Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The notion that debriefing quality is highly reliant on the skills and expertise of the facilitator is being increasingly challenged. There is therefore emerging interest in self-led debriefings (SLDs), whereby following a simulated learning event, individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing amongst themselves, without the immediate presence of a trained facilitator. The interest in this approach to debriefing is multifactorial but is, in part, driven by a desire to reduce costs associated with resource-intensive faculty presence. The debate regarding the role of SLDs in simulation-based education (SBE) therefore has important implications for the simulation community. Main body We comprehensively explore the role of SLDs by contextualising their application across the spectrum of SBE, both in terms of contrasting simulation factors, namely (i) simulation modality, (ii) debriefing forum, and (iii) debriefing adjuncts, as well as different learner characteristics, namely (i) learners’ previous simulation experience, (ii) learner numbers, and (iii) learners’ professional and cultural backgrounds. These factors inherently shape the conduct and format of SLDs, and thus impact their effectiveness in influencing learning. We have synthesised and critically analysed the available literature to illuminate this discussion. Conclusions The current evidence suggests that SLDs can, in the right circumstances, form part of an effective debriefing strategy and support learners to reach appropriate levels of critical self-reflection and learning. Careful consideration and due diligence must go into the design and implementation of SLDs to augment the advantages of this debriefing format, such as enhancing flexibility and learner autonomy, whilst mitigating potential risks, such as reinforcing errors and biases or causing psychological harm. In situations where resources for facilitator-led debriefings (FLDs) are limited, simulation educators should recognise SLDs as a potential avenue to explore in their local contexts. By leveraging the strengths of both formats, balancing learner autonomy and expert guidance, a combined SLD and FLD approach may yet prove to be the optimal debriefing strategy to maximise learning. Whilst more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the nuances of SLDs to assess their true applicability across the spectrum of SBE, the time may now have arrived to consider challenging the status quo.

This paper describes the development and implementation of the INFO (immediate, not for personal assessment, fast facilitated feedback, and opportunity to ask questions) clinical debriefing process. INFO enabled charge nurses to facilitate a group debriefing after critical events across three adult emergency departments (EDs) in Calgary, Alberta. Prior to implementation at our institutions, ED critical event debriefing was a highly variable event. Post-implementation, INFO critical event debriefings have become part of our ED culture, take place regularly in our EDs (254 documented debriefings between March 2016 and September 2017), with recommendations arising from these debriefings being introduced into clinical practice. The INFO clinical debriefing process addresses two significant barriers to regular ED clinical debriefing: a lack of trained facilitators and the focus on physician-led debriefings. Our experience shows that a nurse-facilitated debriefing is feasible, can be successfully implemented in diverse EDs, and can be performed by relatively inexperienced debriefers. A structured approach means that debriefings are more likely to take place and become a routine part of improving team management of high stakes or unexpected clinical events. Il sera question, dans le présent article, de l’élaboration et de la mise en œuvre du processus de réunion-bilan clinique, appelée INFO (d’après l’anglais Immediate, Not for personal assessment, Fast facilitated feedback and Opportunity to ask questions). La formule INFO permet à des infirmières responsables d’animer des réunions de bilan clinique après des événements très graves, dans trois services des urgences (SU) pour adultes, à Calgary (Alberta, Canada). Avant la mise en œuvre du processus dans les établissements en question, la tenue de réunions-bilan consécutives à des événements gravissimes au SU était très variable; depuis la mise en œuvre de la démarche, ces réunions font partie intégrante de la culture du personnel de soins et ont lieu fréquemment dans les trois SU participants (254 réunions-bilan documentées entre mars 2016 et septembre 2017). De plus, les recommandations formulées au cours de ces réunions trouvent maintenant écho en pratique clinique. Le processus des séances INFO vise à surmonter deux obstacles importants à la tenue habituelle de réunions-bilan clinique au SU, soit le manque d’animateurs formés et le point de mire sur les réunions animées par les médecins. L’expérience montre qu’il est possible de tenir des réunions-bilan animées par des infirmières, d’implanter ce type de réunion dans divers SU et de confier la conduite de ces réunions à des animateurs ayant relativement peu d’expérience. Le processus structuré d’INFO rend plus probable la tenue de réunions-bilan et fait de celles-ci un composant de l’amélioration de la gestion collective d’événements à grands enjeux ou d’événements cliniques imprévus.

