Explore the vast range of titles available.

Rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive tumour that can develop in almost any part of the body. Doxorubicin is an effective drug against rhabdomyosarcoma, but its role in combination with an established multidrug regimen remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the possible benefit of early dose intensification with doxorubicin in patients with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial involving 108 hospitals from 14 countries. We included patients older than 6 months but younger than 21 years with a pathologically proven diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma. We assigned each patient to a specific subgroup according to the EpSSG stratification system. Those with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma incompletely resected and localised at unfavourable sites with or without nodal involvement, or those with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma without nodal involvement were considered at high risk of relapse. These high-risk patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either nine cycles of IVA (ifosfamide 3 g/m2 given as a 3-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, vincristine 1·5 mg/m2 weekly during the first 7 weeks then only on day 1 of each cycle [given as a single intravenous injection], and dactinomycin 1·5 mg/m2 on day 1 given as a single intravenous injection) or four cycles of IVA with doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 given as a 4-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 followed by five cycles of IVA. The interval between cycles was 3 weeks. Randomisation was done using a web-based system and was stratified (block sizes of four) by enrolling country and risk subgroup. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival assessed by the investigator at each centre in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were considered in the safety analysis. In agreement with the independent data monitoring committee, the study was closed to patient entry on Dec 16, 2013, after futility analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-000217-35, and is currently in follow-up. Between Oct 1, 2005, and Dec 16, 2013, 484 patients were randomly assigned to receive each chemotherapy regimen (242 in the IVA group and 242 in the IVA plus doxorubicin group). Median follow-up was 63·9 months (IQR 44·6–78·9). The 3-year event-free survival was 67·5% (95% CI 61·2–73·1) in the IVA plus doxorubicin group and 63·3% (56·8–69·0) in the IVA group (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·65–1·16; p=0·33). Grade 3–4 leucopenia (232 [93%] of 249 patients in the IVA plus doxorubicin group vs 194 [85%] of 227 in the IVA group; p=0·0061), anaemia (195 [78%] vs 111 [49%]; p<0·0001), thrombocytopenia (168 [67%] vs 59 [26%]; p<0.0001), and gastrointestinal adverse events (78 [31%] vs 19 [8%]; p<0·0001) were significantly more common in the IVA plus doxorubicin group than in the IVA group. Grade 3–5 infections (198 [79%] vs 128 [56%]; p<0·0001) were also significantly more common in the IVA plus doxorubicin group than in the IVA group, in which one patient had grade 5 infection. Two treatment-related deaths were reported (one patient developed septic shock and one affected by Goldenhar syndrome developed intractable seizures) in the IVA plus doxorubicin group, both occurring after the first cycle of treatment, and none were reported in the IVA group. The addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard IVA chemotherapy did not show a significant improvement in the outcome of patients with high-risk non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Therefore, the IVA chemotherapy regimen should remain the standard of care for patients with localised rhabdomyosarcoma in Europe. Fondazione Città della Speranza, Italy, and the Association Léon Berard Enfant Cancéreux, France.

Background Among patients with nephroblastoma, those with bilateral disease are a unique population where maximising tumour control must be balanced with preserving renal parenchyma. Methods The SIOP 2001 protocol recommended surgery after neoadjuvant cycle(s) of Dactinomycin and Vincristine (AV) with response-adapted intensification, if needed. Adjuvant treatment was given based on the lesion with the worst histology. Results Three hundred and twenty seven patients with stage V disease were evaluable: 174 had bilateral Wilms tumour (BWT), 101 unilateral WT and contralateral nephroblastomatosis (NB) and 52 bilateral nephroblastomatosis. In these three groups, the estimated 5y-EFS was 76.1%, 84.6%, and 74.9%, respectively. AV chemotherapy alone was the successful chemotherapy for 58.7% of all the patients and 65.6% of the non-metastatic patients. Among the 174 patients with BWT, 149 (88.2%) had at least one nephron-sparing surgery. Twenty of 61 bilateral stage I patients were treated with four-week AV postoperatively achieving 94.4% 5y-EFS. At last follow-up, 87% of patients had normal renal function. Conclusions This study demonstrates that AV without anthracyclines is sufficient to achieve NSS and good survival in the majority of patients. For patients with bilateral stage I WT and intermediate risk histology, only four weeks adjuvant AV seems to be sufficient. Clinical Trial Registration NCT00047138

