Explore the vast range of titles available.

Cr (VI) compounds find wide uses in the industrial sector, such as wood preservation, tanning, chrome plating, and anticorrosive agents. Several kinds of both natural and industrial factors can lead to Cr (VI) contamination in wastewater. Human exposure to the hazardous metal ion Cr (VI) can lead to a variety of health problems. The Cr (VI) undergoes a transition into a lower oxidation state once it enters the cell, causing oxidative stress and harming the organelles. Not only do sugar-phosphate backbones, histones, and base pairing of DNA suffer from Cr (VI) induced genotoxicity, but chromosomes are also impacted. Because Cr (VI) is more hazardous compared to other metals, it needs to be removed from water and wastewater. It is feasible to remove Cr (VI) using physiochemical methods, but they are expensive and produce hazardous sludge. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an economical and eco-friendly Cr (VI) removal technique. Biological techniques including biosorption, bioreduction, and bioaccumulation are regarded as economical and environmentally beneficial techniques. The sources of Cr (VI), toxicity, and green technology for Cr (VI) removal were the authors' main points of emphasis in this review.

The reduction potential of the highly toxic Cr(VI) to the inert Cr(III) in an alkaline soil was studied during a 50-day experiment with Portulaca oleracea L. grown in pots. We aimed at assessing whether our test species can be a phytoremediation candidate for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils. We measured the Cr(VI) reduction rate in soil, determined the Cr(VI) and Cr(III) concentrations in aerial and root P. oleracea tissues, and calculated the transfer coefficient (TC = metal in plant over metal in soil) and the translocation factor (TF = metal in aerial biomass over metal in roots) in order to assess Cr(VI) uptake and distribution in plant tissues, while we also studied the effect of added nitrogen in the studied parameters. We added five different Cr(VI) levels (from the unamended T-0 to the treatment of T-4 = 150 mg Cr(VI) kg −1 soil) and also had two N levels (equivalent to 0 and 200 kg ha −1 ). The results indicated that Cr in plant tissues was mainly found in its reduced form (Cr(III)) and only a minor fraction of Cr was detected in its oxidized form (Cr(VI)), with only 1.04% of plant Cr being hexavalent at T-4 with no added N and 1.30% at T-4 with added N. The main remediation mechanism was found to be that of the naturally occurring Cr(VI) reduction that effectively produced Cr(III), followed by the uptake of Cr(VI) from our test plants (at T-4 with no N, 58% of soil added Cr(VI) was reduced and 0.1% absorbed, while at T-4 with added N, 63% was reduced and only 0.4% absorbed by plant). We also found that Cr(VI) in P. oleracea tissues was mainly found in roots and relatively low Cr(VI) concentrations were found in the above-ground tissues. We concluded that P. oleracea is a tolerant plant species, especially if assisted with a sufficient level of N fertilization, although it failed to approach the threshold of being categorized as an accumulator species. However, as this is a rather preliminary experiment, before reaching more conclusive suggestions about P. oleracea as a potential phytoremediation species, further investigation is necessary in order to verify the gained results with naturally contaminated soils with Cr under field conditions.

The toxicity of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) present in the environment has exceeded the current limits or standards and thus may lead to biotic and abiotic catastrophes. Accordingly, several treatments, including chemical, biological, and physical approaches, are being used to reduce Cr(VI) waste in the surrounding environment. This study compares the Cr(VI) treatment approaches from several areas of science and their competence in Cr(VI) removal. As an effective combination of physical and chemical approaches, the coagulation–flocculation technique removes more than 98% of Cr(VI) in less than 30 min. Most membrane filtering approaches can remove up to 90% of Cr(VI). Biological approaches that involve the use of plants, fungi, and bacteria also successfully eliminate Cr(VI) but are difficult to scale up. Each of these approaches has its benefits and drawbacks, and their applicability is determined by the research aims. These approaches are also sustainable and environmentally benign, thus limiting their effects on the ecosystem.

