Explore the vast range of titles available.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by disk diffusion provides an accurate image of bacterial growth, enabling the detection of culture purity, heterogeneous growth, and antibiotic interactions. However, this manual method is time-consuming and visual interpretation is prone to errors. To overcome these disadvantages, the Radian® In-Line Carousel (Copan, Brescia, Italy) was launched, which is a WASPLab® module dedicated to full automation of (pre)-analytical steps as well as interpretation of disk diffusion AST. However, until now, no evaluation of Radian® against manual disk diffusion has been performed. We assessed the categorical agreement (CA) between standardized disk diffusion (reference method) and Radian® using EUCAST 2021 breakpoints. We tested 135 non-duplicate strains, selected from the National EUCAST challenge panel, clinical strains, and external quality controls. The strains included Enterobacterales (n = 63), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3), Enterococcus faecium (n = 10), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 16), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 19), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 4), and Streptococcus spp. (n = 20). Furthermore, we explored antibiotic disk thermolability in the WASP Radian® carousel by testing 10 ATCC® strains up to 7 days. The observed CA was 95.3%, 96.3%, 93.8%, 97.3% and 98.0% for Enterobacterales, Enterococcus spp., P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp., respectively, resulting in an acceptable overall CA for all groups. (Very) major error rates were ≤ 5% for all antibiotics. Antibiotic disk thermostability was confirmed up to 4 days in the WASP Radian® In-Line Carousel. The Radian® In-Line Carousel provides a fully automated solution for accurate disk diffusion AST, reducing workload and improving standardization and traceability. In addition, our study demonstrated the thermostability of antibiotic disks up to 4 days in the WASP Radian® In-Line Carousel.

Background The purpose of this study was to objectively compare methodological approaches that might be utilized in designing an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance program in beef feedlot cattle. Specifically, four separate comparisons were made to investigate their potential impact on estimates for prevalence of AMR. These included investigating potential differences between 2 different susceptibility testing methods (broth microdilution and disc diffusion), between 2 different target bacteria (non-type-specific E . coli [NTSEC] and Mannheimia haemolytica ), between 2 strategies for sampling feces (individual samples collected per rectum and pooled samples collected from the pen floor), and between 2 strategies for determining which cattle to sample (cattle that were culture-positive for Mannheimia haemolytica and those that were culture-negative). Results Comparing two susceptibility testing methods demonstrated differences in the likelihood of detecting resistance between automated disk diffusion (BioMIC®) and broth microdilution (Sensititre®) for both E . coli and M. haemolytica . Differences were also detected when comparing resistance between two bacterial organisms within the same cattle; there was a higher likelihood of detecting resistance in E . coli than in M. haemolytica . Differences in resistance prevalence were not detected when using individual animal or composite pen sampling strategies. No differences in resistance prevalences were detected in E . coli recovered from cattle that were culture-positive for M. haemolytica compared to those that were culture-negative, suggesting that sampling strategies which targeted recovery of E . coli from M. haemolytica -positive cattle would not provide biased results. Conclusions We found that for general purposes, the susceptibility test selected for AMR surveillance must be carefully chosen considering the purpose of the surveillance since the ability to detect resistance appears to vary between these tests depending upon the population where they are applied. Continued surveillance of AMR in M. haemolytica recovered by nasopharyngeal swab is recommended if monitoring an animal health pathogen is an objective of the surveillance program as results of surveillance using fecal E . coli cannot be extrapolated to this important respiratory pathogen. If surveillance of E . coli was pursued in the same population, study populations could target animals that were culture-positive for M. haemolytica without biasing estimates for AMR in E . coli . Composite pen-floor sampling or sampling of individuals per-rectum could possibly be used interchangeably for monitoring resistance in E . coli .

This study compared Neo-Sensitabs with Oxoid paper disks using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test on Mueller–Hinton agar. The EUCAST-recommended quality control strains ( Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212) (Part I) and clinical isolates (Part II) were investigated. In Part I of the study, 27 combinations of antimicrobial agents were tested on four quality control strains repeatedly up to 60 times and zone diameters of tablets and disks were compared. In Part II of the study, 351 clinical isolates were included to cover a broad range of species, as well as resistance mechanisms. In Part I, four major deviations (>1 mm outside quality control ranges) were observed with Neo-Sensitabs. In one case with P . aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (meropenem), there was a corresponding major deviation (2 mm) with the Oxoid disk. The three remaining major deviations with Neo-Sensitabs were observed with meropenem (2 mm) in E . coli ATCC 25922 and with ciprofloxacin (2 mm) and gentamicin (3 mm) in P . aeruginosa ATCC 27853. For Oxoid disks, there were only minor deviations (=1 mm outside quality control ranges) in these three cases. In Part II, there were six discrepancies, susceptible versus resistant, in 3,533 comparisons between the two methods with the clinical isolates. The Rosco Neo-Sensitabs appear to be a possible alternative to Oxoid paper disks for EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing on Mueller–Hinton agar.

