Explore the vast range of titles available.

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6–8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18–21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64–76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0–17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3–11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29–0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3–5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885. Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8–3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30–54) in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9–28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61–9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group vs six [10%] of 63 patients in the docetaxel alone group) and diarrhoea (four [6%] of 63 patients vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (25%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group (none were definitely related to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) and 16 (25%) patients in the docetaxel alone group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed by docetaxel improved antitumour activity in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with docetaxel alone, without increased toxic effects. Our data potentially support a role for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember Foundation and Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund), US Department of Defence Impact Award-Clinical Trials, Endocyte/Advanced Accelerator Applications (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Victorian Cancer Agency, University of Melbourne, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation.

Guiding the beta-emitting isotope lutetium-177 to prostate cancer lesions with the prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted radioligand 177 Lu-PSMA-617 plus using standard care was compared with standard care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The radioligand therapy prolonged progression-free and overall survival. Adverse effects were more common, but quality of life was maintained.

Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is a radiolabelled small molecule that delivers β radiation to cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), with activity and safety in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to compare [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 with cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We did this multicentre, unblinded, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 centres in Australia. We recruited men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for whom cabazitaxel was considered the next appropriate standard treatment. Participants were required to have adequate renal, haematological, and liver function, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Previous treatment with androgen receptor-directed therapy was allowed. Men underwent gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-flourine-18[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET-CT scans. PET eligibility criteria for the trial were PSMA-positive disease, and no sites of metastatic disease with discordant FDG-positive and PSMA-negative findings. Men were randomly assigned (1:1) to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (6·0–8·5 GBq intravenously every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) or cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks for up to ten cycles). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined by a reduction of at least 50% from baseline. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03392428. Between Feb 6, 2018, and Sept 3, 2019, we screened 291 men, of whom 200 were eligible on PET imaging. Study treatment was received by 98 (99%) of 99 men randomly assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus 85 (84%) of 101 randomly assigned to cabazitaxel. PSA responses were more frequent among men in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group than in the cabazitaxel group (65 vs 37 PSA responses; 66% vs 37% by intention to treat; difference 29% (95% CI 16–42; p<0·0001; and 66% vs 44% by treatment received; difference 23% [9–37]; p=0·0016). Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 32 (33%) of 98 men in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 45 (53%) of 85 men in the cabazitaxel group. No deaths were attributed to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 compared with cabazitaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer led to a higher PSA response and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is a new effective class of therapy and a potential alternative to cabazitaxel. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Endocyte (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Movember, The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride, It's a Bloke Thing, and CAN4CANCER.

Saxagliptin, a new oral antihyperglycemic drug in the DPP-4 inhibitor class, had no effect on the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although the drug does not increase cardiovascular risk, it also does not provide cardiovascular benefit. Type 2 diabetes mellitus doubles the risk of major cardiovascular complications in patients with and in patients without established cardiovascular disease, 1 – 3 such that the majority of patients with diabetes die of cardiovascular diseases. 4 Although improved glycemic control has repeatedly been shown to reduce microvascular diabetic complications, 5 uncertainty remains regarding whether any particular glucose-lowering strategy, or specific therapeutic agent, is safe from a cardiovascular standpoint or can actually lower cardiovascular risk. With the possible exception of trials of metformin 6 and insulin, 7 most reported trials to date evaluating the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of specific glucose-lowering strategies or medications either have . . .

OBJECTIVE: This 24-week trial assessed the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control with metformin alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of saxagliptin (2.5, 5, or 10 mg once daily) or placebo plus a stable dose of metformin (1,500-2,500 mg) in 743 patients (A1C greater-than-or-equal7.0 and [less-than or equal to]10.0%). Efficacy analyses were performed using an ANCOVA model using last observation carried forward methodology on primary (A1C) and secondary (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and postprandial glucose [PPG] area under the curve [AUC]) end points. RESULTS: Saxagliptin (2.5, 5, and 10 mg) plus metformin demonstrated statistically significant adjusted mean decreases from baseline to week 24 versus placebo in A1C (-0.59, -0.69, and -0.58 vs. +0.13%; all P < 0.0001), FPG (-14.31, -22.03, and -20.50 vs. +1.24 mg/dl; all P < 0.0001), and PPG AUC (-8,891, -9,586, and -8,137 vs. -3,291 mg · min/dl; all P < 0.0001). More than twice as many patients achieved A1C <7.0% with 2.5, 5, and 10 mg saxagliptin versus placebo (37, 44, and 44 vs. 17%; all P < 0.0001). β-Cell function and postprandial C-peptide, insulin, and glucagon AUCs improved in all saxagliptin treatment groups at week 24. Incidence of hypoglycemic adverse events and weight reductions were similar to those with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin once daily added to metformin therapy was generally well tolerated and led to statistically significant improvements in glycemic indexes versus placebo added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone.

