Explore the vast range of titles available.

Airway management is central to the care of critically ill patients, yet it remains one of the most challenging interventions in emergency departments and intensive care units. Patients often present with severe physiological instability, limited cardiopulmonary reserve, and high acuity, while clinicians often work under constraints related to time for preparation, equipment availability, trained workforce, monitoring, and access to advanced rescue techniques. These challenges are particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries and other resource-limited or austere environments, where the margin for error is narrow and delays or repeated attempts in airway management may rapidly precipitate hypoxemia, hemodynamic collapse, or cardiac arrest. Although contemporary airway guidelines emphasize structured preparation and rescue pathways, many assume resources that are not consistently available in such settings. This narrative review discusses pragmatic, context-adapted strategies for airway management in constrained environments, with emphasis on physiology-first preparation, appropriate oxygenation and induction techniques, simplified rapid-sequence intubation, and the judicious use of basic airway adjuncts, supraglottic devices, and video laryngoscopy, where available. Adapted difficult airway algorithms, front-of-neck access in the absence of surgical backup, human factors, team training, and ethical considerations are also addressed. This review aims to support safer and effective airway management for critically ill patients in resource-limited emergency and intensive care settings.

Obstetric difficult airway management has emerged as a critical safety issue, and unsuccessful intubation can lead to morbidity and mortality. A literature review of difficult and failed obstetric intubations from the 1970s to 2015 shows that the incidence of failed intubation is unchanged, remaining at one per 390 anesthetics. Our obstetric case report highlights an obstetric difficult airway secondary to limited mouth opening; rescue of the airway with an i-gel®; and establishment of a definitive airway with the aid of an Aintree intubation catheter and flexible fiberoptic scope-guided intubation through the i-gel®, a second-generation supraglottic airway.

Background: Videolaryngoscopy (VLS) is recommended by international guidelines for the management of difficult airways. We conducted an observational prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy of the new VL3 videolaryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation (TI) in adults; in terms of success rate, the number of attempts, and maneuver duration, including both normal and difficult airways. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study comprised a sample of 56 adult patients undergoing elective general anesthesia. For each patient, we performed VLS by VL3 recording the following data: successful TI rate, number of attempts, time of intubation, time to glottis visualization, Cormack-Lehane grade (CL), need for external laryngeal pressure, and presence of post-laryngoscopy side effects. Results: TI was successfully carried out in the totality of patients. In only 4 out of 56 cases, the VL3 offered a CL II. The first attempt intubation was achieved in 48 patients (85.7%). In one case, external laryngeal pressure was needed. No CL III or CL IV were observed. We did not find any significant difference between the predicted difficult airways sample and the rest of the population. Conclusion: VL3 videolaryngoscope showed to be an effective and safe device for routine TI, even in those patients with predicted difficult airway. More studies are needed to confirm our findings and verify its efficacy even in other settings.

Background Endotracheal intubation continues to be the gold standard for securing the airway in emergency situations. Difficult intubation is still a dreadful situation when securing the airway. Objective To compare VieScope with Glidescope and conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy (MAC) in a simulated difficult airway situation. Methods In this randomized controlled simulation trial, 35 anesthesiologists performed endotracheal intubation using VieScope, GlideScope and MAC in a randomized order on a certified airway manikin with difficult airway. Results For the primary endpoint of correct tube position, no statistical difference was found ( p  = 0.137). Time until intubation for GlideScope (27.5 ± 20.3 s) and MAC (20.8 ± 8.1 s) were shorter compared to the VieScope (36.3 ± 10.1 s). Time to first ventilation, GlideScope (39.3 ± 21.6 s) and MAC (31.9 ± 9.5 s) were also shorter compared to the VieScope (46.5 ± 12.4 s). There was no difference shown between handling time for VieScope (20.7 ± 7.0 s) and time until intubation with GlideScope or MAC. Participants stated a better Cormack & Lehane Score with VieScope, compared to direct laryngoscopy. Conclusion Rate of correct tracheal tube position was comparable between the three devices. Time to intubation and ventilation were shorter with MAC and Glidescope compared to VieScope. It did however show a comparable handling time to video laryngoscopy and MAC. It also did show a better visualization of the airway in the Cormack & Lehane Score compared to MAC. Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Identifier: DRKS00024968 ) on March 31st 2021.

The difficult airway involves the complex interaction between patient factors, the clinical setting and the practitioner’s skills (Apfelbaum in Anesthesiology 118(2):251–70, 2013 and Mark et al. in Anesth Analg 121(1):127–139, 2015). It can also be a result of preparedness and system failures. Our institution developed a protocol to enhance emergency airway management in settings outside of the operating theatre—the difficult airway (DA) team. The aims of this report are to perform a retrospective review to describe the patient profiles as well as our difficult airway code workflow, and to identify preliminary patterns within DAC activations over an 18-month period (September 2013 to November 2015) in a tertiary university hospital. We believe that these findings may aid institutions in establishing a difficult airway protocol or refining existing airway code workflows. Institutional board approval was granted for medical record review.

