Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
15,295 result(s) for "Database searching"
Sort by:
PostGIS in action
\"PostGIS in Action, Second Edition teaches you to solve real-world goedata problems. It first gives you a background in vector-, raster-, and topology-based GIS and then quickly moves into analyzing, viewing, and mapping data. You'll learn how to optimize queries for maximum speed, simplify geometrics for greater efficiency, and create custom functions for your own applications. You'll also learn how to apply your existing GIS knowledge to PostGIS and integrate with other GIS tools. What's Inside: An introduction to spatial databases -- geometry, geography, raster, and topology spatial types, functions, and queries -- Applying PostGIS to real-world problems -- Extending PostGIS to web and desktop applications -- Updated for PostGIS 2.x and PostgreSQL 9.x\"--Back cover.
Knowledge Discovery Process and Methods to Enhance Organizational Performance
This book explains the knowledge discovery and data mining (KDDM) process in a manner that makes it easy for readers to understand and implement. Sharing insights from international KDDM experts, it presents powerful strategies, models, and techniques relevant to the different stages of the KDDM process.
Data exploration using example-based methods
Data usually comes in a plethora of formats and dimensions, rendering the exploration and information extraction processes challenging. Thus, being able to perform exploratory analyses in the data with the intent of having an immediate glimpse on some of the data properties is becoming crucial. Exploratory analyses should be simple enough to avoid complicate declarative languages (such as SQL) and mechanisms, and at the same time retain the flexibility and expressiveness of such languages. Recently, we have witnessed a rediscovery of the so-called example-based methods, in which the user, or the analyst, circumvents query languages by using examples as input. An example is a representative of the intended results, or in other words, an item from the result set. Example-based methods exploit inherent characteristics of the data to infer the results that the user has in mind, but may not able to (easily) express. They can be useful in cases where a user is looking for information in an unfamiliar dataset, when the task is particularly challenging like finding duplicate items, or simply when they are exploring the data. In this book, we present an excursus over the main methods for exploratory analysis, with a particular focus on example-based methods. We show how that different data types require different techniques, and present algorithms that are specifically designed for relational, textual, and graph data. The book presents also the challenges and the new frontiers of machine learning in online settings which recently attracted the attention of the database community. The lecture concludes with a vision for further research and applications in this area.
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) and Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to classical amputation in prophylactic prevention of pain, primarily by reducing the incidence of symptomatic neuromas, residual limb pain, and phantom limb pain. However, direct comparisons between these two techniques remain limited. Furthermore, their comparative effectiveness across diverse patient demographics (including age, sex, and comorbidities) and surgical variables (amputation level, etiology, and nerve handling) has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize the available evidence to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of primary TMR or RPNI. This review will be conducted following the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A comprehensive electronic search will be performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and MedRxiv, without language restrictions. We will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, and observational studies. Study selection and data extraction will be managed using Covidence. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, assess full-text eligibility, evaluate risk of bias, and extract data.
Strategic searches using digital tools
Readers will get a step-by-step overview of how to make the most of their search activities so they can get the information they want and need with just a few keystrokes, swipes, or clicks.
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for pain prevention in patients with limb amputation: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) and Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to classical amputation in prophylactic prevention of pain, primarily by reducing the incidence of symptomatic neuromas, residual limb pain, and phantom limb pain. However, direct comparisons between these two techniques remain limited. Furthermore, their comparative effectiveness across diverse patient demographics (including age, sex, and comorbidities) and surgical variables (amputation level, etiology, and nerve handling) has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize the available evidence to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of primary TMR or RPNI. Methods and design This review will be conducted following the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A comprehensive electronic search will be performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and MedRxiv, without language restrictions. We will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, and observational studies. Study selection and data extraction will be managed using Covidence. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, assess full-text eligibility, evaluate risk of bias, and extract data. Ethics and dissemination As this systematic review relies on the analysis of secondary data from published studies, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024617299
Numerical algorithms for personalized search in self-organizing information networks
\"This book lays out the theoretical groundwork for personalized search and reputation management, both on the Web and in peer-to-peer and social networks.\" The book develops scalable algorithms that exploit the graphlike properties underlying personalized search and reputation management, and delves into realistic scenarios regarding web-scale data.--[book cover]
Trends in the Regulation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Scoping Review
Products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used for decades in industrial and consumer products. These compounds are persistent in the environment, bioaccumulative, and some are toxic to humans and other animals. Since the early 2000s, laws, policies, and regulations have been implemented to reduce the prevalence of PFAS in the environment and exposures to PFAS. We conducted a scoping literature review to identify how PFAS are regulated internationally, at the U.S. national level, and at the U.S. state level, as well as drivers of and challenges to implementing PFAS regulations in the U.S. This review captured peer-reviewed scientific literature (e.g., PubMed), grey literature databases (e.g., SciTech Premium Collection), Google searches, and targeted websites (e.g., state health department websites). We identified 454 relevant documents, of which 61 discussed the non-U.S. PFAS policy, 214 discussed the U.S. national-level PFAS policy, and 181 discussed the U.S. state-level PFAS policy. The drivers of and challenges to PFAS regulation were identified through qualitative analysis. The drivers of PFAS policy identified were political support for regulation, social awareness of PFAS, economic resource availability, and compelling scientific evidence. The challenges to implementing PFAS regulations were political limitations, economic challenges, unclear scientific evidence, and practical challenges. The implications for PFAS policy makers and other stakeholders are discussed.
Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements
Background A bibliometric review of the biomedical literature could be essential in synthesizing evidence if thoroughly conducted and documented. Although very similar to review papers in nature, it slightly differs in synthesizing the data when it comes to providing a pile of evidence from different studies into a single document. This paper provides a preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO). Methods The BIBLIO was developed through two major processes: literature review and the consensus process. The BIBLIO started with a comprehensive review of publications on the conduct and reporting of bibliometric studies. The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library. The process followed the general recommendations of the EQUATOR Network on how to develop a reporting guideline, of which one fundamental part is a consensus process. A panel of experts was invited to identify additional items and was asked to choose preferred options or suggest another item that should be included in the checklist. Finally, the checklist was completed based on the comments and responses of the panel members in four rounds. Results The BIBLIO includes 20 items as follows: title (2 items), abstract (1 item), introduction/background (2 items), methods (7 items), results (4 items), discussion (4 items). These should be described as a minimum requirements in reporting a bibliometric review. Conclusions The BIBLIO for the first time provides a preliminary guideline of its own kind. It is hoped that it could contribute to the transparent reporting of bibliometric reviews. The quality and utility of BIBILO remain to be investigated further.