Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAAF) using the cryoballoon has emerged as an alternate strategy to point-by-point radiofrequency. However, there is little comparative data on long-term durability of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation comparing these two modalities. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective analysis, the incidences/patterns of late PV reconnection following an index CAAF using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated, non-force-sensing radiofrequency were examined. Results Of the 2002 patients who underwent a first-time CAAF, 186/1126 patients (16.5 %) ablated using cryoballoon and 174/876 patients (19.9 %) with non-contact force-guided radiofrequency required a repeat procedure at 11 ± 5 months. During follow-up, the incidence of atrial flutters/tachycardias was lower (19.9 vs. 32.8 %; p  = 0.005) and fewer patients exhibited PV reconnection (47.3 vs. 60.9 %; p  = 0.007) with cryoballoon versus radiofrequency. Additionally, fewer PVs had reconnected with cryoballoon versus radiofrequency (18.8 vs. 34.6 %; p  < 0.001). With cryoballoon, the right inferior ( p  < 0.001) and left common ( p  = 0.039) PVs were more likely to exhibit late reconnection, versus the left superior PV with radiofrequency ( p  = 0.012). However, when comparing the two strategies, the left common PV was more likely to exhibit reconnection with cryoballoon, whereas all other PVs with the exception of the right inferior PV demonstrated a lower reconnection rate with cryoballoon versus radiofrequency. Lastly, in a logistic regression multivariate analysis, cryoballoon ablation and PV ablation time emerged as significant predictors of durable PV isolation at repeat procedure. Conclusions In this large multicenter, retrospective analysis, CAAF using the second-generation cryoballoon was associated with improved durability of PV isolation compared to open-irrigated, non-force-sensing radiofrequency.

Purpose Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the cryoballoon is an established treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second-generation cryoballoon increased efficacy in comparison to the first-generation cryoballoon. The third-generation cryoballoon was designed with a shorter distal tip to facilitate real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Here, we compared the rate of real-time recordings of PVI of the second- and third-generation cryoballoon. Methods The incidence of real-time recording of PV isolation and time to PV isolation of the first 37 patients treated with the new third-generation cryoballoon at our center were compared to the last 37 patients treated with the second-generation cryoballoon. Results One hundred forty-nine pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified in each group. All PVs were isolated successfully with the second- or third-generation cryoballoon. Real-time registration of PVI occurred in 83 PVs (55.7 %) with the second-generation cryoballoon and in 124 PVs (83.2 %) with the third-generation cryoballoon ( p  < 0.001). The rate of observed real-time PVI was significantly higher with the third-generation cryoballoon for each individual PV. The time-to-isolation was 44 ± 25 s with the second-generation cryoballoon vs. 42 ± 22 s with the third-generation cryoballoon ( p  = 0.25). In a short-term clinical follow-up, there was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates between both groups. Conclusions The third-generation cryoballoon facilitates real-time recording of PV isolation with significantly higher rates of observed time-to-isolation. The time to PV isolation is not different between second- and third-generation cryoballoon.

Background The newer second-generation cryoballoons (CB-2 or Arc-Adv-CB) have been shown to achieve significantly lower temperature and faster pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) time in comparison with first-generation cryoballoons (CB-1 or Arc-CB). To test the premise that second-generation cryoballoons can improve clinical outcomes in comparison to first-generation cryoballoons in terms of safety and efficacy, we pooled data for systemic review and meta-analyses from all available literature comparing their clinical performance. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, and studies presented at various meetings were searched for any published literature comparing safety and efficacy of the second-generation cryoballoons (Arctic Front Advance cryoballoons) with first-generation cryoballoons (Arctic Front Cryoballoons). A total of ten published studies, with 2310 patients, were included in this meta-analysis with 957 patients in second-generation cryoballoon group and 1237 patients in first-generation cryoballoon group. Results The pooled analysis showed significant superiority of second-generation cryoballoons in terms of less procedure time, less fluoroscopic time, and fewer incidences of arrhythmia recurrences compared to first-generation cryoballoons at the cost of higher incidence of persistent and transient phrenic nerve palsy. The differences in the rate of pericardial effusion and incidence of access site complications were not statistically significant. Conclusions Second-generation cryoballoons are associated with a shorter procedure time and fluoroscopy time, along with lower arrhythmia recurrence rates, reflecting higher procedure efficacy when compared to first-generation cryoballoons. However, they are also associated with a higher incidence of transient and persistent phrenic nerve palsies with a non-significant difference in rates of access site complications and pericardial effusion.

