Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a secondary analysis comparing the effect of insulin glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin, added to metformin, on the incidences of microvascular complications and death, no material between-group differences were seen.

Inflammatory osteolysis is sine-qua-non of active Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) causing decreased foot bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. We aimed to explore the effect of anti-inflammatory or anti-resorptive agents for effect on foot bone mineral content (BMC) and consequent long-term outcomes of foot deformities, fractures and amputation. Forty-three patients with active CN (temperature difference >2°C from normal foot) were evaluated. Patients were off-loaded with total contact cast and randomized to receive either methylprednisolone (1gm) (group A), zoledronate (5mg) (group B) or placebo (100ml normal saline) (group C) once monthly infusion for three consecutive months. Change in foot BMC was assessed at 6 months or at remission and followed subsequently up to 4 years for the incidence of new-onset fracture, deformities, or CN recurrence. Thirty-six participants (24 male, 12 female) were randomized (11 in group A, 12 group B, 13 group C). The mean age was 57.7± 9.9 years, duration of diabetes 12.3± 5.8 years and symptom duration 6.5± 2.8 weeks. BMC increased by 36% with zoledronate (p = 0.02) but reduced by 13% with methylprednisolone (p = 0.03) and 9% (p = 0.09) with placebo at remission. There were no incident foot fractures, however, two patients sustained ulcers, and 3 had new-onset or worsening deformities and none required amputation during 3.36 ± 0.89 years of follow-up. Bisphosphonate for active CN is associated with an increase in foot bone mineral content as compared to decrease with steroids or total contact cast but long-term outcomes of foot deformities, ulceration and amputation are similar. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03289338.

Aims/Introduction This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, a novel, potent, selective ligand of the α2δ subunit of voltage‐dependent Ca2+ channels, for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Materials and Methods During this double‐blind, multisite, placebo‐controlled phase III study, Asian patients aged ≥20 years with type 1 or 2 diabetes and DPNP were randomized 2:1:1:1 to a placebo, mirogabalin 15, 20 or 30 mg/day for up to 14 weeks, with a 1‐ to 2‐week titration (NCT02318706). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14, defined as a weekly average of daily pain (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain, for the past 24 h). Results Of 834 randomized patients, 330, 164, 165 and 165 received placebo, mirogabalin 15, 20 or 30 mg/day, respectively, and were included in analyses (modified intention‐to‐treat population, n = 824); 755 (90.5%) completed the study. At week 14, the least squares mean average daily pain score change from baseline was −1.31, −1.34, −1.47 and −1.81, respectively, showing statistical significance for mirogabalin 30 mg/day versus placebo (P = 0.0027). The treatment‐emergent adverse events observed were mostly mild‐to‐moderate in all mirogabalin doses, and the most frequent treatment‐emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, somnolence, dizziness, peripheral edema and weight increase. Conclusions Mirogabalin relieved DPNP in a dose‐dependent manner; mirogabalin 30 mg/day showed statistically significant pain relief (vs placebo) in Asian DPNP patients. All doses of mirogabalin tested were well tolerated. Approximately 20–30% of patients with diabetes mellitus experience diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. This phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of mirogabalin, a ligand of the alpha2delta subunit, in Asian patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of perineural platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for pain and numbness alleviation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Study Design A randomized prospective clinical trial. Setting Pain clinic and Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Departments, Assiut University Hospital. Methods Sixty adult patients with type II DM accompanied by DPN of at least six months’ duration were assessed by modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS) and randomly allocated into two groups. Group I underwent ultrasound-guided perineural PRP injection and medical treatment, and Group II received medical treatment only. Patients were followed up at months 1, 3, and 6 with regard to pain and numbness visual analog scale (VAS) and mTCNS scores. Results Significant improvement was recorded in pain and numbness VAS scale scores in group I vs group II (P ≤ 0.001 during the whole study period for both parameters); at the same time, mTCNS improved in group I in comparison with group II with P = 0.01, 0.001, and <0.001 at months 1, 3, and 6, respectively. Conclusions Perineural PRP injection is an effective therapy for alleviation of diabetic neuropathy pain and numbness and enhancement of peripheral nerve function.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of Superoxide Dismutase, Alpha Lipoic Acid, Acetyl L-Carnitine, and Vitamin B12 (B12) in one tablet in Diabetic Neuropathy (DN). Patients–methods: In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 85 patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DMT2) were randomly assigned, either to receive the combination of four elements (active group, n = 43), or placebo (n = 42) for 12 months. We used the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Examination (MNSIQ and MNSIE), measured the vibration perception threshold (BIO), and Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests (CARTs). Nerve function was assessed by DPN Check [sural nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and amplitude (SNAP)]. Pain (PS) and quality of life (QL) questionnaires were administered. Results: At follow-up, BIO, MNSIQ, QL, PAIN, and SNCV, SNAP, and B12 levels had significantly improved inactive group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.031, and p < 0.001 respectively), whereas the inplacebo group MCR (mean circular resultant) and PAIN deteriorated (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The changes in MNSIQ, QL, SNCV, BIO, and PAIN differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.031, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively). Conclusions: The combination of the four elements in one tablet for 12 months in patients with DMT2 improved all indices of peripheral neuropathy, including SNAP and SNCV, pain, and Quality of Life perception, except CARTs and MNSIE.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) parameter that best identifies diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) in type 1 diabetes and to describe its performance characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Concurrent with clinical and electrophysiological examination for classification of DSP, CCM was performed on 89 type 1 diabetic and 64 healthy subjects to determine corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), density, tortuosity, and branch density. Area under the curve (AUC) and optimal thresholds for DSP identification in those with diabetes were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: DSP was present in 33 (37%) subjects. With the exception of tortuosity, CCM parameters were significantly lower in DSP case subjects. In ROC curve analysis, AUC was greatest for CNFL (0.88) compared with fiber density (0.84, P = 0.0001), branch density (0.73, P < 0.0001), and tortuosity (0.55, P < 0.0001). The threshold value that optimized sensitivity and specificity for ruling in DSP was a CNFL of ≤14.0 mm/mm2 (sensitivity 85%, specificity 84%), associated with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 5.3 and 0.18. An alternate approach that used separate threshold values maximized sensitivity (threshold value ≥15.8 mm/mm2, sensitivity 91%, negative likelihood ratio 0.16) and specificity (≤11.5 mm/mm2, specificity 93%, positive likelihood ratio 8.5). CONCLUSIONS: Among CCM parameters, CNFL best discriminated DSP cases from control subjects. A single threshold offers clinically acceptable operating characteristics, although a strategy that uses separate thresholds to respectively rule in and rule out DSP has excellent performance while minimizing unclassified subjects. We hypothesize that values between these thresholds indicate incipient nerve injury that represents those individuals at future neuropathy risk.

