiplostim group: 29.5 days (range: 13–43 days) compared to 31 days (range: 23–40 days; P  =.269). The median dose of romiplostim was 4 (range: 2–5 doses). Furthermore, the consumption of PLT was equivalent between the Ro group and the rhTPO group: 10 units (range: 7–26 units) and 10 units (range: 3–24 units; P  =.694). All patients survived for one year and remained relapse-free. Romiplostim group had a lower incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD). No severe adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. This study demonstrated that romiplostim and rhTPO are both effective in promoting platelet engraftment after UCBT. Romiplostim was more practical and tolerable due to its cost and labor-saving benefits.

As the threshold nucleated cell dose for one-unit umbilical cord blood (UCB) in adults has not to date been firmly established, we prospectively compared one- vs two-unit UCB transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Study design specified one-UCB unit if the cryopreserved total nucleated cell (TNC) dose was ⩾2.5 × 10 7 /kg recipient weight, otherwise two units matched at minima of 4/6 HLA loci to the patient and 3/6 to each other were infused. A total of 27 patients received one unit; 23 patients received two units. Median time to ANC >500/μL was 24 days (95% confidence interval 22–28 days), 25 days for one unit and 23 days for two units ( P =0.99). At day 100, ANC >500/μL was 88.4 and 91.3% in the one- and two-unit groups ( P =0.99), respectively. Three-year EFS was 28.6% and 39.1% in the one- and two-unit groups ( P =0.71), respectively. Infusion of two units was associated with a significantly lower relapse risk, 30.4% vs 59.3% ( P =0.045). Infused cell doses (TNC, CD3 + , CD34 + and CD56 + CD3 neg ) did not impact on engraftment, OS or EFS. Taken together, one-unit UCB transplantation with a threshold cell dose ⩾2.5 × 10 7 /kg recipient weight after RIC is a viable option for adults, although infusion of two units confers a lower relapse incidence.

The outcomes of cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for hematological malignancies need to be improved because of graft failure and delayed engraftment. Intrabone infusion of cord blood cells has the potential to resolve the problems. In this phase II study, 21 adult patients with hematological malignancy received intrabone transplantation of serological HLA‐A, B, and DR ≥4/6 matched single cord blood with a median number of cryopreserved total nucleated cells of 2.7 × 107/kg (range, 2.0–4.9 × 107/kg) following non‐irradiated fludarabine‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning. Short‐term methotrexate and tacrolimus were given as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis, and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor was given after transplantation. No severe adverse events related to intrabone injection were observed. The cumulative incidences of neutrophils ≥0.5 × 109/L, reticulocytes ≥1%, and platelets ≥20 × 109/L recoveries were 76.2%, 71.4%, and 76.2%, respectively, with median time to recoveries of 17, 28, and 32 days after transplantation, respectively. The probability of survival with neutrophil engraftment on day 60 was 71.4%, and overall survival at 1 year after transplantation was 52.4%. The incidences of grade II–IV and III–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease were 44% and 19%, respectively, with no cases of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease. The present study showed the safety of direct intrabone infusion of cord blood. Further analysis is required to confirm the efficacy of intrabone single cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for adult patients with hematological malignancy. This study was registered with UMIN‐CTR, number 000000865. Twenty‐one adult patients with hematological malignancy received intrabone single unit cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated fludarabine‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery was 76.2% with median time to recovery of 17 days after transplantation. Overall survival at 1 year after transplantation was 52.4%.