Background Facilitator-led debriefings are well-established for debriefing groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education. However, there has been emerging interest in self-led debriefings whereby individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing themselves, without the presence of a facilitator. How and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes remains undetermined. Research aim The aim of this study was to explore how and why in-person self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes for groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education. Methods An integrative review was conducted, searching seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, PsychINFO) for peer-reviewed empirical studies investigating in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners. Data were extracted, synthesised, and underwent reflexive thematic analysis. Results Eighteen empirical studies identified through the search strategy were included in this review. There was significant heterogeneity in respect to study designs, aims, contexts, debriefing formats, learner characteristics, and data collection instruments. The synthesised findings of this review suggest that, across a range of debriefing outcome measures, in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners following immersive simulation-based education are preferable to conducting no debriefing at all. In certain cultural and professional contexts, such as postgraduate learners and those with previous debriefing experience, self-led debriefings can support effective learning and may provide equivalent educational outcomes to facilitator-led debriefings or self-led and facilitator-led combination strategies. Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that self-led and facilitator-led combination approaches may optimise participant learning, with this approach warranting further research. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data revealed four themes, promoting self-reflective practice, experience and background of learners, challenges of conducting self-led debriefings and facilitation and leadership. Similar to facilitator-led debriefings, promoting self-reflective practice within groups of learners is fundamental to how and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes. Conclusions In circumstances where simulation resources for facilitator-led debriefings are limited, self-led debriefings can provide an alternative opportunity to safeguard effective learning. However, their true value within the scope of immersive simulation-based education may lie as an adjunctive method alongside facilitator-led debriefings. Further research is needed to explore how to best enable the process of reflective practice within self-led debriefings to understand how, and in which contexts, self-led debriefings are best employed and thus maximise their potential use.

Background Simulation-based education has expanded across Latin America, creating demand for contextually relevant faculty development. Meta-debriefing, defined as a facilitated conversation following a debriefing, can strengthen debriefer performance. However, its implementation and effectiveness in Spanish-speaking settings remain underexplored. The CORE model (context, observation, reflection, and enhanced practice) provides structural guidance, but its adaptation to regional cultures has not been studied. Methods We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study of one experienced meta-debriefer interacting and facilitating 15 remote meta-debriefing sessions with interprofessional novice debriefers. Quantitative data were derived from audio-recorded sessions using DASH, SET-M, a CORE-aligned checklist, and a meta-debriefing pillars tool. Qualitative data consisted of written observer reports, analyzed using inductive content analysis, and triangulated across sources. Results Quantitative analysis revealed high adherence to the CORE model and consistent demonstration of the four meta-debriefing pillars. Peer-assessed DASH scores ranged from 6.8 to 7.0, while SET-M items were consistently marked as achieved. Qualitatively, the meta-debriefer demonstrated behaviors aligned with psychologically safe, context-dependent, theoretically grounded, and formative facilitation. The meta-debriefer used cultural metaphors (e.g., “boli,” “cazuelas,” and a prisoner’s song) to clarify structure and normalize reflection. Five reflection strategies emerged as central to generating debriefer insight: (1) Structured reorientation, (2) constructivist linkage to clinical identity, (3) metaphorical framing, (4) strategic questioning (e.g., advocacy & inquiry, circular inquiry), and (5) emotional normalization. Conclusion This study demonstrates how meta-debriefing, when implemented through culturally sensitive and structured approaches like CORE, supports transformative learning among simulation debriefers. Meta-debriefer’s relational style, use of shared narratives, and context-sensitive scaffolding activated learner-centered reflection. As meta-debriefing models gain traction in Latin America and beyond, this study highlights the value of culturally responsive faculty development strategies that integrate local language, values, and pedagogical traditions into simulation-based education.

Focus group methodology generates distinct ethical challenges that do not correspond fully to those raised by one-to-one interviews. This paper explores, in both conceptual and practical terms, three key issues: consent; confidentiality and anonymity; and risk of harm. The principal challenge in obtaining consent lies in giving a clear account of what will take place in the group, owing to unpredictability of the discussion and interaction that will occur. As consent can be seen in terms of creating appropriate expectations in the participant, this may therefore be hard to achieve. Moreover, it is less straightforward for the participant to revoke consent than in one-to-one interviews. Confidentiality and anonymity are potentially problematic because of the researcher’s limited control over what participants may subsequently communicate outside the group. If the group discussion encourages over-disclosure by some participants, this problem becomes more acute. Harm in a focus group may arise from the discussion of sensitive topics, and this may be amplified by the public nature of the discussion. A balance should be struck between avoiding or closing down potentially distressing discussion and silencing the voices of certain participants to whom such discussion may be important or beneficial. As a means of addressing the above issues, we outline some strategies that can be adopted in the consent process, in a preliminary briefing session, during moderation of the focus group, and in a subsequent debriefing, and suggest that these strategies can be employed synergistically so as to reinforce each other.