Abstract Objective Existing pharmacologic approaches for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) are limited in efficacy and have side effects. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of group acupuncture for PDN. Design and Setting We randomized patients with PDN from a public safety net hospital to 1) usual care, 2) usual care plus 12 weeks of group acupuncture once weekly, or 3) usual care plus 12 weeks of group acupuncture twice weekly. Methods The primary outcome was change in weekly pain intensity (daily 0–10 numerical rating scale [NRS] averaged over seven days) from baseline to week 12. We also assessed health-related quality of life and related symptoms at baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 18. Results We enrolled 40 patients with PDN (baseline pain = 5.3). Among participants randomized to acupuncture, 92% attended at least one treatment (mean treatments = 10.1). We observed no significant differences between once- vs twice-weekly acupuncture and combined those groups for the main analyses. Compared with usual care, participants randomized to acupuncture experienced greater decreases in pain during the 12-week intervention period (between-group differences from baseline = –2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = –3.01 to –1.10), but benefits were not maintained after acupuncture ended (baseline to week 18 = –0.61, 95% CI = –1.46 to 0.24). Quality of life improved for acupuncture participants (baseline to week 12 difference = 11.79, 95% CI = 1.92 to 21.66), but group differences were not significant compared with usual care (25.58, 95% CI = –3.90 to 55.06). Conclusions Group acupuncture is feasible and acceptable among linguistically and racially diverse safety net patients. Findings suggest clinically relevant reduction in pain from PDN and quality of life improvements associated with acupuncture, with no differences based on frequency.

