Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
335 result(s) for "Demodex"
Sort by:
Evaluating the Efficacy of Oral Ivermectin on Clinical Symptoms and Demodex Densities in Patients with Demodicosis
Background: Dermatologists consistently face challenges in treating demodicosis due to its high recurrence rate and difficulty normalizing the Demodex density (Dd) even after clinical improvement. Oral ivermectin has proven to be an effective treatment for demodicosis. However, there is a lack of comprehensive information on the clinical and acaricidal effects of oral ivermectin in treating demodicosis. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of oral ivermectin on clinical symptoms and Dds of patients with demodicosis. Methods: This prospective, quasi-experimental study included 40 demodicosis patients (20 with Demodex densities (Dds) < 20 D/[cm.sup.2], 20 with Dds [greater than or equal to]20 D/[cm.sup.2]). Both groups of patients were treated with oral ivermectin (200 [micro]g/kg/week) until excellent clinical improvement (Grade 4 according to the Quartile Grading Scale), and Dds [less than or equal to] 5 D/[cm.sup.2] or treated with oral ivermectin for a total of eight weeks period. Results: In our study, 75% of patients achieved clinical remission, showing excellent clinical improvement with Dds [less than or equal to] 5 D/[cm.sup.2]. All patients with a Dds <20 D/[cm.sup.2] experienced remission, while 50% with a Dds [greater than or equal to]20 D/[cm.sup.2] achieved remission. The median time to remission after oral ivermectin treatment was 28 days for Dds <20 D/[cm.sup.2] and 56 days for Dds [greater than or equal to]20 D/[cm.sup.2] (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Oral ivermectin effectively improves clinical symptoms and normalizes Dds in patients with demodicosis. Patients with higher Dds require a longer treatment than those with lower Dds. Keywords: ivermectin, demodicosis, Rosacea, Demodex mite, Demodex folliculorum, Demodex brevis
Ubiquity and Diversity of Human-Associated Demodex Mites: e106265
Demodex mites are a group of hair follicle and sebaceous gland-dwelling species. The species of these mites found on humans are arguably the animals with which we have the most intimate interactions. Yet, their prevalence and diversity have been poorly explored. Here we use a new molecular method to assess the occurrence of Demodex mites on humans. In addition, we use the 18S rRNA gene (18S rDNA) to assess the genetic diversity and evolutionary history of Demodex lineages. Within our samples, 100% of people over 18 years of age appear to host at least one Demodex species, suggesting that Demodex mites may be universal associates of adult humans. A phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA reveals intraspecific structure within one of the two named human-associated Demodex species, D. brevis. The D. brevis clade is geographically structured, suggesting that new lineages are likely to be discovered as humans from additional geographic regions are sampled.
The Prevalence of Demodex Blepharitis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients as Determined by Collarettes: A Pathognomonic Sign
To evaluate the prevalence of blepharitis by its pathognomonic sign, collarettes, in patients presenting for any reason to eye care clinics in the United States. In this retrospective study by 7 investigators at 6 eye care clinics, case records of consecutive patients who underwent a slit-lamp examination, regardless of chief complaint, were reviewed for blepharitis, as identified by the presence of collarettes. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, race, relevant ocular and systemic diagnoses, ocular medications, lid hygiene practices and contact lens wear, were also recorded. Of 1032 patients (mean age: 60.2 ± 17.8 years), 57.7% had blepharitis. While the prevalence of blepharitis in patients with dry eye disease (DED) (58.9%) and cataract (55.7%) was similar to the overall prevalence of blepharitis, it was higher in patients with blepharitis (69.1%) and glaucoma (64.8%). Among patients with collarettes, 44.0% had never been diagnosed with blepharitis. Among those on anti-inflammatory DED treatment, 60.0% had blepharitis. blepharitis prevalence was significantly higher among those using topical tea tree oil versus those who were not (74.5% versus 56.7% p = 0.014); prevalence was comparable among those using/not using lid wipes (56.9% versus 55.5%). blepharitis, based on the pathognomonic finding of collarettes, is common and likely underdiagnosed among patients seeking eye care. These collarettes are still found in patients using over-the-counter treatments for blepharitis. The present study highlights the importance of screening patients for collarettes and blepharitis as part of every slit-lamp examination.
