Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
29
result(s) for
"Diplodocus"
Sort by:
A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda)
by
Mateus, Octávio
,
Tschopp, Emanuel
,
Benson, Roger B.J.
in
Analysis
,
Apatosaurus
,
Cretaceous period
2015
Diplodocidae are among the best known sauropod dinosaurs. Several species were described in the late 1800s or early 1900s from the Morrison Formation of North America. Since then, numerous additional specimens were recovered in the USA, Tanzania, Portugal, and Argentina, as well as possibly Spain, England, Georgia, Zimbabwe, and Asia. To date, the clade includes about 12 to 15 nominal species, some of them with questionable taxonomic status (e.g., 'Diplodocus' hayi or Dyslocosaurus polyonychius), and ranging in age from Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous. However, intrageneric relationships of the iconic, multi-species genera Apatosaurus and Diplodocus are still poorly known. The way to resolve this issue is a specimen-based phylogenetic analysis, which has been previously implemented for Apatosaurus, but is here performed for the first time for the entire clade of Diplodocidae. The analysis includes 81 operational taxonomic units, 49 of which belong to Diplodocidae. The set of OTUs includes all name-bearing type specimens previously proposed to belong to Diplodocidae, alongside a set of relatively complete referred specimens, which increase the amount of anatomically overlapping material. Non-diplodocid outgroups were selected to test the affinities of potential diplodocid specimens that have subsequently been suggested to belong outside the clade. The specimens were scored for 477 morphological characters, representing one of the most extensive phylogenetic analyses of sauropod dinosaurs. Character states were figured and tables given in the case of numerical characters. The resulting cladogram recovers the classical arrangement of diplodocid relationships. Two numerical approaches were used to increase reproducibility in our taxonomic delimitation of species and genera. This resulted in the proposal that some species previously included in well-known genera like Apatosaurus and Diplodocus are generically distinct. Of particular note is that the famous genus Brontosaurus is considered valid by our quantitative approach. Furthermore, \"Diplodocus\" hayi represents a unique genus, which will herein be called Galeamopus gen. nov. On the other hand, these numerical approaches imply synonymization of \"Dinheirosaurus\" from the Late Jurassic of Portugal with the Morrison Formation genus Supersaurus. Our use of a specimen-, rather than species-based approach increases knowledge of intraspecific and intrageneric variation in diplodocids, and the study demonstrates how specimen-based phylogenetic analysis is a valuable tool in sauropod taxonomy, and potentially in paleontology and taxonomy as a whole.
Journal Article
Diplodocus
by
Dee, Nicky, author
,
Dee, Nicky. What's so special about
in
Diplodocus Juvenile literature.
,
Dinosaurs Juvenile literature.
,
Diplodocus Ouvrages pour la jeunesse.
2022
\"À ce jour, plus d'un millier d'espèces de dinosaures ont été recensées. Avec cette série, tu découvriras les plus récents faits et les dernières informations sur certaines des plus communes espèces et apprendras de nouvelles choses sur des dinosaures moins connus mais tout aussi fascinants dont tu n'as peut-être jamais entendu parler.\"-- Publisher's description.
American Dinosaur Abroad
2019
In early July 1899, an excavation team of paleontologists sponsored by Andrew Carnegie discovered the fossil remains in Wyoming of what was then the longest and largest dinosaur on record. Named after its benefactor, theDiplodocus carnegii-or Dippy, as it's known today-was shipped to Pittsburgh and later mounted and unveiled at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in 1907. Carnegie's pursuit of dinosaurs in the American West and the ensuing dinomania of the late nineteenth century coincided with his broader political ambitions to establish a lasting world peace and avoid further international conflict. An ardent philanthropist and patriot, Carnegie gifted his first plaster cast of Dippy to the British Museum at the behest of King Edward VII in 1902, an impulsive diplomatic gesture that would result in the donation of at least seven reproductions to museums across Europe and Latin America over the next decade, in England, Germany, France, Austria, Italy, Russia, Argentina, and Spain. In this largely untold history, Ilja Nieuwland explores the influence of Andrew Carnegie's prized skeleton on European culture through the dissemination, reception, and agency of his plaster casts, revealing much about the social, political, cultural, and scientific context of the early twentieth century.
Your pet diplodocus
by
Holmes, Kirsty, author
,
Holmes, Kirsty. How to take care of your pet dinosaur
in
Diplodocus Juvenile literature.
,
Dinosaurs Juvenile literature.
2019
\"All pets have unique needs. This particular pet needs daily walks, a very long leash, and a home with very high ceilings! Meet the Diplodocus, the tallest dinosaur in town. Taking care of this dino won't be easy, but it will be tons of fun, about 17 tons, to be exact. Delightfully funny illustrations bring the Diplodocus into stunning focus. Cool fact boxes offer interesting information. Even reluctant readers will devour this funny book full of dinosaur facts.\" --Summary taken from goodreads.com.
Evolution of High Tooth Replacement Rates in Sauropod Dinosaurs
by
Whitlock, John A.
,
Wilson, Jeffrey A.