Background Clinical simulation fosters reflective, experiential learning in a safe environment, allowing participants to learn from mistakes without patient risk. Debriefing, essential for reflection, is typically facilitator driven. The MAES© methodology (Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments) shifts the focus to students, guiding them through six sequential phases: group identity creation, topic selection, objective setting, competency establishment, scenario design, simulation, and debriefing. MAES© introduces an expository phase in debriefing, where students present theoretical and practical content. The facilitator assumes a significant, yet secondary role, fostering increased student-led learning opportunities and, at times, enabling even trained real patients to co-facilitate the debriefing. Objective To explore participants’ experiences and perceptions regarding the expository phase of debriefing within the MAES© methodology framework, with specific focus on the student-led debriefing component. Method A descriptive qualitative inductive approach with thematic content analysis was used. Open-ended questionnaires from 151 undergraduate final year and post-graduate nursing students, captured their experiences with the MAES© expository phase. Open-ended questionnaires allow participants to freely and anonymously express their perspectives and experiences. Responses were transcribed, independently coded, and analyzed using MaxQDA ® v18. Data were coded and analyzed based on absolute and relative frequencies of emerging categories. The study adhered to the SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines. Results The analysis revealed several key themes in student evaluations. Satisfaction with the methodology emerged strongly, with over one-third of participants expressing no desired changes. The reflective nature of the approach was prominently valued, along with its effectiveness for concept clarification and fostering collaborative learning. Participants particularly noted developmental outcomes in communication competencies and technical skills, while appreciating the motivational learning environment and evidence-based focus. The suggested improvements focused on three main aspects: increased session dynamism, a greater use of visual and interactive elements, and reduced dependence on slide-based presentations. Conclusion The study highlights the value of the expository phase in the MAES© methodology, emphasizing its effectiveness in clarifying concepts, fostering collaboration, and developing technical and communication skills. It also promotes student autonomy through active engagement. However, participants suggested improvements, such as greater dynamism, personalization, and varied presentation methods using videos, skill stations or patient’s-oriented debriefing. Overall, the expository phase proves to be a valuable pedagogical tool with potential for broader application in simulation-based learning and other debriefing models. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

image The well‐being of nurses is at risk, making it a national priority. Perioperative nurses are at high risk for traumatic psychological and physical symptoms after involvement in a medical error. These symptoms can result in workplace‐related consequences, including lack of concentration; absenteeism; and leaving their position, facility, or profession. These consequences have implications for the health and safety of the nurse, the patients they care for, and the organization. Providing support to affected individuals is the most important step in reducing the severity and duration of their symptoms. The AORN Clinical Nursing Practice Committee developed an evidence‐based tool kit for understanding what affected individuals may be experiencing, how to provide support, how to measure the scope of the issue, and how to set up an organizational support program. This article provides background information on this traumatic phenomenon and reviews the development process for the tool kit and the included resources.

We aimed to compare the debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and simulation satisfaction of using oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session in an interdisciplinary cohort of health sciences students. Debriefing is a reflective process that takes place after a clinical simulation and that can be performed either in a traditional way (oral) or using video-assisted debriefing. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 143 health sciences students (35.7% male, 61.5% female). The simulation scenario was designed to evaluate the procedure for donning and doffing personal protective equipment. Differences in debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and satisfaction were assessed. Regarding debriefing experience, significant differences were observed for the category “learning” (34.9 (6.13) vs. 36.7 (3.89); p = 0.039). For simulation assessment, significantly higher scores for all categories were identified in video-assisted debriefing compared with oral debriefing (p<0.001). There were also significant differences between the oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing for the overall score of reflection ability (86.97 (10.55) vs. 90.74 (9.67); p=0.028) as well as for the category “reflective communication” (24.72 (3.77) vs 26.04 (4.07); p=0.047). Perceived satisfaction was significantly higher in the video-assisted debriefing group compared with oral debriefing group (p <0.001). For anxiety, no significant differences were observed between debriefing groups. Video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session improves debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection and simulation satisfaction, but does not increase anxiety compared with oral debriefing among health sciences students.

The healthcare simulation field has no shortage of debriefing options. Some demand considerable skill which serves as a barrier to more widespread implementation. The plus-delta approach to debriefing offers the advantages of conceptual simplicity and ease of implementation. Importantly, plus-delta promotes learners’ capacity for a self-assessment, a skill vital for safe clinical practice and yet a notorious deficiency in professional practice. The plus-delta approach confers the benefits of promoting uptake of debriefing in time-limited settings by educators with both fundamental but also advanced skills, and enhancing essential capacity for critical self-assessment informed by objective performance feedback. In this paper, we describe the role of plus-delta in debriefing, provide guidance for incorporating informed learner self-assessment into debriefings, and highlight four opportunities for improving the art of the plus delta: (a) exploring the big picture vs. specific performance issues, (b) choosing between single vs. double-barreled questions, (c) unpacking positive performance, and (d) managing perception mismatches.

Many simulation programs have recently shifted towards providing remote simulations with virtual debriefings. Virtual debriefings involve educators facilitating conversations through web-based videoconferencing platforms. Facilitating debriefings through a computer interface introduces a unique set of challenges. Educators require practical guidance to support meaningful virtual learning in the transition from in-person to virtual debriefings. The communities of inquiry conceptual framework offer a useful structure to organize practical guidance for conducting virtual debriefings. The communities of inquiry framework describe the three key elements—social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence—all of which contribute to the overall learning experience. In this paper, we (1) define the CoI framework and describe its three core elements, (2) highlight how virtual debriefings align with CoI, (3) anticipate barriers to effective virtual debriefings, and (4) share practical strategies to overcome these hurdles.