Identification and genetic characterisation of cathepsin L in Demodex
Owing to difficulties in obtaining functional gene sequences, molecular pathogenic mechanisms in Demodex have been understudied. In this study, overlap extension PCR was used to obtain the sequences of cathepsin L (CatL), a pathogenicity-related gene, to provide a foundation for subsequent functional research. Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis mites were obtained from the face skin of Chinese individuals, and Demodex canis mites were isolated from the skin lesions of a dog. RNA was extracted and used to synthesise double-stranded cDNA. PCR amplification, cloning, sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis of CatL were performed. CatL gene sequences of 1005, 1008, and 1008 bp were successfully amplified for D. brevis, D. folliculorum, and D. canis, respectively. These sequences showed 99.9 or 100% identity with templates previously obtained by RNA-seq. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree showed that D. folliculorum clustered with D. canis first, then with D. brevis, and finally with other Acariformes mite species. The three Demodex species had nine similar motifs to those of Sarcoptes scabies, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and Dermatophagoides farinae, and motifs 10–13 were valuable for identification. CatL proteins of Demodex species were predicted to be approximately 38 kDa, be located in lysosomes, have a signal peptide but no transmembrane region, and have two functional domains, I29 and Pept_C1. However, interspecific differences were observed in secondary and tertiary protein structures. In conclusion, we successfully obtained CatL sequences of three Demodex species by overlap extension PCR, which creates conditions for further pathogenic mechanism studies.
The Association Between Acne Vulgaris, Acne Vulgaris with Nonspecific Facial Dermatitis, and Demodex Mite Presence
mites can lead to various skin disorders, from non-specific dermatitis to conditions that mimic other diseases, making it challenging to diagnose accurately. Additionally, it has been reported that mites can cause skin conditions such as perioral dermatitis, pustular folliculitis, pityriasis folliculorum, blepharitis, and rosacea. Due to conflicting studies, there is a debate regarding the link between mites and acne vulgaris. This study aims to determine the prevalence of mites on the faces of individuals with acne vulgaris, acne with nonspecific facial dermatitis, and healthy facial skin to clarify the association. This observational case-control study involved 120 participants aged 18-37: 40 individuals with acne vulgaris only, 40 with acne and nonspecific facial dermatitis, and 40 healthy controls. The same dermatologist examined and diagnosed all participants to ensure accuracy before being grouped. The Standardized Skin Surface Biopsy (SSSB) method was used to detect mites in all three study groups. Furthermore, additional samples were collected randomly from acne lesions using the Superficial Needle Scraping (SNS) method in the two acne groups. The study found no significant difference in prevalence and high density rate between patients with only acne vulgaris and the control group (p>0.05). However, acne patients with nonspecific facial dermatitis had a higher rate of prevalence and high density rate than the only acne vulgaris and control group (p<0.05). The clinical symptoms of nonspecific facial dermatitis in acne patients strongly associated with mites are patchy red, dry, scaly skin, roughness, insect bite-like papules, and flushing. prevalence and high density rate are not associated with acne vulgaris. Still, it is associated with acne and nonspecific facial dermatitis, particularly in patients with patchy redness, dry, scaly skin, roughness, insect bite-like papules, and flushing.