Introduction: Antibiotic susceptibility tests (AST) done on blood cultures are critical for the treatment of patients suspected to be suffering from bloodstream infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of disc diffusion AST conducted directly (direct AST) from flagged-positive blood cultures, especially for Gram-positive cocci bacteria. Methodology: This study compared direct AST with conventional AST (broth micro-dilution). The antibiotics studied were piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin, ceftazidime, erythromycin, and penicillin. Accuracy was determined by calculating very major, major, and minor errors. The reliability was determined by categorical agreement and weighted Kappa index. Results: Gram-positive cocci bacteria were grown in pairs of blood culture bottles and tested with the two methods of AST. No very major errors were detected among the five types of antibiotics. Major errors of 2.56% and minor errors of 4.93% were found when testing gentamicin. The major and minor errors when testing erythromycin were 2.85% and 1.23%, respectively. Perfect agreements (categorical agreement: 100%; weighted Kappa index: 1) of the two AST methods were observed with piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, and penicillin. Almost perfect agreement was found with gentamicin and erythromycin. Categorical agreement results when testing antibiotics gentamicin and erythromycin were 93.83% and 97.53%, respectively. In addition, the weighted-Kappa index when testing these two antibiotics were 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. Conclusions: The accuracy and reliability of the direct AST was within acceptable limits.

To draw inferences about the putative etiologic agents of severe pneumonia, the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) project must be able to objectively assess antibiotic pretreatment in enrolled participants. This review is focused on the disk diffusion bioassay, a simple laboratory method to assess recent antibiotic treatment. In this method, a sensitive indicator organism is used to detect antimicrobial activity in body fluid specimens that have been inoculated on a filter paper disk and placed on agar growth medium. We reviewed and present several variations on the disk diffusion method as applied to serum or urine, including specimen handling, choice of indicator organism and medium, and incubation steps. Although there are limitations to the disk diffusion method, its low cost, ease of use, and ability to broadly detect antibiotic pretreatment make it an appealing method for epidemiologic studies such as PERCH.

Cows suffering from bovine mastitis have markedly reduced milk production because of inflammation within the udder subsequent to infection and damage from bacterial toxins. Antibiotic treatment is commonly used as a preventative and therapeutic measure for bovine mastitis. The most common pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus, various streptococci (Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis), and coliforms (Escherichia coli), which can be contracted from other infected cows or from the environment. A combination of kanamycin and cefalexin (1:1.5 wt/wt) is currently used therapeutically in Europe for the treatment of bovine mastitis, although standardized methods for the in vitro determination of the susceptibility of target pathogens have not been developed. This study evaluates the appropriate broth microdilution testing criteria for kanamycin and cefalexin administered in combination and reports the development of a disk diffusion test. At a ratio of kanamycin:cefalexin relevant to that observed in milk postadministration (10:1 wt/wt), the minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined against 307 isolates of target mastitis pathogens (staphylococci, streptococci, and E. coli). Based on achievable concentrations in milk and the resulting distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations, preliminary broth breakpoints for kanamycin/cefalexin (10:1 fixed ratio) of ≤8/0.8μg/mL susceptible, 16/1.6μg/mL intermediate, and ≥32/3.2μg/mL resistant were applied to evaluated staphylococci, streptococci, and E. coli. Parallel testing by disk diffusion and resulting error-rate bounded analysis using a combined disk concentration of 30μg of kanamycin and 15μg of cefalexin resulted in the establishment of preliminary disk interpretive breakpoints of ≥20mm susceptible, 18 to 19mm intermediate, and ≤17mm resistant for staphylococci, streptococci (Strep. uberis and Strep. dysgalactiae only), and E. coli.

