Explore the vast range of titles available.

We examine whether property market liquidity impacts the choice between secured and unsecured debt. A sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs) allows us to estimate the market liquidity of a REIT’s underlying assets and the debt secured by those assets (or unsecured). Using an instrumental variables approach, we find a positive relationship between a REIT’s property market liquidity and its use of unsecured debt relative to secured debt - when a REIT has greater exposure to more liquid underlying property markets, it is more likely to rely on unsecured debt. We investigate several aspects of this relationship including the debt level, issuances, and property loan-to-value ratio. In each case, we find support for our main result. Likewise, our results are robust to (a) using alternative instruments; (b) controlling for REITs’ unencumbered assets, as well as asset quality and redeployability; (c) controlling for credit market conditions; (d) accounting for real estate market conditions; (e) excluding firms that focus on residential real estate; and (f) adding stock market liquidity. Our study highlights the importance of property market liquidity in the debt structure of REITs. 

This study investigates whether, and to what extent, dividend-paying firms follow pecking order behavior when altering their capital structure. Using a panel of 3173 U.S. firms from 1960 to 2020 (49,424 firm-year observations), we examine four financing activities: equity and debt issuance under a financing deficit, and equity repurchases and debt redemptions under a financing surplus. We find that firms generally follow the pecking order when issuing or redeeming debt but deviate from it when issuing or repurchasing equity. Adherence to the pecking order also varies with issuance and repurchase size. Very large debt issues and redemptions are associated with lower pecking order coefficients, while large equity issues and repurchases are associated with higher pecking order coefficients, although equity coefficients remain below 0.7. Our findings provide novel evidence of how financing choices, along with issuance and repurchase magnitudes, shape pecking order behavior among dividend-paying firms, offering new insights into capital structure literature.

We study how public firm misvaluation affects private peer firm investments. An economic competition hypothesis predicts a negative relation because misvaluation-induced new investment by public firms crowds out investment by private peers that share common input or output markets. An alternative shared sentiment hypothesis predicts a positive relation because private firm stakeholders share in the sentiment associated with misvaluation in public markets. Misvaluation is proxied using both the price-to-fundamental ratio and an exogenous instrument obtained from mutual fund flows. The evidence is consistent with the shared sentiment hypothesis, and robust to alternative treatments for growth opportunities. Private firms finance misvaluation-induced investment primarily internally or externally with debt, not equity. Finally, misvaluation-induced investment increases future return on investment for private firms, in contrast with public firms. Overall, these findings suggest that overvaluation in public markets increases private firm investments and has beneficial effects on private firm investments by relaxing financing constraints.

Purpose: The introduction of dual decisions (such as the issue of shares and the issue of debt; the repurchase of shares and the repayment of debt; and share issues and share repurchases) has provided an order of preference of financing decisions influenced by company-specific attributes. The aim of this study is to investigate determinants of choice of South African companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) between different financing decisions.Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from Integrated Real-time Equity System (IRESS), a reliable supplier of financial data. Data of 90 companies were analysed. A logistic regression model (fixed effect) was used, and multinomial logistic regression (fixed effect) was done using a generalised structural equation model.Findings/results: The research findings highlight the significance of the trade-off theory, the pecking order theory and models based on asymmetric information in elucidating financing decisions in a developing country. The findings extend empirical evidence of determinants of choice between equity issuance, equity repurchase, the no-transaction alternative and debt issuance decisions in South Africa’s emerging economy. The findings also suggest that South African companies listed on the JSE must evaluate company-specific variables and theories that correspond to such variables if they wish to make better financing decisions.Practical implications: The findings will help corporate decision-makers decide between equity issuance, equity repurchase and debt issuance. The findings will also help shareholders make better investment decisions.Originality/value: The article investigates the determinants of choice between four financing decisions and the no-transaction alternatives within the same framework.

Sovereign states issue fixed and floating securities to fund their public debt. The value of such portfolios strongly depends on the fluctuations of the term structure of interest rates. This is a typical example of planning under uncertainty, where decisions have to be taken on the base of the key stochastic economic factors underneath the model. We propose a multistage stochastic programming model to select portfolios of bonds, where the aim of the decision maker is to minimize the cost of the decision process. At the same time, we bound the conditional Value-at-Risk, a measure of risk which accounts for the losses of the tail distribution. We build an efficient frontier to trade-off the optimal cost versus the conditional Value-at-Risk and analyze the results obtained.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effect of real credit ratings change on capital structure decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses three models to examine the impact of credit rating on capital structure decisions within the framework of credit rating-capital structure hypotheses (broad rating, notch rating and investment or speculative grade). These hypotheses are tested by multiple linear regression models. Findings – The results demonstrate that firms issue less net debt relative to equity post a change in the broad credit ratings level (e.g. a change from A- to BBBþ). The findings also show that firms are less concerned by notch ratings change as long the firms remain the same broad credit rating level. Moreover, the paper indicates that firms issue less net debt relative to equity after an upgrade to investment grade. Research limitations/implications – The study covers the periods of 2009 to 2016; therefore, the research result may be affected by the period specific events such as the European debt crisis. Moreover, studying listed non-financial firms only in the Tadawul Stock Exchange has resulted in small sample which may not be adequate enough to reach concrete generalization. Despite the close proximity between the GCC countries, there could be jurisdictional difference due to country specific regulations, policies or financial development. Therefore, it will be interesting to conduct a cross country study on the GCC to see if the conclusions can be generalized to the region. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the literature by testing previous researches on new context (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, KSA) which lack sophisticated comparable studies to the one conducted on other regions of the world. The results highlight the importance of credit ratings for the decision makers who are required to make essential decisions in areas such as financing, structuring or operating firms and regulating markets. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study of its kind that has been applied on the GCC region.

