Explore the vast range of titles available.

Emerging data suggests a possible role for cysteamine as an adjunct treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF) that continue to be a major clinical challenge. There are no studies investigating the use of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF. This exploratory randomized clinical trial was conducted to answer the question: In future pivotal trials of cysteamine as an adjunct treatment in pulmonary exacerbations of CF, which candidate cysteamine dosing regimens should be tested and which are the most appropriate, clinically meaningful outcome measures to employ as endpoints? Multicentre double-blind randomized clinical trial. Adults experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation of CF being treated with standard care that included aminoglycoside therapy were randomized equally to a concomitant 14-day course of placebo, or one of 5 dosing regimens of cysteamine. Outcomes were recorded on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 and included sputum bacterial load and the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CRISS), the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R); FEV1, blood leukocyte count, and inflammatory markers. Eighty nine participants in fifteen US and EU centres were randomized, 78 completed the 14-day treatment period. Cysteamine had no significant effect on sputum bacterial load, however technical difficulties limited interpretation. The most consistent findings were for cysteamine 450mg twice daily that had effects additional to that observed with placebo, with improved symptoms, CRISS additional 9.85 points (95% CI 0.02, 19.7) p = 0.05, reduced blood leukocyte count by 2.46x109 /l (95% CI 0.11, 4.80), p = 0.041 and reduced CRP by geometric mean 2.57 nmol/l (95% CI 0.15, 0.99), p = 0.049. In this exploratory study cysteamine appeared to be safe and well-tolerated. Future pivotal trials investigating the utility of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF need to include the cysteamine 450mg doses and CRISS and blood leukocyte count as outcome measures. NCT03000348; www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a treatment that uses a photosensitizer, molecular oxygen, and light to kill target cells, is a promising cancer treatment method. However, a limitation of PDT is its dependence on light that is not highly penetrating, precluding the treatment of tumors located deep in the body. Copper-cysteamine nanoparticles are a new type of photosensitizer that can generate cytotoxic singlet oxygen molecules upon activation by X-rays. In this paper, we report on the use of copper-cysteamine nanoparticles, designed to be targeted to tumors, for X-ray–induced PDT. In an in vivo study, results show a statistically significant reduction in tumor size under X-ray activation of pH-low insertion peptide–conjugated, copper-cysteamine nanoparticles in mouse tumors. This work confirms the effectiveness of copper-cysteamine nanoparticles as a photosensitizer when activated by radiation and suggests that these Cu-Cy nanoparticles may be good candidates for PDT in deeply seated tumors when combined with X-rays and conjugated to a tumor-targeting molecule.

Copper-cysteamine nanoparticles (Cu-Cy NPs) represent an innovative approach for cancer therapy due to their unique ability to be activated by multiple physical and chemical stimuli. This review systematically evaluates studies investigating Cu-Cy NPs in combination with chemical agents and diverse energy sources, including X-rays, UV light, microwaves, and ultrasound. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to August 2025 identified 18 relevant studies encompassing both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Across these studies, Cu-Cy NPs consistently suppressed tumor growth and triggered cancer cell death by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enhanced therapeutic effects when combined with co-treatments such as disulfiram, potassium iodide, and other adjunct therapies. The multi-modal activation of Cu-Cy NPs, along with their ability to enhance existing therapeutic approaches, demonstrates a novel strategy in cancer treatment that integrates chemical and physical mechanisms for maximal efficacy. These findings underscore the nanoparticles’ potential to transform current oncology strategies, offering targeted, versatile, and personalized therapeutic options. Continued investigation is essential to fully elucidate their mechanisms, optimize treatment protocols, and translate these promising preclinical results into safe and effective clinical applications. Graphical Abstract

Currently, hydroquinone serves as topical treatment of choice for melasma. However, its long-term use was associated with melanocyte toxicity. Cysteamine is an aminothiol that possesses antioxidant and depigmenting properties, therefore potentially suitable for treating melasma. This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of cysteamine 5% cream for the management of melasma. A comprehensive search was conducted on the Europe PMC, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases up until June 22nd, 2024. This review incorporates randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examines the comparison between cysteamine and placebo or hydroquinone in melasma patients. We employed random-effect models to analyze the odds ratio and standardized mean difference (SMD) for presentation of the outcomes. A total of 7 RCTs were incorporated. The results of our meta-analysis showed cysteamine 5% was more effective than placebo in reducing the Melasma Area and Severity Index (SMD − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.19, − 0.49, p  < 0.00001, I 2  = 0%), but showed no significant difference when compared with hydroquinone 4% (SMD 0.16; 95% CI − 0.22, 0.53, p  = 0.42, I 2  = 55%). In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) like erythema, irritation, burning, itching, and dryness were higher in the cysteamine 5% than placebo. However, the incidence of these AEs was similar between cysteamine 5% and hydroquinone 4%. This study suggests that cysteamine 5% cream may become suitable alternative of topical hydroquinone for the management of melasma due to similar efficacy and safety profile.

