Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a trial of patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), addition of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib to gemcitabine improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to gemcitabine alone but biomarkers predictive of treatment are lacking. Here we report a candidate biomarker of response to gemcitabine versus combined gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor therapy in HGSOC ovarian cancer. Patients with replication stress (RS)-high tumors (n = 27), defined as harboring at least one genomic RS alteration related to loss of RB pathway regulation and/or oncogene-induced replication stress achieve significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.38, 90% CI, 0.17–0.86) on gemcitabine monotherapy compared to those with tumors without such alterations (defined as RS-low, n = 30). However, addition of berzosertib to gemcitabine benefits only patients with RS-low tumors (gemcitabine/berzosertib HR 0.34, 90% CI, 0.13–0.86) and not patients with RS-high tumors (HR 1.11, 90% CI, 0.47–2.62). Our findings support the notion that the exacerbation of RS by gemcitabine monotherapy is adequate for lethality in RS-high tumors. Conversely, for RS-low tumors addition of berzosertib-mediated ATR inhibition to gemcitabine is necessary for lethality to occur. Independent prospective validation of this biomarker is required. A randomized phase 2 study recently showed that the addition of ATR inhibitor berzosertib to gemcitabine improved PFS compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with ovarian cancer. In this preplanned exploratory study, the authors demonstrate that a genomic biomarker of replication-stress is associated with outcome to gemcitabine alone and may predict which patients benefit from addition of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib.

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are loci that are hypersensitive to replication stress and hotspots for chromosomal rearrangements in cancers. CFSs replicate late in S phase, are cell-type specific and nest in large genes. The relative impact of transcription–replication conflicts versus a low density in initiation events on fragility is currently debated. Here we addressed the relationships between transcription, replication, and instability by manipulating the transcription of endogenous large genes in chicken and human cells. We found that inducing low transcription with a weak promoter destabilized large genes, whereas stimulating their transcription with strong promoters alleviated instability. Notably, strong promoters triggered a switch to an earlier replication timing, supporting a model in which high transcription levels give cells more time to complete replication before mitosis. Transcription could therefore contribute to maintaining genome integrity, challenging the dominant view that it is exclusively a threat.

[EN]Fidelity in chromosome duplication and segregation is indispensable for maintaining genomic stability and the perpetuation of life. Challenges to genome integrity jeopardize cell survival and are at the root of di erent types of pathologies, such as cancer. The following three main sources of genomic instability exist: DNA damage, replicative stress, and chromosome segregation defects. In response to these challenges, eukaryotic cells have evolved control mechanisms, also known as checkpoint systems, which sense under-replicated or damaged DNA and activate specialized DNA repair machineries. Cells make use of these checkpoints throughout interphase to shield genome integrity before mitosis. Later on, when the cells enter into mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is activated and remains active until the chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle apparatus to ensure an equal segregation among daughter cells. All of these processes are tightly interconnected and under strict regulation in the context of the cell division cycle. The chromosomal instability underlying cancer pathogenesis has recently emerged as a major source for understanding the mitotic processes that helps to safeguard genome integrity. Here, we review the special interconnection between the S-phase and mitosis in the presence of under-replicated DNA regions. Furthermore, we discuss what is known about the DNA damage response activated in mitosis that preserves chromosomal integrity.

Here, we report a single-cell DNA replication sequencing method, scRepli-seq, a genome-wide methodology that measures copy number differences between replicated and unreplicated DNA. Using scRepli-seq, we demonstrate that replication-domain organization is conserved among individual mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Differentiated mESCs exhibited distinct profiles, which were also conserved among cells. Haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq revealed similar replication profiles of homologous autosomes, while the inactive X chromosome was clearly replicated later than its active counterpart. However, a small degree of cell-to-cell replication-timing heterogeneity was present, which was smallest at the beginning and the end of S phase. In addition, developmentally regulated domains were found to deviate from others and showed a higher degree of heterogeneity, thus suggesting a link to developmental plasticity. Moreover, allelic expression imbalance was found to strongly associate with replication-timing asynchrony. Our results form a foundation for single-cell-level understanding of DNA replication regulation and provide insights into three-dimensional genome organization. scRepli-seq measures DNA replication timing in single cells on the basis of copy number. Applying haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq to mESCs establishes basic principles of replication-timing conservation and heterogeneity among populations of cells.

