Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
2,959 result(s) for "Criminal procedure United States."
Sort by:
Misure cautelari 'ad personam' in un triennio di riforme
Da molti anni, e da più parti, si sottolinea il problema, ormai di entità non più tollerabile, del sovraffollamento carcerario la cui soluzione richiede interventi strutturali rispetto ai ciclici provvedimenti di clemenza.È un dato di fatto che alla causazione del fenomeno contribuisca in maniera certamente non indifferente anche l’uso smodato della custodia cautelare.A venticinque anni dalla entrata in vigore del nuovo codice di procedura penale, in poco più di ventiquattro mesi, il legislatore, ricorrendo anche alla decretazione d’urgenza, nel cercare di porre in qualche modo rimedio all’ennesima \"emergenza carceri\", si è ancora una volta affidato ad interventi \"tampone\", volti ad incidere in vario modo su singoli profili della disciplina delle misure cautelari personali. Si è, così, assistito al susseguirsi di ben otto provvedimenti legislativi settoriali (cinque decreti e tre leggi) che, lungi dal realizzare una meditata riforma sistemica della materia, hanno invece apportato - con risultati, invero, non sempre armonici e coerenti - ritocchi sparsi e frammentari.La sensazione netta è che si sia perduta una grande occasione per concretizzare i venti riformistici che, anche sulla scorta delle sollecitazioni provenienti da organismi internazionali, si sono sviluppati negli ultimi tempi.ALESSANDRO DIDDI, è ricercatore confermato di Procedura Penale nell’Università degli Studi di Roma \"Tor Vergata\", Professore a contratto di Procedura penale nell’Università della Calabria e svolge l’attività di avvocato. Nel 2013 ha conseguito l’abilitazione scientifica nazionale alle funzioni di Professore di seconda fascia. È autore di numerose pubblicazioni, tra le quali La rimessione del processo, Milano, 2000; L’impugnazione per gli interessi civili, Padova, 2011 e Testimonianza e segreti professionali, Padova, 2012. Fa parte della redazione delle riviste Processo penale giustizia e La Giustizia penale.ROSA MARIA GERACI è ricercatore confermato di Procedura Penale nell’Università degli Studi di Roma \"Tor Vergata\" ed avvocato. Nel 2013 ha conseguito l’abilitazione scientifica nazionale alle funzioni di Professore di seconda fascia. È autrice di numerose pubblicazioni, tra le quali L’appello contro la sentenza che applica la pena su richiesta delle parti, Padova, 2011 e Sentenze della Corte E.D.U. e revisione del processo penale. I. Dall’autarchia giudiziaria al rimedio straordinario, Roma, 2012. Fa parte della redazione della rivista Processo penale giustizia e collabora con Cassazione penale.
American terrorism trials : prosecutorial and defense strategies
Since 1980, prosecutors and defense attorneys handling federal terrorism trials have developed politicized strategies and counter strategies unique to terrorism trials, and those strategies have had a significant impact on case outcomes. Moreover, case outcomes were positively impacted by proactive policy changes implemented in the wake of 9/11. Building on structural contextual theory and the hydraulic effect, Shields finds that when prosecutors rely less heavily on highly politicized prosecution strategies, conviction rates increased. In fact, his findings indicate that the more prosecutors politicize a case, the more likely the case goes to trial, increasing the odds of acquittal.
The Cost of Plea Bargains
From its early days in New England townships to its rise to dominance in the 20th century, plea bargaining has always presented both benefits and challenges. But how does a system obtain the benefits of these bargains without jeopardizing the fundamental rights at the center of the criminal justice system?The Cost of Plea Bargains contains the complete task force report, including the 14 Principles that have now been adopted as the official policy of the ABA. These 14 Principles, which cover a host of topics such as the use of impermissibly coercive incentives, the use of pretrial detention in plea bargaining, the provision of adequate discovery before a defendant pleads guilty, and the collection of plea bargaining data by the courts, offer a vision for a fairer, more transparent, and more just plea bargain system. In addition, readers are offered deeper insights into many of the concepts, concerns, and proposals raised in the task force's findings through chapters authored by task force members representing various corners of the criminal justice system.The Cost of Plea Bargains is an insightful read for anyone with an interest in our legal system. From the casual reader interested in learning more about plea bargaining to practitioners, courts, and policy makers interested in furthering their understanding of the challenges to reform. The Cost of Plea Bargains offers a wealth of knowledge, insight, and inspiration.
Defending the jury : crime, community, and the Constitution
\"This book sets forth a new approach to twenty-first-century criminal justice and punishment, an approach that fully involves the community and provides a better way to make our criminal process more transparent and inclusive. Using the prism of the Sixth Amendment community jury trial, this book offers fresh and much-needed ways to incorporate the citizenry into the procedures of criminal justice, thereby resulting in greater investment and satisfaction in the system. It exposes the various challenges the American criminal justice system faces because of its ongoing failure to integrate the community's voice.Ultimately, the people's right to participate in the criminal justice system through the criminal law -- a right that is all too often overlooked -- is essential to truly legitimizing the criminal process and ensuring its democratic nature\"-- Back cover.
Not Guilty
A brilliant book that masterfully debunks the conventional wisdom that those who are charged with crimes in our criminal justice system, even when they are acquitted at trial, are almost certainly guilty. It is a data-driven tour de force. --Richard A. Leo, author of Police Interrogation and American Justice. Givelber and Farrell make a persuasive case that most jury acquittals are based on evidence not emotion, and that acquittals should be taken to mean what they say: that the defendant is Not Guilty. --Samuel Gross, co-author of A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts, and Cases. As scores of death row inmates are exonerated by DNA evidence and innocence commissions are set up across the country, conviction of the innocent has become a well-recognized problem. But our justice system makes both kinds of errors - we acquit the guilty and convict the innocent - and exploring the reasons why people are acquitted can help us to evaluate the efficiency and fairness of our criminal justice system. Not Guilty provides a sustained examination and analysis of the factors that lead juries to find defendants not guilty, as well as the connection between those factors and the possibility of factual innocence, examining why some criminal trials result in not guilty verdicts and what those verdicts suggest about the accuracy of our criminal process.