Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
16,648
result(s) for
"Disinformation"
Sort by:
Correction: How fake news can turn against its spreader
2025
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331608.].
Journal Article
Correction: A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions
2023
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260080.].
Journal Article
Calling bullshit : the art of scepticism in a data-driven world
The world is awash in bullshit, and we're drowning in it. Politicians are unconstrained by facts. Science is conducted by press release. Startup culture elevates bullshit to high art. These days, calling bullshit is a noble act. Based on their popular, eponymous, course at the University of Washington, professors Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West catalogue bullshit in its many forms, explaining where bullshit arose in our evolutionary past and why it is ubiquitous today. Calling Bullshit offers readers the tools to see through the obfuscations, deliberate and careless, that dominate every realm of our lives. In this lively guide Bergstrom, a computational biologist, and West, a statistician, teach us that calling bullshit is crucial to a properly functioning social group, whether it be a circle of friends, a community of academics, or the citizenry of a nation.
Integration or Absorption? Analyzing the Propagandist Narratives Generated by Russia-Backed Online Regional Media in Belarus
by
Navumau, Vasil
in
Disinformation
2020
This article analyzes the plethora of disinformation materials that emerged during the most recent negotiations between Russia and Belarus on \"further integration\"--that is, the process of \"political and economic absorption\" of Belarus--that took place between December 2018 and April 2019. Russian media used deceptive news articles to put forward their agenda and interpellate support among Belarusian citizens. The paper uses framing theory to identify the characteristics of pro-integration discourses in resources launched by the Russian authorities in the Belarusian regions between December 2018 and April 2019. The media disguised themselves as \"objective\" regional Internet media by publishing neutral articles, but came to disseminate disinformation and materials that promoted Russia's agenda.
Journal Article