Explore the vast range of titles available.

Preclinical evidence demonstrates that senescent cells accumulate with aging and that senolytics delay multiple age-related morbidities, including bone loss. Thus, we conducted a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of intermittent administration of the senolytic combination dasatinib plus quercetin (D + Q) in postmenopausal women ( n  = 60 participants). The primary endpoint, percentage changes at 20 weeks in the bone resorption marker C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx), did not differ between groups (median (interquartile range), D + Q −4.1% (−13.2, 2.6), control −7.7% (−20.1, 14.3); P  = 0.611). The secondary endpoint, percentage changes in the bone formation marker procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), increased significantly (relative to control) in the D + Q group at both 2 weeks (+16%, P  = 0.020) and 4 weeks (+16%, P  = 0.024), but was not different from control at 20 weeks (−9%, P  = 0.149). No serious adverse events were observed. In exploratory analyses, the skeletal response to D + Q was driven principally by women with a high senescent cell burden (highest tertile for T cell p16 (also known as CDKN2A ) mRNA levels) in which D + Q concomitantly increased P1NP (+34%, P  = 0.035) and reduced CTx (−11%, P  = 0.049) at 2 weeks, and increased radius bone mineral density (+2.7%, P  = 0.004) at 20 weeks. Thus, intermittent D + Q treatment did not reduce bone resorption in the overall group of postmenopausal women. However, our exploratory analyses indicate that further studies are needed testing the hypothesis that the underlying senescent cell burden may dictate the clinical response to senolytics. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313634 . In a phase 2 randomized control trial, intermittent senolytic therapy administered to postmenopausal women did not result in a reduction in the bone resorption marker, serum CTx, compared to control at 20 weeks.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumour in children. Relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma is associated with a poor outcome. We assessed the combination of irinotecan–temozolomide and dasatinib–rapamycin (RIST) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2, RIST-rNB-2011 trial recruited from 40 paediatric oncology centres in Germany and Austria. Patients aged 1–25 years with high-risk relapsed (defined as recurrence of all stage IV and MYCN amplification stages, after response to treatment) or refractory (progressive disease during primary treatment) neuroblastoma, with Lansky and Karnofsky performance status at least 50%, were assigned (1:1) to RIST (RIST group) or irinotecan–temozolomide (control group) by block randomisation, stratified by MYCN status. We compared RIST (oral rapamycin [loading 3 mg/m2 on day 1, maintenance 1 mg/m2 on days 2–4] and oral dasatinib [2 mg/kg per day] for 4 days with 3 days off, followed by intravenous irinotecan [50 mg/m2 per day] and oral temozolomide [150 mg/m2 per day] for 5 days with 2 days off; one course each of rapamycin–dasatinib and irinotecan–temozolomide for four cycles over 8 weeks, then two courses of rapamycin–dasatinib followed by one course of irinotecan–temozolomide for 12 weeks) with irinotecan–temozolomide alone (with identical dosing as experimental group). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was analysed in all eligible patients who received at least one course of therapy. The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one course of therapy and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01467986, and is closed to accrual. Between Aug 26, 2013, and Sept 21, 2020, 129 patients were randomly assigned to the RIST group (n=63) or control group (n=66). Median age was 5·4 years (IQR 3·7–8·1). 124 patients (78 [63%] male and 46 [37%] female) were included in the efficacy analysis. At a median follow-up of 72 months (IQR 31–88), the median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% CI 7–17) in the RIST group and 5 months (2–8) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·62, one-sided 90% CI 0·81; p=0·019). Median progression-free survival in patients with amplified MYCN (n=48) was 6 months (95% CI 4–24) in the RIST group versus 2 months (2–5) in the control group (HR 0·45 [95% CI 0·24-0·84], p=0·012); median progression-free survival in patients without amplified MYCN (n=76) was 14 months (95% CI 9–7) in the RIST group versus 8 months (4–15) in the control group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·51–1·38], p=0·49). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (54 [81%] of 67 patients given RIST vs 49 [82%] of 60 patients given control), thrombocytopenia (45 [67%] vs 41 [68%]), and anaemia (39 [58%] vs 38 [63%]). Nine serious treatment-related adverse events were reported (five patients given control and four patients given RIST). There were no treatment-related deaths in the control group and one in the RIST group (multiorgan failure). RIST-rNB-2011 demonstrated that targeting of MYCN-amplified relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma with a pathway-directed metronomic combination of a multkinase inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor can improve progression-free survival and overall survival. This exclusive efficacy in MYCN-amplified, relapsed neuroblastoma warrants further investigation in the first-line setting. Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Background Bypass activation of Src family kinases can confer resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) based on preclinical models. We prospectively assessed the safety and clinical activity of dasatinib and afatinib in combination for patients with resistant EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Methods An open-label, dose-escalation phase 1/2 trial (NCT01999985) with 2-stage expansion was conducted with 25 lung cancer patients. Dose expansion required activating EGFR mutations and progression following prior EGFR TKI. Results Patients were 72% Caucasian and received median of 2 prior lines of therapy. Maximum-tolerated dose was 30 mg afatinib with 100 mg dasatinib. New or increased pleural effusions were observed in 56% of patients. No radiologic responses were observed, although several EGFR-mutant TKI-resistant patients (26%) had prolonged stable disease over 6 months. The combination reduced the EGFR mutation and T790M variant allele frequency in cell-free DNA ( p  < .05). Nonetheless, the threshold for futility was met, based on 6-month progression-free survival. For EGFR TKI-resistant patients, median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3–5.0) and overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI, 8.5–20.9). Conclusions The combination had a manageable toxicity profile and in vivo T790M modulation, but no objective clinical responses were observed.