Background Previous studies have shown that increasing body mass index (BMI) was associated with decreased hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes, but it remains uncertain whether this finding could be applied to patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN). Methods The study included 7789 participants with type 2 diabetes from action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) trail. CAN was defined as SDNN < 8.2 ms and RMSSD < 8.0 ms. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Outcomes were identified as severe hypoglycemia requiring any assistance (HAA) or requiring medical assistance (HMA). We assessed the association between obesity and severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes with or without CAN using COX regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics. Results Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, a total of 893 participants developed HAA and 584 participants developed HMA. Compared with non-obesity, obesity was associated with lower risk of severe hypoglycemia (HAA: hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.68, P  < 0.001; HMA: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40–0.82, P  = 0.002) in CAN present group, but not in CAN absent group (HAA: HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P  = 0.830; HMA: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79–1.19, P  = 0.754). Similarly, increasing BMI was associated with reduced severe hypoglycemic events in participants with CAN, but not in participants without CAN. Conclusions CAN modifies the association between obesity and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetic individuals with CAN who are under weight control should pay attention to hypoglycemic events. Trial registry http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00000620.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes that affects approximately half of the diabetic population. Up to 53% of DPN patients experience neuropathic pain, which leads to a reduction in the quality of life and work productivity. Tocotrienols have been shown to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties in preclinical and clinical studies. This study aimed to investigate the effects of tocotrienol-rich vitamin E (Tocovid SuprabioTM) on nerve conduction parameters and serum biomarkers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A total of 88 patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of Tocovid twice daily, or a matching placebo for 12 months. Fasting blood samples were collected for measurements of HbA1c, renal profile, lipid profile, and biomarkers. A nerve conduction study (NCS) was performed on all patients at baseline and subsequently at 2, 6, 12 months. Patients were reassessed after 6 months of washout. After 12 months of supplementation, patients in the Tocovid group exhibited highly significant improvements in conduction velocity (CV) of both median and sural sensory nerves as compared to those in the placebo group. The between-intervention-group differences (treatment effects) in CV were 1.60 m/s (95% CI: 0.70, 2.40) for the median nerve and 2.10 m/s (95% CI: 1.50, 2.90) for the sural nerve. A significant difference in peak velocity (PV) was also observed in the sural nerve (2.10 m/s; 95% CI: 1.00, 3.20) after 12 months. Significant improvements in CV were only observed up to 6 months in the tibial motor nerve, 1.30 m/s (95% CI: 0.60, 2.20). There were no significant changes in serum biomarkers, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFβ-1), or vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). After 6 months of washout, there were no significant differences from baseline between groups in nerve conduction parameters of all three nerves. Tocovid at 400 mg/day significantly improve tibial motor nerve CV up to 6 months, but median and sural sensory nerve CV in up to 12 months of supplementation. All improvements diminished after 6 months of washout.

IntroductionCardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a serious, untreatable complication of diabetes that contributes to excess cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. CAN is associated with increased fibrosis and inflammation, possibly driven by increased sympathetic activity and overactive mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs). These may represent a potential therapeutic target. MR antagonists (MRAs) improve autonomic function in non-diabetic diseases, and finerenone, a non-steroidal MRA, has demonstrated promising results in managing diabetic kidney disease and cardiovascular complications, suggesting its potential as a novel therapy for early-stage CAN. This trial aims to evaluate whether daily administration of finerenone can modify the disease progression of early-stage CAN.Methods and analysisThis trial is a two-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, 1:1 randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of 78 weeks of intervention with finerenone or placebo on early-stage CAN in 100 individuals with type 2 diabetes in Denmark. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in the expiration:inspiration ratio of the cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs). Secondary endpoints are the between-group differences in the remaining CARTs, heart rate variability measures and fibrosis markers. Treatment effects on other forms of neuropathy and related pathological mechanisms will be explored.Ethics and disseminationThe study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Counsil for Harmonisation good clinical practice guidelines, with ethics approval obtained from the Danish Medical Research Ethics Committee. All participants will provide written informed consent. Due to the risk of hyperkalaemia associated with finerenone, safety will be closely monitored throughout the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and clinical trial registries. A lay summary will be provided to participants on study completion.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06906081; registration date: 25 March 2025. Clinical Trials Information System: EUCT no. 2024-516597-30-00; registration date: 3 September 2024.