Purpose Data indicate that the second-generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minnesota, USA) could be effective for persistent atrial fibrillation. However, electrophysiological findings and the midterm clinical outcome of repeat procedures following second-generation cryoballoon ablation are lacking. Methods Consecutive patients with drug-resistant persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent a repeat ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence following an index procedure with second-generation cryoballoon were retrospectively included in our analysis. A total of 24 patients were included. Twenty underwent repeat procedures because of atrial fibrillation or left atrial arrhythmias and four because of typical atrial flutter. Mean time to recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias was 6.6 ± 3 months. Mean redo procedural time was 122 ± 23 min. Results At a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 6.5 months, 15 patients (75 %) did not experience recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. Of the five patients (25 %) who had recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, four presented with persistent atrial fibrillation and one with a mitral isthmus-dependent flutter. Of note is that the four patients with typical flutter were free from atrial tachycardia recurrence after the redo procedure. Two patients (9 %) underwent a third procedure. Mean time to recurrence of atrial arrhythmias from the repeat procedure was 9 ± 1 months. Conclusions Our findings show that repeat ablation procedures following a second-generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation result in 75 % of freedom from any atrial tachycardia at 12 months follow-up. Of the recurrences, 63 % were due to new onset of atrial fibrillation and 37 % to organized tachycardias.

Purpose We aim to evaluate the current beliefs and practice patterns of urologists in regard to use of cryosurgery for management of PCa. Methods An anonymous 13-point survey was designed and sent out to members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO), Endourological Society (ES) and American College of Cryosurgery (ACC). Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were used to determine variables associated with the use of cryosurgery. Results Of the 206 responses received [81 (39.2 %) SUO; 106 (51.5 %) ES; 19 (9.2 %) ACC], 83 (40.3 %) performed cryosurgery. The majority of respondents who utilize cryosurgery do so in unilateral (80.3 %) and bilateral (77.6 %) intermediate-risk PCa. Also, users of this technology indicated significant use in primary treatment (>72 %), salvage treatment (>83 %), in patients who prefer cryosurgery (89.9 %) have a life expectancy ≥10 years (65.8 %) and poor erections (74.7 %). The main reason for not utilizing cryosurgery was the lack of technical expertise (56.7 %). A urologist in a non-academic practice setting was 3.2 times more likely to perform cryosurgery compared to a urologist in an academic setting, p  = 0.0001. Conclusion Cryosurgery is increasingly being accepted among urologists. However, the need for large-scale studies as well as randomized clinical trials to further delineate the benefits of cryosurgery and convince the non-users and institutions cannot be overemphasized.

Purpose Cardiac enzyme elevation after radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL) is common. Some studies found that cryoablation (CRYO) of AFL, compared to RF, is associated with higher levels of troponin, a finding that may indicate CRYO causes a greater amount of myocardial injury than RF. However, other investigations found no significant differences between troponin levels after CRYO versus RF. We have in a randomized study compared the post-procedural troponin I levels in RF and CRYO and the possible relation to procedural outcome and complications. Methods We randomized 153 patients with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL to CRYO or RF (78 CRYO; 75 RF). RF was performed with a 3.5-mm open-irrigated-tip catheter, and CRYO was performed with an 8-mm-tip catheter. Troponin I levels were measured before and 6 h after ablation. Results Acute procedural success was achieved in 71/75 patients in the RF and in 72/78 patients in the CRYO. Troponin I levels were significantly elevated in both groups (baseline 0.012, 6th hour 0.35 ng/ml; p  < 0.001). Troponin I levels were similar for RF and CRYO. Troponin I levels were higher in patients with acute failure compared to patients with acute success (0.48 ± 0.4 and 0.34 ± 0.16 ng/ml, p  = 0.029); however, there was no difference between patients with or without late recurrence. There were no major complications in any group. Conclusion RF and CRYO for CTI-dependent AFL resulted in similar amounts of procedural myocardial injury. Troponin I levels had no prognostic value for late recurrence of AFL and there were no complications related to high troponin I levels.