Dasatinib (DAS) and interferon-α have antileukemic and immunostimulatory effects and induce deep responses in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We assigned 40 newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML patients to receive DAS 100 mg o.d. followed by addition of pegylated interferon-α2b (PegIFN) after 3 months (M3). The starting dose of PegIFN was 15 μg/week and it increased to 25 μg/week at M6 until M15. The combination was well tolerated with manageable toxicity. Of the patients, 84% remained on PegIFN at M12 and 91% (DAS) and 73% (PegIFN) of assigned dose was given. Only one patient had a pleural effusion during first year, and three more during the second year. After introduction of PegIFN we observed a steep increase in response rates. Major molecular response was achieved in 10%, 57%, 84% and 89% of patients at M3, M6, M12 and M18, respectively. At M12, MR 4 was achieved by 46% and MR 4.5 by 27% of patients. No patients progressed to advanced phase. In conclusion, the combination treatment appeared safe with very promising efficacy. A randomized comparison of DAS±PegIFN is warranted.

Bone metastases from breast cancer are common, causing significant morbidity. Preclinical data of dasatinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of multiple oncogenic tyrosine kinases, suggested efficacy in tumor control and palliation of bone metastases in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This clinical trial aimed to determine whether treatment with either of 2 dose schedules of dasatinib results in a progression-free survival (PFS) >50 % at 24 weeks in bone metastasis predominant MBC, to evaluate the toxicity of the 2 dosing regimens, and explore whether treatment results in decreased serum bone turnover markers and patient-reported “worst pain.” Subjects with bone metastasis predominant MBC were randomly assigned to either 100 mg of dasatinib once daily, or 70 mg twice daily, with treatment continued until time of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Planned accrual was 40 patients in each arm. The primary trial endpoint was PFS, defined as time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. Median PFS for all eligible patients (79) was 12.6 weeks (95 % CI 9.1–16.7). Neither cohort met the threshold for further clinical interest. There were no significant differences in PFS by randomized treatment arm ( p  = 0.85). Toxicity was similar in both cohorts, with no clear trend in serum biomarkers of bone turnover or patient-reported pain. Dasatinib was ineffective in controlling bone-predominant MBC in a patient population, unselected by molecular markers. Further study of dasatinib in breast cancer should not be pursued unless performed in molecularly determined patient subsets, or rational combinations.