In the PSMAfore study, lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (vipivotide tetraxetan) significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with change of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) in taxane-naive patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we present in-depth analyses of time to worsening of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and pain, and time to first symptomatic skeletal events. PSMAfore, an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 74 investigator sites (including hospitals with nuclear medicine departments and the research facilities where patients were recruited) across 14 countries. Eligible patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, were candidates for ARPI change after one progression on a previous ARPI, had at least one PSMA-positive and no exclusionary PSMA-negative metastatic lesions by gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET–CT, were aged 18 years or older, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (7·4 GBq; every 6 weeks for six cycles) or ARPI change (oral abiraterone or enzalutamide per local labelling). The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included time to worsening in self-reported HRQOL (assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P] and EQ-5D-5L) and pain (assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF]) and time to the first symptomatic skeletal event. All analyses were done using the intention-to-treat principle. The study met the primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival (reported previously), and overall survival follow-up is ongoing; present analyses are from the third interim analysis of overall survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04689828. Between June 15, 2021, and Oct 7, 2022, 468 patients (426 [91%] were White and 12 [3%] were Black or African American) were randomly assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=234) or ARPI change (n=234). Median follow-up time from randomisation to the third interim analysis data cutoff date (Feb 27, 2024) was 24·11 months (IQR 20·24–27·60) in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 24·13 months (20·24–27·37) in the ARPI change group. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 delayed time to worsening in all assessed FACT-P, EQ-5D-5L, and BPI-SF scales and subscales versus ARPI change. In the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus ARPI change groups, median time to worsening in FACT-P total score was 7·46 months (95% CI 6·08–8·54) versus 4·27 months (3·45–4·50; hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·50–0·75]), in EQ-5D-5L utility score was 6·28 months (4·70–7·89) versus 3·88 months (3·25–4·44; 0·67 [0·54–0·82]), and in BPI-SF pain intensity was 5·03 months (4·40–6·80) versus 3·65 months (3·09–4·37; 0·72 [0·59–0·88]). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 also delayed symptomatic skeletal events versus ARPI change: median time to first symptomatic skeletal event was not reached (95% CI not estimable [NE]–NE) in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 17·97 months (14·26–NE) in the ARPI change group (HR 0·41 [0·26–0·63]). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was anaemia (14 [6%] of 227 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group vs 16 [7%] of 232 patients in the ARPI change group). There were no treatment-related deaths in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and one in the ARPI change group (cerebrovascular accident). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 might delay worsening of patient-reported outcomes and prevent symptomatic skeletal events versus ARPI change in taxane-naive patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease has progressed once on a previous ARPI. Novartis.