Before this study started, the standard postoperative chemotherapy regimen for stage II–III Wilms' tumour pretreated with chemotherapy was to include doxorubicin. However, avoidance of doxorubicin-related cardiotoxicity effects is important to improve long-term outcomes for childhood cancers that have excellent prognosis. We aimed to assess whether doxorubicin can be omitted safely from chemotherapy for stage II–III, histological intermediate-risk Wilms' tumour when a newly defined high-risk blastemal subtype was excluded from randomisation. For this international, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised SIOP WT 2001 trial, we recruited children aged 6 months to 18 years at the time of diagnosis of a primary renal tumour from 251 hospitals in 26 countries who had received 4 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy with vincristine and actinomycin D. Children with stage II–III intermediate-risk Wilms' tumours assessed after delayed nephrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1) by a minimisation technique to receive vincristine 1·5 mg/m2 at weeks 1–8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, and 27, plus actinomycin D 45 μg/kg every 3 weeks from week 2, either with five doses of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 given every 6 weeks from week 2 (standard treatment) or without doxorubicin (experimental treatment). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of event-free survival at 2 years, analysed by intention to treat and a margin of 10%. Assessment of safety and adverse events included systematic monitoring of hepatic toxicity and cardiotoxicity. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2007-004591-39, and is closed to new participants. Between Nov 1, 2001, and Dec 16, 2009, we recruited 583 patients, 341 with stage II and 242 with stage III tumours, and randomly assigned 291 children to treatment including doxorubicin, and 292 children to treatment excluding doxorubicin. Median follow-up was 60·8 months (IQR 40·8–79·8). 2 year event-free survival was 92·6% (95% CI 89·6–95·7) for treatment including doxorubicin and 88·2% (84·5–92·1) for treatment excluding doxorubicin, a difference of 4·4% (95% CI 0·4–9·3) that did not exceed the predefined 10% margin. 5 year overall survival was 96·5% (94·3–98·8) for treatment including doxorubicin and 95·8% (93·3–98·4) for treatment excluding doxorubicin. Four children died from a treatment-related toxic effect; one (<1%) of 291 receiving treatment including doxorubicin died of sepsis, three (1%) of 292 receiving treatment excluding doxorubicin died of varicella, metabolic seizure, and sepsis during treatment for relapse. 17 patients (3%) had hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Cardiotoxic effects were reported in 15 (5%) of 291 children receiving treatment including doxorubicin. 12 children receiving treatment including doxorubicin, and ten children receiving treatment excluding doxorubicin, died, with the remaining deaths from tumour recurrence. Doxorubicin does not need to be included in treatment of stage II–III intermediate risk Wilms' tumour when the histological response to preoperative chemotherapy is incorporated into the risk stratification. See Acknowledgments for funders.

Background The chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Methods In this single-arm, single-center, prospective study, pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES were enrolled to receive either VAC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin) regimen or VDC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen in a 3-week cycle, followed by treatment with mecapegfilgrastim (100 μg/kg, maximum 6 mg) given at 24 h after completing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FN. Secondary endpoints included the incidence rate of grade 4 neutropenia, duration of ANC ≤ 0.5 × 10 9 /L, incidence rate of chemotherapy delay or reduction, use of antibiotics, and safety profile. Results In total, 2 of the 30 (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.82–22.07) patients experienced FN after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Eight (26.7%, 95% CI: 12.28–45.89) patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia after receiving prophylactic mecapegfilgrastim. Eight patients experienced ANC ≤ 0.5 × 10 9 /L with a median duration of 4.5 days; among them, 6 patients reached the lowest point of their ANC level on day 7, and 5 of them recovered by day 10. No dose reductions, delays, or discontinuation of chemotherapy was reported. Twenty-one (70.0%) patients received antibiotics during the treatment period. No patient experienced FN in the 0–5 years and the 13–18 years groups, and 2 patients experienced FN in the 6–12 years group. Two patients, 6 patients, and no patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia in the 0–5 years, 6–12 years, and 13–18 years groups, respectively. Conclusion Mecapegfilgrastim showed acceptable efficacy and safety profile in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Further randomized studies with large sample size are warranted. Trial registration This clinical trial was registered at Chictr.org.cn (No.ChiCTR1900022249). Registered on March 31, 2019.

Investigators from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) report on outcomes of children with bilateral Wilms tumour treated on the SIOP 2001 study. They demonstrate that vincristine and actinomycin-D induction chemotherapy is sufficient in a subset of children, but most required additional agents during their treatment.