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of multidrug-resistant, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Salmonella spp. isolated from conveyor belts of broiler cutting rooms in Brazilian broiler processing plants. Ninety-eight strains of Salmonella spp. were analyzed. Multidrug resistance was determined by the disk diffusion test and the susceptibility of the isolated bacteria was evaluated against 18 antimicrobials from seven different classes. The double disk diffusion test was used to evaluate ESBL production. Of the 98 strains tested, 84 were multidrug resistant. The highest rates of resistance were against nalidixic acid (95%), tetracycline (91%), and the beta-lactams: ampicillin and cefachlor (45%), followed by streptomycin and gentamicin with 19% and 15% of strain resistance, respectively. By contrast, 97% of the strains were sensitive to chloramphenicol. 45% of the strains were positive for the presence of ESBL activity. In this study, high rates of multidrug resistance and ESBL production were observed in Salmonella spp.

Background: Coffee is a major dietary source of polyphenols. Previous research found that coffee had a protective effect on periodontal disease. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether coffee extract and its primary phenolic acid, chlorogenic acid, affect the growth and protease activity of a periodontopathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis). Methods: Coffee extract and chlorogenic acid were prepared by a two-fold serial dilution. The turbid metric test and plate count method were used to examine the inhibitory effects of chlorogenic acid on P. gingivalis. The time-kill assay was used to measure changes in the viability of P. gingivalis after exposure to chlorogenic acid for 0–24 h. The protease activity of P. gingivalis was analyzed using the optical density of a chromogenic substrate. Results: As a result, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of chlorogenic acid was 4 mg/mL, and the minimum bactericidal concentration was 16 mg/mL. Chlorogenic acid at concentrations above MIC resulted in a longer-lasting inhibitory effect on P. gingivalis viability and significantly reduced associated protease activity. The coffee extract showed antibacterial activity as observed by the disk diffusion test, whereas these inhibitory effects were not affected by different roast degrees of coffee. Conclusions: Collectively, our novel findings indicate that chlorogenic acid not only has antimicrobial activity but also reduced the protease activity of P. gingivalis. In addition, coffee extract inhibits the proliferation of P. gingivalis, which may partly be attributed to the effect of chlorogenic acid.

Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus are the most common and most important staphylococcal species associated with urinary tract infections. The objective of the present study was to compare and to evaluate the accuracy of four phenotypic methods for the detection of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus spp. Seventy-three strains produced a halo with a diameter ≤28mm (penicillin resistant) and all of them were positive for the blaZ gene. Among the 28 susceptible strain (halo ≥29mm), 23 carried the blaZ gene and five did not. The zone edge test was the most sensitive (90.3%), followed by MIC determination (85.5%), but the specificity of the former was low (40.0%). The nitrocefin test was the least sensitive (28.9%). However, the nitrocefin test together with the disk diffusion method showed the highest specificity (100%). The present results demonstrated that the zone edge test was the most sensitive phenotypic test for detection of beta-lactamase, although it is still not an ideal test to detect this type of resistance since its specificity was low. However, the inhibition halo diameter of the penicillin disk can be used together with the zone edge test since the same disk is employed in the two tests. Combined analysis of the two tests shows a sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 100%, proving better sensitivity, especially for S. saprophyticus. This is a low-cost test of easy application and interpretation that can be used in small and medium-sized laboratories where susceptibility testing is usually performed by the disk diffusion method.

Ceftazidime-avibactam disk studies were performed for disk mass selection and for establishing EUCAST quality control ranges and zone diameter breakpoints. The disk mass study included disk diffusion testing with ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 and 10-6 μg disks and broth microdilution MIC testing for challenge set of 94 Enterobacteriaceae and 45 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EUCAST SOP 9.0-based QC and MIC-disk correlations studies were followed for development of ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 μg ranges for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27583, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and for zone diameter breakpoint determination. The ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 and 10-6 μg disks performed similar in comparison to broth microdilution, with zones ≤ 14 mm for all resistant strains. The 10-4 μg disk was selected and used in QC and breakpoint studies. There was minimal variation of ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 μg QC study results between disks, media, and sites. The QC ranges were within 7 mm for all strains. The zone diameter breakpoint study demonstrated good correlation of MIC and disk results. The established zone diameter breakpoints resulted in false susceptible rates of 1.6 and 4.0% for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. EUCAST selected the ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 μg disk and established QC ranges for E. coli 25922 of 24–30 mm, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 of 21–27 mm, and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 of 18–24 mm. The zone diameter breakpoints that correlated best with the MIC breakpoints of susceptible ≤ 8 mg/L and resistant > 8 mg/L were Enterobacteriaceae (S ≥ 13, R < 13 mm) and P. aeruginosa (S ≥ 17, R < 17 mm).