Background Nephropathic cystinosis is a rare and severe metabolic disease leading to an accumulation of cystine in lysosomes which especially harms kidney function. A lifelong therapy with the aminothiol cysteamine can delay the development of end-stage renal disease and the necessity of kidney transplantation. The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of immediate-release and delayed-release cysteamine on cystine and cysteamine levels as well as assessing the onset of adverse effects. Methods We retrospectively analysed cystine and cysteamine levels of 17 patients after a single dose of immediate-release cysteamine (Cystagon®, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Canonsburg, PA and Recordati Pharma GmbH) as well as a single dose of delayed-release cysteamine (Procysbi®; Horizon Pharma USA and Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) respectively. Data were collected during a period of three years in the context of optimizing the individual treatment regimens. The dose of DR-cysteamine was reduced to 70% of the equivalent dose of IR-cysteamine. The efficacy of both formulas in depleting white blood cells’ cystine levels and their side effects were compared. Results Immediate (IR)- and delayed-release (DR) cysteamine effectively decreased intracellular cystine levels under the target value of 0.5 nmol cystine/mg protein, while fewer side effects occurred under DR-cysteamine. Mean maximum levels of cysteamine were reached after 60 min with IR-cysteamine and after 180 min with DR-cysteamine. Conclusion A therapy with DR-cysteamine is as effective as IR-cysteamine while less side effects were reported. Our data show that DR-cysteamine should be dosed higher than 70% of the equivalent dose of IR-cysteamine in order to decrease cystine levels over an extended period of time. Moreover, our data suggest increasing the dosing scheme of Procysbi® to three times daily, to prevent a rapid decrease and achieve a steadier decline in cystine levels. Due to the more convenient dosing scheme, DR-cysteamine might ameliorate therapy adherence and improve patients’ quality of life.

Background The objective of this report is to identify and characterize cases of fibrosing colonopathy, a rare and underrecognized adverse event, associated with cysteamine delayed-release (DR) in patients with nephropathic cystinosis. Methods We searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the medical literature for postmarketing reports of fibrosing colonopathy associated with cysteamine through August 2, 2023. Results We identified four cases of fibrosing colonopathy reported with the use of cysteamine DR. The time to onset ranged from 12 to 31 months. In one case, the patient required surgery to have a resection of a section of the strictured colon and a diverting ileostomy. Fibrosing colonopathy was diagnosed by histopathology in two of the cases. Conclusions Our case series identified the risk of fibrosing colonopathy in patients taking cysteamine DR and prompted regulatory action by the FDA. As outlined in changes to the U.S. prescribing information for cysteamine DR, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential risk of fibrosing colonopathy with cysteamine DR, especially as symptoms can be non-specific leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. If the diagnosis of fibrosing colonopathy is confirmed, consideration should be given to permanently discontinuing cysteamine DR and switching to cysteamine immediate-release treatment. Graphical abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

