Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background/aimsTo evaluate the long-term effects of treat-and-extend dosing of ranibizumab with and without navigated focal laser for diabetic macular oedema (DME).MethodsThis is a multicentre, randomised clinical trial where 150 eyes were randomised into three cohorts; Monthly (n=30), TReat and EXtend without macular laser photocoagulation (TREX; n=60), and treat and extend with angiography-GuIded macular LAser photocoagulation (GILA; n=60). During the first 2 years, eyes either received ranibizumab 0.3 mg every 4 weeks or underwent treat-and-extend ranibizumab with or without angiography-guided laser therapy. In the third year, all eyes were treated as needed with ranibizumab for >5 letters vision loss or if the central retinal thickness (CRT) was >325 µm, and all eyes were eligible to receive focal laser.Results109 eyes (73%) completed the 3-year end-point. At week 156, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT improved by 6.9, 9.7, 9.5 letters (p=0.60) and 129, 138, 165 µm (p=0.39), in the Monthly, TREX and GILA cohorts, respectively. These improvements were reached prior to week 104 and no significant changes occurred from week 104 to week 156 (BCVA: p=0.34; CRT: p=0.36). The mean number of injections in the third year was 3.0, 3.1, and 2.4 in the Monthly, TREX and GILA cohorts, respectively (p=0.56). 86 eyes (79%) required at least one ranibizumab injection in the third year.ConclusionThe improvements achieved after 2 years of treat-and-extend ranibizumab for DME were maintained in the third year with a mean of 3 intravitreal injections.Trial registration numberFDA IND 119146, NCT01934556.

Purpose To report the outcome of adjunctive intravitreal dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implantation in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and retinal detachment (RD) undergoing vitrectomy and silicone oil (SO) tamponade. Design A one-year, single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods A total of 30 people (34 eyes) with PDR and RD who need vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade were randomly assigned as 1:1 to study group and control group. Eyes in study group were injected with Ozurdex after vitrectomy and just before silicone oil tamponade. Primary outcome was the changes of epiretinal proliferative membranes area from 1 month to 12 months after the first operation. Anatomical and functional outcomes were also assessed during follow-up. Results There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of preretinal proliferation progression from 1-month to 12-months follow-up in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (23.5% vs. 88.2%, p=0.000). The area of preretinal proliferation in the study group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months follow-up and this difference increased with the prolongation of follow-up time. During the follow-up period, the incidence of macular epiretinal membrane in the study group (11.8%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (41.2%) (p=0.024). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between the two groups only showed a significant difference at 12-months follow-up, with better BCVA in study group (0.61±0.70 logMAR) than in the control group (1.02±1.00 logMAR) (p=0.024). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) of the study group at 1 and 6 months were 225.9 ± 106.9 µm and 223.0±118.9 µm respectively which was significantly lower than that of the control group (450.8 ± 301.4 µm and 275.5±131.9 µm, p=0.008 and 0.024, respectively). Conclusion In patients with proliferative diabetes retinopathy complicated with retinal detachment, the combination of vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade and dexamethasone implantation can reduce the incidence of preretinal proliferative membrane and macular epiretinal membrane and improve the visual outcome during 1 year follow-up.

