Explore the vast range of titles available.

In vitro experiments, using purified proteins and an assay that detects DNA unwinding, reveal the mechanism of activation of eukaryotic DNA replication. Unravelling DNA replication DNA replication in eukaryotes begins with the loading of a double hexamer of minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins onto the origin. Replication is then activated by separating the double hexamer into single-hexamer MCM rings that, together with Cdc45 and GINS, make up the CMG helicase, which is required for DNA unwinding. John Diffley and colleagues describe the role of ATP hydrolysis in regulating double-hexamer assembly and then CMG formation. Notably, there is an inactive CMG state that precedes the helicase-active CMG form that can translocate along the unwound DNA strand. The active CMG moves unidirectionally so that the two helicases pass by each other to establish bidirectional replication. The initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication occurs in two discrete stages 1 : first, the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex assembles as a head-to-head double hexamer that encircles duplex replication origin DNA during G1 phase; then, ‘firing factors’ convert each double hexamer into two active Cdc45–MCM–GINS helicases (CMG) during S phase. This second stage requires separation of the two origin DNA strands and remodelling of the double hexamer so that each MCM hexamer encircles a single DNA strand. Here we show that the MCM complex, which hydrolyses ATP during double-hexamer formation 2 , 3 , remains stably bound to ADP in the double hexamer. Firing factors trigger ADP release, and subsequent ATP binding promotes stable CMG assembly. CMG assembly is accompanied by initial DNA untwisting and separation of the double hexamer into two discrete but inactive CMG helicases. Mcm10, together with ATP hydrolysis, then triggers further DNA untwisting and helicase activation. After activation, the two CMG helicases translocate in an ‘N terminus-first’ direction, and in doing so pass each other within the origin; this requires that each helicase is bound entirely to single-stranded DNA. Our experiments elucidate the mechanism of eukaryotic replicative helicase activation, which we propose provides a fail-safe mechanism for bidirectional replisome establishment.

Retrotransposons are highly enriched in the animal genome 1 – 3 . The activation of retrotransposons can rewrite host DNA information and fundamentally impact host biology 1 – 3 . Although developmental activation of retrotransposons can offer benefits for the host, such as against virus infection, uncontrolled activation promotes disease or potentially drives ageing 1 – 5 . After activation, retrotransposons use their mRNA as templates to synthesize double-stranded DNA for making new insertions in the host genome 1 – 3 , 6 . Although the reverse transcriptase that they encode can synthesize the first-strand DNA 1 – 3 , 6 , how the second-strand DNA is generated remains largely unclear. Here we report that retrotransposons hijack the alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) DNA repair process of the host for a circularization step to synthesize their second-strand DNA. We used Nanopore sequencing to examine the fates of replicated retrotransposon DNA, and found that 10% of them achieve new insertions, whereas 90% exist as extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA). Using eccDNA production as a readout, further genetic screens identified factors from alt-EJ as essential for retrotransposon replication. alt-EJ drives the second-strand synthesis of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon DNA through a circularization process and is therefore necessary for eccDNA production and new insertions. Together, our study reveals that alt-EJ is essential in driving the propagation of parasitic genomic retroelements. Our study uncovers a conserved function of this understudied DNA repair process, and provides a new perspective to understand—and potentially control—the retrotransposon life cycle. Retrotransposons hijack the alternative end-joining DNA repair process of the host for a circularization step to synthesize their second-strand DNA.

Creating and characterizing individual genetic variants remains limited in scale, compared to the tremendous variation both existing in nature and envisioned by genome engineers. Here we introduce retron library recombineering (RLR), a methodology for high-throughput functional screens that surpasses the scale and specificity of CRISPR-Cas methods. We use the targeted reverse-transcription activity of retrons to produce single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in vivo, incorporating edits at >90% efficiency and enabling multiplexed applications. RLR simultaneously introduces many genomic variants, producing pooled and barcoded variant libraries addressable by targeted deep sequencing. We use RLR for pooled phenotyping of synthesized antibiotic resistance alleles, demonstrating quantitative measurement of relative growth rates. We also perform RLR using the sheared genomic DNA of an evolved bacterium, experimentally querying millions of sequences for causal variants, demonstrating that RLR is uniquely suited to utilize large pools of natural variation. Using ssDNA produced in vivo for pooled experiments presents avenues for exploring variation across the genome.