Objectives Objective: To undertake a pilot, feasibility RCT of umbilical cord blood derived cell therapy for treatment of adult patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus related moderate-to-severe pneumonia to prevent progression to severe ARDS. Hypothesis: Expanded cord blood derived cell therapy will be feasible, well tolerated and show potential efficacy in the treatment of acute COVID-19 related moderate to severe pneumonia in adult patients because of their powerful anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Trial design Pilot, parallel design randomised controlled trial. Participants The trial will recruit 24 hospitalised patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonia from July to December 2020 at Monash Medical Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Intervention and comparator Intervention: Intravenous injection of expanded umbilical cord blood cells at a dose of 5 million cells/kg (maximum dose - 500 million cells). Cell infusion will occur over 30-60 minutes through a peripheral intravenous cannula. Standard supportive care will continue as needed. Comparator: Standard supportive care. Main outcomes Safety and tolerability of cell administration within first 24 hours of administration; clinical improvement on a seven-category clinical improvement ordinal scale. Randomisation Randomisation will be done using computer generated allocation to intervention/ control groups in a 1:1 ratio (in blocks of 6) using sealed opaque envelopes. Blinding (masking) This will be an unblinded study, given that it is the first study using expanded cord blood cells in COVID-19 patients. There will be no placebo infusion. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) Twelve participants in each group. Total n =24. Trial Status CBC-19 protocol v2, dated 23 rd April 2020. Recruitment has not started yet. Estimated recruitment timeline is between 1st July – 31st December 2020. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12620000478910, registered 16th April 2020. Full protocol The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1 ). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been performed in the clinic for over 30 years. The biological and immunological characteristics of umbilical cord blood (UCB) have been re‐recognized in recent years. UCB, previously considered medical waste, is rich in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are naïve and more energetic and more easily expanded than other stem cells. UCB has been identified as a reliable source of HSCs for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). UCBT has several advantages over other methods, including no harm to mothers and donors, an off‐the‐shelf product for urgent use, less stringent HLA match, lower incidence and severity of chronic graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD), and probably a stronger graft‐vs‐leukemia effect, especially for minimal residual disease‐positive patients before transplant. Recent studies have shown that the outcome of UCBT has been improved and is comparable to other types of allo‐HSCT. Currently, UCBT is widely used in malignant, nonmalignant, hematological, congenital and metabolic diseases. The number of UCB banks and transplantation procedures increased exponentially before 2013. However, the number of UCBTs increased steadily in Asia and China but decreased in the United States and Europe year‐on‐year from 2013 to 2019. In this review, we focus on the development of UCBT over the past 30 years, the challenges it faces and the strategies for future improvement, including increasing UCB numbers, cord blood unit selection, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis for UCBT, and management of complications of UCBT. Advantages and disadvantages of UCBT and improving strategies.

Few methods are available to regenerate articular cartilage defects in patients with osteoarthritis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of articular cartilage regeneration by a novel medicinal product composed of allogeneic human umbilical cord blood‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB‐MSCs). Patients with Kellgren‐Lawrence grade 3 osteoarthritis and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 4 cartilage defects were enrolled in this clinical trial. The stem cell‐based medicinal product (a composite of culture‐expanded allogeneic hUCB‐MSCs and hyaluronic acid hydrogel [Cartistem]) was applied to the lesion site. Safety was assessed by the World Health Organization common toxicity criteria. The primary efficacy outcome was ICRS cartilage repair assessed by arthroscopy at 12 weeks. The secondary efficacy outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain on walking. During a 7‐year extended follow‐up, we evaluated safety, VAS score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and histological evaluations. Seven participants were enrolled. Maturing repair tissue was observed at the 12‐week arthroscopic evaluation. The VAS and IKDC scores were improved at 24 weeks. The improved clinical outcomes were stable over 7 years of follow‐up. The histological findings at 1 year showed hyaline‐like cartilage. MRI at 3 years showed persistence of the regenerated cartilage. Only five mild to moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events were observed. There were no cases of osteogenesis or tumorigenesis over 7 years. The application of this novel stem cell‐based medicinal product appears to be safe and effective for the regeneration of durable articular cartilage in osteoarthritic knees. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:613–621

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a musculo-degenerative disease characterized by lack of dystrophin production with no definite cure available currently. Discarded umbilical cord is a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells which are non-immunogenic and can be used for transplantation in allogenic set ups. Given the regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), here we investigated its role in the cellular therapy of DMD patients. This is a single-blinded study conducted in various hospitals of India situated in Mumbai, Delhi, and Lucknow. Inclusion criteria for enrolling the patients in the study were boys aged between 5 to 18 years, absence of dystrophin in the immunohistochemistry of muscle biopsy and mutation in dystrophin gene in cytogenetic analysis. The exclusion criteria were presence of dystrophin in the muscle biopsy, patients on corticosteroids etc. UC-MSCs (2 millions/kg body weight) were administered through IV and IM injection. Muscle power in muscles of proximal upper limb, distal upper limb, proximal lower limb, distal lower limb, hip flexors, hip extensors, hip abductors, and paraspinal muscles were measured in 11 DMD patients after UC-MSCs transplantation and were followed for up to 3 years (average follow up 1.5 years). 5 DMD patients did not receive any UC-MSCs transplantation and served as the control group. The treatment group (N = 11 at baseline) had a pretransplantation strength of 3.45 ± 1.0357 and 4.090 ± 0.8312 in muscles of proximal upper limb and distal upper limb respectively. After 1 year (N = 9) these strengths remained stable with an average of 3.78 (1.03) and 4.22 (0.83). In contrast, the control group (N = 5) has a pre-transplantation strength of 3.6 (0.54) and 4 (1) in the proximal and distal upper limb respectively. After 1 year, (N = 5) 3/5 subjects had a slight but not statistically significant decrease in the proximal upper limb, mean 3.0 (1.0) and 5/5 had a lunit decrease in strength, mean 3.0 (1.0). The treatment group had a pre-transplantation strength of 2.0909 ± 0.8312 and 3.1181 ± 0.8738 in muscles of distal and proximal lower limbs respectively. At 1 year (N = 9), 4/9 subjects had a 1 unit increase in strength in the distal lower limb (mean 3.78 (0.97)) and 8/9 subjects had a lunit increase in strength in the proximal lower limb, mean 3.11 (1.05). The control group has a mean of 3.41 (0.54) and 3.0 (1.0) at baseline in the distal and proximal lower limb respectively. By 1 year, 3/5 subjects had a 1 unit decrease (mean 2.8 (0.45)) and 5/5 had a lunit decrease, mean 2.0 (1.0) in distal and proximal lower limb strength. Stability in muscle function was also achieved in muscles of hip flexors, hip extensors, hip abductors, and paraspinal muscles at one year as compared to untreated group. UC-MSCs administration not only resulted in the stabilization of muscle power but also did not show GVHD or any deleterious effects on the patients and thus may be considered as safe option for treatment of DMD as compared to control untreated group although further larger double-blinded studies are needed.

Neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a serious condition; many survivors develop neurological impairments, including cerebral palsy and intellectual disability. Preclinical studies show that the systemic administration of umbilical cord blood cells (UCBCs) is beneficial for neonatal HIE. We conducted a single-arm clinical study to examine the feasibility and safety of intravenous infusion of autologous UCBCs for newborns with HIE. When a neonate was born with severe asphyxia, the UCB was collected, volume-reduced, and divided into three doses. The processed UCB was infused at 12–24, 36–48, and 60–72 hours after the birth. The designed enrolment was six newborns. All six newborns received UCBC therapy strictly adhering to the study protocol together with therapeutic hypothermia. The physiological parameters and peripheral blood parameters did not change much between pre- and postinfusion. There were no serious adverse events that might be related to cell therapy. At 30 days of age, the six infants survived without circulatory or respiratory support. At 18 months of age, neurofunctional development was normal without any impairment in four infants and delayed with cerebral palsy in two infants. This pilot study shows that autologous UCBC therapy is feasible and safe.

Umbilical-cord blood (UCB) is increasingly considered as an alternative to peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) or bone marrow, especially when an HLA-matched adult unrelated donor is not available. We aimed to determine the optimal role of UCB grafts in transplantation for adults with acute leukaemia, and to establish whether current graft-selection practices are appropriate. We used Cox regression to retrospectively compare leukaemia-free survival and other outcomes for UCB, PBPC, and bone marrow transplantation in patients aged 16 years or over who underwent a transplant for acute leukaemia. Data were available on 1525 patients transplanted between 2002 and 2006. 165 received UCB, 888 received PBPCs, and 472 received bone marrow. UCB units were matched at HLA-A and HLA-B at antigen level, and HLA-DRB1 at allele level (n=10), or mismatched at one (n=40) or two (n=115) antigens. PBPCs and bone-marrow grafts from unrelated adult donors were matched for allele-level HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 (n=632 and n=332, respectively), or mismatched at one locus (n=256 and n=140, respectively). Leukaemia-free survival in patients after UCB transplantation was comparable with that after 8/8 and 7/8 allele-matched PBPC or bone-marrow transplantation. However, transplant-related mortality was higher after UCB transplantation than after 8/8 allele-matched PBPC recipients (HR 1·62, 95% CI 1·18–2·23; p=0·003) or bone-marrow transplantation (HR 1·69, 95% CI 1·19–2·39; p=0·003). Grades 2–4 acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were lower in UCB recipients compared with allele-matched PBPC (HR 0·57, 95% 0·42–0·77; p=0·002 and HR 0·38, 0·27–0·53; p=0·003, respectively), while the incidence of chronic, but not acute GvHD, was lower after UCB than after 8/8 allele-matched bone-marrow transplantation (HR 0·63, 0·44–0·90; p=0·01). These data support the use of UCB for adults with acute leukaemia when there is no HLA-matched unrelated adult donor available, and when a transplant is needed urgently. National Cancer Institute, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease ( U24-CA76518); Health Resources and Services Administration ( HHSH234200637015C); Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy ( N00014-08-1-1207); Children's Leukemia Research Association; and a Scholar in Clinical Research Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.