Abstract Context Glycemic variability and hypoglycemia during diabetes treatment may impact therapeutic effectiveness and safety, even when glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction is comparable between therapies. Objective We employed masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during a randomized trial of dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin (DAPA + SAXA) vs insulin glargine (INS) to compare glucose variability and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Design 24-week substudy of a randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, phase 3b study. Setting Multicenter study (112 centers in 11 countries). Patients 283 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin ± sulfonylurea. Interventions DAPA + SAXA vs INS. Main outcome measures Changes in CGM profiles, HbA1c, and PROs. Results Changes from baseline in HbA1c with DAPA + SAXA were similar to those observed with INS, with mean difference [95% confidence interval] between decreases of −0.12% [−0.37 to 0.12%], P = .33. CGM analytics were more favorable for DAPA + SAXA, including greater percent time in range (> 3.9 and ≤ 10 mmol/L; 34.3 ± 1.9 vs 28.5 ± 1.9%, P = .033), lower percent time with nocturnal hypoglycemia (area under the curve ≤ 3.9 mmol/L; 0.6 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.5%, P = .007), and smaller mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (−0.7 ± 0.1 vs −0.3 ± 0.1 mmol/L, P = .017). Improvements in CGM were associated with greater satisfaction, better body weight image, less weight interference, and improved mental and emotional well-being. Conclusion DAPA + SAXA and INS were equally effective in reducing HbA1c at 24 weeks, but people with T2D treated with DAPA + SAXA achieved greater time in range, greater reductions in glycemic excursions and variability, less time with hypoglycemia, and improved patient-reported health outcomes.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a morbid ordeal affecting chronic liver disease patients always insists for the search of a rational, superior & infallible agent beyond the time-proven standards i.e., Lactulose & Rifaximin. In this RCT, we compared the efficacy of intravenous (IV) l -ornithine- l -aspartate(LOLA) versus Oral LOLA in patients with chronic liver disease(CLD) enduring overt Hepatic Encephalopathy(OHE). 40 CLD patients with OHE were randomly assigned IV or oral LOLA in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were graded for HE and monitored for serum ammonia levels from day 1 to day 5. The aim was to compare IV versus oral LOLA efficacy in HE grades improvement and its correlation with ammonia levels. The study was registered with clinical trials registry-India, CTRI/2020/12/029943. Baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. The mean difference in ammonia levels from day 1 to day 5 was 55.4 ± 32.58 µmol/L in the IV LOLA group and 60.75 ± 13.82 µmol/L in the oral LOLA group (p = 0.511). Significant reductions in ammonia levels were observed from day 1 to day 5 within each group (p < 0.001). HE grade & ammonia correlated positively in both groups. LOLA, regardless of administration route, has demonstrated efficacy in OHE.

Introduction Effects of Dapagliflozin (Dapa) and Dapagliflozin-Saxagliptin combination (Combo) was examined on peripheral blood derived CD34 + Hematopoetic Stem Cells (HSCs) as a cellular CVD biomarker. Both Dapa (a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 or SGLT2, receptor inhibitor) and Saxagliptin (a Di-peptydl-peptidase-4 or DPP4 enzyme inhibitor) are commonly used type 2 diabetes mellitus or T2DM medications, however the benefit of using the combination has not been evaluated for cardio-renal risk assessment, in a real-life practice setting, compared to a placebo. Hypothesis We hypothesized that Dapa will improve the outcomes when compared to placebo and the Combo maybe even more beneficial. Methods This is a pilot study evaluating low dose Dapagliflozin 10 mg or low dose Dapa + low dose Saxagliptin combination. 15 subjects were enrolled in 16 weeks, double-blind, three-arm, randomized placebo matched trial, with 10mg Dapa  + Saxa placebo ( n  = 4), 10 mg Dapa + 5 mg Saxa ( n  = 5) Combo , And Dapa placebo + Saxa placebo ( n  = 6), Placebo groups. T2DM subjects (age 30–70 yrs) with HbA1c of 7–10%, were included. CD34 + HSC number, migration, mRNA expression along with biochemistry and urine exosomes were measured. Data were collected at week 0, 8, and 16. For statistics, a mixed model regression analysis was used. Results Significant HbA1c ( p  = 0.0357) reduction was noted in Combo group versus Dapa alone and Placebo. hsCRP levels ( P  = 0.0317) and IL-6, two important inflammatory molecules, were significantly reduced in both Dapa and Combo vs. Placebo. Leptin levels decreased significantly in both Dapa alone ( p  = 0.035) and Combo group( p  = 0.015), vs. Placebo, however the Adiponectin levels were higher in Dapa alone group. Dapagliflozin alone reduced lipid parameters significantly particularly triglyceride (TG) when compared to placebo, with resultant visit 3 values at 99.5  ±  7.2 vs. 129  ±  12.3 and LDL/HDL ratio values were similar at 2.18  ±  0.08 vs. 2.13  ±  0.15. CD34 + cell migration improved significantly in both Dapa alone ( p  = 0.05) and Combo group ( p  = 0.05) vs. Placebo. Conclusions Several parameters showed significant improvement with both Dapa alone and Combo compared to placebo. However, when all outcome measures were taken into account, other than glycemic control the Combo didn’t seem to offer any further benefit, over Dapa alone. Therefore, contrary to our initial hypothesis we do not believe the more expensive Dapa + Saxa combination offers any specific cardiovascular benefit compared to Dapagliflozin alone. However it is noteworthy that both Dapa and its combination with Saxagliptin showed significant improvement compared to placebo in T2DM, particularly when progenitor cell based numbers and function were analyzed and taken into account. Trial Registration The trial was registered with Clinical Trials.gov number NCT03660683, last updated 06052023.