Dynamic and continuous genome editing systems based on different in vivo single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) synthesis mechanisms are burgeoning ssDNA-mediated genome engineering tools.Retron-based systems are promising ssDNA-mediated tools for continuous engineering of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.Approaches to improve the efficiency of ssDNA-based continuous editing systems include biopart optimization, host engineering, and coupling with CRISPR systems.In vivo-synthesized ssDNA can be used for DNA-based data storage, high-throughput functional variant screening, and gene-specific continuous in vivo evolution, which are difficult to achieve with conventional chemically synthesized ssDNA. Despite the prevalence of genome editing tools, there are still some limitations in dynamic and continuous genome editing. In vivo single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-mediated genome mutation has emerged as a valuable and promising approach for continuous genome editing. In this review, we summarize the various types of intracellular ssDNA production systems and notable achievements in genome engineering in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. We also review progress in the development of applications based on retron-based systems, which have demonstrated significant potential in molecular recording, multiplex genome editing, high-throughput functional variant screening, and gene-specific continuous in vivo evolution. Furthermore, we discuss the major challenges of ssDNA-mediated continuous genome editing and its prospects for future applications. Despite the prevalence of genome editing tools, there are still some limitations in dynamic and continuous genome editing. In vivo single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-mediated genome mutation has emerged as a valuable and promising approach for continuous genome editing. In this review, we summarize the various types of intracellular ssDNA production systems and notable achievements in genome engineering in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. We also review progress in the development of applications based on retron-based systems, which have demonstrated significant potential in molecular recording, multiplex genome editing, high-throughput functional variant screening, and gene-specific continuous in vivo evolution. Furthermore, we discuss the major challenges of ssDNA-mediated continuous genome editing and its prospects for future applications.

DNA origami nanocarriers have emerged as a promising tool for many biomedical applications, such as biosensing, targeted drug delivery, and cancer immunotherapy. These highly programmable nanoarchitectures are assembled into any shape or size with nanoscale precision by folding a single-stranded DNA scaffold with short complementary oligonucleotides. The standard scaffold strand used to fold DNA origami nanocarriers is usually the M13mp18 bacteriophage’s circular single-stranded DNA genome with limited design flexibility in terms of the sequence and size of the final objects. However, with the recent progress in automated DNA origami design—allowing for increasing structural complexity—and the growing number of applications, the need for scalable methods to produce custom scaffolds has become crucial to overcome the limitations of traditional methods for scaffold production. Improved scaffold synthesis strategies will help to broaden the use of DNA origami for more biomedical applications. To this end, several techniques have been developed in recent years for the scalable synthesis of single stranded DNA scaffolds with custom lengths and sequences. This review focuses on these methods and the progress that has been made to address the challenges confronting custom scaffold production for large-scale DNA origami assembly.

Most DNA viruses that use recombination-dependent mechanisms to replicate their DNA encode a single-strand annealing protein (SSAP). The herpes simplex virus (HSV) single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB), ICP8, is the central player in all stages of DNA replication. ICP8 is a classical replicative SSB and interacts physically and/or functionally with the other viral replication proteins. Additionally, ICP8 can promote efficient annealing of complementary ssDNA and is thus considered to be a member of the SSAP family. The role of annealing during HSV infection has been difficult to assess in part, because it has not been possible to distinguish between the role of ICP8 as an SSAP from its role as a replicative SSB during viral replication. In this paper, we have characterized an ICP8 mutant, Q706A/F707A (QF), that lacks annealing activity but retains many other functions characteristic of replicative SSBs. Like WT ICP8, the QF mutant protein forms filaments in vitro, binds ssDNA cooperatively, and stimulates the activities of other replication proteins including the viral polymerase, helicase–primase complex, and the origin binding protein. Interestingly, the QF mutant does not complement an ICP8-null virus for viral growth, replication compartment formation, or DNA replication. Thus, we have been able to separate the activities of ICP8 as a replicative SSB from its annealing activity. Taken together, our data indicate that the annealing activity of ICP8 is essential for viral DNA replication in the context of infection and support the notion that HSV-1 uses recombination-dependent mechanisms during DNA replication.

Scalable production of kilobase single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with sequence control has applications in therapeutics, gene synthesis and sequencing, scaffolded DNA origami, and archival DNA memory storage. Biological production of circular ssDNA (cssDNA) using M13 addresses these needs at low cost. However, one unmet goal is to minimize the essential protein coding regions of the exported DNA while maintaining its infectivity and production purity to produce sequences less than 3,000 nt in length, relevant to therapeutic and materials science applications. Toward this end, synthetic miniphage with inserts of custom sequence and size offers scalable, low-cost synthesis of cssDNA at milligram and higher scales. Here, we optimize growth conditions using an E . coli helper strain combined with a miniphage genome carrying only an f1 origin and a β-lactamase-encoding ( bla ) antibiotic resistance gene, enabling isolation of pure cssDNA with a minimum sequence genomic length of 1,676 nt, without requiring additional purification from contaminating DNA. Low-cost scalability of isogenic, custom-length cssDNA is demonstrated for a sequence of 2,520 nt using a bioreactor, purified with low endotoxin levels (<5 E.U./ml). We apply these exonuclease-resistant cssDNAs to the self-assembly of wireframe DNA origami objects and to encode digital information on the miniphage genome for biological amplification.

