Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background In the UK older adults in care homes have exhibited poorer oral health than age-equivalent persons in the community. In response the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence issued guidance (NG48) on the maintenance and improvement of oral health in this group. Currently, there is little evidence on the cost-effectiveness of such interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of evaluating an intervention framed around NICE guidance. Methods The study was undertaken in 22 care homes across 2 sites with eligibility criteria used to ensure access to residents for whom the oral health care intervention was relevant and who could consent to participation. The intervention followed the guidance issued by NICE in respect of care staff knowledge; oral health assessment and development of care plans, and provision of daily mouth care to residents. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from residents and care home managers and interviews undertaken with a range of stakeholders. Quantitative data from residents comprised EQ5D5L at baseline, 6 and 12 months, qualitiative data was taken from interviews. Descriptive statistics and a discussion of themes raised in surveys and interviews was undertaken. The trial was registered with the UK’s Clinical Study Registry (ISRCTN10276613) on 17/04/2020. Results Of 119 residents recruited, 115 provided usable EQ5D5L data at baseline. The data had good face validity. Managers from 7 of 22 homes provided responses to the care home survey. All responding care homes routinely recorded information on care provided to residents and 5 of the 7 recorded information on the funding source for that care. Care assistant time was a key consideration among managers in terms of resource use. Residents overall quality of life was a key consideration among managers in terms of outcomes. Among key stakeholders, there was a universal appreciation of the need to improve the evidence base on the value for money of interventions framed around NG48. Conclusion The study supports the case for the conduct of an economic evaluation in a definitive trial to address a manifest gap in the evidence base on oral hygiene interventions in this context.

Dental utilization patterns and costs of providing comprehensive oral healthcare for older adults in different settings have not been examined. Retrospective longitudinal cohort data from Apple Tree Dental (ATD) were analyzed (N = 1,159 total; 503 outpatients, 656 long-term care residents) to describe oral health status at presentation, service utilization patterns, and care costs. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) repeated measures analysis identified significant contributors to service cost over the three-year study period. Cohort mean age was 74 years (range = 55-104); the outpatient (OP) group was younger compared to the long-term care (LTC) group. Half (56%) had Medicaid, 22% had other insurance, and 22% self-paid. Most (72%) had functional dentitions (20+ teeth), 15% had impaired dentitions (9-19 teeth), 6% had severe tooth loss (1-8 teeth), and 7% were edentulous (OP = 2%, LTC = 11%). More in the OP group had functional dentition (83% vs. 63% LTC). The number of appointments declined from 5.0 in Year 1 (OP = 5.7, LTC = 4.4) to 3.3 in Year 3 (OP = 3.6, LTC = 3.0). The average cost to provide dental services was $1,375/year for three years (OP = $1,427, LTC = $1,336), and costs declined each year, from an average of $1,959 (OP = $2,068, LTC = $1,876) in Year 1 to $1,016 (OP = $989, LTC = $1,037) by Year 3. Those with functional dentition at presentation were significantly less costly than those with 1-19 teeth, while edentulous patients demonstrated the lowest cost and utilization. Year in treatment, insurance type, dentition type, and problem-focused first exam were significantly associated with year-over-year cost change in both OP and LTC patients. Costs for providing comprehensive dental care in OP and LTC settings were similar, modest, and declined over time. Dentate patients with functional dentition and edentulous patients were less costly to treat. LTC patients had lower utilization than OP patients. Care patterns shifted over time to increased preventive care and decreased restorative care visits.

Since Medicare doesn’t cover most dental care, seniors often go without treatment.

Objectives. We estimated the use of preventive dental care services by the US Medicare population, and we assessed whether money spent on preventive dental care resulted in less money being spent on expensive nonpreventive procedures. Methods. We used data from the 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey to estimate a multinomial logistic model to analyze the influence of predisposing, enabling, and need variables in identifying those beneficiaries who used preventive dental care, only nonpreventive dental care, or no dental care in a multiple-variable context. We used regression models with similar controls to estimate the influence of preventive care on the utilization and cost of nonpreventive dental care and all dental care. Results. Our analyses showed that beneficiaries who used preventive dental care had more dental visits but fewer visits for expensive nonpreventive procedures and lower dental expenses than beneficiaries who saw the dentist only for treatment of oral problems. Conclusions. Adding dental coverage for preventive care to Medicare could pay off in terms of both improving the oral health of the elderly population and limiting the costs of expensive nonpreventive dental care for the dentate beneficiary population.