Vitreous hemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy can cause severe vision loss. DRCR Retina Network Protocol AB was a randomized clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept versus vitrectomy with panretinal photocoagulation and found no difference in the average rate of visual recovery over 104 weeks. Herein, we describe patient-reported outcome measures from Protocol AB. Secondary analysis of a multicenter (39 sites) randomized clinical trial. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire was administered at 4, 12, 24, 36, 52, 68, 84, and 104 weeks. Main outcomes were mean change in activity impairment and work productivity loss over 24 and 104 weeks (area under the curve). Mean (SD) activity impairment at baseline was 58% (27%) in the aflibercept group (N = 99) and 56% (30%) in the vitrectomy group (N = 105). The mean reduction in activity impairment from baseline over 24 weeks was 21% (25%) in the aflibercept group and 27% (31%) in the vitrectomy group (adjusted difference = -6.8% [95% CI, -12.7% to -0.9%], P = .02); over 104 weeks, the adjusted mean difference was -3.1% (95% CI, -9.2% to 3.0%, P = .31). Mean work productivity loss at baseline was 51% (28%) in the aflibercept group (N = 44) and 58% (30%) in the vitrectomy group (N = 43). The mean reduction in work productivity loss from baseline over 24 weeks (area under the curve) was 19% (23%) in the aflibercept group and 31% (24%) in the vitrectomy group (adjusted difference = -8.3% [95% CI, -16.8% to 0.2%], P = .06); over 104 weeks, the adjusted mean difference was -9.1% (95% CI, -18.4% to 0.2%, P = .05). Participants with vitreous hemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy had less activity impairment over 24 weeks when treated initially with vitrectomy and panretinal photocoagulation versus intravitreal aflibercept. The trend was similar for work productivity but not statistically significant. By 104 weeks, the improvements were similar in the two treatment groups. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02858076.

Background At present, intraocular injection of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) drugs has replaced traditional laser therapy as the first-line treatment for DME (diabetic macular edema). However, ranibizumab, a commonly used anti-VEGF drug, is expensive and requires multiple intraocular injections. It places a heavy economic burden on patients with DME. Micropulse laser is safer than conventional laser and can reduce edema. Combined treatment with anti-VEGF may reduce the number of intraocular injections. This study will compare the efficacy of micropulse laser combined with ranibizumab treatment to ranibizumab monotherapy in the treatment of DME, providing a new regimen for future DME treatment. Methods This study is a prospective randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial (RCT) in patients with DME. After 1-year follow-up, visual acuity and macular edema regression will be compared between micropulse laser combined with ranibizumab group and ranibizumab monotherapy group to determine whether the efficacy of micropulse laser combined with ranibizumab treatment was not lower than that of ranibizumab monotherapy in the treatment of DME. Visual acuity measured by the ETDRS chart is the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures are CMT (central macular thickness) measured by OCT (optical coherence tomography) and the number of injections of two groups. Changes in visual acuity and CMT of the two groups will be compared at 12-month follow-up. Before patients are recruited, we provide them with informed consent, in which we explain to them the purpose and process of the study. Discussion Micropulse laser combined with anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of DME can reduce the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, not only relieve the pain of the patients, but also ease the economic and psychological burden of patients, bringing great benefits. However, there is no treatment consensus for the parameters and specific methods of micropulse laser treatment for DME. There is a lack of clinical research data reference of micropulse laser combined with anti-VEGF therapy in clinical practice. This study intends to provide a new direction for clinical DME treatment and also provide a realistic consideration for the application of micropulse laser in DME treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03690947. Registered on 1 October 2018.

Background To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injection with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus early vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Methods Prospective, randomized study that included 34 eyes with diabetic VH. They were divided into two groups, Group Ι (17 eyes) received three successive IVA injections followed by PRP and group ΙΙ (17 eyes) for whom early vitrectomy was done. Follow up was carried out after one, two, three, six and nine months. The primary outcome measure was change in the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after nine months, secondary outcome measures were mean duration of clearance of VH and rate of recurrent hemorrhage with any additional treatment in both groups. Complications were reported. Results There was no statistically significant difference regarding initial demographic criteria between both groups. The mean final log MAR BCVA was statistically better than the initial BCVA in both groups (0.51 ± 0.20, 1.17 ± 0.48 for group I and 0.48 ± 0.18, 1.44 ± 0.44 for group II, P  < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the mean final Log Mar BCVA (0.51 ± 0.20 for group I, 0.48 ± 0.18 for group II, p  ≥ 0.05), the mean duration of clearance of VH was 7.8 ± 1.8 weeks, 5 days for group I and II respectively. PRP was completely done for all eyes in group I after three months. The difference in the recurrence rate between group I (29.4%) and group II (11.8%) was statistically significant ( p  < 0.05). Vitrectomy was done for three eyes (17.6%) due to recurrent non-resolving VH in group I. late recurrent VH occurred in two eyes (11.8%) in group II, IVA was given with complete clearance of the hemorrhage. No vision threatening complications were reported in both groups. Conclusion Both intravitreal injection of aflibercept followed by PRP and early vitrectomy are effective and safe modalities for treatment of diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Early vitrectomy leads to faster vision gain with less incidence of recurrence than intravitreal injection. Trial registration Randomized clinical trial under the number of NCT04153253 on November 6, 2019 “Retrospectively registered”.

