Explore the vast range of titles available.

Anthropogenic global change is impacting the evolutionary potential of biodiversity in ways that have been difficult to predict. Distinct evolutionary units within species may respond differently to the same environmental trends, reflecting unique geography, ecology, adaptation, or drift. Least shrews (Cryptotis parvus group) have a widespread distribution across North America, yet systematic relationships and ongoing evolutionary processes remain unresolved. Westernmost peripheral populations have been prioritized for conservation, but little is known of their evolutionary histories or population trajectories. The broad range of this group of species is coincident with many other temperate taxa, presenting a hypothesis that diversification of least shrews follows a repeated process through the Pleistocene, leading to regionally diagnosable conservation units. We use genomic data and niche modeling to delimit species and conservation units of least shrews. Our results show that least shrews warrant recognition as multiple distinct species, along with geographically discrete infraspecific lineages of C. parvus (sensu stricto). Western peripheral populations are evolutionarily distinct based on nuclear, but not mitochondrial data, possibly reflecting mitochondrial capture during the last glacial phase. This population represents a relict conservation unit, consistent with both an “adaptive unit” and “management unit” based on non‐neutral and neutral divergence, respectively. Hindcast niche modeling supports growing evidence for a shared process of diversification among co‐distributed biota, and forecast modeling suggests continued future loss of suitable environmental niche in peripheral regions. Given mito‐nuclear discordance among samples of parapatric lineages, future environmental perturbation may continue to impact the genomic integrity of important conservation units, making ecological and genomic monitoring a critical need. Least shrews, distributed widely across North America and Mesoamerica, remain an enigmatic group in terms of their evolutionary history, biogeography, and ongoing responses to environmental change. Under a phylogenomic framework using reduced representation genome data, we investigated these dynamics across multiple scales of analysis. We found that the current taxonomy is in need of revision and provide updated nomenclature, systematic relationships, and conservation implications. This group provides a clear demonstration of diagnosable diversification across this vast study area.

John Bachman (1837:391) described the “fringe-footed shrew,” Sorex fimbripesBachman, 1837, in his landmark monograph on the North American Soricidae (Mammalia: Eulipotyphla), in which he recognized 13 uniquely New World species. Characters he attributed to S. fimbripes resulted in its being interpreted as a tiny, semi-aquatic species and contributed to the complexity of its subsequent taxonomic history. The status and location of the holotype, which should aid in resolving questions about the nature of S. fimbripes, instead have added to the confusion. Originally studied by Bachman in South Carolina, the holotype was later thought to have been identified in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), and it is currently considered to be in the National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Washington, D.C. To clarify the identity of the species and its holotype, I compared descriptions of the holotype and the ANSP type with the USNM specimen and with eight species of eastern North American shrews. I conclude that the three accounts of S. fimbripes refer to three different specimens and that the holotype was probably destroyed during the American Civil War. Bachman's S. fimbripes was most likely equivalent to S. cinereusKerr, 1792, S. fontinalisHollister, 1911, or S. fumeusMiller, 1895, but without the holotype, its identity cannot be determined definitively, and the name is a nomen dubium.

John Bachman (1837:391) described the \"fringe-footed shrew,\" Sorex fimbripes Bachman, 1837, in his landmark monograph on the North American Soricidae (Mammalia: Eulipotyphla), in which he recognized 13 uniquely New World species. Characters he attributed to S. fimbripes resulted in its being interpreted as a tiny, semi-aquatic species and contributed to the complexity of its subsequent taxonomic history. The status and location of the holotype, which should aid in resolving questions about the nature of S. fimbripes, instead have added to the confusion. Originally studied by Bachman in South Carolina, the holotype was later thought to have been identified in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), and it is currently considered to be in the National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Washington, D.C. To clarify the identity of the species and its holotype, I compared descriptions of the holotype and the ANSP type with the USNM specimen and with eight species of eastern North American shrews. I conclude that the three accounts of S. fimbripes refer to three different specimens and that the holotype was probably destroyed during the American Civil War. Bachman's S. fimbripes was most likely equivalent to S. cinereus Kerr, 1792, S. fontinalis Hollister, 1911, or S. fumeus Miller, 1895, but without the holotype, its identity cannot be determined definitively, and the name is a nomen dubium.