Explore the vast range of titles available.

There has been an increasing interest in the role of fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We report results from the first randomized controlled trial of the low FODMAP diet in US adults with IBS and diarrhea (IBS-D). The objectives were to compare the efficacy of the low FODMAP diet vs. a diet based upon modified National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (mNICE) on overall and individual symptoms in IBS-D patients. This was a single-center, randomized-controlled trial of adult patients with IBS-D (Rome III) which compared 2 diet interventions. After a 2-week screening period, eligible patients were randomized to a low FODMAP or mNICE diet for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients reporting adequate relief of IBS-D symptoms ≥50% of intervention weeks 3-4. Secondary outcomes included a composite end point which required response in both abdominal pain (≥30% reduction in mean daily pain score compared with baseline) and stool consistency (decrease in mean daily Bristol Stool Form of ≥1 compared with baseline), abdominal pain and stool consistency responders, and other key individual IBS symptoms assessed using daily questionnaires. After screening, 92 subjects (65 women, median age 42.6 years) were randomized. Eighty-four patients completed the study (45 low FODMAP, 39 mNICE). Baseline demographics, symptom severity, and nutrient intake were similar between groups. Fifty-two percent of the low FODMAP vs. 41% of the mNICE group reported adequate relief of their IBS-D symptoms (P=0.31). Though there was no significant difference in the proportion of composite end point responders (P=0.13), the low FODMAP diet resulted in a higher proportion of abdominal pain responders compared with the mNICE group (51% vs. 23%, P=0.008). Compared with baseline scores, the low FODMAP diet led to greater reductions in average daily scores of abdominal pain, bloating, consistency, frequency, and urgency than the mNICE diet. In this US trial, 40-50% of patients reported adequate relief of their IBS-D symptoms with the low FODMAP diet or a diet based on modified NICE guidelines. The low FODMAP diet led to significantly greater improvement in individual IBS symptoms, particularly pain and bloating, compared with the mNICE diet.

The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of zinc supplementation on diarrhea and average daily weight gain (ADG) in pre-weaned dairy calves. A total of 1,482 healthy Holstein heifer and bull calves from a large California dairy were enrolled at 24 to 48 hours of age until hutch exit at approximately 90 days of age. Calves were block-randomized by time to one of three treatments: 1) placebo, 2) zinc methionine (ZM), or 3) zinc sulfate (ZS) administered in milk once daily for 14 days. Serum total protein at enrollment and body weight at birth, treatment end, and hutch exit were measured. Fecal consistency was assessed daily for 28 days post-enrollment. For a random sample of 127 calves, serum zinc concentrations before and after treatment and a fecal antigen ELISA at diarrhea start and resolution for Escherichia coli K99, rotavirus, coronavirus, and Cryptosporidium parvum were performed. Linear regression showed that ZM-treated bull calves had 22 g increased ADG compared to placebo-treated bulls (P = 0.042). ZM-treated heifers had 9 g decreased ADG compared to placebo-treated heifers (P = 0.037), after adjusting for average birth weight. Sex-stratified models showed that high birth weight heifers treated with ZM gained more than placebo-treated heifers of the same birth weight, which suggests a dose-response effect rather than a true sex-specific effect of ZM on ADG. Cox regression showed that ZM and ZS-treated calves had a 14.7% (P = 0.015) and 13.9% (P = 0.022) reduced hazard of diarrhea, respectively, compared to placebo-treated calves. Calves supplemented for at least the first five days of diarrhea with ZM and ZS had a 21.4% (P = 0.027) and 13.0% (P = 0.040) increased hazard of cure from diarrhea, respectively, compared to placebo-treated calves. Logistic regression showed that the odds of microbiological cure at diarrhea resolution for rotavirus, C. parvum, or any single fecal pathogen was not different between treatment groups. Zinc supplementation delayed diarrhea and expedited diarrhea recovery in pre-weaned calves. Additionally, zinc improved weight gain differentially in bulls compared to heifers, indicating a research need for sex-specific dosing.