In order to maintain genomic integrity, DNA replication must be highly coordinated. Disruptions in this process can cause replication stress which is aberrant in many pathologies including cancer. Despite this, little is known about the mechanisms governing the temporal regulation of DNA replication initiation, thought to be related to the limited copy number of firing factors. Here, we present a high (1-kilobase) resolution stochastic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae whole-genome replication in which origins compete to associate with limited firing factors. After developing an algorithm to fit this model to replication timing data, we validated the model by reproducing experimental inter-origin distances, origin efficiencies, and replication fork directionality. This suggests the model accurately simulates the aspects of DNA replication most important for determining its dynamics. We also use the model to predict measures of DNA replication dynamics which are yet to be determined experimentally and investigate the potential impacts of variations in firing factor concentrations on DNA replication.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are implicated in various physiological processes, such as class-switch recombination or crossing-over during meiosis, but also present a threat to genome stability. Extensive evidence shows that DSBs are a primary source of chromosome translocations or deletions, making them a major cause of genomic instability, a driving force of many diseases of civilization, such as cancer. Therefore, there is a great need for a precise, sensitive, and universal method for DSB detection, to enable both the study of their mechanisms of formation and repair as well as to explore their therapeutic potential. We provide a detailed protocol for our recently developed ultrasensitive and genome-wide DSB detection method: immobilized direct in situ breaks labeling, enrichment on streptavidin and next-generation sequencing (i-BLESS), which relies on the encapsulation of cells in agarose beads and labeling breaks directly and specifically with biotinylated linkers. i-BLESS labels DSBs with single-nucleotide resolution, allows detection of ultrarare breaks, takes 5 d to complete, and can be applied to samples from any organism, as long as a sufficient amount of starting material can be obtained. We also describe how to combine i-BLESS with our qDSB-Seq approach to enable the measurement of absolute DSB frequencies per cell and their precise genomic coordinates at the same time. Such normalization using qDSB-Seq is especially useful for the evaluation of spontaneous DSB levels and the estimation of DNA damage induced rather uniformly in the genome (e.g., by irradiation or radiomimetic chemotherapeutics). This protocol describes a genome-wide approach for ultrasensitive and quantitative detection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that relies on encapsulating cells in agarose beads and labeling breaks with biotinylated adapters.

Chromosomal DNA replication involves the coordinated activity of hundreds to thousands of replication origins. Individual replication origins are subject to epigenetic regulation of their activity during S-phase, resulting in differential efficiencies and timings of replication initiation during S-phase. This regulation is thought to involve chromatin structure and organization into timing domains with differential ability to recruit limiting replication factors. Rif1 has recently been identified as a genome-wide regulator of replication timing in fission yeast and in mammalian cells. However, previous studies in budding yeast have suggested that Rif1's role in controlling replication timing may be limited to subtelomeric domains and derives from its established role in telomere length regulation. We have analyzed replication timing by analyzing BrdU incorporation genome-wide, and report that Rif1 regulates the timing of late/dormant replication origins throughout the S. cerevisiae genome. Analysis of pfa4Δ cells, which are defective in palmitoylation and membrane association of Rif1, suggests that replication timing regulation by Rif1 is independent of its role in localizing telomeres to the nuclear periphery. Intra-S checkpoint signaling is intact in rif1Δ cells, and checkpoint-defective mec1Δ cells do not comparably deregulate replication timing, together indicating that Rif1 regulates replication timing through a mechanism independent of this checkpoint. Our results indicate that the Rif1 mechanism regulates origin timing irrespective of proximity to a chromosome end, and suggest instead that telomere sequences merely provide abundant binding sites for proteins that recruit Rif1. Still, the abundance of Rif1 binding in telomeric domains may facilitate Rif1-mediated repression of non-telomeric origins that are more distal from centromeres.