Prevalence of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis in patients with blepharitis and chalazion
Purpose Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis are common ectoparasites on skin that also can lead to blepharitis and chalazion. The aim of our study is to determine the prevalence of Demodex spp. in eyelashes of patients diagnosed with chronic blepharitis and chalazion. Methods This study included 330 patients diagnosed with chronic blepharitis, 70 patients diagnosed with chalazion and 130 volunteers without any ocular problems. Patient eyelashes were examined under a light microscope at magnifications of × 40, × 100 and × 400. Demodex spp . were determined. Results Parasite prevalence was significantly higher in blepharitis (75.5%) and chalazion groups (70%) compared to the control group (16.2%) ( p  < 0.001). The prevalence of D. folliculorum in the blepharitis group and D. brevis in the chalazion group was found to be significantly higher compared to other groups ( p  < 0.05). The average number of mites per eyelash was found to be significantly higher in patients with Demodex positive blepharitis ( p  = 0.001) and in chalazion patients ( p  = 0.047) than in the control group. It has been determined that mite positivity increases with age in blepharitis and control groups ( p  < 0.05). In the group with blepharitis, it was found that mite positivity was significant in the presence of symptoms ( p  = 0.0001) and Demodex positivity decreased as the education level of individuals increased ( p  = 0.039). Conclusion The results of the study show that Demodex spp infestations should be considered in chronic blepharitis and chalazion.
Demodex blepharitis: clinical perspectives
and are two mites which infest the human eye and which may, in excess, lead to a wide range of anterior segment findings. mites have been implicated in anterior and posterior blepharitis, blepharoconjunctivitis, blepharokeratitis, and beyond. Due to significant overlap with other anterior segment conditions, infestation remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Definitive diagnosis can be made with lash sampling, and the most common mode of treatment is with tea tree oil in varying concentrations. This article summarizes elements of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management critical to clinical care of this common condition.
Demodex folliculorum (Trombidiformes: Demodicidae) and Demodex brevis Prevalence in an Extreme Environment of Chile
The prevalence of mites of the genus Demodex and their associations with host age, gender, workplace, and comorbid skin and ocular conditions were studied in participants in Antofagasta, Chile, which is in a region with an extreme environment. We examined 680 participants aged 18–88 yr using standardized surface skin biopsies. Among them, Demodex had a prevalence of 13.5 % (95% confidence interval, 10.88–16.17). A slightly higher prevalence was observed in males (51.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.9–61.3; nonsignificant) and participants in the 69–88 yr age group (50.0%; 95% confidence interval, 23.8–76.2; P < 0.05). Regarding the species involved, Demodex folliculorum was found in 89.1% (CI 82.7–95.5) of cases, while D. brevis was found in the remaining 10.9% of cases. A higher prevalence (25.0% CI 16.1–33.91) was observed in participants who worked indoors in generally enclosed and dust-rich environments (such as theaters, libraries, and administrative offices). There was also a strong association between Demodex prevalence and conjunctival hyperemia, with 35.9% (95% confidence interval, 9.1–35; OR 17.9) of the Demodex positive participants having this pathology compared to 10.3% of the noninfested participants. In summary, the prevalence of Demodex in Antofagasta, Chile (13.5%) was toward the lower end of the range reported among other regions around the world. Environmental factors such as exposure to the sun (including ultraviolet rays) or environmental pollution may affect the mites. In addition, Demodex genetics (related to virulence) and the ocular or skin microbiota may positively or negatively influence infestation and pathology.
Can the tea tree oil (Australian native plant: Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) be an alternative treatment for human demodicosis on skin?
Australian tea tree oil (TTO) and its extract terpinen-4-ol (T4O) are found to be effective in moderating demodex-related diseases. Their possible effects are lowering the mite counts, relieving the demodex-related symptoms and modulating the immune system especially the inflammatory response. This review summarizes the topical treatments of TTO and T4O in human demodicosis, their possible mechanism of actions, side-effects and potential resistance in treating this condition. Although current treatments other than TTO and T4O are relatively effective in controlling the demodex mite population and the related symptoms, more research on the efficacy and drug delivery technology is needed in order to assess its potential as an alternative treatment with minimal side-effect profile, low toxicity and low risk of demodex resistance.