Explore the vast range of titles available.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1182728.].[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1182728.].

Cognitive regulation of emotions is a fundamental prerequisite for intact social functioning which impacts on both well being and psychopathology. The neural underpinnings of this process have been studied intensively in recent years, without, however, a general consensus. We here quantitatively summarize the published literature on cognitive emotion regulation using activation likelihood estimation in fMRI and PET (23 studies/479 subjects). In addition, we assessed the particular functional contribution of identified regions and their interactions using quantitative functional inference and meta-analytic connectivity modeling, respectively. In doing so, we developed a model for the core brain network involved in emotion regulation of emotional reactivity. According to this, the superior temporal gyrus, angular gyrus and (pre) supplementary motor area should be involved in execution of regulation initiated by frontal areas. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may be related to regulation of cognitive processes such as attention, while the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex may not necessarily reflect the regulatory process per se, but signals salience and therefore the need to regulate. We also identified a cluster in the anterior middle cingulate cortex as a region, which is anatomically and functionally in an ideal position to influence behavior and subcortical structures related to affect generation. Hence this area may play a central, integrative role in emotion regulation. By focusing on regions commonly active across multiple studies, this proposed model should provide important a priori information for the assessment of dysregulated emotion regulation in psychiatric disorders. •We quantitatively summarize the literature on emotion regulation (ER) using ALE.•Using MACM and quantitative functional inference we develop a neural model of ER.•DLPFC is related to higher order “cold” regulatory processes.•VLPFC evaluates salience and indicates need to regulate.•STG, angular gyrus and SMA are associated to execution of regulation.

Working memory subsumes the capability to memorize, retrieve and utilize information for a limited period of time which is essential to many human behaviours. Moreover, impairments of working memory functions may be found in nearly all neurological and psychiatric diseases. To examine what brain regions are commonly and differently active during various working memory tasks, we performed a coordinate-based meta-analysis over 189 fMRI experiments on healthy subjects. The main effect yielded a widespread bilateral fronto-parietal network. Further meta-analyses revealed that several regions were sensitive to specific task components, e.g. Broca's region was selectively active during verbal tasks or ventral and dorsal premotor cortex were preferentially involved in memory for object identity and location, respectively. Moreover, the lateral prefrontal cortex showed a division in a rostral and a caudal part based on differential involvement in task set and load effects. Nevertheless, a consistent but more restricted “core” network emerged from conjunctions across analyses of specific task designs and contrasts. This “core” network appears to comprise the quintessence of regions, which are necessary during working memory tasks. It may be argued that the core regions form a distributed executive network with potentially generalized functions for focussing on competing representations in the brain. The present study demonstrates that meta-analyses are a powerful tool to integrate the data of functional imaging studies on a (broader) psychological construct, probing the consistency across various paradigms as well as the differential effects of different experimental implementations.

Objective Currently, there is a lack of reliable evidence to prove the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the cognitive and emotional domains of neurodegenerative diseases (ND), leading to the absence of a unified and effective rTMS treatment protocol or stimulation targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes existing evidence to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and non-DLPFC in the cognitive and emotional aspects of ND. Methods For two common types of ND Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), we included 17 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from five databases. Search terms included rTMS, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive impairment, and randomized controlled studies. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias in the included literature, performed data extraction, and evaluated the evidence. Treatment effects were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Data were analyzed using R software to evaluate effect sizes and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity tests were conducted to assess differences in treatment effects between DLPFC and non-DLPFC. Results We screened 3,467 articles and identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed significant effects: MoCA (MD: 2.13, 95% CI [0.75, 3.52], p  < 0.001); MMSE (MD: 1.16, 95% CI [0.91, 1.41], p  = 0.0075); HAMD (MD: -2.63, 95% CI [-6.45, -1.20], p  = 0.14); HAMA (SMD: -0.62, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.33], p  < 0.001); ADL (MD: -0.56, 95% CI [-1.10, 2.22], p  = 0.48). Conclusion rTMS has a positive effect on cognitive impairment and emotional abnormalities associated with ND. There is a significant difference in MoCA scores between rTMS applied to DLPFC and non-DLPFC. DLPFC may serve as a reliable stimulation target for treating non-motor symptoms related to ND (such as cognitive and emotional issues), which is beneficial for developing an rTMS treatment protocol with broad applicability for ND. However, due to the small number of included studies and the indirect nature of the comparison methods, we should interpret these results with caution.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) holds potential promise as a therapeutic modality for disorders of addiction. Our previous findings indicate that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and low-frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC can reduce drug craving for methamphetamine. One major issue with rTMS is the duration of treatment and hence potential dropout rate. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has been recently shown to be non-inferior relative to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression. Here, we aim to compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of intermittent and continuous theta burst stimulation protocols targeting left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on methamphetamine craving in abstinent-dependent subjects. In this randomized single-blind pilot study, 83 abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects from a long-term residential treatment program were randomly allocated into three groups: intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the left DLPFC (active group), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the left DLPFC (active control group), or cTBS over the right DLPFC (active group) was administered twice daily over 5 days for a total of 10 sessions. We measured the primary outcome of cue-induced craving and secondarily sleep quality, depression, anxiety, impulsivity scores, and adverse effects. We show a pre- vs. postintervention effect on craving, which, on paired tests, showed that the effect was driven by iTBS of the left DLPFC and cTBS of the right DLPFC, reducing cue-induced craving but not cTBS of the left DLPFC. We did not show the critical group-by-time interaction. The secondary outcomes of depression, anxiety, and sleep were unrelated to the improvement in craving in the left iTBS and right cTBS group. In the first two sessions, self-reported adverse effects were higher with left iTBS when compared to right cTBS. The distribution of craving change suggested greater clinical response (50% improvement) with right cTBS and a bimodal pattern of effect with left iTBS, suggesting high interindividual variable response in the latter. Accelerated twice-daily TBS appears feasible and tolerable at modulating craving and mood changes in abstinent methamphetamine dependence critically while reducing session length. We emphasize the need for a larger randomized controlled trial study with a sham control to confirm these findings and longer duration of clinically relevant follow-up. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, 17013610.

