Explore the vast range of titles available.

MET exon 14 alterations are oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) 1 . These alterations are associated with increased MET activity and preclinical sensitivity to MET inhibition 2 . Crizotinib is a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against MET 3 . The antitumor activity and safety of crizotinib were assessed in 69 patients with advanced NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 alterations. Objective response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21–45) among 65 response-evaluable patients. Objective responses were observed independent of the molecular heterogeneity that characterizes these cancers and did not vary by splice-site region and mutation type of the MET exon 14 alteration, concurrent increased MET copy number or the detection of a MET exon 14 alteration in circulating tumor DNA. The median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.4–12.7). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.4–9.1). MET exon 14 alteration defines a molecular subgroup of NSCLCs for which MET inhibition with crizotinib is active. These results address an unmet need for targeted therapy in people with lung cancers with MET exon 14 alterations and adds to an expanding list of genomically driven therapies for oncogenic subsets of NSCLC. Results from an expansion cohort of the PROFILE 1001 trial describe the anti-tumor activity of crizotinib in people with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring a MET exon 14 alteration.

The ALK inhibitor crizotinib as first-line therapy was associated with a significantly better response rate, longer progression-free survival, and greater improvement in quality of life measures than standard chemotherapy in patients with ALK -positive lung cancer. Rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) gene are present in 3 to 5% of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). 1 , 2 They define a distinct subgroup of NSCLC that typically occurs in younger patients who have never smoked or have a history of light smoking and that has adenocarcinoma histologic characteristics. 3 – 5 Crizotinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ALK, MET, and ROS1 kinases. 6 In phase 1 and 2 studies, crizotinib treatment resulted in objective tumor responses in approximately 60% of patients with ALK -positive NSCLC and in progression-free survival of 7 to 10 months. 7 – 9 In . . .

A combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is likely to be a therapeutic option for numerous oncological situations due to high frequency of oncogenic addiction and progress in precision oncology. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a subtype of tumors for which oncogenic drivers are frequently involved. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of a patient treated with three different TKIs. Osimertinib and crizotinib were administered concurrently for an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC developing a MET amplification as a resistance mechanism to osimertinib. Simultaneously, imatinib was administered for a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The progression-free survival was 7 months for both tumors with this tritherapy. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to assess plasma concentrations of each TKI was a powerful tool to manage the toxicity profile of this combination (creatine phosphokinase elevation) while preserving an optimal exposure to each TKI and treatment efficacy. We observed an imatinib over-exposition related to crizotinib introduction, probably explained by drug–drug interaction mediated by crizotinib enzymatic inhibition on cytochrome P-450 3A4. Posology adjustment due to therapeutic drug monitoring was probably involved in the good survival outcome of the patient. This tool should be used more routinely for patients treated by TKIs to prevent co-treatment interactions and, in particular, for patients receiving TKI combinations to obtain optimal therapeutic exposure and efficacy while reducing possible side-effects.

In an interim analysis of a trial involving 296 patients with ALK -positive non–small-cell lung cancer, lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor, was superior to crizotinib in response (in 76% vs. 58%), 12-month progression-free survival (78% vs. 39%), and intracranial disease response (82% vs. 23%). Altered lipid levels were the major toxic effect associated with lorlatinib.

The advent of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of ALK-rearranged malignancies, establishing these agents as vital components of precision oncology. Despite their proven efficacy in prolonging progression-free and overall survival, ALK inhibitors are associated with notable adverse events, particularly cardiopulmonary complications such as pleural and pericardial effusions. This study investigates the real-world prevalence and risk of these effusions associated with five ALK inhibitors, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib, through disproportionality analysis using the FAERS pharmacovigilance database. The data revealed elevated reporting odds ratios (RORs) for pleural and pericardial effusions, with notable variability among the agents. Crizotinib exhibited RORs of 7.76 (95% CI: 6.60-9.12) and 9.00 (95% CI: 7.10-11.41) for pleural and pericardial effusions, respectively. Ceritinib demonstrated RORs of 7.36 (95% CI: 5.16-10.50) and 10.80 (95% CI: 6.79-17.19), respectively. Alectinib showed lower RORs of 4.76 (95% CI: 3.80-5.97) and 6.67 (95% CI: 4.92-9.04). Brigatinib displayed elevated RORs of 8.70 (95% CI: 6.58-11.52) and 7.87 (95% CI: 4.95-12.51). Lorlatinib presented the highest risk, with RORs of 8.61 (95% CI: 6.72-11.02) and 12.57 (95% CI: 9.08-17.38). This study highlights the critical need for vigilant pharmacovigilance and a multidisciplinary approach to balance the oncologic benefits of ALK inhibitors against their cardiopulmonary risks. By enhancing awareness and fostering proactive management, these findings aim to support the safe and effective use of ALK inhibitors in treating ALK-rearranged malignancies.

In a randomized trial involving patients with ALK -rearranged lung cancer, brigatinib was associated with longer progression-free survival and more activity against central nervous system disease than crizotinib.