Persistent diarrhea remains medical challenge to date regarding both its etiology and therapeutic interventions. Here, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose multi-strain Bacillus spore probiotics (LiveSpo DIA30) containing B. subtilis , B. clausii , and B. coagulans at 5 billion CFU/5 mL ampoule, in the supportive treatment of persistent diarrhea in children. Our findings revealed a significant 3-day shorter recovery period, 1.60-fold enhanced efficacy, and a 9.47-fold increase in odds (all p- values < 0.0001) for effectively resolving diarrhea by day 5 with the Bacillus spores. Notably, the group receiving LiveSpo DIA30 (Dia30 group) experienced a reduction in antibiotic treatment duration by 2 days compared to the Control group, equivalent to a 25% decrease in antibiotic usage. After 5 days of treatment, LiveSpo DIA30 demonstrated significant reductions in elevated blood pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-17 (26.62%; p  = 0.0178), IL-23 (25.13%; p  = 0.0256), TNF-α (19.09%; p  = 0.038), and in fecal sIgA (24.24%; p  = 0.0433). Analysis of 16S rRNA metagenome revealed that Dia30 group exhibited a notable increase in density of Actinomycetota and Bacillota phylum, along with Actinomycetaceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Streptococaceae families. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus , a beneficial gut species, was not detectable at day 0 but reached a density of 0.91% ( p  = 0.015) in Dia30 group by day 5. Additionally, Dia30 group showed a significant reduction in density of the Proteobacteria phylum, Enterobacteriaceae family, and harmful species Escherichia fergusoni (682.8-fold; p  = 0.011). In conclusion, this clinical trial presents robust clinical evidence, supported by laboratory testing data, demonstrating the efficacy of multi-strain and high-concentration Bacillus spore probiotics in rapidly alleviating symptoms and reducing antibiotic usage in children with persistent diarrhea. This is archived by improving the native gut microbiota and modulating immunological responses. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier No: NCT05812820, 14/4/2023.

Background Diarrhea is frequent in patients in intensive care units (ICU) and is associated with discomfort and complications and may increase the length of stay and nursing workload. Methods This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled single-center pilot study to assess the incidence and frequency of diarrhea and the respective effects of a modified enteral diet (intervention: Peptamen® AF, rich in proteins, medium chain triglycerides and fish oil) compared to a standard diet (control: Isosource® Energy) in 90 randomized adult patients (intervention, n  = 46; control, n  = 44) with an ICU stay ≥5 days and tube feeding ≥3 days. Tube feeding was initiated within 72 h of ICU admission and continued up to 10 days. The caloric goal was adjusted to needs by indirect calorimetry. Gastrointestinal function, nutritional intake, and nursing workload were recorded. Follow-up was until 28 days after randomization. Results Median age was 63.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 51.0–73.2) years and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II was 61.0 (IQR 47.8–74). Time to reach caloric goal (intervention: 2.2 (0.8–3.7) days (median, IQR); control: 2.0 (1.3–2.7) days; p  = 0.16), length of time on study nutrition (intervention: 5.0 (3.6–6.4) days; control: 7.0 (5.3–8.7) days; p  = 0.26), and calorie intake (intervention: 18.0 (12.5–20.9) kcal/kg/day; control 19.7 (17.3–23.1) kcal/kg/day; p  = 0.08) did not differ between groups, with a higher protein intake for Peptamen® group (1.13 (0.78–1.31) g/kg/day vs 0.80 (0.70–0.94); p  < 0.001). No difference in diarrhea incidence (intervention group: 29 (64%); control group: 31 (70%); p  = 0.652), use of fecal collectors (23 (51%) vs. 24 (55%); p  = 0.83), or diarrhea-free days (161 (64%) vs 196 (68%); p  = 0.65) was found. Nursing workload and cost for diarrhea care were not different between the groups. In a post-hoc analysis, adjusted for treatment group, age, sex, and SAPS II score, diarrhea was associated with length of mechanical ventilation (9.5 (6.0–13.1) vs. 3.9 (3.2–4.6) days; p  = 0.006) and length of ICU stay (11.0 (8.9–13.1) vs. 5.0 (3.8–6.2) days; p  = 0.001). Conclusions In this pilot study, we found a high incidence of diarrhea, which was not attenuated by Peptamen® AF. Patients with diarrhea stayed longer in the ICU. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01581957 . Registered on 18 April 2012.