The field of DNA nanotechnology has harnessed the programmability of DNA base pairing to direct single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) to assemble into desired 3D structures. Here, we show the ability to express ssDNAs in Escherichia coli (32–205 nt), which can form structures in vivo or be purified for in vitro assembly. Each ssDNA is encoded by a gene that is transcribed into non-coding RNA containing a 3′-hairpin (HTBS). HTBS recruits HIV reverse transcriptase, which nucleates DNA synthesis and is aided in elongation by murine leukemia reverse transcriptase. Purified ssDNA that is produced in vivo is used to assemble large 1D wires (300 nm) and 2D sheets (5.8 μm 2 ) in vitro . Intracellular assembly is demonstrated using a four-ssDNA crossover nanostructure that recruits split YFP when properly assembled. Genetically encoding DNA nanostructures provides a route for their production as well as applications in living cells. DNA nanostructures have the potential to be powerful tools in many areas of biology however they are difficult to manufacture completely in vivo . Here the authors combine RNA hairpins and reverse transcription to generate and assemble a complex DNA structure inside the cellular environment.

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a DNA damage tolerance mechanism in which specialized low-fidelity DNA polymerases bypass replication-blocking lesions, and it is usually associated with mutagenesis. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae a key event in TLS is the monoubiquitination of PCNA, which enables recruitment of the specialized polymerases to the damaged site through their ubiquitin-binding domain. In mammals, however, there is a debate on the requirement for ubiquitinated PCNA (PCNA-Ub) in TLS. We show that UV-induced Rpa foci, indicative of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions caused by UV, accumulate faster and disappear more slowly in Pcna(K164R/K164R) cells, which are resistant to PCNA ubiquitination, compared to Pcna(+/+) cells, consistent with a TLS defect. Direct analysis of TLS in these cells, using gapped plasmids with site-specific lesions, showed that TLS is strongly reduced across UV lesions and the cisplatin-induced intrastrand GG crosslink. A similar effect was obtained in cells lacking Rad18, the E3 ubiquitin ligase which monoubiquitinates PCNA. Consistently, cells lacking Usp1, the enzyme that de-ubiquitinates PCNA exhibited increased TLS across a UV lesion and the cisplatin adduct. In contrast, cells lacking the Rad5-homologs Shprh and Hltf, which polyubiquitinate PCNA, exhibited normal TLS. Knocking down the expression of the TLS genes Rev3L, PolH, or Rev1 in Pcna(K164R/K164R) mouse embryo fibroblasts caused each an increased sensitivity to UV radiation, indicating the existence of TLS pathways that are independent of PCNA-Ub. Taken together these results indicate that PCNA-Ub is required for maximal TLS. However, TLS polymerases can be recruited to damaged DNA also in the absence of PCNA-Ub, and perform TLS, albeit at a significantly lower efficiency and altered mutagenic specificity.

CrAss-like phages are a recently described expansive group of viruses that includes the most abundant virus in the human gut 1 – 3 . The genomes of all crAss-like phages encode a large virion-packaged protein 2 , 4 that contains a DFDxD sequence motif, which forms the catalytic site in cellular multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) 5 . Here, using Cellulophaga baltica crAss-like phage phi14:2 as a model system, we show that this protein is a DNA-dependent RNAP that is translocated into the host cell along with the phage DNA and transcribes early phage genes. We determined the crystal structure of this 2,180-residue enzyme in a self-inhibited state, which probably occurs before virion packaging. This conformation is attained with the help of a cleft-blocking domain that interacts with the active site and occupies the cavity in which the RNA–DNA hybrid binds. Structurally, phi14:2 RNAP is most similar to eukaryotic RNAPs that are involved in RNA interference 6 , 7 , although most of the phi14:2 RNAP structure (nearly 1,600 residues) maps to a new region of the protein fold space. Considering this structural similarity, we propose that eukaryal RNA interference polymerases have their origins in phage, which parallels the emergence of the mitochondrial transcription apparatus 8 . The RNA polymerase from the crAss-like bacteriophage phi14:2, which is translocated into the host cell with phage DNA and transcribes early phage genes, is structurally most similar to eukaryotic RNA interference polymerases, suggesting that the latter have a phage origin.