,
Fisher, Daniel C.
in
Animals
,
Biological Evolution
,
Biology
2013
Tooth replacement rate can be calculated in extinct animals by counting incremental lines of deposition in tooth dentin. Calculating this rate in several taxa allows for the study of the evolution of tooth replacement rate. Sauropod dinosaurs, the largest terrestrial animals that ever evolved, exhibited a diversity of tooth sizes and shapes, but little is known about their tooth replacement rates.
We present tooth replacement rate, formation time, crown volume, total dentition volume, and enamel thickness for two coexisting but distantly related and morphologically disparate sauropod dinosaurs Camarasaurus and Diplodocus. Individual tooth formation time was determined by counting daily incremental lines in dentin. Tooth replacement rate is calculated as the difference between the number of days recorded in successive replacement teeth. Each tooth family in Camarasaurus has a maximum of three replacement teeth, whereas each Diplodocus tooth family has up to five. Tooth formation times are about 1.7 times longer in Camarasaurus than in Diplodocus (315 vs. 185 days). Average tooth replacement rate in Camarasaurus is about one tooth every 62 days versus about one tooth every 35 days in Diplodocus. Despite slower tooth replacement rates in Camarasaurus, the volumetric rate of Camarasaurus tooth replacement is 10 times faster than in Diplodocus because of its substantially greater tooth volumes. A novel method to estimate replacement rate was developed and applied to several other sauropodomorphs that we were not able to thin section.
Differences in tooth replacement rate among sauropodomorphs likely reflect disparate feeding strategies and/or food choices, which would have facilitated the coexistence of these gigantic herbivores in one ecosystem. Early neosauropods are characterized by high tooth replacement rates (despite their large tooth size), and derived titanosaurs and diplodocoids independently evolved the highest known tooth replacement rates among archosaurs.
Journal Article
Bone Wars
2021
With a New Foreword by Matthew C. Lamanna and a New
Afterword by Tom Rea
Less than one hundred years ago, Diplodocus
carnegii -named after industrialist and philanthropist Andrew
Carnegie-was the most famous dinosaur on the planet. The most
complete fossil skeleton unearthed to date, and one of the largest
dinosaurs ever discovered, Diplodocus was displayed in a dozen
museums around the world and viewed by millions of people. Bone
Wars explains how a fossil unearthed in the badlands of
Wyoming in 1899 helped give birth to the public's fascination with
prehistoric beasts. Rea also traces the evolution of scientific
thought regarding dinosaurs and reveals the double-crosses and
behind-the-scenes deals that marked the early years of bone
hunting. With the help of letters found in scattered archives, Tom
Rea recreates a remarkable story of hubris, hope, and
turn-of-the-century science. He focuses on the roles of five men:
Wyoming fossil hunter Bill Reed; paleontologists Jacob Wortman-in
charge of the expedition that discovered Carnegie's dinosaur-and
John Bell Hatcher; William Holland, imperious director of the
recently founded Carnegie Museum; and Carnegie himself, smitten
with the colossal animals after reading a story in the New York
Journal and Advertiser . What emerges is the picture of an era
reminiscent of today: technology advancing by leaps and bounds; the
press happy to sensationalize anything that turned up; huge amounts
of capital ending up in the hands of a small number of people; and
some devoted individuals placing honest research above personal
gain.
The Functional and Palaeoecological Implications of Tooth Morphology and Wear for the Megaherbivorous Dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada
2014
Megaherbivorous dinosaurs were exceptionally diverse on the Late Cretaceous island continent of Laramidia, and a growing body of evidence suggests that this diversity was facilitated by dietary niche partitioning. We test this hypothesis using the fossil megaherbivore assemblage from the Dinosaur Park Formation (upper Campanian) of Alberta as a model. Comparative tooth morphology and wear, including the first use of quantitative dental microwear analysis in the context of Cretaceous palaeosynecology, are used to infer the mechanical properties of the foods these dinosaurs consumed. The phylliform teeth of ankylosaurs were poorly adapted for habitually processing high-fibre plant matter. Nevertheless, ankylosaur diets were likely more varied than traditionally assumed: the relatively large, bladed teeth of nodosaurids would have been better adapted to processing a tougher, more fibrous diet than the smaller, cusp-like teeth of ankylosaurids. Ankylosaur microwear is characterized by a preponderance of pits and scratches, akin to modern mixed feeders, but offers no support for interspecific dietary differences. The shearing tooth batteries of ceratopsids are much better adapted to high-fibre herbivory, attested by their scratch-dominated microwear signature. There is tentative microwear evidence to suggest differences in the feeding habits of centrosaurines and chasmosaurines, but statistical support is not significant. The tooth batteries of hadrosaurids were capable of both shearing and crushing functions, suggestive of a broad dietary range. Their microwear signal overlaps broadly with that of ankylosaurs, and suggests possible dietary differences between hadrosaurines and lambeosaurines. Tooth wear evidence further indicates that all forms considered here exhibited some degree of masticatory propaliny. Our findings reveal that tooth morphology and wear exhibit different, but complimentary, dietary signals that combine to support the hypothesis of dietary niche partitioning. The inferred mechanical and dietary patterns appear constant over the 1.5 Myr timespan of the Dinosaur Park Formation megaherbivore chronofauna, despite continual species turnover.
Journal Article