The Children's Oncology Group defines intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma as unresected FOXO1 fusion-negative disease arising at an unfavourable site or non-metastatic FOXO1 fusion-positive disease. Temsirolimus in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma. We aimed to compare event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine and irinotecan (VAC/VI) combined with temsirolimus followed by maintenance therapy versus VAC/VI alone with maintenance therapy. ARST1431 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted across 210 institutions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible patients were those aged 40 years or younger with non-metastatic FOXO1-positive rhabdomyosarcoma or unresected FOXO1-negative rhabdomyosarcoma disease from unfavourable sites. Two other groups of patients were also eligible: those who had FOXO1-negative disease at a favourable site (excluding orbit) that was unresected; and those who were aged younger than 10 years with stage IV FOXO1-negative disease with distant metastases. Eligible patients had to have a Lansky performance status score of 50 or higher if 16 years or younger and a Karnofsky performance status score of 50 or higher if older than 16 years; all patients were previously untreated. Patients were randomised (1:1) in blocks of four and stratified by histology, stage, and group. Patients received intravenous VAC/VI chemotherapy with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1·2 g/m2 per dose per cycle with or without a reducing dose of intravenous weekly temsirolimus starting at 15 mg/m2 or 0·5 mg/kg per dose for those who weighed less than 10 kg. The total duration of therapy was 42 weeks followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with oral cyclophosphamide plus intravenous vinorelbine for all patients. Temsirolimus was withheld during radiotherapy and for 2 weeks before any major surgical procedure. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival. Data were analysed with a revised intention-to-treat approach. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567435) and is complete. Between May 23, 2016, and Jan 1, 2022, 325 patients were enrolled. In 297 evaluable patients (148 assigned to VAC/VI alone and 149 assigned to VAC/VI with temsirolimus), the median age was 6·3 years (IQR 3·0–11·3); 33 (11%) patients were aged 18 years or older; 179 (60%) of 297 were male. 113 (77%) of 148 patients were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI group, and 108 (73%) of 149 were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group. With a median follow-up of 3·6 years (IQR 2·8–4·5), 3-year event-free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (64·8% [95% CI 55·5–74·1] in the VAC/VI group vs 66·8% [57·5–76·2] in the VAC/VI plus temsirolimus group (hazard ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·58–1·26]; log-rank p=0·44). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were anaemia (62 events in 60 [41%] of 148 patients in the VAC/VI group vs 89 events in 87 [58%] of 149 patients in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group), lymphopenia (83 events in 65 [44%] vs 99 events in 71 [48%]), neutropenia (160 events in 99 [67%] vs 164 events in 105 [70%]), and leukopenia (121 events in 86 [58%] vs 132 events in 93 [62%]). There was one treatment-related death in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group, categorised as not otherwise specified. Addition of temsirolimus to VAC/VI did not improve event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma defined by their FOXO1 translocation status and clinical factors. Novel biology-based strategies are needed to improve outcomes in this population. The Children's Oncology Group (supported by the US National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health).

Background Isolated limb infusion (ILI) treats unresectable extremity malignancies with high-dose regional chemotherapy limited to the limb. This study assessed long-term outcomes after ILI for limb-threatening sarcomas. Methods A retrospective review analyzed patients with an extremity sarcoma who underwent ILI with melphalan and dactinomycin from 2008 to 2023 at a single institution. Results The study identified 61 patients (52.5% female; median age, 73 years; range, 20–94 years). Of these patients, 68.9% had lower-extremity disease. The median follow-up period was 6.9 years. The overall response rate was 48.3% (complete response [CR], 21.7%; partial response [PR], 26.7%), and the disease control rate (DCR: CR + PR + stable disease [SD]) was 65%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the patients with CR/PR/SD/progressive disease (PD) was respectively 16.8/9.6/4.8/2.4 months ( P  < 0.0001). The responders (CR + PR) had significantly longer PFS than the non-responders (SD + PD) (hazard ratio [HR], 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1–12.9; P  < 0.001). The median in-field PFS times for CR/PR/SD/PD were respectively 16.8/12/4.8/2.4 months ( P  < 0.001). The responders had a significantly longer risk of in-field PFS than the non-responders (HR, 5.9; 95% CI 2.9–12.0; P  < 0.001). The median distant relapse PFS for CR/PR/SD/PD was not reached (NR)/NR/44.4/40.8 months ( P  = 0.02). The responders had a significantly longer distant relapse PFS than the non-responders (HR, 2.7; range, 1.1–6.8; P  = 0.04). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.6 years for the responders and 4.1 years for the non-responders ( P  = 0.02). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 87% at 1 year, 71% at 3 years, and 64% at 5 years. The median DSS was not reached for the responders and was 4.1 years for the non-responders ( P  = 0.003). The limb salvage rates at 6 months were 85% at 1 year, 80% at 3 years, and 70% at 5 years. The patients with PD had a higher risk of requiring amputation than the patients with CR + PR + SD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI 1.0–8.7; P  = 0.04). Conclusions The 5-year limb salvage rates after ILI are notably high, reaching 70%. After ILI, the responders had significantly better in-field and distant relapse PFS, OS, and DSS.

