Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Multiple modifiable risk factors for late complications in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), including hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia, increase the risk of a poor outcome. DKD is associated with a very high cardiovascular risk, which requires simultaneous treatment of these risk factors by implementing an intensified multifactorial treatment approach. However, the efficacy of a multifactorial intervention on major fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events (MACEs) in DKD patients has been poorly investigated. Methods Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is a multicentre, cluster-randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolling 395 DKD patients with albuminuria, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and negative history of CV events in 14 Italian diabetology clinics. Centres were randomly assigned to either Standard-of-Care (SoC) (n = 188) or multifactorial intensive therapy (MT, n = 207) of main cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg, glycated haemoglobin < 7%, LDL, HDL and total cholesterol < 100 mg/dL, > 40/50 mg/dL for men/women and < 175 mg/dL, respectively). Primary endpoint was MACEs occurrence by end of follow-up phase. Secondary endpoints included single components of primary endpoint and all-cause death. Results At the end of intervention period (median 3.84 and 3.40 years in MT and SoC group, respectively), targets achievement was significantly higher in MT. During 13.0 years (IQR 12.4–13.3) of follow-up, 262 MACEs were recorded (116 in MT vs. 146 in SoC). The adjusted Cox shared-frailty model demonstrated 53% lower risk of MACEs in MT arm (adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.30–0.74, P  =  0.001 ). Similarly, all-cause death risk was 47% lower (adjusted HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29–0.93, P  =  0.027 ). Conclusion MT induces a remarkable benefit on the risk of MACEs and mortality in high-risk DKD patients. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925

Diabetic retinopathy is a common and specific microvascular complication of diabetes, and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It is identified in a third of people with diabetes and associated with increased risk of life-threatening systemic vascular complications, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Optimum control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and possibly blood lipids remains the foundation for reduction of risk of retinopathy development and progression. Timely laser therapy is effective for preservation of sight in proliferative retinopathy and macular oedema, but its ability to reverse visual loss is poor. Vitrectomy surgery might occasionally be needed for advanced retinopathy. New therapies, such as intraocular injection of steroids and antivascular endothelial growth-factor agents, are less destructive to the retina than are older therapies, and could be useful in patients who respond poorly to conventional therapy. The outlook for future treatment modalities, such as inhibition of other angiogenic factors, regenerative therapy, and topical therapy, is promising.

Aims/hypothesesWe aimed to quantify the association of individual circulating amino acids with macrovascular disease, microvascular disease and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes.MethodsWe performed a case-cohort study (N = 3587), including 655 macrovascular events, 342 microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy) and 632 all-cause mortality events during follow-up, in a secondary analysis of the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study. For this study, phenylalanine, isoleucine, glutamine, leucine, alanine, tyrosine, histidine and valine were measured in stored plasma samples by proton NMR metabolomics. Hazard ratios were modelled per SD increase in each amino acid.ResultsIn models investigating associations and potential mechanisms, after adjusting for age, sex and randomised treatment, phenylalanine was positively, and histidine inversely, associated with macrovascular disease risk. These associations were attenuated to the null on further adjustment for extended classical risk factors (including eGFR and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio). After adjustment for extended classical risk factors, higher tyrosine and alanine levels were associated with decreased risk of microvascular disease (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67, 0.91 and HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76, 0.98, respectively). Higher leucine (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.90), histidine (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81, 0.99) and valine (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70, 0.88) levels were associated with lower risk of mortality. Investigating the predictive ability of amino acids, addition of all amino acids to a risk score modestly improved classification of participants for macrovascular (continuous net reclassification index [NRI] +35.5%, p < 0.001) and microvascular events (continuous NRI +14.4%, p = 0.012).Conclusions/interpretationWe report distinct associations between circulating amino acids and risk of different major complications of diabetes. Low tyrosine appears to be a marker of microvascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes independently of fundamental markers of kidney function.

Purpose To report the outcome of adjunctive intravitreal dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implantation in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and retinal detachment (RD) undergoing vitrectomy and silicone oil (SO) tamponade. Design A one-year, single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods A total of 30 people (34 eyes) with PDR and RD who need vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade were randomly assigned as 1:1 to study group and control group. Eyes in study group were injected with Ozurdex after vitrectomy and just before silicone oil tamponade. Primary outcome was the changes of epiretinal proliferative membranes area from 1 month to 12 months after the first operation. Anatomical and functional outcomes were also assessed during follow-up. Results There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of preretinal proliferation progression from 1-month to 12-months follow-up in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (23.5% vs. 88.2%, p=0.000). The area of preretinal proliferation in the study group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months follow-up and this difference increased with the prolongation of follow-up time. During the follow-up period, the incidence of macular epiretinal membrane in the study group (11.8%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (41.2%) (p=0.024). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between the two groups only showed a significant difference at 12-months follow-up, with better BCVA in study group (0.61±0.70 logMAR) than in the control group (1.02±1.00 logMAR) (p=0.024). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) of the study group at 1 and 6 months were 225.9 ± 106.9 µm and 223.0±118.9 µm respectively which was significantly lower than that of the control group (450.8 ± 301.4 µm and 275.5±131.9 µm, p=0.008 and 0.024, respectively). Conclusion In patients with proliferative diabetes retinopathy complicated with retinal detachment, the combination of vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade and dexamethasone implantation can reduce the incidence of preretinal proliferative membrane and macular epiretinal membrane and improve the visual outcome during 1 year follow-up.