Background Multiple modifiable risk factors for late complications in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), including hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia, increase the risk of a poor outcome. DKD is associated with a very high cardiovascular risk, which requires simultaneous treatment of these risk factors by implementing an intensified multifactorial treatment approach. However, the efficacy of a multifactorial intervention on major fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events (MACEs) in DKD patients has been poorly investigated. Methods Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is a multicentre, cluster-randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolling 395 DKD patients with albuminuria, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and negative history of CV events in 14 Italian diabetology clinics. Centres were randomly assigned to either Standard-of-Care (SoC) (n = 188) or multifactorial intensive therapy (MT, n = 207) of main cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg, glycated haemoglobin < 7%, LDL, HDL and total cholesterol < 100 mg/dL, > 40/50 mg/dL for men/women and < 175 mg/dL, respectively). Primary endpoint was MACEs occurrence by end of follow-up phase. Secondary endpoints included single components of primary endpoint and all-cause death. Results At the end of intervention period (median 3.84 and 3.40 years in MT and SoC group, respectively), targets achievement was significantly higher in MT. During 13.0 years (IQR 12.4–13.3) of follow-up, 262 MACEs were recorded (116 in MT vs. 146 in SoC). The adjusted Cox shared-frailty model demonstrated 53% lower risk of MACEs in MT arm (adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.30–0.74, P  =  0.001 ). Similarly, all-cause death risk was 47% lower (adjusted HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29–0.93, P  =  0.027 ). Conclusion MT induces a remarkable benefit on the risk of MACEs and mortality in high-risk DKD patients. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925

Purpose To compare the effect on contrast sensitivity (CS) measurements of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) associated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections versus PRP alone in high risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR). Design Prospective, randomised, masked, controlled trial. Participants 42 patients with HR-PDR with visual acuity ≥20/200. Methods Eyes were randomised to one of two groups: one underwent PRP and IVB injections (study group) and the other PRP alone (control group). PRP was performed three times during the study and IVB injection was administered twice. Main outcome measures Mean change in CS threshold scores between and within groups, from baseline to 6 months. Results Seven patients presented with vitreous haemorrhage and were removed from the study. Mean results for CS threshold (at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) frequencies) for patients with and without diabetic macular oedema showed no significant differences (p>0.05 for all comparisons) between the two groups. In 35 eyes in the control group, compared with baseline values, there was significant worsening (p<0.05) of CS at 1.5, 12 and 18 cpd after 1 month, at 12 cpd after 3 months, and at 6 and 12 cpd after 6 months. In the study group, there was significant improvement in CS at 3 cpd, 3 months after treatment. Conclusions In eyes with HR-PDR, PRP treatment is associated with deterioration of CS while adjuvant use of bevacizumab prevents such deterioration. CS evaluation seems to support the adjuvant use of bevacizumab when using PRP for the treatment of HR-PDR. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT 01389505.

Diabetic retinopathy is a common and specific microvascular complication of diabetes, and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It is identified in a third of people with diabetes and associated with increased risk of life-threatening systemic vascular complications, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Optimum control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and possibly blood lipids remains the foundation for reduction of risk of retinopathy development and progression. Timely laser therapy is effective for preservation of sight in proliferative retinopathy and macular oedema, but its ability to reverse visual loss is poor. Vitrectomy surgery might occasionally be needed for advanced retinopathy. New therapies, such as intraocular injection of steroids and antivascular endothelial growth-factor agents, are less destructive to the retina than are older therapies, and could be useful in patients who respond poorly to conventional therapy. The outlook for future treatment modalities, such as inhibition of other angiogenic factors, regenerative therapy, and topical therapy, is promising.