Background Although there have been multiple randomised trials in newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT) and these have been conducted over many years and involved many international cooperative groups, the outcomes for all stages of disease have plateaued. Internationally, the standard treatment of ESFT is not defined, and there is a need to add new agents other than conventional chemotherapy to improve outcomes. This trial will compare two different induction/consolidation chemotherapy regimens: (1) vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (VIDE) induction and vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, or busulfan and mephalan (VAI/VAC/BuMel) consolidation and (2) vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) induction and ifosfamide and etoposide, vincristine and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, actinomycin D and ifosfamide, or busulfan and mephalan (IE/VC/VAI/BuMel) consolidation (randomisation 1, or R1). A second randomisation (R2) will determine whether the addition of zoledronic acid to consolidation chemotherapy, as assigned at R1, is associated with improved clinical outcome. Methods EURO EWING 2012 is an international, multicentre, phase III, open-label randomised controlled trial. There are two randomisations: R1 and R2. Patients are randomly assigned at two different time points: at entry to the trial (R1) and following local control therapy (R2). The primary outcome measure is event-free survival. The secondary outcome measures include overall survival, adverse events and toxicity, histological response of the primary tumour, response of the primary tumour, regional lymph nodes or metastases (or both), and achievement of local control at the end of treatment. Discussion This study will establish which is the “standard regimen” of chemotherapy, taking into account both clinical outcomes and toxicity. This will form the chemotherapy backbone for future interventional studies where we may want to add new targeted agents. It will also determine the role of zoledronic acid in conjunction with the separate EE2008 trial. Any trial in ESFT needs to take into account the rarity of the tumour and consider that international cooperation is needed to provide answers in a timely manner. Trial registration Registered with EudraCT number 2012-002107-17 on 26 February 2012. Registered with ISRCTN number 92192408 on 4 November 2013.

RG7787 is a mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin designed to have low-immunogenicity, high-cytotoxic activity and fewer side effects. RG7787 kills many types of mesothelin-expressing cancer cells lines and causes tumor regressions in mice. Safety and immunogenicity of RG7787 is now being assessed in a phase I trial. To enhance the antitumor activity of RG7787, we screened for clinically used drugs that can synergize with RG7787. Actinomycin D is a potent transcription inhibitor that is used for treating several cancers. We report here that actinomycin D and RG7787 act synergistically to kill many mesothelin-positive cancer cell lines and produce major regressions of pancreatic and stomach cancer xenografts. Analyses of RNA expression show that RG7787 or actinomycin D alone and together increase levels of TNF/TNFR family members and NF-κB–regulated genes. Western blots revealed the combination changed apoptotic protein levels and enhanced cleavage of Caspases and PARP.

Background and Objective Despite its important role in cancer treatment, there is currently very limited available information concerning the clinical pharmacology of actinomycin D (Act D). The study was designed to characterise Act D pharmacokinetics and investigate the impact of pharmacogenetic variation on Act D disposition in children with cancer. Methods A total of 650 plasma samples collected over an 8 year period from 117 patients ≤21 years receiving Act D (0.4–1.6 mg/m 2 ) were used to characterise a population pharmacokinetic model. Polymorphisms in ABCB1 were analysed in 140 patients. Results A 3-compartment model provided a good fit to the data. Median values for Act D clearance and volume of distribution in the central compartment ( V 1 ) obtained from the model were 5.3 L/h and 1.9 L (13.9 L/h/70 kg and 7.5 L/70 kg), respectively. There was substantial inter-subject variation in all pharmacokinetic parameters (coefficients of variation 53–81 % for non-normalised values). Body weight was a major determinant of Act D clearance, such that dose capping at 2 mg in larger children at a protocol dose of 1.5 mg/m 2 resulted in significantly lower area under the plasma concentration-time curves (mean AUC values: 9.3 versus 12.8 mg·min/L; P  < 0.0001). No significant relationships were found between ABCB1 genetic variants and Act D pharmacokinetic parameters, nor between CL, V 1 or dose and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Conclusion We have defined the pharmacokinetics of Act D in a paediatric patient population, providing robust estimates of key pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic data bring into question the current clinical practice of dose capping at 2 mg in larger patients. Pharmacogenetic variation in candidate drug transporter genes identified from preclinical studies does not significantly impact on Act D exposure in a clinical setting.