MET (also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor) signalling is a key driver of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Given that no optimal therapy for metastatic PRCC exists, we aimed to compare an existing standard of care, sunitinib, with the MET kinase inhibitors cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of patients with PRCC. We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 65 centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic PRCC who had received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed and MET-directed agents). Patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib, with stratification by receipt of previous therapy and PRCC subtype. All drug doses were administered orally: sunitinib 50 mg, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (dose reductions to 37·5 mg and 25 mg allowed); cabozantinib 60 mg daily (reductions to 40 mg and 20 mg allowed); crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (reductions to 200 mg twice daily and 250 mg once daily allowed); and savolitinib 600 mg daily (reductions to 400 mg and 200 mg allowed). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Analyses were done in an intention-to-treat population, with patients who did not receive protocol therapy excluded from safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761057. Between April 5, 2016, and Dec 15, 2019, 152 patients were randomly assigned to one of four study groups. Five patients were identified as ineligible post-randomisation and were excluded from these analyses, resulting in 147 eligible patients. Assignment to the savolitinib (29 patients) and crizotinib (28 patients) groups was halted after a prespecified futility analysis; planned accrual was completed for both sunitinib (46 patients) and cabozantinib (44 patients) groups. PFS was longer in patients in the cabozantinib group (median 9·0 months, 95% CI 6–12) than in the sunitinib group (5·6 months, 3–7; hazard ratio for progression or death 0·60, 0·37–0·97, one-sided p=0·019). Response rate for cabozantinib was 23% versus 4% for sunitinib (two-sided p=0·010). Savolitinib and crizotinib did not improve PFS compared with sunitinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 31 (69%) of 45 patients receiving sunitinib, 32 (74%) of 43 receiving cabozantinib, ten (37%) of 27 receiving crizotinib, and 11 (39%) of 28 receiving savolitinib; one grade 5 thromboembolic event was recorded in the cabozantinib group. Cabozantinib treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS compared with sunitinib in patients with metastatic PRCC. National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.

In the context of cancer treatment, the employment of multiple drug therapies frequently results in a high prevalence of drug-drug interaction (DDI) in clinical practice. Crizotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tropifexor is a Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) agonist used to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and other metabolic disorders. This study developed an ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative determination of crizotinib and 2-Keto crizotinib concentrations and investigated the effect of tropifexor on crizotinib metabolism. Results showed good linearity for crizotinib and 2-Keto crizotinib in plasma, with the method meeting all quantitative analysis requirements, including selectivity, accuracy, precision, stability, matrix effects, and recovery. In rat liver microsomes (RLM), tropifexor inhibited the metabolism of crizotinib via non-competitive and uncompetitive mechanisms, whereas in human liver microsomes (HLM), the inhibition occured through competitive and non-competitive mechanisms. In vivo studies in rats demonstrated that tropifexor significantly increased the AUC 0−t , AUC 0−∞ , and C max of crizotinib by 35.7%, 36.9%, and 37.5%, respectively, and decreased the CL z/F of crizotinib by 25.2%. For the metabolite 2-Keto crizotinib, tropifexor reduced its CL z/F by 27.9%. Our study developed this UPLC-MS/MS method for the accurate and sensitive quantitative determination of crizotinib and 2-Keto crizotinib concentrations, and elucidated the inhibitory effect of tropifexor on crizotinib metabolism and its inhibitory mechanism. The results of this study will support the necessity of monitoring crizotinib plasma concentrations when used in combination therapy.

Abstract Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant tumor that starts from the epithelium of the bile duct and has a poor prognosis. They are characterized by poor response to chemotherapy and lack of effective targeted therapies; thus, therapeutic options are limited. Case Presentation A 59-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for a workup of abnormal CA19-9 levels. He was diagnosed with ICC, underwent surgery and was found to have pT1bNx disease. He developed rapid disease recurrence on adjuvant gemcitabine + capecitabine. Following recurrence, he received first-line systemic pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and second-line pembrolizumab + lenvatinib + chemotherapy and had mild tumor regression followed by progression. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the baseline surgical sample. This revealed a novel RBPMS-MET fusion, and based on the literature, crizotinib 250 mg twice a day was administered. After 3 months of crizotinib treatment, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a significant reduction in liver lesions, and 4 months after initiating treatment, scans demonstrated a partial response. Conclusion Our case report strengthens the evidence that crizotinib may be a viable treatment option for patients with ICC with a c-MET tyrosine kinase fusion, necessitating additional clinical investigation.

Background MET amplification is associated with acquired resistance to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the therapeutic strategy in these patients is undefined. Herein we report the clinical outcomes of patients with c-MET amplification resistance to EGFR-TKIs treated with crizotinib. Methods We retrospectively analyzed advanced NSCLC patients from five sites who were diagnosed with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and received EGFR-TKI treatment. After disease progression, these patients were confirmed to have a MET-to-centromere ratio (MET:CEN) ≥ 1.8 based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) examination and without a T790M mutation. We assessed the efficacy and safety of crizotinib to overcome EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR-activating mutations NSCLC with acquired MET amplification. Results Amplification of the acquired MET gene was identified in 18 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Fourteen patients received crizotinib treatment after acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Among the 14 patients, 6 (42.9%) received crizotinib plus EGFR-TKI and 8 (57.1%) received crizotinib monotherapy. The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 50.0% (7/14) and 85.7% (12/14), respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) of patients receiving crizotinib monotherapy and crizotinib plus EGFR-TKI was 6.0 and 12.6 months, respectively (P = 0.315). Notably, treatment efficacy was more pronounced in patients with crizotinib than patients with chemotherapy (24.0 months vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.046). The mOS for 8 of 14 patients receiving crizotinib monotherapy and 6 of 14 patients receiving crizotinib plus EGFR-TKI was 17.2 and 24.0 months, respectively (P = 0.862). Among the 14 patients, 1 who received crizotinib monotherapy (grade 3 nausea) and 2 who received crizotinib plus EGFR-TKI (grade 3 elevated liver aminotransferase levels) received reduced doses of crizotinib (200 mg twice daily) to better tolerate the dose. Conclusions We observed the clinical evidence of efficacy generated by combination of crizotinib and previous EGFR-TKIs after the resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. These results might increase evidence of more effective therapeutic strategies for NSCLC treatment. Combination therapy did not increase the frequency of adverse reactions.