Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
33,021
result(s) for
"Critical Illness"
Sort by:
Beyond words : illness and the limits of expression
\"Author Kathlyn Conway, a three-time cancer survivor, believes that the triumphalist approach to writing about illness fails to do justice to the shattering experience of disease. By wrestling with the challenge of writing about the reality of serious illness and injury, she argues, writers can offer a truer picture of the complex relationship between body and mind\"--Provided by publisher.
Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness
by
Ely, E. Wesley
,
Douglas, Ivor S
,
Strength, Cayce
in
Aged
,
Antipsychotic Agents - adverse effects
,
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
2018
In a multicenter trial in 566 patients with critical illness who had delirium, the use of haloperidol or ziprasidone, as compared with placebo, had no significant effect on the duration of delirium or coma. Side effects and extrapyramidal disorders occurred at similar rates in all groups.
Journal Article
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of post-intensive care multidisciplinary consultations on mortality and the quality of life at 1 year
by
Mazeraud, Aurelien
,
Siami, Shidasp
,
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
in
Clinical trials
,
Cognitive ability
,
Hospitals
2024
Purpose Critical illness is associated with long-term increased mortality and impaired quality of life (QoL). We assessed whether multidisciplinary consultations would improve outcome at 12 months (M12) after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge.Methods We performed an open, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible are patients discharged alive from ICU in 11 French hospitals between 2012 and 2018. The intervention group had a multidisciplinary face-to-face consultation involving an intensivist, a psychologist, and a social worker at ICU discharge and then at M3 and M6 (optional). The control group had standard post-ICU follow-up. A consultation was scheduled at M12 for all patients. The QoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (Euro-QoL-5D-5L) which includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression), each ranging from 1 to 5 (1: no, 2: slight, 3: moderate, 4: severe, and 5: extreme problems). The primary endpoint was poor clinical outcome defined as death or severe-to-extreme impairment of at least one EuroQoL-5D-5L dimension at M12. The information was collected by a blinded investigator by phone. Secondary outcomes were functional, psychological, and cognitive status at M12 consultation.Results 540 patients were included (standard, n = 272; multidisciplinary, n = 268). The risk for a poor outcome was significantly greater in the multidisciplinary group than in the standard group [adjusted odds ratio 1.49 (95% confidence interval, (1.04–2.13)]. Seventy-two (13.3%) patients died at M12 (standard, n = 32; multidisciplinary, n = 40). The functional, psychological, and cognitive scores at M12 did not statistically differ between groups.Conclusions A hospital-based, face-to-face, intensivist-led multidisciplinary consultation at ICU discharge then at 3 and 6 months was associated with poor outcome 1 year after ICU.
Journal Article
Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
by
Elke, Gunnar
,
Schäper, Jörn
,
Preiser, Jean-Charles
in
Abdomen
,
Anesthesia & intensive care
,
Anesthésie & soins intensifs
2020
Background
Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is frequent in the critically ill but can be overlooked as a result of the lack of standardization of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We aimed to develop a research agenda for GI dysfunction for future research. We systematically reviewed the current knowledge on a broad range of subtopics from a specific viewpoint of GI dysfunction, highlighting the remaining areas of uncertainty and suggesting future studies.
Methods
This systematic scoping review and research agenda was conducted following successive steps: (1) identify clinically important subtopics within the field of GI function which warrant further research; (2) systematically review the literature for each subtopic using PubMed, CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; (3) summarize evidence for each subtopic; (4) identify areas of uncertainty; (5) formulate and refine study proposals that address these subtopics; and (6) prioritize study proposals via sequential voting rounds.
Results
Five major themes were identified: (1) monitoring, (2) associations between GI function and outcome, (3) GI function and nutrition, (4) management of GI dysfunction and (5) pathophysiological mechanisms. Searches on 17 subtopics were performed and evidence summarized. Several areas of uncertainty were identified, six of them needing consensus process. Study proposals ranked among the first ten included: prevention and management of diarrhoea; management of upper and lower feeding intolerance, including indications for post-pyloric feeding and opioid antagonists; acute gastrointestinal injury grading as a bedside tool; the role of intra-abdominal hypertension in the development and monitoring of GI dysfunction and in the development of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia; and the effect of proton pump inhibitors on the microbiome in critical illness.