To reduce treatment burden and optimise patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema, we present 1-year results from two phase 3 trials of faricimab, a novel angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A bispecific antibody. YOSEMITE and RHINE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 353 sites worldwide. Adults with vision loss due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6·0 mg per personalised treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks up to week 100. PTI dosing intervals were extended, maintained, or reduced (every 4 weeks up to every 16 weeks) based on disease activity at active dosing visits. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population (non-inferiority margin 4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); safety analyses included patients with at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (YOSEMITE NCT03622580 and RHINE NCT03622593). 3247 patients were screened for eligibility in YOSEMITE (n=1532) and RHINE (n=1715). After exclusions, 940 patients were enrolled into YOSEMITE between Sept 5, 2018, and Sept 19, 2019, and 951 patients were enrolled into RHINE between Oct 9, 2018, and Sept 20, 2019. These 1891 patients were randomly assigned to faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=315, RHINE n=317), faricimab PTI (n=313, n=319), or aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=312, n=315). Non-inferiority for the primary endpoint was achieved with faricimab every 8 weeks (adjusted mean vs aflibercept every 8 weeks in YOSEMITE 10·7 ETDRS letters [97·52% CI 9·4 to 12·0] vs 10·9 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 12·2], difference −0·2 ETDRS letters [−2·0 to 1·6]; RHINE 11·8 ETDRS letters [10·6 to 13·0] vs 10·3 ETDRS letters [9·1 to 11·4] letters, difference 1·5 ETDRS letters [−0·1 to 3·2]) and faricimab PTI (YOSEMITE 11·6 ETDRS letters [10·3 to 12·9], difference 0·7 ETDRS letters [−1·1 to 2·5]; RHINE 10·8 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 11·9], difference 0·5 ETDRS letters [−1·1 to 2·1]). Incidence of ocular adverse events was comparable between faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=98 [31%], RHINE n=137 [43%]), faricimab PTI (n=106 [34%], n=119 [37%]), and aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=102 [33%], n=113 [36%]). Robust vision gains and anatomical improvements with faricimab were achieved with adjustable dosing up to every 16 weeks, demonstrating the potential for faricimab to extend the durability of treatment for patients with diabetic macular oedema. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

PurposeTo demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) versus laser photocoagulation for the treatment of Chinese patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsREFINE was a phase III, 12-month, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled study in patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with DME. Patients were randomized 4:1 to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg or laser dosing regimen. Efficacy was evaluated as mean average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from Months 1 to 12 versus baseline (primary endpoint), anatomical outcomes, treatment exposure, and safety were also assessed.ResultsRanibizumab was statistically superior (p < 0.001) to laser treatment, with a mean average BCVA gain of 6.8 letters (ranibizumab) over 12 months versus 1.1 letters (laser). At Month 12, mean BCVA gain was 7.8 letters (ranibizumab) and 2.5 letters (laser) from baseline. Patients in the ranibizumab arm received a mean number of 7.9 intravitreal injections, whereas those in the laser arm received a mean of 2.1 treatments. There were no new safety signals.ConclusionRanibizumab 0.5 mg PRN demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful treatment effect versus laser and was well tolerated in Chinese patients with visual impairment due to DME over 12 months.