Corticocortical neuroplastic changes from higher-order cortices to primary motor cortex (M1) have been described for procedural sequence learning. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays critical roles in cognition, including in motor learning and memory. However, neuroplastic changes in the DLPFC and their influence on M1 and on motor learning are not well understood. The present study examined bilateral DLPFC–M1 changes in plasticity induced by procedural motor sequence learning in a serial reaction time task. DLPFC plasticity induced by procedural sequence learning was examined by comparing before vs. after training assessments of ipsilateral/contralateral DLPFC–M1 interactions between sequence order and random order trials performed using either the left or right hand. Intra-hemispheric (inter-stimulus interval [ISI] = 10 ms) and inter-hemispheric (ISI = 10 or 50 ms) DLPFC–M1 interactions and single-pulse motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The reaction times of participants measured during motor training were faster for sequence learning than for random learning with either hand. Paired-pulse TMS induced DLPFC–M1 interactions that were disinhibited after motor sequence learning, especially for left DLPFC–left M1 interactions with right hand task performance and for left DLPFC–right M1 interactions with left hand task performance. These findings indicate that motor sequence learning induces neuroplastic changes to enhance DLPFC–M1 interactions. This manifestation of plasticity showed hemispheric specificity, favoring the left DLPFC. DLPFC plasticity may be a useful index of DLPFC function and may be a treatment target for enhancing DLPFC function and motor learning.

Two prominent risk factors for major depressive disorder (MDD) are childhood maltreatment (CM) and familial risk for MDD. Despite having these risk factors, there are individuals who maintain mental health, i.e. are resilient, whereas others develop MDD. It is unclear which brain morphological alterations are associated with this kind of resilience. Interaction analyses of risk and diagnosis status are needed that can account for complex adaptation processes, to identify neural correlates of resilience. We analyzed brain structural data (3T magnetic resonance imaging) by means of voxel-based morphometry (CAT12 toolbox), using a 2 × 2 design, comparing four groups (N = 804) that differed in diagnosis (healthy v. MDD) and risk profiles (low-risk, i.e. absence of CM and familial risk v. high-risk, i.e. presence of both CM and familial risk). Using regions of interest (ROIs) from the literature, we conducted an interaction analysis of risk and diagnosis status. Volume in the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), part of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), was significantly higher in healthy high-risk individuals. There were no significant results for the bilateral superior frontal gyri, frontal poles, pars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyri, and the right MFG. The healthy high-risk group had significantly higher volumes in the left DLPFC compared to all other groups. The DLPFC is implicated in cognitive and emotional processes, and higher volume in this area might aid high-risk individuals in adaptive coping in order to maintain mental health. This increased volume might therefore constitute a neural correlate of resilience to MDD in high risk.

Speed of Processing (SoP) represents a fundamental limiting step in cognitive performance which may underlie General Intelligence. The measure of SoP is particularly sensitive to aging, neurological or cognitive diseases, and has become a benchmark for diagnosis, cognitive remediation, and enhancement. Neural efficiency of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) is proposed to account for individual differences in SoP. However, the mechanisms by which DLPFC efficiency is shaped by training and whether it can be enhanced remain elusive. To address this, we monitored the brain activity of sixteen healthy participants using functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) while practicing a common SoP task (Symbol Digit Substitution Task) across 4 sessions. Furthermore, in each session, participants received counterbalanced excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) during mid-session breaks. Results indicate a significant involvement of the left-DLPFC in SoP, whose neural efficiency is consistently increased through task practice. Active neurostimulation, but not Sham, significantly enhanced the neural efficiency. These findings suggest a common mechanism by which neurostimulation may aid to accelerate learning. •Left-DLPFC activity is associated with Symbol-Digit Performance.•Practice of SDST increases neural efficiency.•Excitatory rTMS to left-DLPFC further increases neural efficiency.•Neuroimaging may help evaluate the effects of neurostimulation paradigms.

Food addiction is characterized by heightened craving and impaired inhibitory control, contributing to compulsive eating and obesity. Existing behavioral and pharmacological interventions often fail to achieve lasting effects. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), by modulating neural oscillations and connectivity, offers a novel, non-invasive approach for regulating craving-related neural circuits. This study aims to evaluate the effects of fixed-frequency tACS targeting the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and insula on food cravings, inhibitory control, and related neural oscillations. The trial will assess whether tACS can reduce craving intensity and enhance inhibitory performance in individuals with varying degrees of food addiction severity. We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial involving 175 participants aged 20-55 years, stratified by food addiction status (FA+ vs. FA-) using the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS 2.0). Participants will receive tACS at alpha (10 Hz) or theta (6 Hz) frequency over the DLPFC, ACC, or insula for seven consecutive days. Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be conducted pre- and post-intervention. Primary outcomes include changes in craving intensity and inhibitory control. Secondary outcomes include alterations in neural oscillations and functional connectivity. We hypothesize that theta-tACS over the ACC and insula will enhance inhibitory control and interoceptive awareness, while alpha-tACS over the DLPFC will improve top-down regulatory processes. This protocol aims to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying food cravings and evaluate tACS as a promising intervention for compulsive eating.