Hexavalent chromium is a highly soluble environmental contaminant. It is a widespread anthropogenic chromium species that is 100 times more toxic than trivalent chromium. Leather, chrome plating, coal mining and paint industries are the major sources of hexavalent chromium in water. Hexavalent chromium is widely recognised as a carcinogen and mutagen in humans and other animals. It is also responsible for multiorgan damage, such as kidney damage, liver failure, heart failure, skin disease and lung dysfunction. The fate of the toxicity of hexavalent chromium depends on its oxidation state. The reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) is responsible for the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and chromium intermediate species, such as Cr (V) and Cr (IV). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are responsible for oxidative tissue damage and the disruption of cell organelles, such as mitochondria, DNA, RNA and protein molecules. Cr (VI)-induced oxidative stress can be neutralised by the antioxidant system in human and animal cells. In this review, the authors summarise the Cr (VI) source, toxicity and antioxidant defence mechanism against Cr (VI)-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS).

The novel Cr(VI) anion-imprinted polymer (Cr(VI)-IIP) was prepared by a surface imprinting technique with bifunctional monomers pre-assembly system based on mesoporous silicon (SBA-15). The synthesized Cr(VI)-IIP was characterized by Fourier transmission infrared spectra (FT-IR), energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), X-ray powder diffractometer, N2 adsorption–desorption and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), proving to be with a highly ordered mesoporous structure, as well as favorable thermal stability. The saturated adsorption amount was 96.32 mg/g, which was 2.7 times higher than that of non-imprinted polymer (NIP). Kinetic experiments showed that the adsorption equilibrium state was obtained within 70 min. In addition, in the selectivity experiments, Cr(VI)-IIP exhibited strong specific recognition ability for Cr(VI) and could realize the separation of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from an aqueous solution. The dynamic adsorption experiments exhibited that the dynamic adsorption efficiency of Cr(VI)-IIP was as high as 71.57%. Meanwhile, the dynamic regeneration experiments showed that the adsorption amount of Cr(VI)-IIP did not decrease significantly after repeating for five times. All of the findings suggested that Cr(VI)-IIP could achieve precise identification as well as efficient separation of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution.

This study presents the latest results of the groundwater monitoring of a research project, which tested an innovative pump and treat method in combination with an in-situ remediation. This technique was assessed on an abandoned site in Austria, where two hot spots of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) were located. For the in-situ remediation, a strong reducing agent (sodium dithionite) was injected into the underground to reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by using different injection strategies. Throughout this treatment, part of the Cr(VI) is mobilized and not instantly reduced. To prevent a further spreading of the mobilized Cr(VI), the pump and treat method, which uses zero-valent iron to clean the groundwater, was installed downgradient of the hot spots. Based on the groundwater sample analyses, it was possible to distinguish different remediation phases, characterized by excess chromate and excess sulfite. During the excess sulfite conditions, Cr(VI) was successfully removed from the system, but after terminating the sodium dithionite injection, the Cr(VI) rebounded.

The bioremediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil is a promising strategy; however, the performance of Cr(VI)-reducing bacteria is limited by the toxicity of Cr(VI). In this study, two novel Cr(VI)-reducing bacteria were isolated from a Cr salt plant and identified as Agrobacterium sp. and Lysinibacillus sp. The Cr(VI) reduction conditions of the two strains were optimized. At a Cr(VI) concentration of 500 mg/L, Agrobacterium sp. Cr-1 reduced Cr(VI) with a removal rate of 96.91%, while that for Lysinibacillus sp. Cr-2 was 92.82%. First-order reaction kinetic equations simulated the positive relationship between time and Cr(VI) concentration during Cr(VI) reduction in these two strains. Agrobacterium sp. Cr-1 was further studied, and the effects of different cell components on Cr(VI) reduction were detected. The extracellular extracts of Agrobacterium sp. Cr-1 played a major role in Cr(VI) reduction, followed by intracellular extracts and cell membranes. The scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM–EDS) images show that the precipitation was Cr. The high Cr(VI) reducing ability of Agrobacterium sp. Cr-1 suggests that this strain is promising for the remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated sites.