Replication timing (RT), the temporal order of DNA replication during S phase, influences regional mutation rates, yet the mechanistic basis for RT-associated mutagenesis remains incompletely defined. To identify drivers of RT-dependent mutation biases, we analyzed whole-genome sequencing data from cells with disruptions in DNA replication/repair genes or exposed to mutagenic compounds. Mutation distributions between early- and late-replicating regions were compared using bootstrapping and statistical modeling. We identified 14 genes that exhibit differential effects in early- or late-replicating regions, encompassing multiple DNA repair pathways, including mismatch repair (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS1, and PMS2), trans-lesion DNA synthesis (REV1) and double-strand break repair (DCLRE1A and PRKDC), DNA polymerases (POLB, POLE3, and POLE4), and other genes central to genomic instability (PARP1 and TP53). Similar analyses of mutagenic compounds revealed 19 compounds with differential effects on replication timing. These results establish replication timing as a critical modulator of mutagenesis, with distinct DNA repair pathways and exogenous agents exhibiting replication timing-specific effects on genomic instability. Our systematic bioinformatics approach identifies new DNA repair genes and mutagens that exhibit differential activity during the S phase. These findings pave the way for further investigation of factors that contribute to genome instability during cancer transformation.

All cells possess mechanisms to maintain and replicate their genomes, whose integrity and transmission are constantly challenged by DNA damage and replication impediments. In eukaryotes, the protein kinase Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like family acts as a master regulator of the eukaryotic response to DNA injuries, ensuring DNA replication completion and genome stability. Here we aimed to investigate the functional relevance of the ATR homolog in the DNA metabolism of Leishmania major , a protozoan parasite with a remarkably plastic genome. CRISPR/cas9 genome editing was used to generate a Myc-tagged ATR cell line (mycATR), and a Myc-tagged C-terminal knockout of ATR (mycATRΔC-/-). We show that the nuclear localisation of ATR depends upon its C-terminus. Moreover, its deletion results in single-stranded DNA accumulation, impaired cell cycle control, increased levels of DNA damage, and delayed DNA replication re-start after replication stress. In addition, we show that ATR plays a key role in maintaining L. major’s unusual DNA replication program, where larger chromosomes duplicate later than smaller chromosomes. Our data reveals loss of the ATR C-terminus promotes the accumulation of DNA replication signal around replicative stress fragile sites, which are enriched in larger chromosomes. Finally, we show that these alterations to the DNA replication program promote chromosome instability. In summary, our work shows that ATR acts to modulate DNA replication timing, limiting the plasticity of the Leishmania genome.

Besides genome-wide patterns of replication timing (RT), some genes display allelic replication asynchrony in stem cells, brought about by stochastic events and genetic polymorphisms. Whether epigenetic modifications control asynchronous replication remains unclear. Here, we explore domains controlled by genomic imprinting, where parental DNA methylation imprints mediate allele-specific gene expression. Our genome-wide and locus-specific assays in mono-parental and hybrid mouse ESCs reveal pronounced RT asynchrony—which is parent-of-origin dependent and lost upon neural differentiation—at the Dlk1-Dio3 and Snrpn domains, which both comprise lncRNA polycistrons. Generating a range of mutant lines, we find that asynchronous replication at Dlk1-Dio3 is mediated by differential DNA methylation, and that the lncRNA Meg3 controls early replication across parts of the domain on the maternal chromosome. Moreover, we find no evidence that RT and organisation into TADs are linked in this domain. The combined replication timing, DNA methylation, 3D chromatin structure, and gene expression data highlight how parental methylation imprints and lncRNA expression control replication and can override RT domain organisation. It is not fully understood why genomic loci show asynchronous DNA replication. Here, the authors show that two imprinted gene domains replicate asynchronously between the parental chromosomes due to differential DNA methylation and non-coding RNA, leading to allelic differences.