Conclusions
Current evidence on GI dysfunction is scarce, partially due to the lack of precise definitions. The use of core sets of monitoring and outcomes are required to improve the consistency of future studies. We propose several areas for consensus process and outline future study projects.
Journal Article
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults
2018
In this cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial conducted in 5 ICUs, intravenous administration of balanced crystalloids resulted in a lower rate of the composite outcome — death from any cause, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction — than saline.
Journal Article
Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients
2019
In a randomized trial involving 4000 patients in the ICU who required sedation for mechanical ventilation, dexmedetomidine had no benefit on 90-day mortality as compared with usual care and was associated with more adverse events. Additional drugs were required for prescribed sedation levels in the two groups.
Journal Article
Balanced Multielectrolyte Solution versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults
by
Myburgh, John
,
Mackle, Diane
,
Gattas, David
in
Acute Kidney Injury - etiology
,
Acute Kidney Injury - prevention & control
,
Adult
2022
This randomized, double-blind trial involving critically ill patients compared balanced multielectrolyte solution with saline as fluid therapy in the ICU. There was no evidence that the risk of death or acute kidney injury was lower with the use of BMES than with saline.
Journal Article
Acute Outcomes and 1-Year Mortality of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness. A Cohort Study and Propensity-matched Analysis
by
Vanhullebusch, Tine
,
Clerckx, Beatrix
,
Van Cromphaut, Sophie
in
Aged
,
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
,
Biological and medical sciences
2014
Abstract
Rationale
Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness is a frequent complication of critical illness. It is unclear whether it is a marker or mediator of poor outcomes.
Objectives
To determine acute outcomes, 1-year mortality, and costs of ICU-acquired weakness among long-stay (≥8 d) ICU patients and to assess the impact of recovery of weakness at ICU discharge.
Methods
Data were prospectively collected during a randomized controlled trial. Impact of weakness on outcomes and costs was analyzed with a one-to-one propensity-score-matching for baseline characteristics, illness severity, and risk factor exposure before assessment. Among weak patients, impact of persistent weakness at ICU discharge on risk of death after 1 year was examined with multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.
Measurements and Main Results
A total of 78.6% were admitted to the surgical ICU; 227 of 415 (55%) long-stay assessable ICU patients were weak; 122 weak patients were matched to 122 not-weak patients. As compared with matched not-weak patients, weak patients had a lower likelihood for live weaning from mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.709 [0.549–0.888]; P = 0.009), live ICU (HR, 0.698 [0.553–0.861]; P = 0.008) and hospital discharge (HR, 0.680 [0.514–0.871]; P = 0.007). In-hospital costs per patient (+30.5%, +5,443 Euro per patient; P = 0.04) and 1-year mortality (30.6% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.015) were also higher. The 105 of 227 (46%) weak patients not matchable to not-weak patients had even worse prognosis and higher costs. The 1-year risk of death was further increased if weakness persisted and was more severe as compared with recovery of weakness at ICU discharge (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
After careful matching the data suggest that ICU-acquired weakness worsens acute morbidity and increases healthcare-related costs and 1-year mortality. Persistence and severity of weakness at ICU discharge further increased 1-year mortality.
Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00512122).
Journal Article
Energy-Dense versus Routine Enteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill
2018
This trial involving critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation compared the effects of energy-dense and routine enteral nutrition. The use of an energy-dense formulation did not increase the rate of survival at 90 days.
Journal Article
Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults
2015
The appropriate caloric goal for critically ill adults is unclear. In this study, enteral feeding to deliver a moderate amount of nonprotein calories was not associated with lower mortality than that associated with planned delivery of a full amount of nonprotein calories.
Nutritional support is an essential component of the care of critically ill adults.
1
Achieving caloric targets has been recommended with the premise that attenuating malnutrition and protein catabolism, which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, will improve outcomes.
2
Observational studies examining various doses of enteral feeding have yielded conflicting results.
3
–
7
Two cluster-randomized, controlled trials comparing higher enteral nutritional delivery with usual care in critically ill patients showed no reduction in mortality with the higher enteral nutrition.
8
,
9
Augmenting energy intake with early parenteral nutrition has been shown to result in no change in mortality
10
and in an increased . . .
Journal Article