A wide application of chromium (Cr) in industries has discharged large quantity of Cr(VI) into the environment. Cr(VI) is a strong oxidizing agent that can react rapidly to produce toxic compounds to humans. Various agricultural products and byproducts have been studied for the sorptive removal of Cr(VI). However, less attention has been given to the presence of Cr(III) in solution after the adsorption with significant effect to actual adsorption capacity of the material. Here the Cr(VI) removal efficiency was investigated by using modified banana pseudostems (m-BP). Banana pseudostems were treated with 0.08 M HCl for 4 h and washed thoroughly. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cr(VI) was found at pH 2, adsorbent dose 34 g/L, contact time of 180 min and 100 mg/L initial Cr(VI) concentration. The adsorption efficiency of Cr(VI) onto m-BP was recorded to be 73.6% while the total conversion of Cr(VI) was 99.6%. The adsorption efficiency was lower than the total conversion of Cr(VI) due to the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by the presence of organic groups in banana pseudostems. Owing to relatively high efficiency, m-BP can be used as effective and very low cost adsorbent for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater.

To address Cu(II) and Cr(VI) water pollution, a carbonized zeolite/chitosan (C-ZLCH) composite adsorbent was produced via pyrolysis at 500 °C for two hours. C-ZLCH was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and zeta potential measurements. The batch experiments were performed by varying the initial pH, concentration, and contact time. The optimal pH values for Cu(II) and Cr(VI) were 8.1 and 9.6, respectively. The highest adsorption capacities for Cu(II) and Cr(VI) were 111.35 mg/g at 60 min and 104.75 mg/g at 90 min, respectively. The effects of chemicals such as sodium (Na+), glucose, ammonium (NH4+), and acid red 88 (AR88) were also studied. Statistical analysis showed that sodium had no significant effect on Cu(II) removal, in contrast to Cr(VI) removal. However, there was a significant effect of the presence of glucose, ammonium, and AR88 on both Cu(II) and Cr(VI) removal. The adsorption isotherm and kinetic models were fitted using Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models for Cu(II) and Cr(VI), respectively.

An integrated approach involving vermicompost, chromate reducing bacteria and AMF was tested to manage the toxic impacts of Cr(VI) on Ocimum basilicum as a model plant. Pot experiments were conducted on O. basilicum plants in an artificially Cr(VI)-contaminated soil in two phases of experiment as bioinoculants experiment and vermicompost experiment. In the first phase of the bioinoculants experiment the series of gradient concentrations of Cr(VI) (0, 25, 50 and 100 mg kg–1 in soil) were evaluated with previously isolated four efficient Cr(VI)-reducing rhizo-bacterial strains (Bacillus Cereus strain SUCR 44, BC; Microbacterium sp. strain SUCR 140, MB; Bacillus thuringiensis strain SUCR186, BT; and Bacillus subtilis strain SUCR188; BS) along with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus—Glomus fasciculatum (GF) in alone and in co-inoculation form. In the second experiment (vermicompost) the best performing strain (MB) was tested alone or in combination with GF along with different doses of vermicompost. It was observed that vermicompost by itself could be useful in decreasing the bioavailable Cr(VI), uptake of Cr besides improving the nutritional status of plants. The vermicompost also played an important and indirect role and improved herb yield by supporting the multiplication of MB (Microbacterium sp.), an efficient chromate reducing rhizobacteria, that further decreased the bioavailable and toxic form of Cr and improved population and colonization of GF too. The translocation of Cr(VI) was averted through improved colonization of GF, also prevented higher accumulation of Cr in aerial parts (leafy herb) of O. basilicum.