Background Intermittent treatment with TKIs is an option for the great majority (70%–80%) of CML patients who do not achieve a stable deep molecular response and are not eligible for treatment discontinuation. For these patients, the only alternative is to assume TKI continuously, lifelong. Methods The Italian phase III multicentric randomized OPTkIMA study started in 2015, with the aim to evaluate if a progressive de‐escalation of TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib) is able to maintain the molecular response (MR3.0) and to improve Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Results Up to December 2018, 166/185 (90%) elderly CML patients in stable MR3.0/MR4.0 completed the first year of any TKI intermittent schedule 1 month ON and 1 month OFF. The first year probability of maintaining the MR3.0 was 81% and 23.5% of the patients who lost the molecular response regained the MR3.0 after resuming TKI continuously. Patients’ HRQoL at baseline was better than that of matched peers from healthy population. Women was the only factor independently associated with worse baseline HRQoL (p > 0.0001). Overall, global HRQoL worsened at 6 (p < 0.001) but returned to the baseline value at 12 months and it was statistically significantly worse in women (p = 0.001). Conclusions De‐escalation of any TKI by 1 month ON/OFF schedule maintains the MR3.0/MR4.0 in 81% of the patients during the first 12–24 months. No patients progressed to accelerated/blastic phase, all the patients (23.5%) losing MR3.0 regained the MR3.0 and none suffered from TKI withdrawn syndrome. The study firstly report on HRQoL in elderly CML patients moving from a continuous daily therapy to a de‐escalated intermittent treatment. The 1‐year probability of maintaining the MR3.0 while on intermittent 1 month ON/OFF TKI therapy was 81%. Patients’ QoL at baseline was better than that of matched peers from healthy population. Diarrhea significantly improved at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.022) and fatigue worsened at 6 (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.022). Overall, global QoL worsened at 6 (p < 0.001) but returned to the baseline value at the 12 months

The international phase III DASISION trial demonstrated improved efficacy of dasatinib versus imatinib in treatment-naive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). We report efficacy and safety outcomes in a Japanese population from the final, 5-year follow-up of DASISION. At the end of the study, 77% (20/26) of dasatinib-treated and 61% (14/23) of imatinib-treated patients remained on initial therapy. Improved responses were observed in Japanese patients who received dasatinib versus imatinib (complete cytogenetic response: 96 vs 87%; major molecular response: 88 vs 74%; BCR - ABL1 ≤0.0032% International Scale [MR 4.5 ]: 58 vs 52%). In patients who achieved BCR - ABL1 ≤10% at 3 months, 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were high with dasatinib (96 and 96%) and imatinib (88 and 100%). The majority of adverse events were grade 1/2 in Japanese patients. Pleural effusion occurred more frequently in dasatinib-treated Japanese patients versus all patients (42 vs 28%), with no treatment discontinuations. Overall, in Japanese patients, dasatinib maintained its safety profile and had higher or comparable response and survival outcomes compared with imatinib or with all patients in DASISION. These findings demonstrate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of dasatinib and support frontline treatment of Japanese patients with CML-CP with dasatinib.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder with an incidence of 1–2 cases per 100 000 adults per year.1 Since the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 trial (IRIS trial) in 2003, treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has become the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed CML in the chronic phase.2 Dasatinib is a second-generation TKI and is generally well tolerated, with cytopenias, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and fluid retention being the most commonly observed side effects.3–5 Bleeding complications, although unusual, have been reported with dasatinib, with an incidence ranging from 8% to 24%.3–6 The most commonly reported site of bleeding is the GI tract.3 5 We report an unusual case of dasatinib-associated bleeding presenting with acute bilateral hyphemas, which, to our knowledge, is the first report of its kind.

Neuritic plaques, a pathological hallmark in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains, comprise extracellular aggregates of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide and degenerating neurites that accumulate autolysosomes. We found that, in the brains of patients with AD and in AD mouse models, Aβ plaque-associated Olig2- and NG2-expressing oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), but not astrocytes, microglia, or oligodendrocytes, exhibit a senescence-like phenotype characterized by the upregulation of p21/CDKN1A, p16/INK4/CDKN2A proteins, and senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. Molecular interrogation of the Aβ plaque environment revealed elevated levels of transcripts encoding proteins involved in OPC function, replicative senescence, and inflammation. Direct exposure of cultured OPCs to aggregating Aβ triggered cell senescence. Senolytic treatment of AD mice selectively removed senescent cells from the plaque environment, reduced neuroinflammation, lessened Aβ load, and ameliorated cognitive deficits. Our findings suggest a role for Aβ-induced OPC cell senescence in neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits in AD, and a potential therapeutic benefit of senolytic treatments.The Alzheimer’s disease (AD) amyloid-beta peptide causes oligodendrocyte progenitor cells to undergo senescence, contributing to neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment. Treatment of AD mice with senolytic drugs ameliorates AD neuropathologies and cognitive deficits.

In patients who have acute lymphoblastic leukemia with tumor cells that bear the Philadelphia chromosome, traditional therapy is not very effective. The use of the ABL kinase inhibitor dasatinib to achieve remission, followed by the bifunctional antibody blinatumomab (which has both anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 specificity as maintenance therapy), led to complete remission in 98% of the patients.