Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
45
result(s) for
"Deterrence (Strategy) Case studies."
Sort by:
Nuclear strategy in the modern era : regional powers and international conflict
\"The world is in a second nuclear age in which regional powers play an increasingly prominent role. These states have small nuclear arsenals, often face multiple active conflicts, and sometimes have weak institutions. How do these nuclear states--and potential future ones--manage their nuclear forces and influence international conflict? Examining the reasoning and deterrence consequences of regional power nuclear strategies, this book demonstrates that these strategies matter greatly to international stability and it provides new insights into conflict dynamics across important areas of the world such as the Middle East, East Asia, and South Asia.Vipin Narang identifies the diversity of regional power nuclear strategies and describes in detail the posture each regional power has adopted over time. Developing a theory for the sources of regional power nuclear strategies, he offers the first systematic explanation of why states choose the postures they do and under what conditions they might shift strategies. Narang then analyzes the effects of these choices on a state's ability to deter conflict. Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis, he shows that, contrary to a bedrock article of faith in the canon of nuclear deterrence, the acquisition of nuclear weapons does not produce a uniform deterrent effect against opponents. Rather, some postures deter conflict more successfully than others. Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era considers the range of nuclear choices made by regional powers and the critical challenges they pose to modern international security\"-- Provided by publisher.
Book
Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era
The world is in a second nuclear age in which regional powers play an increasingly prominent role. These states have small nuclear arsenals, often face multiple active conflicts, and sometimes have weak institutions. How do these nuclear states-and potential future ones-manage their nuclear forces and influence international conflict? Examining the reasoning and deterrence consequences of regional power nuclear strategies, this book demonstrates that these strategies matter greatly to international stability and it provides new insights into conflict dynamics across important areas of the world such as the Middle East, East Asia, and South Asia.
Vipin Narang identifies the diversity of regional power nuclear strategies and describes in detail the posture each regional power has adopted over time. Developing a theory for the sources of regional power nuclear strategies, he offers the first systematic explanation of why states choose the postures they do and under what conditions they might shift strategies. Narang then analyzes the effects of these choices on a state's ability to deter conflict. Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis, he shows that, contrary to a bedrock article of faith in the canon of nuclear deterrence, the acquisition of nuclear weapons does not produce a uniform deterrent effect against opponents. Rather, some postures deter conflict more successfully than others.
Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Eraconsiders the range of nuclear choices made by regional powers and the critical challenges they pose to modern international security.
eBook
Conceal or Reveal?
International political outcomes are deeply shaped by the balance of power, but some military capabilities rely on secrecy to be effective. These “clandestine capabilities” pose problems for converting military advantages into political gains. If clandestine capabilities are revealed, adversaries may be able to take steps that attenuate the advantages they are supposed to provide. On the other hand, if these capabilities are not revealed, then adversaries will be unaware of, and unimpressed by, the real balance of power. Most of the existing literature emphasizes that states have few incentives to signal their clandestine capabilities. This conclusion deserves qualification: the condition of long-term peacetime competition can make signaling a profitable decision. Within this context, two important variables help determine whether a state will signal or conceal its secret capabilities: the uniqueness of the capability and the anticipated responsiveness of the adversary. An extended case study of Cold War strategic antisubmarine warfare confirms these predictions.
Journal Article
Failure Characteristics and Cooperative Control Strategies for Gob-Side Entry Driving near an Advancing Working Face: A Case Study
Gob-side entry driving near an advancing working face can improve the recovery rate of coal resources and keep the balance between mining and development. However, the large displacement of the gob-side entry caused by the mining dynamics of abutment pressure challenges the safety and processes of coal mining. This article takes the 15102 tailentry of Xizhang Coal Mine in Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, as an example to study the stability of the coal pillar and the failure characteristics of the surrounding rock and proposes cooperative control strategies of surrounding rock stability. Field tests indicated that when the coal pillar width was 15 m, the displacements of the entry floor, roof, coal pillar side, and solid coal side were 1121 mm, 601 mm, 783 mm, and 237 mm, respectively. A meticulously validated numerical model, incorporating a double-yield model for the gob materials and calibrated parameters, was developed to investigate the stress changes and yield zone distribution across the coal pillar with different sizes. The results of the simulation indicate that the influence range of the dynamic abutment pressure caused by mining in the upper section of gob-side entry driving is 30 m ahead and 70 m behind. When the coal pillar width increases from 7 m to 20 m, the internal stress of the coal pillar increases continuously, while the internal stress of the solid coal decreases continuously. It is estimated that the reasonable coal pillar width should be 7 m, which is subjected to a lower load. The cooperative control strategies comprising a narrow coal pillar, hydraulic fracturing roof cutting for pressure relief, and entry dynamic support were proposed and applied in the 15103 tailentry. The final displacements of the floor, roof, coal pillar side, and solid coal side were 66.01%, 62.06%, 61.05%, and 63.30% lower than that of the 15102 tailentry in the same period, respectively, which effectively controlled the stability of surrounding rock. In addition, this finding for the gob-side entry driving near an advancing working face in this study can potentially be applied to other similar projects.