IntroductionA national research priority for people living with bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is effective treatment options to improve their quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel healthy dietary pattern (The 8×5 Diet) to inform a future, larger trial.Methods and analysisWe plan to enrol 76 UK adults living with BAD and ongoing diarrhoea using self-selection sampling and digital technologies. Eligible participants will be assigned to groups using permuted block randomisation using 1:1 allocation to receive either 8 weeks of usual care or The 8×5 Diet using one-to-one, dietitian counselling via a video-conferencing platform and developed digital resources. Randomisation, consent, recruitment, retention and acceptability will be evaluated using data from the RCT and post-trial interviews conducted with those in the intervention group. Secondary outcome exploratory assessment will include health-related quality of life, symptom relief, diarrhoea, diet quality, nutrient intakes and diet satisfaction.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by the University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee (2024-19094-33261; V1.7, last updated: 24/02/2025).Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and social media.Trial registration numberNCT06259396.

Powders containing iron and other micronutrients are recommended as a strategy to prevent nutritional anaemia and other micronutrient deficiencies in children. We assessed the effects of provision of two micronutrient powder formulations, with or without zinc, to children in Pakistan. We did a cluster randomised trial in urban and rural sites in Sindh, Pakistan. A baseline survey identified 256 clusters, which were randomly assigned (within urban and rural strata, by computer-generated random numbers) to one of three groups: non-supplemented control (group A), micronutrient powder without zinc (group B), or micronutrient powder with 10 mg zinc (group C). Children in the clusters aged 6 months were eligible for inclusion in the study. Powders were to be given daily between 6 and 18 months of age; follow-up was to age 2 years. Micronutrient powder sachets for groups B and C were identical except for colour; investigators and field and supervisory staff were masked to composition of the micronutrient powders until trial completion. Parents knew whether their child was receiving supplementation, but did not know whether the powder contained zinc. Primary outcomes were growth, episodes of diarrhoea, acute lower respiratory tract infection, fever, and incidence of admission to hospital. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00705445. The trial was done between Nov 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2011. 947 children were enrolled in group A clusters, 910 in group B clusters, and 889 in group C clusters. Micronutrient powder administration was associated with lower risk of iron-deficiency anaemia at 18 months compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] for micronutrient powder without zinc=0·20, 95% CI 0·11–0·36; OR for micronutrient powder with zinc=0·25, 95% CI 0·14–0·44). Compared with the control group, children in the group receiving micronutrient powder without zinc gained an extra 0·31 cm (95% CI 0·03–0·59) between 6 and 18 months of age and children receiving micronutrient powder with zinc an extra 0·56 cm (0·29–0·84). We recorded strong evidence of an increased proportion of days with diarrhoea (p=0·001) and increased incidence of bloody diarrhoea (p=0·003) between 6 and 18 months in the two micronutrient powder groups, and reported chest indrawing (p=0·03). Incidence of febrile episodes or admission to hospital for diarrhoea, respiratory problems, or febrile episodes did not differ between the three groups. Use of micronutrient powders reduces iron-deficiency anaemia in young children. However, the excess burden of diarrhoea and respiratory morbidities associated with micronutrient powder use and the very small effect on growth recorded suggest that a careful assessment of risks and benefits must be done in populations with malnourished children and high diarrhoea burdens. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Background Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates that play an important role in inducing functional gut symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet improves abdominal symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. However, there were no study for the effect of FODMAP content on gastrointestinal intolerance and nutritional status in patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Methods In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 14-day clinical trial, eligible hospitalized patients receiving EN ( n  = 100) were randomly assigned to three groups; 84 patients completed the trial (low-FODMAP EN, n  = 30; moderate-FODMAP EN, n  = 28; high-FODMAP EN, n  = 26). Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured; stool assessment was performed using the King’s Stool Chart and clinical definition. Results Baseline values were not significantly different among the three groups. After the 14-day intervention, diarrhea significantly improved in the low-FODMAP group than in the moderate- and high-FODMAP groups ( P  < 0.05). King’s Stool scores in diarrhea subjects were significantly and steadily reduced in the low-FODMAP group compared with the other two groups ( P for time and EN type interaction <0.05). BMI increased significantly in the low- and high-FODMAP groups during the intervention ( P  < 0.05 for both), and showed a trend toward increasing in the moderate-FODMAP group ( P  < 0.10). Serum prealbumin increased significantly in all groups by 14-day; by 3-day, it had increased to the levels at 14-day in the low-FODMAP group. At 14-day, serum transferrin had increased significantly in the moderate-FODMAP group. In addition, subjects were classified by final condition (unimproved, normal maintenance, diarrhea only improved, constipation only improved, and recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved). Seventy-five percent of the diarrhea improved group consumed the low-FODMAP EN formula. 38.5 and 46.2 % of recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved group consumed the low- and moderate-FODMAP EN respectively. BMI significantly increased in all groups except the unimproved. Prealbumin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 3-day and continued by 14-day, and in the constipation-improved group at 14-day. Transferrin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 14-day. Conclusion Low-FODMAP EN may improve diarrhea, leading to improved nutritional status and facilitating prompt recovery from illness.