ObjectiveTo compare different doses and dosing regimens of RC28-E, a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), with conbercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).DesignProspective, randomised, active comparator-controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 clinical trial.centeParticipantsThe trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with centre-involving DME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 73 to 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, and central subfield thickness (CST) of 300 µm or more.MethodsPatients were assigned randomly to one of five treatment regimens: 1.0 mg RC28-E for three initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks (1.0mgQ8); 1.0 mg RC28-E for five initial monthly doses and then on a pro re nata (PRN) basis (1.0mgPRN); 2.0 mg RC28-E for three initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks (2.0mgQ8); 2.0 mg RC28-E for five initial monthly doses and then on a PRN basis (2.0mgPRN); or 0.5 mg conbercept for three initial monthly doses and then on a PRN basis. Assessments were made at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter.Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the change in BCVA compared with baseline at 24 and 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the change in CST from baseline at 52 weeks; the proportion of patients who gained/lost ≥15 letters, ≥10 letters and >0 letter in BCVA; and the number of injections and safety outcomes.ResultsThe trial enrolled 156 patients. Mean improvements in BCVA in the RC28-E groups at week 24 were 7.1, 11.0, 7.4 and 10.5 letters for 1.0mgQ8, 1.0mgPRN, 2.0mgQ8 and 2.0mgPRN regimens, respectively, versus 9.7 letters for the conbercept group (p=0.146). By week 52, the RC28-E groups exhibited respective mean BCVA enhancements of 5.5, 9.5, 9.2 and 9.7 letters, compared with 8.4 letters of the conbercept group (p=0.469). Mean reductions in CST in the RC28-E groups at week 52 were −163.2 µm, −136.9 µm, −142.5 µm and −153.6 µm, versus −160.7 µm for the conbercept group (p=0.948). The Per Protocol Set analysis indicated that at 24 weeks, the BCVA improvement in the 2.0mgPRN group was significantly greater than that in the conbercept group (14.0 vs 9.8, p=0.019). In patients with poor baseline glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5%), the 2.0mgPRN group showed greater BCVA improvement than the conbercept group (14.4 vs 4.2, p=0.039) at week 52. During the maintenance phase, the 2.0mgPRN group had fewer injections (2.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.7) compared with the conbercept group (4.4, 95% CI 3.5 to 5.2). RC28-E was generally well tolerated. The incidence of ocular adverse events in study eyes was comparable between RC28-E groups (22.6% in 1.0mgQ8 group, 26.7% in 1.0mgPRN group, 34.4% in 2.0mgQ8 group, 25.0% in 2.0 mg PRN group) and conbercept group (32.3%). The number of ocular serious adverse events was 1 (1.0mgQ8), 0 (1.0mgPRN), 1 (2.0mgQ8), 2 (2.0mgPRN) and 0 (conbercept).ConclusionsIntravitreous RC28-E improved BCVA and CST in eyes with centre-involved DME. Compared with conbercept, the 2.0mgPRN regimen of RC28-E was recommended due to its superior efficacy in improving vision particularly for patients with poor glycaemic control, fewer treatment injections during the maintenance phase and comparable safety profile.Trial registration number NCT04782115.

Background Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) often leads to tractional retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage, requiring vitrectomy. Poor visual outcomes are commonly caused by macular edema and proliferative vitreous retinopathy after vitrectomy. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant has shown promise in improving visual function after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema, but its role in vitrectomy for PDR treatment remains unexplored. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of vitrectomy combined with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant for PDR patients. Methods We will design a single-mask, randomized controlled trial with 100 participants diagnosed with PDR requiring vitrectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Ozurdex (0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implant) group or the control group. The dexamethasone implant group will undergo vitrectomy combined with 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implant, while the control group will undergo vitrectomy alone. A single surgeon will perform all the vitrectomy surgeries, and the choice of intravitreal dexamethasone implant treatment will be disclosed before the closure of scleral wounds. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post-vitrectomy. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be conducted using R software. A p value 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The analysis methods will include the following: visual acuity and OCT measurements will be analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with two-tailed tests; rates of visual improvement, visual decline, postoperative vitreous hemorrhage, elevated intraocular pressure, and postoperative retinal detachment will be analyzed using chi-square tests with two-tailed tests. Logistic regression analysis will be used to analyze risk factors for poor visual prognosis, neovascular glaucoma development, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurrence. Discussion This protocol aims to enhance our understanding of the effects of combining an intravitreal Ozurdex 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant with vitrectomy on visual outcomes and macular morphology changes in treating late complications of PDR. Trial registration The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on May 11, 2022, with registration number ChiCTR2200059760.

Aims: Recent trials provide conflicting results on the association between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). The aim of the AngioSafe type 2 diabetes (T2D) study was to determine the role of GLP-1RA in angiogenesis using clinical and preclinical models.Methods: We performed two studies in humans. In study 1, we investigated the effect of GLP-1RA exposure from T2D diagnosis on the severity of DR, as diagnosed with retinal imaging (fundus photography). In study 2, a randomized 4-week trial, we assessed the effect of liraglutide on circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), and angio-miRNAs. We then studied the experimental effect of Exendin-4, on key steps of angiogenesis: in vitro on human endothelial cell proliferation, survival and three-dimensional vascular morphogenesis; and in vivo on ischemia-induced neovascularization of the retina in mice.Results: In the cohort of 3154 T2D patients, 10% displayed severe DR. In multivariate analysis, sex, disease duration, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), micro- and macroangiopathy, insulin therapy and hypertension remained strongly associated with severe DR, while no association was found with GLP-1RA exposure (o 1.139 [0.800-1.622], P = .47). We further showed no effect of liraglutide on HPCs, and angio-miRNAs. In vitro, we demonstrated that exendin-4 had no effect on proliferation and survival of human endothelial cells, no effect on total length and number of capillaries. Finally, in vivo, we showed that exendin-4 did not exert any negative effect on retinal neovascularization.Conclusions: The AngioSafe T2D studies provide experimental and clinical data confirming no effect of GLP-1RA on angiogenesis and no association between GLP-1 exposure and severe DR.

Despite progress in the treatment of diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy, the rate of lower fundus examination due to limitations of medical resources delays the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Therefore, implementation of automated diabetic retinopathy screening program and the identification of more specific and sensitive biomarkers are important for facilitating the earlier detection of diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy to decrease the prevalence of poor vision and blindness.