The strict intake regimen of cysteamine bitartrate formulations, associated with side effects, is a concern for the treatment compliance in cystinosis therapy. Therefore, there is a need for a cysteamine formulation with an improved pharmacokinetic profile. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of a new sustained‐release cysteamine dosage form, PO‐001, in healthy volunteers. This was a randomized, investigator‐blinded, three‐way cross‐over study to compare single doses (600 mg) of PO‐001 with Cystagon® (immediate‐release) and Procysbi® (delayed‐release). Collected blood samples were analyzed for plasma cysteamine concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis. In addition, plasma cysteamine concentrations were analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach using NONMEM®. Pharmacokinetics showed clear sustained‐release characteristics of PO‐001 over time with a lower Cmax and longer Tmax compared to Cystagon® and Procysbi®. All treatment‐emergent adverse events were of mild severity, with the exception of two subjects who reported moderate severity gastrointestinal problems including vomiting and diarrhea, which were related to Cystagon® intake. Population PK simulations showed a favourable PK profile based on Cmax and Ctrough concentrations at steady state. In conclusion, a single dose of 600 mg PO‐001 was well tolerated with no findings of clinical concern. This new cysteamine bitartrate formulation showed pharmacokinetics of a sustained‐release formulation, which may be beneficial for the treatment of cystinosis patients. This study supports advancing this type of sustained‐release formulation into a subsequent study to confirm reduced dosing frequency with efficient control of white blood cells (WBCs) cystine levels. Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR) (NL67638.056.18). PO‐001 showed clear sustained‐release characteristics with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile based on the tmax, and both Cmax and Ctrough concentrations PO‐001 could be an advanced treatment for cystinosis patients.

The aim of this letter to the editor is to summarize the results from three clinical trial programs evaluating delayed-release cysteamine bitartrate (DR-CYS), which demonstrated the long-term clinical benefits in patients with nephropathic cystinosis when dosed every 12 h. The authors of “A comparison of immediate release and delayed release cysteamine in 17 patients with nephropathic cystinosis” presented recommendations altering the dosage and dosing scheme from what has been previously approved by the FDA for DR-CYS. In this letter to the editor, we critique the authors’ aforementioned article as it is a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients and does not follow the dosing recommendation by the FDA for equivalent dosing of DR-CYS to immediate-release cysteamine bitartrate (IR-CYS). In addition, the article does not include study data to properly support the authors’ suggestion of increased dosing effects and benefits. We present a summary of the results from the DR-CYS clinical trial program and evidence of the rigor from which the clinical data for DR-CYS were generated and recommendation for usage as prescribed.

Cystinosis is a severe inherited metabolic storage disease caused by the lysosomal accumulation of cystine. Lifelong therapy with the drug cysteamine bitartrate is necessary. Cysteamine cleaves intralysosomal cystine, and thereafter, it can exit from the organelle. The need for frequent dosing every 6 h and the high prevalence of gastrointestinal side effects lead to poor therapy adherence. The purpose of our study was to improve cysteamine treatment by comparing the efficacy of two cysteamine formulas. This is highly relevant for the long-term outcome of cystinosis patients. The cystine and cysteamine levels of 17 patients taking immediate-release cysteamine (IR-cysteamine/Cystagon®) and 6 patients taking encapsulated delayed-release cysteamine (EC-cysteamine) were analyzed. The EC-cysteamine levels showed a near-ideal pharmacokinetic profile indicative of delayed release (longer Tmax and Tmin), and the corresponding cystine levels showed few fluctuations. In addition, the Cmax of IR-cysteamine was greater, which was responsible for unbearable side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, halitosis, lethargy). Treatment with EC-cysteamine improves the quality of life of cystinosis patients because the frequency of intake can be reduced to 2–3 times daily and it has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than IR-cysteamine. In particular, cystinosis patients with no access to the only approved delayed-release cysteamine Procysbi® could benefit from a cost-effective alternative.

Nephropathic cystinosis is a multisystem autosomal recessive disease caused by cystine accumulation, which is usually treated by oral cysteamine. In order to determine long-term effects of this therapy, we enrolled 86 adult patients (mean age 26.7 years) diagnosed with nephropathic cystinosis, 75 of whom received cysteamine. Therapy was initiated at a mean age of 9.9 years with a mean duration of 17.4 years. By last follow-up, 78 patients had end-stage renal disease (mean age 11.1 years), 62 had hypothyroidism (mean age 13.4), 48 developed diabetes (mean age 17.1 years), and 32 had neuromuscular disorders (mean age 23.3 years). Initiating cysteamine therapy before 5 years of age significantly decreased the incidence and delayed the onset of end-stage renal disease, and significantly delayed the onset of hypothyroidism, diabetes, and neuromuscular disorders. The development of diabetes and hypothyroidism was still significantly delayed, however, in patients in whom therapy was initiated after 5 years of age, compared with untreated patients. The life expectancy was significantly improved in cysteamine-treated versus untreated patients. Thus, cysteamine decreases and delays the onset of complications and improves life expectancy in cystinosis. Hence, cysteamine therapy should be introduced as early as possible during childhood and maintained lifelong.