Journal Article
Assessing the Potential of Punitive Measures in Deterring Economic Coercion: Advocating for the Efficacy of Anti-Coercion Instrument
Originality: This paper argues the effectiveness and feasibility of Anti Coercion Instrument, which just came in force in the end of December 2023. This paper thus has the forsseablity of deterring economic coercion by punishment.
Journal Article
Sound Matters: How Sonic Formations Shape the Nuclear Deterrence and Non-Proliferation Regimes
Abstract
Sound matters for international political sociology. Drawing upon literature from cultural geography and sound studies, we argue that sound contributes to political dynamics that are constitutive of world politics. To capture these dynamics, we offer a set of conceptual frameworks to analyze sound. First, we differentiate the concept of sound from noise and show the importance of doing so. Second, we introduce “sonic formations” as a means of capturing how sound contributes to world politics. Third, we make the case for analyzing sound's historicity, adaptability, relationality, and performativity (SHARP) in any given context. Fourth, using sonic formations and the SHARP framework, we examine an illustrative case study: the nuclear deterrence and non-proliferation regimes. By focusing on the role of sound in these regimes, our preliminary findings demonstrate the utility for the field of undertaking additional work to capture the wider significance of sound. This includes its contributions to shaping relations of power.
Journal Article
Bilateral Alliances in an Interconnected Cyber World: Cyber Deterrence and Operational Control in the US Indo-Pacific Strategy
During the Cold War, US extended deterrence commitments mostly focused on deterring nuclear or strategic conventional attacks against allies in Europe and Asia. In the decades following the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the emergence of new technologies and domains for conflict, particularly the cyber domain, prompted new thinking for alliance management and extended deterrence. In this article I explore how the system of US bilateral alliances and informal strategic groupings in the Indo-Pacific affects the crafting of allied cyber deterrence strategies in the region. Based on deterrence and alliance theory, I survey cyber threats faced by US allies and partners in the region and views of cyber deterrence to form a general framework of allied cyber deterrence strategy. The US-South Korea alliance is used as a case study for allied cyber deterrence strategy, with a special focus on the impact that South Korea assuming wartime operational control of allied military forces could have on cyber deterrence on the Korean Peninsula. Just as concepts of extended deterrence had to evolve, the cyber domain will force the United States and allies to reconceptualize peacetime and wartime operational control.
Journal Article
Elite–Public Gaps on Nuclear Weapons: The Roles of Salience and Knowledge
An explosion of survey experimental research shows that public support for nuclear use is alarmingly high and malleable. Thus, nuclear nonuse may depend on elite restraint. Can elites be counted on to resist nuclear use? How do national security elites think about nuclear weapons, and what does this imply for potential nuclear use and our understanding of public–elite gaps in political behavior? Drawing on the literature on public opinion formation, I argue that two features of public attitudes toward nuclear weapons help explain elite–public gaps on nuclear weapons: low salience and low knowledge. I then test this explanation using parallel preregistered survey experiments assessing support for nuclear use across three samples: the US public before the Ukraine conflict; the US public after the Ukraine conflict began; and a highly elite sample of US military officers and strategists, also after the Ukraine conflict began. While the US public is willing to support nuclear use, US national security elites are significantly more reluctant. Among the public, respondents for whom nuclear weapons are a high-knowledge or high-salience issue behave more like elites: they are less likely to support nuclear use. The findings have important implications for survey experimental research, scholarship on nuclear weapons, public opinion formation, and elite–public gaps in political behavior.
Journal Article
FRANCE’S NUCLEAR DEFENCE STRATEGY TOWARDS THE PROSPECTS FOR EUROPEAN NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
The crisis of multilateralism and the growing strategic and military rivalry be-tween superpowers is changing the stability and balance of forces in the world.The war in Ukraine has put nuclear weapons and their role in Europe’s defenceback at the centre of the security debate. To maintain its international positionand effectively protect its interests, France cannot afford to weaken its main as-set – nuclear deterrence forces. That is why President Emmanuel Macron hasannounced the maintenance of strategic autonomy and has also offered dialoguefor a greater role and participation of Europeans in common defence. The arti-cle focuses on France as a case study and examines the motivations of the Frenchauthorities to formulate a strong push for the Europeanisation of nuclear deter-rence based on French capabilities. The employment of historical and compara-tive methodology, comprising the analysis of document content, statements andofficial reports, augmented by interviews with experts and key policymakers, haspermitted the tracing of the evolution of the French nuclear deterrent. This pro-vides a research context for President Emmanuel Macron’s current policy and hisproposals relating to the role of French nuclear deterrence in Europe. The aim ofthis study is to analyse and explain the role of French nuclear deterrence forcesin creating a nuclear deterrent at a European level and promoting a nuclear cul-ture among European allies. This article, which explores how the French nucle-ar strategy is shaped by historical circumstances and current geopolitical needs,makes a threefold contribution to the literature: firstly, it discusses the historicalbackground to the development of the French doctrine of nuclear deterrence;secondly, it presents the main principles of the French nuclear deterrent; andthirdly, it demonstrates that France is not in a position to rapidly provide and extended nuclear deterrent for Europe but can make a significant contributionto the collective security of European Union states.
Journal Article