Developing countries need additional, cross-border capital channeled into their private sectors to generate employment and growth, reduce poverty, and meet the other Millennium Development Goals. Innovative financing mechanisms are necessary to make this happen. 'Innovative Financing for Development' is the first book on this subject that uses a market-based approach. It compiles pioneering methods of raising development finance including securitization of future flow receivables, diaspora bonds, and GDP-indexed bonds. It also highlights the role of shadow sovereign ratings in facilitating access to international capital markets. It argues that poor countries, especially those in Sub-Saharan Africa, can potentially raise tens of billions of dollars annually through these instruments. The chapters in the book focus on the structures of the various innovative financing mechanisms, their track records and potential for tapping international capital markets, the constraints limiting their use, and policy measures that governments and international institutions can implement to alleviate these constraints.

Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and shareholder wealth arising from announcement returns of security issuance from a frontier market. It also explores the role of business group affiliation (BGA) on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study uses short-term scenarios to examine the link between CSR and shareholder wealth using the event study methodology which helps us mitigate the reverse causality problems related to studies of the relationship between CSR and firm value. Abnormal returns surrounding the security issue announcements were generated using the market model. Findings This paper finds that security issuers with high CSR scores are associated with higher shareholder value. However, this paper finds that CSR activities of security issuers with BGA are value-destroying which is consistent with the agency perspective of CSR. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to only one nascent market, namely the Colombo Stock Exchange. Originality/value This study documents that CSR and BGA are important determinants, among others, of stock price reactions to security offerings in emerging markets.

We examine the cash-flow sensitivities of firms\" simultaneous choice of investment, liquidity, dividends and net debt respectively equity financing in a large sample of US corporates between 1971 and 2016. We differentiate firms according to their (external) financial constraints and their (internal) needs to hedge against future shortfalls in operating income. Our estimation approach shows that financially constrained firms in our sample save more future funding capacity but invest and pay out less out of free cash flows than unconstrained firms. In the financial crisis 2007–2009, all firms invested less out of cash flow and raised their debt repayments, cash holdings and dividend payments. Constrained firms, however, show particularly strong increases in their cash savings but much smaller debt reductions compared to unconstrained firms – both in the crisis and post-crisis period. Internal hedging needs have different effects than external constraints: They weaken the build-up of future debt capacity out of cash flows for all firms, and raise the investment cash-flow sensitivity only for unconstrained firms. Cash-Flow Sensitivitäten verflochtener Unternehmensentscheidungen – Der Einfluss finanzieller Restriktionen und der Notwendigkeit zur Absicherung Dieser Artikel untersucht die Cash-Flow Sensitivitäten simultaner Unternehmensentscheidungen zu Investitionen, Liquidität, Dividendenausschüttungen sowie zur Fremd- und Eigenkapitalfinanzierung anhand eines Datensatzes US-amerikanischer Unternehmen zwischen 1971 und 2016. Unterschieden werden Unternehmen bezüglich ihrer (externen) Finanzierungsrestriktionen und ihrer (internen) Notwendigkeit sich gegen zukünftige Gewinneinbrüche abzusichern. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass finanziell restringierte Unternehmen ihren Cash-Flow stärker dazu nutzen, Kapazität für zukünftige Finanzierung vorzuhalten, aber weniger investieren und an Anteilseigner ausschütten als finanziell nicht-restringierte Unternehmen. Während der Finanzkrise 2007–2009 tätigten alle Unternehmen weniger Investitionen aus ihrem Cash-Flow, welcher dafür verstärkt für Fremdkapitalrückzahlungen, Kassehaltung und Dividendenausschüttungen genutzt wurde. Vor allem finanziell restringierte Unternehmen sparten vermehrt und zahlten weniger Fremdkapital zurück als finanziell nicht-restringierte Unternehmen – sowohl während der Krise als auch danach. Im Vergleich zu externen Finanzierungsrestriktionen zeigt die interne Notwendigkeit sich abzusichern andere Auswirkungen: Sie schwächt den Aufbau zukünftiger Fremdkapitalkapazität aus dem Cash-Flow für alle Unternehmen und erhöht die Investment-Cash-Flow Sensitivität lediglich für finanziell nicht-restringierte Unternehmen.