Background Older adults in care homes have increasingly complex health care needs, and care provision should be evidence-based whenever possible. However, recruitment of frail, older people to research is a complex process and often results in care home residents being excluded from research participation. This paper draws on the experience of setting up a randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of probiotics on antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in care home residents [Probiotics for Antibiotic Associated Diarrhoea in Care Homes (PAAD) Study] in Wales. Findings Significant challenges were encountered setting up a clinical trial in care homes. There were a number of barriers and facilitative factors encountered that were unique to this research setting. The classification of the study intervention (a widely available food supplement with a low risk safety profile) as an investigational medicinal product, with the associated requirements including obtaining statutory approvals and research governance, had a major impact. Conclusion The process for setting up a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product in care homes has been more complex and time consuming than the process for setting up an observational study in the same setting, and clinical trials in other health care settings. We recommend regulatory changes to ensure approvals processes are more proportionate to risk and context, to ensure that care home residents have the opportunity to participate in research and are able to help generate much needed evidence to underpin care. Recommendations made may inform future research practice. Trial registration: ISRCTN 25324586.

We designed a double-blinded randomized clinical trial of zinc (10 or 20 mg of zinc sulphate for 2–5 month-old or 6–59 month-old children, respectively, during 10 days) vs. placebo in otherwise healthy children aged 2 months to 5 years who presented with acute diarrhoea (i.e. ≥3 stools/day for less than 72 h). Eighty-seven patients (median age 14 months; range 3.1–58.3) were analysed in an intention-to-treat approach. Forty-two patients took zinc and 45 placebo. There was no difference in the duration nor in the frequency of diarrhoea, but only 5 % of the zinc group still had diarrhoea at 120 h of treatment compared to 20 % in the placebo group ( P  = 0.05). Thirty-one patients (13 zinc and 18 placebo) were available for per-protocol analyses. The median (IQR) duration of diarrhoea in zinc-treated patients was 47.5 h (18.3–72) and differed significantly from the placebo group (median 76.3; IQR 52.8–137) ( P  = 0.03). The frequency of diarrhoea was also lower in the zinc group ( P  = 0.02). Conclusion : zinc treatment decreases the frequency and severity of diarrhoea in children aged 2 months to 5 years living in Switzerland. However, the intention-to-treat analysis reveals compliance issues that question the proper duration of treatment and the choice of optimal pharmaceutical formulation. What is known • The effectiveness of zinc in childhood diarrhoea has been demonstrated in developing countries. It helps to decrease the duration and severity of diarrhoea. There is currently no sufficient data to justify its use in developed countries, where there is, theoretically, no zinc deficiency. What is new • We demonstrated the effectiveness of zinc in diarrhoea of children living in a developed country. This confirms the result of two studies (Passariello 2011, and Dalgic 2011) that also reported the positive impact of zinc in diarrhoea of children living in Italy and in Turkey. However, our population is wider in terms of age (2–60 months compared to 3–36 months for Passariello’s study and 1–28 months for Dalgic’s study) and is not limited to a specific aetiology or to a certain degree of severity of the diarrhoea. Furthermore, it’s the first study that uses a placebo for the control group. The main limitation of our study is the differences in the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol analyses that reveal big compliance problems. These could be dealt by changing the dosage form of the zinc formula and/or by diminishing the treatment duration.

Probiotics are viable non-pathogenic micro-organisms which, when ingested, exert a positive influence on host health or physiology. We have critically analysed the evidence for the efficacy of specific probiotic strains in human gastrointestinal diseases. The best evidence can be obtained with randomised controlled trials which avoid bias. Good evidence has been obtained with several strains in the prevention or treatment of antibiotic-associated disorders, in the treatment (and to a lesser extent prevention) of gastroenteritis and acute diarrhoea and in the alleviation of lactose intolerance. We also analysed the recent randomised controlled trials performed in patients with Clostridium difficile or Helicobacter pylori, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, non-ulcer dyspepsia and colon cancer.