Initial treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon ablation was associated with a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation and other atrial tachyarrhythmias over 3 years than rhythm-control medications.

In this multicenter trial involving patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who had not previously received rhythm-control treatment, cryoballoon ablation resulted in a significantly higher percentage of patients with treatment success at 1 year than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with a low incidence of procedure-related adverse events.

Background Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), as recently demonstrated by three randomized trials. This sub-analysis of the Cryo Global Registry aims to examine current clinical practices of first-line CBA. Methods AF patients treated with first-line CBA were compared to CBA in antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory patients at 12 months. Efficacy was examined using time-to-first atrial arrhythmia recurrence following a 90-day blanking period. Healthcare utilization was evaluated by repeat ablations and hospitalizations. Disease burden was examined by assessing quality of life (QOL) and patients’ reporting of symptoms. Results Of 1394 patients, 433 (31.1%) were treated with first-line CBA, which was more frequent in high-volume centers. Serious procedure-related adverse event rates were similar. Efficacy at 12 months was higher in the first-line group (87.8 vs. 81.6%, HR unadj 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.88); p  < 0.01) regardless of the centers’ CBA experience; when controlling for baseline characteristics, the difference was not significant (HR adj 0.87 (95% CI 0.56–1.37); p  = 0.55). No difference was observed in repeat ablations and hospitalizations between cohorts. First-line patients experienced a larger mean reduction in symptoms and were prescribed AADs at a lower rate at 12-month follow-up (9.7 vs. 29.9%). QOL improved in both cohorts from baseline to 12 months with no significant difference between groups ( p  = 0.29). Conclusions In this global real-world experience, first-line CBA in patients with symptomatic AF is effective, with a larger symptom reduction compared with CBA after AAD failure and without a difference in healthcare utilization at mid-term follow-up. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02752737 Graphical abstract

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation using the cryoballoon is effective at reducing symptomatic AF episodes. The prevalence of AF is increasing with the aging population and access to such treatment would be enhanced by reducing the resource requirements. Relinquishing electrical mapping of the pulmonary veins (PV) removes the need for PV catheters, electrical recording equipment and staff trained in using this equipment. Moreover, the majority of complications are peri-procedural so overnight hospitalization maybe unnecessary. We tested this streamlined approach to AF ablation against medical therapy using the endpoint of time to all hospital episodes. The AVATAR-AF study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial testing the primary hypothesis that AF ablation done without PV mapping or overnight hospitalization is more effective than anti-arrhythmic drugs at reducing all hospital episodes related to recurrent atrial arrhythmias. We included a third arm to test a secondary hypothesis that confirming PV entrance block as per consensus guidelines can improve outcomes. Three hundred twenty-one patients with documented paroxysmal AF will be randomized in a 1:1:1 manner to one of three investigation arms: (1) AVATAR protocol cryoballoon ablation without assessment of acute PV isolation or overnight hospitalization; (2) medical therapy with anti-arrhythmic drugs; or (3) conventional cryoballoon ablation with assessment of acute PV isolation. The primary endpoint is defined as the time to all hospital episodes (including outpatient consultation) related to treatment for atrial arrhythmia. The AVATAR-AF study will determine whether the resource utilization for AF ablation can be reduced whilst maintaining superiority over medical therapy.