Societal changes, including the aging of the US population and the lack of routine dental service coverage under Medicare, have left many seniors unable to afford any dental care whatsoever, let alone the most advanced treatments. 1 In 2004, the Columbia University College of Dental Medicine and its partners instituted the ElderSmile program in the largely impoverished communities of Harlem and Washington Heights/Inwood in New York City. The long-term goal of this program is to improve access to and delivery of oral health care for seniors; the short-term goal is to establish and operate a network of prevention centers surrounding a limited number of treatment centers. Preliminary results indicate substantial unmet dental needs in this largely Hispanic and Black elderly population.

Objectives. We examined the effect of age, income, and coverage on dental service utilization during 1996. Methods. We used data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Results. Edentulous and poorer older adults are less likely to have coverage and less likely to report a dental visit than dentate or wealthier older adults. Conclusions. These analyses help to describe the needs of older adults as they cope with diminishing resources as a consequence of retirement, including persons previously accustomed to accessing oral health services with dental insurance.

The objective of this study was to investigate knowledge and perceptions of executive directors of long-term care facilities in a large western state regarding oral health of residents, barriers to the provision of optimal oral health care and the collaborative practice role for dental hygienists. A descriptive, exploratory online survey research design was utilized. A purposive sample of executive directors of long-term care facilities in a large western state certified for Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement was used. An online survey was developed to investigate perceptions and knowledge regarding oral health of long-term care residents, protocol for provision of, and barriers to optimal oral health care, and support for employment of dental hygienists in long-term care facilities. Statistics used for data analysis included frequency distributions, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney test. Executive directors in long-term care facilities included in the study perceived oral health as an important aspect of general health; however, a knowledge deficit was identified related to oral disease as an exacerbating factor to systemic disease. Financial concerns and low interest among residents/families were identified as major barriers to accessing care. Executive directors supported interprofessional practice of nurses working with dental hygienists to optimize oral health care of residents. No significant associations were found between demographics and facility characteristics. Awareness of the knowledge and perceptions of executive directors providing leadership in these facilities can provide avenues to creating needed change, which can foster improvement in the oral and overall health status of long-term care residents. Support for interprofessional work of nurses and dental hygienists can open a door for innovative practice that optimizes oral health care of long-term care facility residents through the application of shared expertise.

The purpose of this report was to use a particular clinical trial, the Preventive Geriatric Trial (PGT), as a starting point to discuss whether treatment efficacy can be evaluated by means of tooth mortality. In the PGT, 296 subjects were recruited and randomly assigned to five treatment groups: (1) usual procedures (UP); (2) UP + a cognitive-behavioral intervention (CB); (3) UP + CB + weekly chlorhexidine rinse (CHX); (4) UP + CB + CHX + semi-annual fluoride varnish (F); and (5) UP + CB + CHX + F + semi-annual prophylaxis, including scaling (P). Exploratory analyses revealed that tooth mortality after the 1st year was lower in treatment groups 3, 4, and 5 than in groups 1 and 2. A one-year exposure resulted in a 45% reduction in tooth mortality (p < 0.05); a two-year exposure resulted in a 59% reduction (p-value < 0.04). The PGT findings suggested that it is possible to design trials based on clinically relevant endpoints, such as tooth mortality. For the detection of moderate treatment effects, such trials could take the form of Large, Simple Trials (LST), where many subjects are recruited with minimally restrictive entry criteria, and data are collected only on essential baseline characteristics and tooth mortality. LSTs have provided \"reliable answers to important clinical questions\" for other chronic diseases, and several arguments suggest that they could play a similar critical role in dental research: (1) Periodontitis and caries are among the most common and costly chronic diseases affecting humans, and the identification of even moderately effective treatments by LSTs can have a large socio-economic impact; (2) the identification of low-cost widely practicable treatments that lend themselves to be investigated in LSTs is likely to benefit more people than the identification of high-cost complex treatments; and (3) tooth mortality is simple to assess and more relevant than the unvalidated surrogate endpoints that have largely failed for more than 20 years to provide reliable answers to certain controversial issues regarding treatment efficacy. The cost of not reliably establishing the safety and the efficacy of treatments may be far greater than the cost of conducting LSTs.

Examines challenges older people encounter in maintaining satisfactory oral health status. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.