To determine if a high score (≥ 3) on the STOP-Bang screening questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) predicts whether obese patients are at high risk for OSA and increased risk of difficult airway. Prospective, questionnaire-based clinical assessment. University-affiliated hospital. 127 ASA physical status 2 and 3 patients, who were scheduled for elective bariatric surgery. Patients were allocated to three groups. Group 1 patients had a previous history of OSA, Group 2 patients had no history of OSA but did have a high STOP-Bang score (≥ 3), and Group 3 patients had no history of OSA but did have a low STOP-Bang score (< 3). Groups 2 and 3 only were assessed using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. After induction and intubation of the patient, an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the three study group allocations completed an airway questionnaire on the three study groups. The frequency of difficult airway, difficult mask ventilation with or without muscle relaxation, poor visualization of the vocal cords, difficulty in blade insertion, and difficult intubation were compared. The group of patients with high STOP-Bang scores (Group 2) and those patients previously diagnosed with OSA (Group1) showed a higher risk for difficult airway than the patients with low STOP-Bang scores (Group 3; P < 0.001). The STOP-Bang score may be used as an effective predictor of difficult airway in obese patients. Obese surgical patients with unknown/undiagnosed OSA status should be evaluated using the STOP-Bang questionaire score.

Background: Patients with potential difficult mask ventilation (DV) and difficult intubation (DI) are often managed with awake intubation, which can be stressful for patients and anesthesiologists. This prospective randomized study evaluated a new approach, fast difficult airway evaluation (FDAE). We hypothesized that the FDAE approach would reduce the need for awake intubation. Methods: After obtaining informed consent, 302 patients with potential DV/DI undergoing elective surgeries were randomly assigned to the FDAE group (Group E) and the control group (Group C). In Group E, patients were gradually sedated, and adequacy of manual mask ventilation during spontaneous breathing was assessed at various sedation levels. Awake intubation was applied in those with inadequate mask ventilation. In Group C, DI was evaluated under local anesthesia. However, the care team could intubate under general anesthesia if the vocal cords were visible. The primary outcome was the rate of awake intubations in both groups and the induction efficiency assessed by the induction time. The secondary outcome was the incidence of serious complications. Results: The rate of awake intubation was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group C (5.81% vs. 36.05%, χ2 = 42.3, P < 0.001). The induction time was much shorter in Group E than in Group C (11.85 ± 4.82 min vs. 18.71 ± 7.85 min, t = 5.39, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intubation related complications between the two groups. Patients in Group E had a much lower incidence of recall (9.68% vs. 44.90%, χ2 = 47.68, P < 0.001) of the induction process and higher satisfaction levels than patients in Group C (t = 15.36, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The FDAE significantly reduces the need for awake intubation and improves the efficiency of the intubation process without comprising safety in patients with potential difficult mask ventilation and DI. Trial Registration: No. ChiCTR-TRC-11001418; http://www.gctr.org/cn/proj/show.aspx?proj=1562.

The prevalence of in situ tracheal stents has increased in the past two decades for the management of malignant and benign central airway diseases for either palliation or definitive therapy. Recent placement of a tracheal stent has been associated with edema of the upper airway; therefore, these patients are at a great risk for airway collapse, especially within the days most recent to the procedure. The authors present the case of a morbidly obese patient with a tracheal stent admitted to the Intensive Care Unit who developed acute respiratory failure and was found to be \"unable to ventilate, unable to intubate.\" Surgical airway approach through a cricothyroidotomy failed to provide a patent airway and the patient subsequently developed cardiac arrest and expired. The presence of tracheal stent poses a high challenge during emergent airway interventions; thus, carefully planned airway manipulation in such patients is paramount in order to avoid catastrophic outcomes.

Background: Prediction of difficult airway is important for airway management in patients undergoing surgery. The assessment of airway structures and establishment of protective airway strategies are essential to improve patient safety. However, the association between successful palpation of the cricothyroid membrane and airway predictions has not been fully elucidated in patients undergoing surgery. We investigated this in female patients undergoing non-neck surgery. Methods: A total of 68 female patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study between January 2021 and June 2021 at Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Exclusion criteria were male patients and those with neck pathology or neck surgery. The assessment of difficult airway was performed before the induction of anesthesia and was defined by one of the following conditions: inter-incisor distance < 3 fingerbreadths, hyoid-to-mental distance < 3 fingerbreadths, and thyroid-to-hyoid distance < 2 fingerbreadths (the “3-3-2 rule”). The accuracy of palpable identification of the cricothyroid membrane was confirmed by ultrasonography (US). The patients were divided into the non-difficult airway (NDA) group (n = 30) and the difficult airway (DA) group (n = 30). Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, but the DA group had higher body mass index (BMI). In airway assessment, 9 patients showed inter-incisor distance < 3 fingerbreadths, 3 patients showed hyoid-to-mental distance < 3 fingerbreadths, and 24 patients showed thyroid-to-hyoid distance < 2 fingerbreadths in the DA group. The rate of successful palpation of the cricothyroid membrane was higher in the patients without than in those with difficult airway variables. Conclusions: Patients with a positive 3-3-2 rule showed a poor palpability of cricothyroid membrane.